See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Confessions Of A 911 Hitman
Source:
www.rense.com
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general73/confess.htm
Published: Oct 15, 2006
Author: Douglas Herman
Post Date: 2006-10-15 23:45:22 by robin
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 3057
Comments: 310
Confessions Of A 911 Hitman And are you sorry that all these faked resource wars have to be concocted so that you can get that oil and live comfortably? Didn't think so.
How & Why I Helped Blow Up The World Trade Center
By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
10-13-6 
MY job was to wire explosives inside the various WTC buildings. We wired buildings 1, 2, 6, and 7. We hardwired some areas and attached explosives and electronic detonators to many other key structural joints. We did this weeks in advance. WTC-7 fell in a classic controlled demolition (See example) but the Twin Towers required a lot more ingenuity. The fellow who planned the actual sequence of detonations is a genius. He was rumored to have been paid seven or eight figures and is a fucking master. Almost like a composer of a symphony orchestra but better. Much better. 
Longtime Rense writer, Douglas Herman wrote the suspense novel, The Guns of Dallas, that features a confessed hitman revealing the perfect scenario for the murder of JFK. The above scenario is fiction but probably far closer to the truth than anything yet offered in the so-called fact based media.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 243.
#1. To: robin (#0)
(Edited)
Demolitions don't work that way. In fact demolitions won't bring down a building in and of themselves. That is why they spend more time gutting the inside of buildings and weakening the superstructure because the explosions would not do a thing in terms of getting the building to implode and fall down in a precise manner.
In fact demolitions won't bring down a building in and of themselves. That is why they spend more time gutting the inside of buildings and weakening the superstructure because the explosions would not do a thing in terms of getting the building to implode and fall down in a precise manner. Which is exactly what the man who wrote this saying, that it took years to plan this and months to prepare the building. BTW, have you watched any of the excellent 9/11 videos that have been made this year?
Sorry - this theory fails Occam's Razor theorem.
Have you seen any of the excellent 9/11 videos made recently? They explain with high school physics how the buildings fell at the rate of free fall and that this only happens in a demolition. They also show the squibs (the explosives going off under each falling floor) that precede that fall. They also interviewed some of the surviving tenants of the building who describe some of the odd goings on before 9/11. They also replay the sound of some powerful explosions that precede the fall of each tower. They also play the video of Larry Silverstein, who coincidently owned all 3 buildings that fell that day, saying on the video "so I told them to 'pull it'". He used a term used in demolitions regarding WTC7.
Wow - he let the bag out on a PBS interview - LOL - it was not a slip heard on some CB. People don't tell you that - they make it sound like his calls were intercepted. It was in reference to pulling out of WTC 7 and not trying to save it.
Not true, have you seen the video interview where he says exactly "pull it"?
Yes. Have you?
Do you too believe that the buildings pancaked on top of each other; yet managed to fall at the rate of free fall? So since the floors were around the steel center core, why isn't the core still standing? The pancake theory doesn't hold water regarding the center core and no one who tries to hold that theory can ever explain the center core not still standing. But demolition explains everything.
So since the floors were around the steel center core, why isn't the core still standing? The freefall rate is one man's work based on his own assumptions - a man not involved in the construction or demolition industry. The steel core is what to you? Some super duper adamantium structure? Like one long solid bar of steel that would be left standing like a pipe? Come on - you are making stuff up as you go along based on cartoon notions of pyhsics. Physics as composed by Bugs Bunny.
That is incorrect. Many have produced video and calculation to prove this. The steel core is what to you? Some super duper adamantium structure? Like one long solid bar of steel that would be left standing like a pipe? Hardly. You really have not studied any of the proof about the demolition of 9/11 have you? No, I don't make stuff up. I have done a lot of reading about what others have spent a great deal of their education and time studying and proving. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/210406runattack.htm The official explanation is laughable (in the words of Andreas Von Bülow): Former Helmut Schmidt cabinet member, 25-year German Parliamentarian and global intelligence expert Andreas Von Bülow says that the 9/11 attack was run by the highest levels of the US intelligence apparatus using WTC Building 7 as a command bunker which was later demolished in order to destroy the crime scene. But you prefer to believe Lucky Larry and George Bush. Not much anyone can say to you really.
http://prisonplanet.com is a joke.
