[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11 See other 9/11 Articles Title: Confessions Of A 911 Hitman Confessions Of A 911 Hitman Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 73.
#1. To: robin (#0)
(Edited)
Demolitions don't work that way. In fact demolitions won't bring down a building in and of themselves. That is why they spend more time gutting the inside of buildings and weakening the superstructure because the explosions would not do a thing in terms of getting the building to implode and fall down in a precise manner.
In fact demolitions won't bring down a building in and of themselves. That is why they spend more time gutting the inside of buildings and weakening the superstructure because the explosions would not do a thing in terms of getting the building to implode and fall down in a precise manner. Which is exactly what the man who wrote this saying, that it took years to plan this and months to prepare the building. BTW, have you watched any of the excellent 9/11 videos that have been made this year?
Sorry - this theory fails Occam's Razor theorem.
Have you seen any of the excellent 9/11 videos made recently? They explain with high school physics how the buildings fell at the rate of free fall and that this only happens in a demolition. They also show the squibs (the explosives going off under each falling floor) that precede that fall. They also interviewed some of the surviving tenants of the building who describe some of the odd goings on before 9/11. They also replay the sound of some powerful explosions that precede the fall of each tower. They also play the video of Larry Silverstein, who coincidently owned all 3 buildings that fell that day, saying on the video "so I told them to 'pull it'". He used a term used in demolitions regarding WTC7.
Wow - he let the bag out on a PBS interview - LOL - it was not a slip heard on some CB. People don't tell you that - they make it sound like his calls were intercepted. It was in reference to pulling out of WTC 7 and not trying to save it.
Not true, have you seen the video interview where he says exactly "pull it"?
Yes. Have you?
Do you too believe that the buildings pancaked on top of each other; yet managed to fall at the rate of free fall? So since the floors were around the steel center core, why isn't the core still standing? The pancake theory doesn't hold water regarding the center core and no one who tries to hold that theory can ever explain the center core not still standing. But demolition explains everything.
So since the floors were around the steel center core, why isn't the core still standing? The freefall rate is one man's work based on his own assumptions - a man not involved in the construction or demolition industry. The steel core is what to you? Some super duper adamantium structure? Like one long solid bar of steel that would be left standing like a pipe? Come on - you are making stuff up as you go along based on cartoon notions of pyhsics. Physics as composed by Bugs Bunny.
That is incorrect. Many have produced video and calculation to prove this. The steel core is what to you? Some super duper adamantium structure? Like one long solid bar of steel that would be left standing like a pipe? Hardly. You really have not studied any of the proof about the demolition of 9/11 have you? No, I don't make stuff up. I have done a lot of reading about what others have spent a great deal of their education and time studying and proving. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/210406runattack.htm The official explanation is laughable (in the words of Andreas Von Bülow): Former Helmut Schmidt cabinet member, 25-year German Parliamentarian and global intelligence expert Andreas Von Bülow says that the 9/11 attack was run by the highest levels of the US intelligence apparatus using WTC Building 7 as a command bunker which was later demolished in order to destroy the crime scene. But you prefer to believe Lucky Larry and George Bush. Not much anyone can say to you really.
http://prisonplanet.com is a joke.
I'll believe Alex Jones over Lucky Larry Silverstein any day of the week.
Alex Jones is a joke.
#75. To: Destro (#73)
And in what way do you find him a joke? Examples please.
Yeah, this is a real joke. Let's see you refute AJ's documentation of government sponsored terrorism and false flag operations. Funny, governments themselves admit to it. Bet you won't watch it the same as you didn't watch 911 Mysteries: Demolitions.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|