See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Confessions Of A 911 Hitman
Source:
www.rense.com
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general73/confess.htm
Published: Oct 15, 2006
Author: Douglas Herman
Post Date: 2006-10-15 23:45:22 by robin
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 3148
Comments: 310
Confessions Of A 911 Hitman And are you sorry that all these faked resource wars have to be concocted so that you can get that oil and live comfortably? Didn't think so.
How & Why I Helped Blow Up The World Trade Center
By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
10-13-6 
MY job was to wire explosives inside the various WTC buildings. We wired buildings 1, 2, 6, and 7. We hardwired some areas and attached explosives and electronic detonators to many other key structural joints. We did this weeks in advance. WTC-7 fell in a classic controlled demolition (See example) but the Twin Towers required a lot more ingenuity. The fellow who planned the actual sequence of detonations is a genius. He was rumored to have been paid seven or eight figures and is a fucking master. Almost like a composer of a symphony orchestra but better. Much better. 
Longtime Rense writer, Douglas Herman wrote the suspense novel, The Guns of Dallas, that features a confessed hitman revealing the perfect scenario for the murder of JFK. The above scenario is fiction but probably far closer to the truth than anything yet offered in the so-called fact based media.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-237) not displayed.
.
.
.
#238. To: Burkeman1, scrapper2, robin, angle, christine, BTP Holdings, leveller, swarthguy (#235)
The buildings were demolitioned by the govt is as a honey trap - an appealing but distracting conspiracy theory that sucks away credibility and resources from truth finders and inquisitive people out for the real deal. The images is exactly why the buildings were dynamited makes an appealing honey trap - it is something tangible - to distract from the intangible - The 'Great Game' America has been playing into Central Asia from Bosnia all the way to 'Stans. In fact I remember an article posted on a neocon right wing website blamed the rise of al-Qaeda and Islamic jihadis on the Soviets!! That is classic disinfo- distraction techniques being used by the neocons. (Read this bull here). This should send red flags up to most but they are too busy looking for squibb like explosions in grainy videos to notice. The USA has been arming and training jihadis for 20 years via CIA contracting out Saudi and Paki intel orgs who in turn sub-contracted out to jihad groups like al-Qaeda. Goal? To spread destabilization through Islamic uprisings that would allow UAS/NATO to swoop in and restore peace and a puppet democracy along the so called Green Road - From Bosnia to Afghanistan to Indonesia where oil and gas fields are and where pipelines come out from. I think Osama read the American play book and liked the plan and made it his own. That is why in some areas al-Qaeda and America seemed at odds ('Stans) and in other areas seemed like allies (Balkans - Chechnya). Burke said the 9/11 commish did not want to delve into the Pakistani connection. Why? Because that leads back to Washington and Texas. The 9/11 cell was here as were dozens of other such Muslims for American approved training and fundraising and organizing for the jihad abroad. That is what they want to keep secret. Maybe the 9/11 cell double-crossed their American allies? Maybe they were in league (maybe without even knowing it) with America's shadow govt players on 9/11? That is where we need to look - not trying to see if implanted explosives did this or that - or turn 9/11 into a laughable real estate insurance plot by Silverstein - which is where 'they' want you to concentrate your resources and thoughts on.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
PS: An apology for my style (meaning apology in the Greek sense as a word meaning 'explanation'). I am using an old debate style and rhetorical technique - the Socratic method. It antagonizes people at first but then leaves them open to what will be said after they exhaust themselves on their counter arguments. Which is probably why the Athenians made him drink the hemlock.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Russia, India, China.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
robin: bluedogtxn called today's military the JOB CORPS The Empire builders are unwilling to part with a nickel that does not go into their personal "purses." As a result JOB CORPS is not keeping up with wages commenserate with the "risks" of the current job openings. The empire builders' lame carrots -ie. sign up bonuses of $10,000 - will not be enough as more vets return stateside from the killing fields of Iraq sans limbs, sans working brains and as these vets get a media profile. Without an expanded grunt filled military, American empire will come to a screeching halt, if DC plans extending the war front. For too many years, fedgov has filled the ranks with affirmative action gender equal pencil pushing "career" soldiers, so the US military may look like it's got lots of warm bodies for the front lines, but that's not the case. North Korea, Iran, heck even Israel have more military warm bodies to fight as grunts for their nations than we do.