I'll believe Alex Jones over Lucky Larry Silverstein any day of the week.
Alex Jones is a joke.
And in what way do you find him a joke? Examples please.
I think one has to ask oneself why a poster like destro would come to this site posting the rhetoric he/she does if he/she in fact was looking for truth.
I posted a more credible conspiracy that also implicates the govt - you guy are obsessed with demolition charges - why? Because you want to implicate the US govt but don't know how. I was posting regarding 9/11 even before 9/11. I was the first to reveal that Muslims in America for training were in fact from the Bosnian Muslim army the CIA was helping - a fact kept secret until several years later. Burke may remember those exposes by me back in the day on Freerepublic.
There is nothing wrong with your speculation and your theory. I happen to believe your theory and that the towers were demolished with charges. They are not mutually exclusive. And I don't think there is much moral difference between the government backing the 9/11 terrorists and turning a blind eye to their attacks on this country and setting charges in the WTC. They are both the same in my opinion. I think the charges were more than likely backups. I imagine the planners hoped the planes would do more damage and cause a collapse or partial collapses with huge chunks of the building flying into others and causing thousands of deaths. But- when it became apparrent to the conspirators that the Towers were not that damaged (as they were monitoring all emergency communications from WTC seven I imagine) they "pulled" the towers. They needed spectacular attacks- a smoking crater- thousands of deaths- a searing image. Two towers with holes in them that could be repaired or just demolished slowly with 800 people killed? Uh uh. That is a bad train accident in India- not a rallying cry to start a never ending war. They needed an event. They got it with the towers coming down- and from what I have read I believe they came down with charges. Now, were your Moslems used? More than likely.
For some reason I have almost no interest in 9/11, and have not read up on all the theories, though I am vaguely aware of them. All I can say is that just from hearing the news as events unfurled, the facts of the government's story did not add up to me, and I mean starting right from the day it happened. Regarding this controlled demo business though; as I recall, the aim of the '93 truck bomb in the basement of the Trade Center was to topple the towers. It seems to me that after that failed attempt it would make sense that the city government, owners of surrounding buildings, insurance companies and other interested parties could see some advantage to having demolitions preinstalled in the towers just in case another attack mortally wounded the buildings. In such a scenario the buildings could be preemptively destroyed in a controlled fashion thus minimizing the damage to the surrounding buildings. If such safety precautions did exist then the fall of the towers could have been government ordained and executed prematurely through a combination of panic and faulty damage assessment - or maliciously by this administration for a big, splashy "Pearl Harbor" effect. I personally lean towards the later explanation as being most likely but then again, I haven't followed things closely so maybe I'm missing some important "facts." But considering the history of this country's government, and the temperament of the neocons, their publicly stated policy goals, and circumstantial evidence, I have to suspect malfeasance first and foremost.
