See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Confessions Of A 911 Hitman
Source:
www.rense.com
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general73/confess.htm
Published: Oct 15, 2006
Author: Douglas Herman
Post Date: 2006-10-15 23:45:22 by robin
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 2703
Comments: 310
Confessions Of A 911 Hitman And are you sorry that all these faked resource wars have to be concocted so that you can get that oil and live comfortably? Didn't think so.
How & Why I Helped Blow Up The World Trade Center
By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
10-13-6 
MY job was to wire explosives inside the various WTC buildings. We wired buildings 1, 2, 6, and 7. We hardwired some areas and attached explosives and electronic detonators to many other key structural joints. We did this weeks in advance. WTC-7 fell in a classic controlled demolition (See example) but the Twin Towers required a lot more ingenuity. The fellow who planned the actual sequence of detonations is a genius. He was rumored to have been paid seven or eight figures and is a fucking master. Almost like a composer of a symphony orchestra but better. Much better. 
Longtime Rense writer, Douglas Herman wrote the suspense novel, The Guns of Dallas, that features a confessed hitman revealing the perfect scenario for the murder of JFK. The above scenario is fiction but probably far closer to the truth than anything yet offered in the so-called fact based media.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: robin (#0)
(Edited)
Demolitions don't work that way. In fact demolitions won't bring down a building in and of themselves. That is why they spend more time gutting the inside of buildings and weakening the superstructure because the explosions would not do a thing in terms of getting the building to implode and fall down in a precise manner.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
So what are you saying took down the buildings?
Do I hear a fat lady singing?
http://www.implosionworld.com/wtc.h tm
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
So without explosives, cutting a few columns with planes, and then weakening a few with fire could take out an entire tower, but explosives alone could not have done it?
Do I hear a fat lady singing?
One of the arguments you hear routinely out of the mouths of the official line spewers is that such an operation couldn't be kept secret because of the enormous numbers of people who would need to be involved. Someone would talk- Larry King would interiew the guy. Bull. Yes- several hundred people would be needed to wire the towers, remove the gold- etc, etc. But what would such people really know? Not damn much. Your average bomb laying technician at the WTC would know absolutely nothing about the people who hired him. We have an "intelligence community" that has had 50 years to develop and mature. There are literally thousands upon thousands of contractors, soldiers of fortune, hitmen, free lancers- all in rolodex files that organizations like the CIA, Mossad, MI6, FSB, South African intelligence etc etc have used for thousands of jobs back and forth. There are men who exist in the shadows who have no ideological motivation and no national allegiance (patriotism is for suckers among these types) and who work for money. They are hired by brokers, hired through old contacts in the various official services they at one time worked for- hired through third and fourth parties so that they have no idea who is really hiring them. Money is transfered by wire accounts- again through three or four middlemen. What do they know? Nothing. The teams would be kept in cells- assigned a leader- they wouldn't even know the names of their other team members for the most part or their cell leader. They would use code names. To them- it would be just another black bag job- on a large scale to be sure- but one of many they had particpated in. These people have no scruples. They don't believe in "innocence". They know the dark underbelly of government and what it is capable of doing. But wouldn't one of them do something stupid and take his payments for helping pull off 9/11 and go to Vegas and blow it in a few days and find himself in need of some money- want to write a book- and make a few million? Yes- and that is exactly the sort of person you would have if anyone came forward- a totally impeachable reprobate who gambles, drinks, and otherwise leads a scummy life- in other words totally unbelievable. Wouldn't Larry King and the MSM pay attention to such a person? Please. When people say that 9/11 couldn't have been a conspiracy because the media would report I have to laugh. Do they mean the same MSM that ran with the government lies on Iraq? That ran stories on WMD and nuke programs from anonymous leakers in the government who then cited their own leaks in the papers on the News Shows as proof that they were true while our media didn't think it important that leakers were using their own leaks to spread misinfo? The press contradicted their own archives form just the mid 90's on WMD in spreading these stories. BLOGGERS were pointing this crap out in 2002! Bloggers picked apart Powell's UN speech and exposed it for the sham it was then! Not our MSM! There is an interview with a 9/11 Scholar on Tucker Carlson's show about his "theories". Carlson starts the interview off by saying the man is immoral and reprehensible for even suggesting these things. And that is the attitude of the MSM toward this story- facts be dammed. Even looking into it is "immoral".