It antagonizes people at first but then leaves them open to what will be said after they exhaust themselves on their counter arguments Let's hear more about this debate technique please. Perhaps start a new thread. Thank you kindly in advance.. Yours, Lady X
The start was the American defeat in the Spanish-American War. That was the beginning of the empire.
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
We shall start by asking if you saw my application of the Socratic method work on this thread? I kind of get a kick out of being disagreed with and then a little later on those that disagree with me actually agree with me (if only grudgingly).
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
You meant American victory I am sure.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Wrong - chunks of the collapsed towers flew into WTC7. The Oklahoma City bombing was more damaging to the building and it never fell.... furthermore, the a-bomb dome (made of steel and glass) in Hiroshima, Japan was exposed to thousands of degrees of (nuclear) heat and never crumbled.....
-- "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed people can change the world. Indeed it is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead
Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam (American Empire Project) (Hardcover) by Robert Dreyfuss "THERE IS AN unwritten chapter in the history of the Cold War and the New World Order that followed..." (more)
Pray you will never know, the hell where youth and laughter go - Siegfried Sassoon. Ypres, Autumn 1914.
And trees in Tunguska, Siberia that were under the exploding comet in 1903 stayed upright while the trees outward from the air blast were flattened. Pressure down is different from pressure sideways. Physics lesson 101. WTC7 Is just across the street from the Towers. The collapse tore a gash in its side. The diesel tanks for the mayor's emergency command ignited. The building was already a total loss - it fell what was it 12 or so hours later? - so you people who claim he had to pull it down for the insurance money are talking out your holes - the building was already a total loss in that condition.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Nope, not at all. The supposed victory was really the death of the Republic since we took over Spain's colonies, and their headaches of the remainder of their empire. It was a tactical defeat for the U.S. We've been doing the same thing ever since, and all at the behest of free traders and corporate dominance.
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
Still peddling this bullcrap about WTC 7, I see. Got any pics that show the damage you claim? I've never seen any. Diesel fuel will not burn down a steel structure, or haven't you figured that out? http://www.wtc7.net/location.html People who have heard of Building 7 tend to assume that 'ancillary damage' from the collapses of the Twin Towers had something to do with Building 7's collapse. It is important to note that Building 7 was no closer to the towers than any of several other large buildings outside of the WTC complex. Building 7 was the only of the seven buildings with a World Trade Center address that was on a different block. It, along with the 6 other buildings, were completely or largely destroyed on September 11th. No buildings outside of the two turquoise zones in the map to the right suffered more than superficial damage. “The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
It sure is, nothing but a smoke and dust cloud. Where is the structural damage? LOL
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
See, that was a set up by me of you - lets me post another photo further debunking you. "The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Riiight. You're here to discuss the truth of the matter.
Oh, yeah, nice charade. That don't mean diddly. Furthermore, it in no way explains the classic demolition collapse of WTC 7. That damage on one corner of the building would never in a million years cause that building to collapse. And you are dreaming if you think you can convince anyone of this on here. Posting this kind of nonsense will only serve for you to get the richly deserved moniker of DISINFORMATIONIST.
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
You are a demolition's expert? What is your expertise in the manner or are you repeating what websites tell you? Also, you asked me for proof of my statement that there was a large gash in the side of the WTC7 building from the falling debris - so I provided 2 of them. That you did not know there was such a gash speaks volumes on your knowledge (or lack there of) on the condition of the WTC 7 building.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
I did not see it..
I was asked for proof of my statement that there was a large gash in the side of the WTC7 building from the falling debris - so I provided 2 of them. That is all.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
The prosecution of Socrates was not without point.