Building on what I posted earlier . . . Commonly you hear people expressing the sentiment that "our government" couldn't do such evil. How would it be possible to even start planning for such an act- wouldn't the very evil nature of it repel anyone remotely involved in it? In order for something like 9/11 to be pulled off there would have to exist a culture already in place with people who would think nothing of murdering innocents. And that is a good question. And if this was the US government circa 1901 I would say such a conspiracy would be completely and totally impossible. The infrastructure of evil simply didn't exist in this country in 1901 for such an truly evil false flag op like 9/11 to be pulled off. But America circa 2001? Yes. You hear about how 9/11 was "blowback" because of US foreign policy- how pissed off Moooslims finally paid us back for 50 years of corrupt foreign policy in their part of the world. And that is quite believable. But I happen to think it is another sort of blowback. It is the blowback of the CULTURE of empire that has been bred within our government for a 100 years. This is a culture that exists on its own, quite outside the rest of the country- that has its own rules, mores, and ways of doing things. 9/11 was merely the habits of empire coming home to roost. Prior to 9/11 we had a government that was engaging in false flag operations as a matter of routine tactics in every corner of the globe. The OSS of WWII which later became the CIA had pulled off one of their first foreign engineered coups by 1953 in Iran by literally spreading around money to street thugs in Iran and installing the Shah. And the list of dubious operations only gets more suspect and more morally outrageous with the passage of time. Two, even three generations of intelligence ops all over the world involving assassinations, engineered coups, rigged elections, the funding of wholly artificial "Guerilla movements", Death squad training manuals . . . aiding governments with Death lists (Indonesia and 100,000 'communists' being killed in a week by Suharto is the best known example). Now with that history, a history our media and text books don't dwell upon, known you are going to tell me that elements of the US Federal government are not amoral enough to do something like 9/11? Please. When you have literally thousands of people from many branches of government involved up to their eyeballs in the evil of running a de facto empire day in and day out for 50 years- with the habits only getting worse with time- and the participants more and more cynical and nihilistic- eventually the tactics employed by the empire to keep the Dirt people in line in the distant provinces are going to be used at home. It was only a matter of time. You can't keep the "necessary evil" that our "intelligence services" practice abroad from crossing the borders and being used here at home. Empires corrupt Republics. When you have intelligence services monitoring foreign politicians and getting blackmail info on them- they will eventually do the same at home. When you have them engineering "plane accidents" for troublesome foreigners- they will do so at home. You can't keep this evil of Empire contained in a little box. The culture for brainstorming and planning something like 9/11 did and does exist in our government. When you have people whose job it is to carry out outrageous muderous acts all over the globe and under the cover of darkness- most of which we still don't know about- such a suggestion or plan among them might have raised eyebrows because it was a plan directed against "Americans" and risky- but the "morality" of it would never have even come up among such people. This is what they do. 9/11 is blowback alright. It is blowback from our own shadow government that the rest of the world knows only too damn well.
The start was the American defeat in the Spanish-American War. That was the beginning of the empire.
#245. To: BTP Holdings (#243)
You meant American victory I am sure.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#12. To: Destro (#1)
Demolitions don't work that way.
#14. To: robin (#12)
Which is exactly what the man who wrote this saying, that it took years to plan this and months to prepare the building.
#15. To: Destro (#14)
#18. To: robin (#15)
They also play the video of Larry Silverstein, who coincidently owned all 3 buildings that fell that day, saying on the video "so I told them to 'pull it'". He used a term used in demolitions regarding WTC7.
#21. To: Destro (#18)
#27. To: robin (#21)
have you seen the video interview where he says exactly "pull it"?
#48. To: Destro (#27)
#52. To: robin, It Is A Republic (#48)
(Edited)
Do you too believe that the buildings pancaked on top of each other; yet managed to fall at the rate of free fall?
#54. To: Destro (#52)
The freefall rate is one man's work based on his own assumptions - a man not involved in the construction nore demolition industry.
#59. To: robin (#54)
#70. To: Destro (#59)
http://prisonplanet.com is a joke.
#73. To: robin (#70)
#75. To: Destro (#73)
Alex Jones is a joke.
#83. To: robin (#75)
#94. To: angle, robin, burkeman1 (#83)
I think one has to ask oneself why a poster like destro would come to this site posting the rhetoric he/she does if he/she in fact was looking for truth.
#175. To: Destro (#94)
#215. To: Burkeman1 (#175)
"from what I have read I believe they came down with charges. "
#230. To: u-89 (#215)
#243. To: Burkeman1 (#230)
But I happen to think it is another sort of blowback. It is the blowback of the CULTURE of empire that has been bred within our government for a 100 years.
Replies to Comment # 243. The start was the American defeat in the Spanish-American War. That was the beginning of the empire.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 243.