See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Confessions Of A 911 Hitman
Source:
www.rense.com
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general73/confess.htm
Published: Oct 15, 2006
Author: Douglas Herman
Post Date: 2006-10-15 23:45:22 by robin
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 2797
Comments: 310
Confessions Of A 911 Hitman And are you sorry that all these faked resource wars have to be concocted so that you can get that oil and live comfortably? Didn't think so.
How & Why I Helped Blow Up The World Trade Center
By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
10-13-6 
MY job was to wire explosives inside the various WTC buildings. We wired buildings 1, 2, 6, and 7. We hardwired some areas and attached explosives and electronic detonators to many other key structural joints. We did this weeks in advance. WTC-7 fell in a classic controlled demolition (See example) but the Twin Towers required a lot more ingenuity. The fellow who planned the actual sequence of detonations is a genius. He was rumored to have been paid seven or eight figures and is a fucking master. Almost like a composer of a symphony orchestra but better. Much better. 
Longtime Rense writer, Douglas Herman wrote the suspense novel, The Guns of Dallas, that features a confessed hitman revealing the perfect scenario for the murder of JFK. The above scenario is fiction but probably far closer to the truth than anything yet offered in the so-called fact based media.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-219) not displayed.
.
.
.
#220. To: Destro (#195)
the uneducated in america have been brainwashed the educated have now figured it out it's a race to the finish line.
perhaps it would be cause to fly the flag again?
Proven...yes that is a problem without evidence, isn't it? Yet the truthers have proven that the official explanation is mostly impossible. That puts the ball back in the court of the pigs and they ain't scoring any points.
2 things square it away for me. The collapse of the 2 towers severely weakened the building - coupled with the fact Giuliani in a bone headed move built into the WTC7 his command bunker high up - the only known sky high bunker ever - and installed diesel fuel storage tanks - several thousand gallons - this caught on fire as the flaming debris fell into WTC7. That is why WTC7 collapsed hours later.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Could you expound on what is the "real deal?"
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
That is why WTC7 collapsed hours later. And if you really believe that is what lead to the collapse of WTC 7 then you indeed win the booby prize for swallowing such a bone headed theory yourself. :0)
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
An aspect of the conspiracy is to hide the fact that these 9/11 Muslims had ties with our intel orgs. Now did our pet Muslims - used by the USA via proxies to fight the Russians and Serbs and Chinese and Indians - go rogue and double cross us? Or were they doing what elements within our power structure wanted? Maybe a little of both? That is the question - not how the buildings fell down - which is self evident and in fact meaningless because our govt is implicated one way or another.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Many of us are aware of this. Or were they doing what elements within our power structure wanted? And Richard Perle was all gung-ho about sending the Mujahideen trained in Afghanistan and Pakistan to fight for the Bosnians and the Albanians (in Kosovo). Rogue? That is what the neocons are. The neocons have wormed their way into the power structure for the last 30 years. Maybe, just maybe, this is all connected back to the covert operations started by Bush the Elder with the Iran Contra deals. In that case, it is the Bush Crime Family which is behind this, and the neocons have grasped the levers of power and propelled themselves into position to control the mightiest military in the world. But the Bush's and their cohorts in crime are only water bearers for the real power behind the scenes, the international bankers. The Bush Crime Family is allowed to grab as much loot as they are able, as long as they keep in line with the program supplied by their ultimate controllers. There is no profit in peace. It is hardly meaningless when another Pearl Harbor-type event is perpetrated which propels this nation into a scenario of perpetual war. This, in fact, is just what has been called for in the PNAC documents, which ties it all back to the Zionist regime.
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
Damn, I hate when that happens! Good post. Daniel Hopsicker on MadCow has done some good investigation into the arabs involved in 9/11. OBL and Saddam were on the CIA payroll at one time. We instigated the war between Iran/Iraq, and plenty others. A lot of "population control" is going on in Iraq at the moment; Prince Philip must be so pleased, he didn't even have to be reincarnated as a royal virus.
Good summary.
