See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Confessions Of A 911 Hitman
Source:
www.rense.com
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general73/confess.htm
Published: Oct 15, 2006
Author: Douglas Herman
Post Date: 2006-10-15 23:45:22 by robin
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 3185
Comments: 310
Confessions Of A 911 Hitman And are you sorry that all these faked resource wars have to be concocted so that you can get that oil and live comfortably? Didn't think so.
How & Why I Helped Blow Up The World Trade Center
By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
10-13-6 
MY job was to wire explosives inside the various WTC buildings. We wired buildings 1, 2, 6, and 7. We hardwired some areas and attached explosives and electronic detonators to many other key structural joints. We did this weeks in advance. WTC-7 fell in a classic controlled demolition (See example) but the Twin Towers required a lot more ingenuity. The fellow who planned the actual sequence of detonations is a genius. He was rumored to have been paid seven or eight figures and is a fucking master. Almost like a composer of a symphony orchestra but better. Much better. 
Longtime Rense writer, Douglas Herman wrote the suspense novel, The Guns of Dallas, that features a confessed hitman revealing the perfect scenario for the murder of JFK. The above scenario is fiction but probably far closer to the truth than anything yet offered in the so-called fact based media.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-269) not displayed.
.
.
.
#270. To: angle (#269)
In the same places where Judith Miller wrote her exposes. As part of the push to convince the people that Iraq was behind 911.
Pray you will never know, the hell where youth and laughter go - Siegfried Sassoon. Ypres, Autumn 1914.
do you accept a huge gash existed in the WTC 7 before it collapsed?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Jeez, for someone who purports to want to discuss exactly who the perpetrators of 911 are at the exclusion of all else, you sure spend a lots of bandwidth refuting the WTC7 demolition.
Did WTC7 tip or lean to the side with the gash? No, it fell exactly like a demolition, complete with squibs, falling into its own footprint. A classic demolition.
It fell towards the gash - see the photo that shows the WTC 7 north face covering the debris pile - not possible if it fell straight down. "The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
The Yugoslav Caldron “The CIA recruited and trained the jihadists”
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
your photo shows that it fell straight down. it was a 47 story building.
If you are delusional it does. I guess the facade just floated down ontop of the debris pile then.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
This poster is a mole.
Mark The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C., that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink."— Christie Todd Whitman - 9/18/2001
There are many excellent videos with newsreel footage of the entire collapse that show how it fell at the rate of free fall (only possible in a demolition). You show a fuzzy, unclear picture and call that evidence? NO! That's NOTHING next to all the evidence. The squibs, the sounds of explosions before the fall, the way it fell, the speed of the fall, the testimony of firefighters, Larry Silverstein himself saying "to pull it". 9-11 video THE INEXPLICABLE COLLAPSE OF WTC7 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5848378758602000405&q=WTC7&hl=en http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5878047211466071205&q=WTC7&hl=en Rick Siegel's camera footage on 9/11 from Hoboken and Frank Sinatra Piers
And at what speed should it have fallen? Or do you guys think it should have fallen in dramatic slow motion like in a Hollywood movie? Also, your logic on the WTC7 conspiracy is faulty. You guys claim it was brought down for the insurance money. It collapsed like 9-12 or so hours later after the attacks so it could not have been done to shock people - but for the insurance money. There were massive gashes and fires that damaged the building to such an extent that there is no question the building was at a loss - and the insurance money was already in the bank - so no need to bring it down.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Your mother.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
THE ONLY WAY A BUILDING FALLS AT THE RATE OF "FREE FALL" IS IN A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. The Laws of physics cannot be denied (except by people like you).
The Laws of physics cannot be denied (except by people like you). All things fall in a state of free fall. See, I passed my physics class.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
When nothing is underneath to block a fall that's exactly how they fall. That is what the explosives are for in a demolition, to knock out the floors beneath the fall at just the right time. 47 story steel-framed buildings do not fall at the rate of free fall w/o carefully implemented explosives.