You dare make such a statement when at first you questioned my assertion that there ever existed such a huge structural gash to begin with???? Does that even classify as logical reasoning? Science and reason don't work like that.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Socrates was a prick who liked to point out that his fellow Athenians were being assholes. (Copyright to Destro)
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
That hardly qualifies as sufficient damage to cause the building to collapse. Your attempts at making that damage so disproportionate are clearly disinformation. From your perspective, stretching the truth qualifies as such. Since you have failed to show any science and only allude to these things, yes it does, but not for those on BOZO. C'ya! ;0)
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
A gash starting from the 18th floor all the way down does not qualify how? What scientific methods have you used to make that 'qualifying' statement? Click the pictures above to a link where at least they provide their evidence in a quantifiable manner - not relying on qualitative evidence.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Sure - info vs disinfo - suddenly they are my talking points. I posted a picture. A picture of the gash from the WTC 7. Why did I provide such picture? Because BTP Holdings dared me to present any evidence that the WTC 7 had such a gash. We can end the back and forth on this and see if we can come to an understanding - ignoring if that gash helped bring down the WTC 7 - do you accept a huge gash existed in the WTC 7 as a result from the debris free fall of the Twin Towers?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
the trail clearly leads back to Pakistan and their intelligence chief Yes. Imagine, just imagine, if the Head of Iraki Intelligence had been caught with such evidence and cuplability. We'd have the results of his colonoscopy posted. But, in this case, virtual silence.
Pray you will never know, the hell where youth and laughter go - Siegfried Sassoon. Ypres, Autumn 1914.
Because you have the people who would want an expose chasing down video clips to see if there are squibb explosions going on....
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
absolutely not
Really? Where'd you have it posted? Forums...blogs? The virtual silence is coming through loud and clear. MSM is owned.
In the same places where Judith Miller wrote her exposes. As part of the push to convince the people that Iraq was behind 911.
Pray you will never know, the hell where youth and laughter go - Siegfried Sassoon. Ypres, Autumn 1914.
do you accept a huge gash existed in the WTC 7 before it collapsed?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Jeez, for someone who purports to want to discuss exactly who the perpetrators of 911 are at the exclusion of all else, you sure spend a lots of bandwidth refuting the WTC7 demolition.
Did WTC7 tip or lean to the side with the gash? No, it fell exactly like a demolition, complete with squibs, falling into its own footprint. A classic demolition.
It fell towards the gash - see the photo that shows the WTC 7 north face covering the debris pile - not possible if it fell straight down. "The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
The Yugoslav Caldron “The CIA recruited and trained the jihadists”
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
your photo shows that it fell straight down. it was a 47 story building.
If you are delusional it does. I guess the facade just floated down ontop of the debris pile then.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
This poster is a mole.
Mark The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C., that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink."— Christie Todd Whitman - 9/18/2001
Comments (279 - 310) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestHow the buildings fell is a bit of a distraction. But on another level- I think a lot of the 9/11 truth movement has been concentrating on why the buildings fell because it is the THE IMAGE in the brains of Americans and what they associate 9/11 with- and the official line on those collapses is just so pathetic and improbable and frankly impossible.
#239. To: Burkeman1, scrapper2, robin, angle, christine, BTP Holdings, leveller, swarthguy (#235)
#240. To: angle, Burkeman1 (#231)
So where's the chink in the armor...the achilles heel?
#241. To: robin (#237)
scrapper: they are too greedy to pay mercenary wages to the GI's
#242. To: Destro (#239)
I am using an old debate style and rhetorical technique - the Socratic method.
#243. To: Burkeman1 (#230)
But I happen to think it is another sort of blowback. It is the blowback of the CULTURE of empire that has been bred within our government for a 100 years.
#244. To: Lady X (#242)
Let's hear more about this debate technique please.
#245. To: BTP Holdings (#243)
The start was the American defeat in the Spanish-American War. That was the beginning of the empire.
#246. To: Destro (#19)
But planes alone could not take down those towers. And NOTHING flew into WTC7.
#247. To: Destro (#245)
It's us, Pogo was right, we have met the enemy and he is our erstwhile allies. LOL!
#248. To: maggies mom (#246)
furthermore, the a-bomb dome (made of steel and glass) in Hiroshima, Japan was exposed to thousands of degrees of (nuclear) heat and never crumbled.....