Building on what I posted earlier . . . Commonly you hear people expressing the sentiment that "our government" couldn't do such evil. How would it be possible to even start planning for such an act- wouldn't the very evil nature of it repel anyone remotely involved in it? In order for something like 9/11 to be pulled off there would have to exist a culture already in place with people who would think nothing of murdering innocents. And that is a good question. And if this was the US government circa 1901 I would say such a conspiracy would be completely and totally impossible. The infrastructure of evil simply didn't exist in this country in 1901 for such an truly evil false flag op like 9/11 to be pulled off. But America circa 2001? Yes. You hear about how 9/11 was "blowback" because of US foreign policy- how pissed off Moooslims finally paid us back for 50 years of corrupt foreign policy in their part of the world. And that is quite believable. But I happen to think it is another sort of blowback. It is the blowback of the CULTURE of empire that has been bred within our government for a 100 years. This is a culture that exists on its own, quite outside the rest of the country- that has its own rules, mores, and ways of doing things. 9/11 was merely the habits of empire coming home to roost. Prior to 9/11 we had a government that was engaging in false flag operations as a matter of routine tactics in every corner of the globe. The OSS of WWII which later became the CIA had pulled off one of their first foreign engineered coups by 1953 in Iran by literally spreading around money to street thugs in Iran and installing the Shah. And the list of dubious operations only gets more suspect and more morally outrageous with the passage of time. Two, even three generations of intelligence ops all over the world involving assassinations, engineered coups, rigged elections, the funding of wholly artificial "Guerilla movements", Death squad training manuals . . . aiding governments with Death lists (Indonesia and 100,000 'communists' being killed in a week by Suharto is the best known example). Now with that history, a history our media and text books don't dwell upon, known you are going to tell me that elements of the US Federal government are not amoral enough to do something like 9/11? Please. When you have literally thousands of people from many branches of government involved up to their eyeballs in the evil of running a de facto empire day in and day out for 50 years- with the habits only getting worse with time- and the participants more and more cynical and nihilistic- eventually the tactics employed by the empire to keep the Dirt people in line in the distant provinces are going to be used at home. It was only a matter of time. You can't keep the "necessary evil" that our "intelligence services" practice abroad from crossing the borders and being used here at home. Empires corrupt Republics. When you have intelligence services monitoring foreign politicians and getting blackmail info on them- they will eventually do the same at home. When you have them engineering "plane accidents" for troublesome foreigners- they will do so at home. You can't keep this evil of Empire contained in a little box. The culture for brainstorming and planning something like 9/11 did and does exist in our government. When you have people whose job it is to carry out outrageous muderous acts all over the globe and under the cover of darkness- most of which we still don't know about- such a suggestion or plan among them might have raised eyebrows because it was a plan directed against "Americans" and risky- but the "morality" of it would never have even come up among such people. This is what they do. 9/11 is blowback alright. It is blowback from our own shadow government that the rest of the world knows only too damn well.
So where's the chink in the armor...the achilles heel?
When you have people whose job it is to carry out outrageous muderous acts all over the globe and under the cover of darkness- most of which we still don't know about- such a suggestion or plan among them might have raised eyebrows because it was a plan directed against "Americans" and risky- but the "morality" of it would never have even come up among such people. This is what they do. Excellent post.
Prior to 9/11 we had a government that was engaging in false flag operations as a matter of routine tactics in every corner of the globe. agreed. excellent post again !
It was a ten second free fall..that's what I saw, that's what you saw..that's what everybody saw...
The "Achilles heel" is that this isn't 1963. It is 2006 and the truth cannot be contained nearly as easily. But on the other hand we are a very different people from 1963 as well . . . we have been corrupted just as much as our shadow government. We are more stupid, more selfish, more atomized, and more dependent on government than we were in 1963. So . . . I don't know if there is one.
How the buildings fell is a bit of a distraction. In my view it is topping on the ice cream sunday. A far better avenue of approach is indeed the documented connections of the so called 9/11 hijackers to Pakistani intelligence. When you have the 9/11 commission basically saying that who paid them- who financed them- is "of no consequence" when the trail clearly leads back to Pakistan and their intelligence chief (and Pakistanni intelligence is a creature of the CIA itself) then something is up. We have known "knowns" so to speak with the hijackers and who paid them. We don't have such "knowns" when it comes to the buildings falling. Concentrating on the hijackers, who knew what when about them, who paid them . . . to me- is more interesting than why the buildings fell. But on another level- I think a lot of the 9/11 truth movement has been concentrating on why the buildings fell because it is the THE IMAGE in the brains of Americans and what they associate 9/11 with- and the official line on those collapses is just so pathetic and improbable and frankly impossible.
Maybe the hope is that "we" are different people today than in 1963 because we are more stupid, more selfish,etc. Empires require a strong military to maintain status quo and I think this empire is straining its military to the n'th degree. I don't think the American hyphenated we's coming up the pipeline have any sense of patriotism or any sense of loyalty to this nation and they certainly will not take to conscription too well. So what options do the DC empire builders have - they are too greedy to pay mercenary wages to the GI's - I think we will see the empire implode when they run out of volunteer cannon fodder and if DC legalizes the 20-30 Million Hispanic aliens as both parties are wont to do - I think that's the achilles heel - a sudden infusion of hyphenated Americans who loathe the white gringo and who will not do his bidding.
bluedogtxn called today's military the JOB CORPS.