Do yourself a favor and move on. This poster is a mole.
Mark The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C., that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink."— Christie Todd Whitman - 9/18/2001
But they do if you have a multi story gash in the building taking out support columns and a 16K gallon diesel tanks ignited inside.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Do yourself a favor, watch the videos. The building falls straight down at the rate of free fall. A gash, a few fires and some fuel won't do that. Get a grip. I remember you posting that you want America destroyed. So does the ZOG (Zionist Occupational Govt). Although you claim to be angry over Kosovo, your goals seem to coincide. Is that why you refute the Laws of Physics and the insurmountable evidence so hotly? Have you joined forces with the ZOG, to further the destruction of the nation and people you hate so much?
No, Nimrod. I stated that if I accepted the premise that the USA's leadership - using what has to be highly trained American cadres for such demolition and coordination work to be done on 9/11 - then such an evil nation (WITH THOUSANDS OF NUKES) can not be allowed to continue to exist. How can you trust such an evil nation with nuclear weapons like we have? In Hungry the people are rioting in the streets because the PM lied about the economy. You guys propose an even greater evil - that our leaders did what only Satanic people could carry out without pause. If I accepted that the USA's govt did this to its own people in the manner you suggest I would go on a warpath. That is the logical conclusion. If you guys are for real and think the USA's leadership did this thing when will you rise up? If you don't rise up - what kind of cowardly immoral people are you if you don't take these evil people out?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
We are on a warpath. And yes that is the logical conclusion. Logic applied to 9/11 is what is needed. Most of us arrived at this realization a bit late. But, if Abu Ghraib, torture, Diebold, the loss of liberties (including one cherished since 1215), the torture renditions, and the willful destruction of Iraq (not to mention Lebanon this past summer) do not convince you how evil this regime is, then nothing will. Of course they are capable of 9/11! And Dov Zakheim and PNAC wrote about it years before as "the new Pearl Harbor" event required to galvanize support for their NeoShevik wars. BTW, are you following the Bush/Paraguay info? I guess a visit to The Hague has lost its thrill.
Bush would find no refuge in Paraguay - I don't think Bush or any one is fleeing anywhere i what I am saying. That is again - more internet rumors feeding on themselves.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
What would you call the Reichstag Fire?
Depending on the viewpoint, a success. /kidding
Pray you will never know, the hell where youth and laughter go - Siegfried Sassoon. Ypres, Autumn 1914.
...the Reichstag fire was a stroke of good luck for the Nazis. "The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Göring's possible role William L. Shirer's The Rise and Fall of The Third Reich (Touchstone Edition, 1990, p. 192-) details how at Nuremberg, General Franz Halder stated in an affidavit that Hermann Göring had joked about setting the fire: On the occasion of a lunch on the Führer's birthday in 1942, the people around the Führer turned the conversation to the Reichstag building and its artistic value. I heard with my own ears how Göring broke into the conversation and shouted: 'The only one who really knows about the Reichstag building is I, for I set fire to it.' And saying this he slapped his thigh. [1] [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_Fire_Decree The decree nullified many of the key civil liberties of German citizens. With Nazis in key positions of the German government, the decree was used as the legal basis of imprisonment of anyone considered to be opponents of the Nazis, and was used to suppress publications not considered "friendly" to the Nazi cause. The decree is considered by historians to be one of the key steps in the establishment of a one-party Nazi state in Germany. The UNpatriot ACT. Swarthyguy: Depending on the viewpoint, a success. /kidding 911 is not a success. Regardless of the viewpoint. BushCheneyInc and global backers and the corrupt in congress and the other appointees/traitors are executing their plans under pressure from an awakening public. The final outcome is yet to be determined.
RE: destro MOLE ALERT!!! Do yourself a favor and move on. This poster is a mole. Thanks kamala. (And this mole ain't alone.)
You are intellectual and moral cowards - who throw out the mole word like Freepers yell out troll. Is this a sign of your intellectual bankruptcy?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
The Laws of physics cannot be denied I have, in person, watched buildings collapsed. They come down in seconds. I saw a 20-story building come down in four seconds. What you are writing is nonsense.