#249. To: Destro (#245)
You meant American victory I am sure.
#250. To: Destro, maggies mom (#248)
WTC7 Is just across the street from the Towers. The collapse tore a gash in its side. The diesel tanks for the mayor's emergency command ignited.
Building 7's Location
Building 7 occupied a city block immediately north of the World Trade Center complex. WTC 1 through WTC 6 were on the superblock bounded by West, Church, Liberty, and Vessey Streets. Building 7 was wedged between the Verizon and U.S. Post Office buildings across Vessey Street from the WTC complex. It straddled an electrical substation that filled the first two stories of about half the block. 
The wall of Building 7 closest to the WTC complex was more than 300 feet from the nearest wall of the North Tower. It appears that nearly all of the heavy fallout from the disintegration of the North Tower landed short of Building 7. Building 6 stood between the North Tower and Building 7. 
These photographs show Building 7 in front of the exploding North Tower. It is the square bronze building on the left. Even in the second photo, the nearest of the debris from the tower is several hundred feet behind Building 7.
#251. To: BTP Holdings, maggies mom (#250)
Got any pics that show the damage you claim?
The above photo is very different than the photos you usually see on conspiracy sites.
#252. To: Destro, maggies mom (#251)
The above photo is very different than the photos you usually see on conspiracy sites.
#253. To: BTP Holdings, maggies mom (#252)
(Edited)
sure is, nothing but a smoke and dust cloud. Where is the structural damage? LOL
#254. To: Destro (#253)
#255. To: Destro, maggies mom (#253)
See, that was a ste up by me of you - lets me post another photo further debunking you.
#256. To: BTP Holdings, maggies mom (#255)
Furthermore, it in no way explains the classic demolition collapse of WTC 7. That damage on one corner of the building would never in a million years cause that building to collapse
#257. To: Destro (#244)
We shall start by asking if you saw my application of the Socratic method work on this thread?
#258. To: angle (#254)
Riiight. You're here to discuss the truth of the matter.
#259. To: Destro (#239)
Which is probably why the Athenians made him drink the hemlock.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
#260. To: BTP Holdings (#255)
Furthermore, it in no way explains the classic demolition collapse of WTC 7. That damage on one corner of the building would never in a million years cause that building to collapse.
#261. To: Tauzero (#259)
The prosecution of Socrates was not without point.
#262. To: Destro (#260)
You dare make such a statement when at first you questioned my assertion that there ever existed such a huge structural gash to begin with????
Does that even classify as logical reasoning?
Science and reason don't work like that.
#263. To: BTP Holdings (#262)
(Edited)
That hardly qualifies as sufficient damage to cause the building to collapse. Your attempts at making that damage so disproportionate are clearly disinformation.
#264. To: BTP Holdings (#262)
Those pictures are from a disinfo site. you can just go right here and read destro's talking points for yourself.
#265. To: angle, BTP Holdings (#264)
Those pictures are from a disinfo site. you can just go right here and read destro's talking points for yourself.
#266. To: Burkeman1, Destro (#235)
Concentrating on the hijackers, who knew what when about them, who paid them . . . to me- is more interesting than why the buildings fell.
#267. To: swarthyguy (#266)
But, in this case, virtual silence.
#268. To: Destro (#265)
do you accept a huge gash existed in the WTC 7 as a result from the debris free fall of the Twin Towers?
#269. To: swarthyguy (#266)
We'd have the results of his colonoscopy posted.
#270. To: angle (#269)
#271. To: angle (#268)
#272. To: Destro, BTPHoldings, christine, arator, kamala, noone22 (#271)
#273. To: Destro (#271)
#274. To: robin (#273)
Did WTC7 tip or lean to the side with the gash?
#275. To: angle, BTPHoldings, christine, arator, kamala, noone22, robin (#272)
Jeez, for someone who purports to want to discuss exactly who the perpetrators of 911 are
#276. To: Destro (#274)
#277. To: Red Jones (#276)
your photo shows that it fell straight down. it was a 47 story building.
#278. To: angle (#272)
.
.
.