Title: WTC video's plus Thermite demo video Source:
WTC videos URL Source:[None] Published:Oct 14, 2006 Author:??? Post Date:2006-10-14 05:01:38 by Neil McIver Ping List:*9-11*Subscribe to *9-11* Keywords:None Views:207 Comments:19
This is a peculiar video I didn't see until the other day, and thought it peculiar enough to do a little comparison video surfing.
The above is right before the south tower collapse.
Here's a stabilized version of a few seconds of the above: (on google.... can't find a youtube version):
Once we know what to look for, it's easy enough to see the thermite/thermate cutting going on here.
I guess we all have our perspectives and different standards of things that we find convincing. Call me slow on the subject, but for me, this molten material flowing out is very significant as it doesn't have any plausible alternative explanation, as this stuff could hardly be anything other than molten metal, and as such would have to be not just heated to the melting point of the metal, but heated very far above that.
I'm kind of surprised this wasn't even mentioned on the loose change or other 911 videos. Am I missing something?
I'm kind of surprised this wasn't even mentioned on the loose change or other 911 videos.
i do believe that issue is covered in LooseChange 2. in fact, yesterday, this topic was discussed on Jason Bermas's new show on RBN. Dylan Avery was on too and i'm pretty certain that he said they covered the molten metal pools under all three buildings in their film. it's been a long time since i watched it and i don't remember now.
Okay, well maybe I missed it then when I went back to find it, but I did find it on the net. The stabilized one is a good fix.
The red hot metal found weeks after the fact, while certainly demanding some research, has some possible explanation with the shear amount of of energy released in the building collapse. Without question that amount of energy was huge, supposedly equivilent to 20% of an atomic bomb or something like that. Asbestos insulation might account for the lingering heat for weeks. I'm not sure, though, that even thermite alone would explain the heat's longevity.
....possible explanation with the shear amount of of energy released in the building collapse....
What energy release are you talking about that would account for running flows and pools of molten iron at all three buildings? Remember WTC 7 wasn't hit by a airliner.
Gravity, pancaking and a progressive collapse, fall much, much short of explaining how the towers were exploding as they came down, ejecting girders and dust at hundreds of feet per second, hundreds of feet away.
No way can jet fuel or diesel fuel(in the case of WTC 7) and a conventional office fire account for metal running like flows from a volcano in Hawaii. This was confirmed by many witnesses. There just wasn't red hot metal, this iron was flowing like streams and eventually formed giant slag meteorites.
The energy can be explained by explosives. Specifically, thermate and nano-thermite.
In two separate samples, Dr Jones has found the following in the molten metal; iron, aluminum, sulphur, fluorine, zinc, manganese, potassium and barium. These are traces of military explosives.
In the dust was found a plastic molecule; 1,3- DPP or 1,3 diphenylpropane that could be associated with a sol-gel compound that would stabilize the nano thermite.
This nano aluminothermic compound is around 1000% more powerful than conventional demo explosives. One wouldn't need much to pulverize everything into talc, just like we saw at the towers.
This was a first of its kind, top down demo explosion. It would take much more powerful explosives to keep the building coming down at near freefall speeds. WTC 7 was a conventional bottom up implosion.
After the "probable collapse initiation", NIST dosen't explain how the twin towers continue to collapse. NIST never tested for explosives.
Giant pools of metal were found at thousands of degrees MONTHS later buried in an oxygen deficient environment. This is a pure chemical reaction.
Structual steel was evaporated. It takes almost 5000 degrees to do this. This was a military high tech opperation.
Keep searching, you will unfortunately find the truth.