"We become what we behold. We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." -- Marshall McLuhan, after Alexander Pope and William Blake.
A 100+ story or 47 story steel-framed building with floors that supposedly "pancaked" on each other but did not even pause half a second at each floor, but fell at the rate of free fall? And, fell within its own footprint? I don't think so. Oh, and the steel center core w/o any flooring, also fell along with the whole building. The squibs (planted explosives detonating just under the falling building at precise intervals) are visible in many of the newsreel videos. Furthermore, there were loud explosions recorded & heard before the fall of the 2 towers.
Not only a mole but prolly a Jewish mole! Get with the program, dudestein!
Pray you will never know, the hell where youth and laughter go - Siegfried Sassoon. Ypres, Autumn 1914.
Nonsense? The laws of physics are not nonsense. Buildings cannot come down at near freefall speeds if they are at the same time colliding with floors below. This is basic science you are calling nonsense. Does a car that is moving at 60 MPH that hits another car that is not moving continue to move at 60 MPH after the collision? For a person that claims to have a high IQ you should know better than this.
God is always good! Only in a vacuum. Sure you did.
God is always good! Parts of buildings not encountering resistance would come down at free fall speeds - all things fall in 'free fall' if not acted upon. But you stated yourself they fell at near free fall - hence - something restricted the ability to fall at free fall. The best evidence is thus the floors it collided with. Maybe you guys have not been around construction of this scale - the mass and weight are enormous. They do create a pulverizing effect on massive steel and concrete structures.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
When you state falling at free fall speeds - all things would fall at that speed. What speed should it fall under?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
No, the very slight difference does not come close to what would have happened in a supposed "pancake" fall. Watch the videos. They explain all of this very well..
I have. That's why I know this explosives-in-the-towers is nonsense. My father owned a construction company, and I was raised in the business. The "Truthers" don't under that when buildings are demolished, they are first gutted. Explosives themselves wouldn't bring down a building, not unless you maybe used nukes or put so many explosives in the building you'll kill everyone for a few blocks around. Pancaking is a well-known phenomena, as are buildings falling in their own "footprint." Nothing out of the ordinary about either. And, imploded buildings always fall from the bottom up. The WTC fell from the top down, specifically where the planes hit. I see no evidence at all that nothing was involved except the biggest flying bombs in the world -- 20 tons of flying metal, loaded with over 10,000 gallons of jet fuel, hitting two poorly-designed buildings at over 300 mph.
"We become what we behold. We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." -- Marshall McLuhan, after Alexander Pope and William Blake.
I already corrected you once, but I guess you didn't understand. Nothing falls at a free fall rate unless in a vacuum. The towers were in no vacuum. The towers fell within anywhere from 8 to 20 percent slower than free fall time depending on which tower you are talking about and which official collapse time you believe. This is way too fast considering the official pancake theory. The fact that the antenna on top of the North tower can clearly be seen as falling straight down first means that the core it was standing on was compromised even before the floors started to fall. The core of this building obviously failed first which proves a controlled demolition was occurring given the circumstances of that day. The pancake theory cannot account for a core failing at all, much less even before the alleged pancaking even occurred. Also the pancake theory cannot account for the floors being pulverized to dust when they supposedly had only begun to fall, which of course would have meant a speed under 20 MPH. Collisions at such speeds will produce less fine particles than what was observed being ejected from the towers shortly after they began to collapse, or stated more correctly, explode.
God is always good! That might as well be slow motion compared to 'free fall' speed. Oops. But that's OK keep looking for explosives inside the Towers. Make any true investigation into the events of 9/11 look like the ravings of kooks and thus preventing the underlying truth from emerging. "The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
You have repeated this more than once and you are still wrong. Explosives placed at the proper positions throughout a structure and detonated in a predetermined sequence bring down such structures routinely.
God is always good!