The author should have written how he lives next to Elvis. It would have made the article more believable.
"We become what we behold. We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." -- Marshall McLuhan, after Alexander Pope and William Blake.
It is easier, quicker, safer, less expensive, cleaner and a must for insurance purposes to "prep" a building for demo. It has nothing to do with the inability of explosives to bring down a structure.
Mark The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C., that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink."— Christie Todd Whitman - 9/18/2001
Destro with YT think evil Muslims flying planes and crashing them and fire brought down the towers. Nevermind about WTC 7. It got tired, an just fell down.
Mark The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C., that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink."— Christie Todd Whitman - 9/18/2001
Oh, I loved it. So simple and easy to understand. And wasn't it nice of him to email and let us know what happened.
I buy the above guy's confession about as much as I buy those testimonies saying the WMD were taken to Syria. The whole 'buildings brought down by planted explosives' is based on the premise that the USA would not wake up the day after traumatized if only planes crashed into the towers. In other words (to use a Bushisim), the American people are sooooo stupid and dim that the sight of planes slamming into buildings is not horrific enough they need to have these buildings fall down on them for the powers that be to do anything. Trust me, I was across from the WTC and we saw the planes slam into the buildings from our office windows. People were freaking out - the trauma that leads to blind obedience was already there. Americans are stupid but not that stupid that they needed the additional buildings to fall to get them to understand something scary just happened. I don't know if you all are aware of my posting history. I questioned the 9/11 events from day one. The real conspiracy is the fact that these 9/11 Muslims had ties with our intel orgs. Now did our pet Muslims - used by the USA via proxies to fight the Russians and Serbs and Chinese and Indians - go rogue and double cross us? Or were they doing what elements within our power structure wanted? Maybe a little of both? That is the question - not how the buildings fell down - which is self evident. Unlike most Americans I had a few years in the so called "anti-American" trenches digging up the lies the USA told about the situation in Kosovo and Bosnia and the murky American and British alliances with jihadists. (which kept leading to my bannings on freetraderrepublic).
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Giuliani that retard decided he wanted his command center in a high-rise building instead of the traditional underground model and then loaded that building with duel tanks filled with thousands of gallons of diesel fuel for the emergency generators. WTC7 already had a chuck of it taken out when the other buildings fell and then the fire weakened the rest of it. A slow cook of thousands of gallons of diesel oil inside the WTC7.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
In fact demolitions won't bring down a building in and of themselves. That is why they spend more time gutting the inside of buildings and weakening the superstructure because the explosions would not do a thing in terms of getting the building to implode and fall down in a precise manner. Which is exactly what the man who wrote this saying, that it took years to plan this and months to prepare the building. BTW, have you watched any of the excellent 9/11 videos that have been made this year?
Aren't you going to post the author's I.Q. score? And if you're so smart how do you explain the free fall speed at which these buildings fell?
Sorry - this theory fails Occam's Razor theorem.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Have you seen any of the excellent 9/11 videos made recently? They explain with high school physics how the buildings fell at the rate of free fall and that this only happens in a demolition. They also show the squibs (the explosives going off under each falling floor) that precede that fall. They also interviewed some of the surviving tenants of the building who describe some of the odd goings on before 9/11. They also replay the sound of some powerful explosions that precede the fall of each tower. They also play the video of Larry Silverstein, who coincidently owned all 3 buildings that fell that day, saying on the video "so I told them to 'pull it'". He used a term used in demolitions regarding WTC7.
He waited 5 years to write it, and from a safe distance. Do you too believe that the buildings pancaked on top of each other; yet managed to fall at the rate of free fall? So since the floors were around the steel center core, why isn't the core still standing? The pancake theory doesn't hold water regarding the center core and no one who tries to hold that theory can ever explain the center core not still standing. But demolition explains everything.
But planes alone could not take down those towers. And NOTHING flew into WTC7. Are you familiar with Dov Zakheim's contribution to a report by PNAC, explaining that a "new Pearl Harbor" is necessary? I know you must already know about the Reichstag fire and the faked invasion of Germany by Poland.
Wow - he let the bag out on a PBS interview - LOL - it was not a slip heard on some CB. People don't tell you that - they make it sound like his calls were intercepted. It was in reference to pulling out of WTC 7 and not trying to save it.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Wrong - chunks of the collapsed towers flew into WTC7.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
And you think that was enough to make a building fall at the rate of free fall? There were a few small fires. And Silverstein said "pull it", he is on video saying those words. Yet other buildings nearby had more chunks fall on them than WTC7 and they did not fall.
Not true, have you seen the video interview where he says exactly "pull it"?
Of course I don't believe the official lie. I just don't happen to believe that this fellow was involved. Story's too schmaltzy. Neither do I buy anything Destro's been writing on this thread.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/011904wtc7.html Lucky Larry http://www.informationliberation.com/index.php?id=15459 I just don't happen to believe that this fellow was involved. Story's too schmaltzy. I make no claims about the author's authenticity. The article does raise questions and suggest answers as to how it was done. The interviews with some of the surviving tenants of WTC spoke of some very odd work being done prior to 9/11.
The above scenario is fiction but probably far closer to the truth than anything yet offered in the so-called fact based media.
His story fits too carefully into the framework set up by the truthers...he sounds like a plant that has a lot of potential to be discredited. Ya gotta ask yourself...why would a guy come forward and admit to treason and give a heads- up on his whereabouts to the cabal? Doesn't pass the smell test. You know, I know and one third of America knows the BushCheneyInc et al and their globalist backers pulled off this most outrageous of coups. The question is no longer did they or how did they, but what to do about it now.
Yes. Have you?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
I'll agree with that.
That was the last line in the story. It really is a fictional application.....
your analysis is very sound. americans do some things very very well historically, actually many things. military endeavors and intelligence operations are things that we have historically done very well. of course our people could pull off the 911 events. and of course our media will fail to uncover it, it is their job to fail to uncover it. do you think our intelligence services are incompetent? they would be so if our MSM would uncover it and publicize it.
If any of the above scenario is true - and I don't think it is - then taking into account that America produces such people and that the American people do nothing to remove such people from power - the only logical conclusion from this - again only if the above is true and I don't think it is - then the American people need to be put an end to. Such evil people need have their seed scattered and their earth salted. That you all talk about the USA doing this and then not leading an armed rebellion to stop such monsters - who plant demolitions within their own buildings to kill their own citizens for profit - means either you all live in a fantasy world where you like to spook yourselves with campfire ghost stories of govt conspiracies or you are cowards. I will tell you this - if I thought my nation's leadership planted explosives in the WTC attacks on us - and I don't - but if I did - I would be organizing an armed resistance and killing anyone working for the govt and anyone wearing a uniform and any and all elected officials in the manner of the IRA or the Serbian Black Hand. Because this is not idle and light speculation - it is deadly serious accusation against the govt that demands armed action. So when are you all going to head into the mountains and form the resistance?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
If they (whoever they are) could have pulled this 9-11 thing off, the Iraqi war would have been better planned and resulting problems dealt with more intelligently, Afghanistan would be applying for statehood, The DPRK would have been dealt with differently and solved long ago, Iran would have already been overthrown from within, (probably the easiest task) and South and Central America would not be in the mess they are with Chavez acting like a kitten or being a really dead former leader of Venezeula. The MSM would love to expose a 9-11 coverup, but it is just too far out there.
Amen.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Doesn't your argument apply just as much in reverse? If Al Qaeda was really the bunch that pulled off 9/11, wouldn't they have been able to prevent the defeat of the Taliban in Afghanistan? Of course, that's not much of an argument. The two situations are so different. But the same can be said of 9/11 and America's war in Iraq.
Katrina was America's Chernobyl.
Bad application of logic. You forget two things. 1) al-Qaeda is an insurgency based organization. 2) The 9/11 cell was able to operate in the USA because they were American intelligence assets - one of many such jihadi groups allowed to enter into the USA to train and raise money and organize to carry out jihad against mutual enemies of al-Qaeda and America like Serbia and Russia.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
I'm been involved in construction since the day I was born, and have seen many buildings fall. There was nothing out of the ordinary at the speed they fell. They also -- all of them -- fall into their own "footprint." This is why you never see articles by those involved in demolition support these goofy theories.
"We become what we behold. We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." -- Marshall McLuhan, after Alexander Pope and William Blake.
I do not think the 9-11 hijacker jokers and those who planned it ever expected the catastropic results they got. If they (again, whoever they are) did plan the implosion and destruction of the WTC, it was the results they attempted to attain. Being able to plan and pull off that mission would imply more ability than most give this group in power and more than they have shown in ALL their other endeavors.
well, I appreciate your argument in #32. that is a rational argument. I don't agree with your assessment of the MSM. the MSM is a dishonest propaganda tool IMHO. also, the simple facts of 911 don't jibe with official explanations. But I put it to you that if our only goal was to topple saddam and free Iraq, that it would've been achieved easily. Saddam and his regime were removed very quickly & easily. the thing to do then would be for the US forces to leave the scene and let other isntitutions take over, mostly iraqi institutions and international efforts too, they could've easily transitioned to a democracy. Remember, Iraq had a democracy from 1933 to mid 1950's. the US goal in Iraq is not for Iraq to be free though. the goal is for Iraq to be dominated strongly. this is why we're having so much trouble - it is difficult nation to subjugate, especially with only 150,000 troops on the ground. Don't under-estimate also, that war seems to be the big goal, instigating a wider war seems likely to be part of the real goal. the people who set US policy are not incompetent, they are doing precisely and exactly what they desire.
This is why you never see articles by those involved in demolition support these goofy theories. That is a good point - no one of those pushing the demolition theory has a background in construction or the demolition business. And what you said is also true - all high-rise buildings are designed to fall in on themselves in cases of structural failure to prevent the timber effect.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Yup, those 1000+ foot tall towers are falling all the time. Yup, by the hundreds. Nothing out of the ordinary here.
Do I hear a fat lady singing?
Comments (41 - 310) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: Destro (#1)
In fact demolitions won't bring down a building in and of themselves.
#3. To: Critter (#2)
#4. To: Destro (#3)
#5. To: robin (#0)
#6. To: robin (#0)
#7. To: Destro (#1)
#8. To: Critter (#4)
#9. To: YertleTurtle (#6)
The author should have written how he lives next to Elvis. It would have made the article more believable.
#10. To: Burkeman1, Kamala, robin (#5)
(Edited)
#11. To: Kamala, Critter (#8)
Nevermind about WTC 7. It got tired, an just fell down.
#12. To: Destro (#1)
Demolitions don't work that way.
#13. To: YertleTurtle (#6)
#14. To: robin (#12)
Which is exactly what the man who wrote this saying, that it took years to plan this and months to prepare the building.
#15. To: Destro (#14)
#16. To: angle (#9)
What surprises me most, however, is how very few intelligent people in America question the obvious signature of the crime, even after five years.
#17. To: Destro (#10)
(Edited)
#18. To: robin (#15)
They also play the video of Larry Silverstein, who coincidently owned all 3 buildings that fell that day, saying on the video "so I told them to 'pull it'". He used a term used in demolitions regarding WTC7.
#19. To: robin (#17)
But planes alone could not take down those towers. And NOTHING flew into WTC7.
#20. To: Destro (#19)
#21. To: Destro (#18)
#22. To: robin (#16)
(Edited)
#23. To: Destro (#18)
#24. To: angle (#22)
Of course I don't believe the official lie.
#25. To: angle (#22)
I just don't happen to believe that this fellow was involved. Story's too schmaltzy.
#26. To: robin (#24)
#27. To: robin (#21)
have you seen the video interview where he says exactly "pull it"?
#28. To: It Is A Republic (#25)
The above scenario is fiction but probably far closer to the truth than anything yet offered in the so-called fact based media.
#29. To: angle (#28)
I'll agree with that.
#30. To: Burkeman1 (#5)
#31. To: It Is A Republic, Burkeman1, Kamala, robin, angle, YertleTurtle (#29)
#32. To: Red Jones (#30)
#33. To: It Is A Republic (#32)
#34. To: It Is A Republic (#32)
#35. To: aristeides, It Is A Republic (#34)
If Al Qaeda was really the bunch that pulled off 9/11, wouldn't they have been able to prevent the defeat of the Taliban in Afghanistan?
#36. To: robin (#13)
And if you're so smart how do you explain the free fall speed at which these buildings fell?
#37. To: aristeides (#34)
#38. To: It Is A Republic (#32)
#39. To: YertleTurtle, robin (#36)
I'm been involved in construction since the day I was born, and have seen many buildings fall. There was nothing out of the ordinary at the speed they fell. They also -- all of them -- fall into their own "footprint."
#40. To: YertleTurtle (#36)
I'm been involved in construction since the day I was born, and have seen many buildings fall. There was nothing out of the ordinary at the speed they fell.
.
.
.