The buildings were demolitioned by the govt is as a honey trap - an appealing but distracting conspiracy theory that sucks away credibility and resources from truth finders and inquisitive people out for the real deal. The images is exactly why the buildings were dynamited makes an appealing honey trap - it is something tangible - to distract from the intangible - The 'Great Game' America has been playing into Central Asia from Bosnia all the way to 'Stans. In fact I remember an article posted on a neocon right wing website blamed the rise of al-Qaeda and Islamic jihadis on the Soviets!! That is classic disinfo- distraction techniques being used by the neocons. (Read this bull here). This should send red flags up to most but they are too busy looking for squibb like explosions in grainy videos to notice. The USA has been arming and training jihadis for 20 years via CIA contracting out Saudi and Paki intel orgs who in turn sub-contracted out to jihad groups like al-Qaeda. Goal? To spread destabilization through Islamic uprisings that would allow UAS/NATO to swoop in and restore peace and a puppet democracy along the so called Green Road - From Bosnia to Afghanistan to Indonesia where oil and gas fields are and where pipelines come out from. I think Osama read the American play book and liked the plan and made it his own. That is why in some areas al-Qaeda and America seemed at odds ('Stans) and in other areas seemed like allies (Balkans - Chechnya). Burke said the 9/11 commish did not want to delve into the Pakistani connection. Why? Because that leads back to Washington and Texas. The 9/11 cell was here as were dozens of other such Muslims for American approved training and fundraising and organizing for the jihad abroad. That is what they want to keep secret. Maybe the 9/11 cell double-crossed their American allies? Maybe they were in league (maybe without even knowing it) with America's shadow govt players on 9/11? That is where we need to look - not trying to see if implanted explosives did this or that - or turn 9/11 into a laughable real estate insurance plot by Silverstein - which is where 'they' want you to concentrate your resources and thoughts on.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
PS: An apology for my style (meaning apology in the Greek sense as a word meaning 'explanation'). I am using an old debate style and rhetorical technique - the Socratic method. It antagonizes people at first but then leaves them open to what will be said after they exhaust themselves on their counter arguments. Which is probably why the Athenians made him drink the hemlock.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Russia, India, China.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
robin: bluedogtxn called today's military the JOB CORPS The Empire builders are unwilling to part with a nickel that does not go into their personal "purses." As a result JOB CORPS is not keeping up with wages commenserate with the "risks" of the current job openings. The empire builders' lame carrots -ie. sign up bonuses of $10,000 - will not be enough as more vets return stateside from the killing fields of Iraq sans limbs, sans working brains and as these vets get a media profile. Without an expanded grunt filled military, American empire will come to a screeching halt, if DC plans extending the war front. For too many years, fedgov has filled the ranks with affirmative action gender equal pencil pushing "career" soldiers, so the US military may look like it's got lots of warm bodies for the front lines, but that's not the case. North Korea, Iran, heck even Israel have more military warm bodies to fight as grunts for their nations than we do.
It antagonizes people at first but then leaves them open to what will be said after they exhaust themselves on their counter arguments Let's hear more about this debate technique please. Perhaps start a new thread. Thank you kindly in advance.. Yours, Lady X
The start was the American defeat in the Spanish-American War. That was the beginning of the empire.
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
We shall start by asking if you saw my application of the Socratic method work on this thread? I kind of get a kick out of being disagreed with and then a little later on those that disagree with me actually agree with me (if only grudgingly).
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
You meant American victory I am sure.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Wrong - chunks of the collapsed towers flew into WTC7. The Oklahoma City bombing was more damaging to the building and it never fell.... furthermore, the a-bomb dome (made of steel and glass) in Hiroshima, Japan was exposed to thousands of degrees of (nuclear) heat and never crumbled.....
-- "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed people can change the world. Indeed it is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead
Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam (American Empire Project) (Hardcover) by Robert Dreyfuss "THERE IS AN unwritten chapter in the history of the Cold War and the New World Order that followed..." (more)
Pray you will never know, the hell where youth and laughter go - Siegfried Sassoon. Ypres, Autumn 1914.
And trees in Tunguska, Siberia that were under the exploding comet in 1903 stayed upright while the trees outward from the air blast were flattened. Pressure down is different from pressure sideways. Physics lesson 101. WTC7 Is just across the street from the Towers. The collapse tore a gash in its side. The diesel tanks for the mayor's emergency command ignited. The building was already a total loss - it fell what was it 12 or so hours later? - so you people who claim he had to pull it down for the insurance money are talking out your holes - the building was already a total loss in that condition.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Nope, not at all. The supposed victory was really the death of the Republic since we took over Spain's colonies, and their headaches of the remainder of their empire. It was a tactical defeat for the U.S. We've been doing the same thing ever since, and all at the behest of free traders and corporate dominance.
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
Still peddling this bullcrap about WTC 7, I see. Got any pics that show the damage you claim? I've never seen any. Diesel fuel will not burn down a steel structure, or haven't you figured that out? http://www.wtc7.net/location.html People who have heard of Building 7 tend to assume that 'ancillary damage' from the collapses of the Twin Towers had something to do with Building 7's collapse. It is important to note that Building 7 was no closer to the towers than any of several other large buildings outside of the WTC complex. Building 7 was the only of the seven buildings with a World Trade Center address that was on a different block. It, along with the 6 other buildings, were completely or largely destroyed on September 11th. No buildings outside of the two turquoise zones in the map to the right suffered more than superficial damage. “The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
It sure is, nothing but a smoke and dust cloud. Where is the structural damage? LOL
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
See, that was a set up by me of you - lets me post another photo further debunking you. "The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Riiight. You're here to discuss the truth of the matter.
Oh, yeah, nice charade. That don't mean diddly. Furthermore, it in no way explains the classic demolition collapse of WTC 7. That damage on one corner of the building would never in a million years cause that building to collapse. And you are dreaming if you think you can convince anyone of this on here. Posting this kind of nonsense will only serve for you to get the richly deserved moniker of DISINFORMATIONIST.
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
You are a demolition's expert? What is your expertise in the manner or are you repeating what websites tell you? Also, you asked me for proof of my statement that there was a large gash in the side of the WTC7 building from the falling debris - so I provided 2 of them. That you did not know there was such a gash speaks volumes on your knowledge (or lack there of) on the condition of the WTC 7 building.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
I did not see it..
I was asked for proof of my statement that there was a large gash in the side of the WTC7 building from the falling debris - so I provided 2 of them. That is all.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
The prosecution of Socrates was not without point.
You dare make such a statement when at first you questioned my assertion that there ever existed such a huge structural gash to begin with???? Does that even classify as logical reasoning? Science and reason don't work like that.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Comments (261 - 310) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latestthe American people allow such leadership - empower it and do nothing against it
#221. To: Jethro Tull (#198)
I'm a decent human being, much more willing to love than hate. Americans for the most part are like me, I suspect. Now should someone else ...
#222. To: leveller (#216)
the 9/11 conspiracy theorists have proven only that certain questions are unanswered
#223. To: leveller (#216)
WTC 7 bothers me, as do other problems with the official line
#224. To: Destro (#194)
an appealing but distracting conspiracy theory that sucks away credibility and resources from the real deal.
#225. To: Destro (#223)
2 things square it away for me. The collapse of the 2 towers severely weakened the building - coupled with the fact Giuliani in a bone headed move built into the WTC7 his command bunker high up - the only known sky high bunker ever - and installed diesel fuel storage tanks - several thousand gallons - this caught on fire as the flaming debris fell into WTC7.
#226. To: BTP Holdings (#224)
Could you expound on what is the "real deal?"
#227. To: Destro (#226)
(Edited)
An aspect of the conspiracy is to hide the fact that these 9/11 Muslims had ties with our intel orgs.
Now did our pet Muslims - used by the USA via proxies to fight the Russians and Serbs and Chinese and Indians - go rogue and double cross us?
Maybe a little of both?
That is the question - not how the buildings fell down - which is self evident and in fact meaningless because our govt is implicated one way or another.
#228. To: BTP Holdings (#227)
There is no profit in peace.
#229. To: BTP Holdings (#227)
But the Bush's and their cohorts in crime are only water bearers for the real power behind the scenes, the international bankers. The Bush Crime Family is allowed to grab as much loot as they are able, as long as they keep in line with the program supplied by their ultimate controllers.
#230. To: u-89 (#215)
#231. To: Burkeman1 (#230)
#232. To: Burkeman1 (#230)
And if this was the US government circa 1901 I would say such a conspiracy would be completely and totally impossible. The infrastructure of evil simply didn't exist in this country in 1901 for such an truly evil false flag op like 9/11 to be pulled off. But America circa 2001? Yes.
#233. To: Burkeman1 (#230)
But I happen to think it is another sort of blowback. It is the blowback of the CULTURE of empire that has been bred within our government for a 100 years. This is a culture that exists on its own, quite outside the rest of the country- that has its own rules, mores, and ways of doing things. 9/11 was merely the habits of empire coming home to roost.
#234. To: angle (#231)
#235. To: Destro (#226)
#236. To: Burkeman1 (#234)
It is 2006 and the truth cannot be contained nearly as easily. But on the other hand we are a very different people from 1963 as well . . . we have been corrupted just as much as our shadow government. We are more stupid, more selfish, more atomized, and more dependent on government than we were in 1963.
#237. To: scrapper2, bluedogtxn (#236)
they are too greedy to pay mercenary wages to the GI's
#238. To: Burkeman1, scrapper2, robin, angle, christine, BTP Holdings, leveller, swarthguy (#235)
How the buildings fell is a bit of a distraction. But on another level- I think a lot of the 9/11 truth movement has been concentrating on why the buildings fell because it is the THE IMAGE in the brains of Americans and what they associate 9/11 with- and the official line on those collapses is just so pathetic and improbable and frankly impossible.
#239. To: Burkeman1, scrapper2, robin, angle, christine, BTP Holdings, leveller, swarthguy (#235)
#240. To: angle, Burkeman1 (#231)
So where's the chink in the armor...the achilles heel?
#241. To: robin (#237)
scrapper: they are too greedy to pay mercenary wages to the GI's
#242. To: Destro (#239)
I am using an old debate style and rhetorical technique - the Socratic method.
#243. To: Burkeman1 (#230)
But I happen to think it is another sort of blowback. It is the blowback of the CULTURE of empire that has been bred within our government for a 100 years.
#244. To: Lady X (#242)
Let's hear more about this debate technique please.
#245. To: BTP Holdings (#243)
The start was the American defeat in the Spanish-American War. That was the beginning of the empire.
#246. To: Destro (#19)
But planes alone could not take down those towers. And NOTHING flew into WTC7.
#247. To: Destro (#245)
It's us, Pogo was right, we have met the enemy and he is our erstwhile allies. LOL!
#248. To: maggies mom (#246)
furthermore, the a-bomb dome (made of steel and glass) in Hiroshima, Japan was exposed to thousands of degrees of (nuclear) heat and never crumbled.....
#249. To: Destro (#245)
You meant American victory I am sure.
#250. To: Destro, maggies mom (#248)
WTC7 Is just across the street from the Towers. The collapse tore a gash in its side. The diesel tanks for the mayor's emergency command ignited.
Building 7's Location
Building 7 occupied a city block immediately north of the World Trade Center complex. WTC 1 through WTC 6 were on the superblock bounded by West, Church, Liberty, and Vessey Streets. Building 7 was wedged between the Verizon and U.S. Post Office buildings across Vessey Street from the WTC complex. It straddled an electrical substation that filled the first two stories of about half the block. 
The wall of Building 7 closest to the WTC complex was more than 300 feet from the nearest wall of the North Tower. It appears that nearly all of the heavy fallout from the disintegration of the North Tower landed short of Building 7. Building 6 stood between the North Tower and Building 7. 
These photographs show Building 7 in front of the exploding North Tower. It is the square bronze building on the left. Even in the second photo, the nearest of the debris from the tower is several hundred feet behind Building 7.
#251. To: BTP Holdings, maggies mom (#250)
Got any pics that show the damage you claim?
The above photo is very different than the photos you usually see on conspiracy sites.
#252. To: Destro, maggies mom (#251)
The above photo is very different than the photos you usually see on conspiracy sites.
#253. To: BTP Holdings, maggies mom (#252)
(Edited)
sure is, nothing but a smoke and dust cloud. Where is the structural damage? LOL
#254. To: Destro (#253)
#255. To: Destro, maggies mom (#253)
See, that was a ste up by me of you - lets me post another photo further debunking you.
#256. To: BTP Holdings, maggies mom (#255)
Furthermore, it in no way explains the classic demolition collapse of WTC 7. That damage on one corner of the building would never in a million years cause that building to collapse
#257. To: Destro (#244)
We shall start by asking if you saw my application of the Socratic method work on this thread?
#258. To: angle (#254)
Riiight. You're here to discuss the truth of the matter.
#259. To: Destro (#239)
Which is probably why the Athenians made him drink the hemlock.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
#260. To: BTP Holdings (#255)
Furthermore, it in no way explains the classic demolition collapse of WTC 7. That damage on one corner of the building would never in a million years cause that building to collapse.
.
.
.