#271. To: angle (#268)
#272. To: Destro, BTPHoldings, christine, arator, kamala, noone22 (#271)
#273. To: Destro (#271)
#274. To: robin (#273)
Did WTC7 tip or lean to the side with the gash?
#275. To: angle, BTPHoldings, christine, arator, kamala, noone22, robin (#272)
Jeez, for someone who purports to want to discuss exactly who the perpetrators of 911 are
#276. To: Destro (#274)
#277. To: Red Jones (#276)
your photo shows that it fell straight down. it was a 47 story building.
#278. To: angle (#272)
#279. To: Destro (#274)
#280. To: robin, yertleturtle (#279)
There are many excellent videos with newsreel footage of the entire collapse that show how it fell at the rate of free fall (only possible in a demolition).
#281. To: Kamala (#278)
This poster is a mole.
#282. To: Destro (#280)
#283. To: robin, yertleturtle (#282)
(Edited)
THE ONLY WAY A BUILDING FALLS AT THE RATE OF "FREE FALL" IS IN A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
#284. To: Destro (#283)
#285. To: robin, Mole Alert!! (#279)
MOLE ALERT!!!
#286. To: robin (#284)
#287. To: Destro (#286)
#288. To: robin, swarthyguy (#287)
(Edited)
I remember you posting that you want America destroyed. So does the ZOG (Zionist Occupational Govt). Although you claim to be angry over Kosovo, your goals seem to coincide.
#289. To: Destro (#288)
If I accepted that the USA's govt did this to its own people in the manner you suggest I would go on a warpath. That is the logical conclusion.
#290. To: robin (#289)
BTW, are you following the Bush/Paraguay info? I guess a visit to The Hague has lost its thrill.
#291. To: angle, BTPHoldings, christine, arator, kamala, noone22, robin, swarthyguy (#275)
#292. To: Destro (#291)
#293. To: robin (#292)
the Reichstag Fire
#294. To: robin (#292)
(Edited)
What would you call the Reichstag Fire?
#295. To: Destro (#294)
(Edited)
Another theory appears in the book Himmler's Secret War by Martin Allen (published in Great Britain by Robson Books in the year 2005). According to this book, the Reichstag fire was started by a band of Sicherheitsdienst (SD, the SS security service) agents who secretly entered the Reichstag through an underground tunnel that was connected to Göring's official residence. [edit]
#296. To: swarthyguy (#293)
Robin: What would you call the Reichstag Fire?
#297. To: robin (#292)
(Edited)
#298. To: angle, robin, kamala, swarthyguy (#297)
#299. To: robin (#282)
THE ONLY WAY A BUILDING FALLS AT THE RATE OF "FREE FALL" IS IN A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
#300. To: YertleTurtle (#299)
#301. To: Destro (#298)
#302. To: YertleTurtle, Robin (#299)
(Edited)
Robin: The Laws of physics cannot be denied
YertleTurtle: What you are writing is nonsense.
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
#303. To: Destro (#283)
All things fall in a state of free fall.
See, I passed my physics class.
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
#304. To: RickyJ, YertleTurtle, Robin (#302)
Buildings cannot come down at near freefall speeds if they are at the same time colliding with floors below.
#305. To: RickyJ (#303)
#306. To: Destro (#304)
But you stated yourself they fell at near free fall - hence - something restricted the ability to fall at free fall. The best evidence is thus the floors it collided with.
#307. To: Destro (#304)
Maybe you guys have not been around construction of this scale - the mass and weight are enormous. They do create a pulverizing effect on massive steel and concrete structures
#308. To: Destro (#304)
(Edited)
Parts of buildings not encountering resistance would come down at free fall speeds - all things fall in 'free fall' if not acted upon.
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
#309. To: RickyJ, YertleTurtle (#308)
(Edited)
The towers fell within anywhere from 8 to 20 percent slower than free fall time depending on which tower you are talking about and which official collapse time you believe.
#310. To: YertleTurtle (#307)
Explosives themselves wouldn't bring down a building
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest