[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!


4play
See other 4play Articles

Title: Goldi on Women's Suffrage
Source: ElPee
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... rt.cgi?ArtNum=162468&Disp=5#C4
Published: Oct 16, 2006
Author: Goldi-Lox
Post Date: 2006-10-16 21:50:48 by Nostalgia
Keywords: None
Views: 1332
Comments: 142

4. To: High Hopes (#0)

Women led the opposition, with seven in 10 saying they oppose the war. Twenty-eight percent say they support it, which is the lowest support among women in any CNN poll taken since the invasion more than three years ago.

Women voting is a mistake.

Women are emotional, changeable, and notoriously unstable because of hormone flux.

They usually want to talk talk talk talk a situation over, under, around, and to death. LONG after the time for action.

And action, even when the right thing to do, is the LAST thing they want, and will try to stop it after it starts.

I'm a woman, and I know this is true.

I'd give up my vote in a minute if they took it away from all other women as well. We just don't have what it takes to be "rulers" and "deciders". Those roles require cooler heads and harder hearts.

Goldi-Lox posted on 2006-10-16 17:54:48 ET Reply Trace


Poster Comment:

Oy Vey

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 95.

#17. To: Nostalgia (#0)

I'm a woman, and I know this is true.

She needs to get laid more than once in the last 10 years.

angle  posted on  2006-10-16   22:30:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: angle (#17)

She needs to get laid more than once in the last 10 years.

we should all kick in and buy buckeroo a plane ticket to maryland.

Morgana le Fay  posted on  2006-10-16   22:37:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Morgana le Fay, Buckeroo (#26)

US troops 'winning friends in Iraq'

Why does Buck post these there at LP? Then he makes a show that he hates the piece and that he is, "...not a liberal nor a democrat as you claim. Nor am I a "compassionate conservative" or a Republican as yourself" to a bot's bot there.

There are just some things I can't understand about the lad.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-16   23:47:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Ferret Mike (#48)

Why does Buck post these there at LP?

Because I feel like posting that ludicrous crap. I love the torturous methods of enigmas snapping jellyfish's backs ... like yours.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-17   0:46:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: buckeroo (#51)

Actually, it is more the tactic of those conflicted. You are like the guy who says no while shaking your head yes.

As far as torturous goes, I have no problem with your loony thread posting there. And as far as insults go, yours' amuse me.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-17   0:54:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Ferret Mike (#52)

You are like the guy who says no while shaking your head yes.

You are very confused. I have maintained my perspectives upon the various HOT political topics forever. You know that, too. Of course, you won't produce any links worthy of merit to actually contradict me, either. All you can do is say what you believe which is an outright lie.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-17   0:59:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: buckeroo (#53) (Edited)

"All you can do is say what you believe which is an outright lie.

Believe? I didn't say I believed anything. I noted an interesting manner in which you seem to court conflict.

You spoke so glowingly and compassionately about Goofy-Lox being a Mama protecting her creation, LP. Then you post an article she would agree with and post back patting denials that that is how you feel about the war.

So, are you empathetic with her and trying to contribute in ways she likes, or hacking at her? You seem to have some conflict and I merely inquire regarding this.

#9. To: Coral Snake (#5)

CS - "Goldi is just another JimRob."

Rubbish. Shes struggling. Shes seeing a change in the political climate; shes renewed her forum with a re-fresh of tech and sees new forum members pouncing in more than ever.

Shes a mother hen wanting none other than to protect the forum. Nothing wrong with that .... but, the strain is showing.

buckeroo posted on 2006-05-04 2:17:41 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-17   1:08:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Ferret Mike (#54)

I rarely perform the gang pings that you elude to. The article I posted was not intended for Goldie or anyone in particular. I simply stated my opinion by ripping it up which I have always performed. In effect, it was intended for EVERYONE including yourself whom is making a BIG_DEAL out of it.

Ever since I have been at LP ( since 2002-3 ) I have been against GW Bush's Iraqi invasion. EVERYONE knows it, to include EVERYONE on 4um but yourself.

Get a life, pal. You are losing yourself in delusion.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-17   1:15:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: buckeroo (#55) (Edited)

"I rarely perform the gang pings that you elude to."

How special of you.

"Ever since I have been at LP ( since 2002-3 ) I have been against GW Bush's Iraqi invasion. EVERYONE knows it, to include EVERYONE on 4um but yourself."

You are conflicted. When I showed you the contradiction inherent to your call to murder a man who acted in accordance with his conscious and refused to go back to take part in what he had come to realize is an illegal and immoral conflict you went ballistic and avoided any further discussion on the topic.

He acted in accordance with the Geneva Accords that superseded his oath of enlistment. And you reacted by going nutz.

So, what is it Buck? An illegal and immoral conflict people should display good moral judgment and refuse to take part in? Should the Geneva Convention that calls upon people who would say, "I was only following orders" to remember they have higher responsibilities, some of which call for them to disobey illegal orders be taken seriously? Or what?

No, you are conflicted, that is obvious. And you have a Madonna/Whore relationship with Goofy-Lox on top of it.

I only note what I see Buckeroo. I am more impressed by the contradictions I note then by your bluster about your beliefs.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-17   1:25:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Ferret Mike (#57)

When I showed you the contradiction inherent to your call to murder a man who acted in accordance with his conscious and refused to go back to take part in what he had come to realize is an illegal and immoral conflict you went ballistic and avoided any further discussion on the topic.

The man contradicted his own oath. In the REAL world, we don't get to sit around and act like pansies protected by the tooth-fairy. We stand tall and confront our own basis of reality. We maintain our honor by ensuring that our own oath is actually worth something besides an at-ta-boy.

The decision to join the military is totally voluntary in the US. And its a serious matter. The later decision to abandon his oath was, as well. But, it jeopardized others within his own unit. It could have cost others their lives.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-17   1:37:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: buckeroo, Ferret Mike, Zipporah, christine (#58)

The man contradicted his own oath.

One cannot be honor bound to commit immoral acts. Few who took that oath ever anticipated the evil of these blood soaked neocons.

No oath can be invoked to obscure the fact that the killing of non combatants is murder. No order to do so can be lawfully enforced.

And, the logical place for an honest man in a corrupt system IS IN JAIL!

Did you disagree with the Nuremberg findings that "I WAS JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS" was not an excuse?

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-10-17   2:36:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: HOUNDDAWG (#60)

"And, the logical place for an honest man in a corrupt system IS IN JAIL!"

Well said, great post.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-17   7:12:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Ferret Mike, buckaroo, christine, Zipporah, Angel Spawn, rowdee, Diana, robin (#62)

Well said, great post.

Thank you.

Actually, you said it better than I could.

I believe that many Vietnam era vets feel the same and would have the courage to refuse and the morals to understand why.

But, sadly, the military is now the JOB CORPS, and as Jefferson said, "Literacy is not a luxury, it is a moral condition."

As the standards for enlistment fall ever lower we are arming up less educated (and less moral) individuals. It's no coincidence that for the most part the principled refuseniks are officers, and the AWOLers are just scared kids who don't want to get their brains shot partially away and end up drooling in playpens.

The former understand the moral bankruptcy of this bloody imperialist folly, the latter just know that it isn't for the preservation of the Merken Way.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-10-17   9:43:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: HOUNDDAWG, buckeroo (#63)

again, well said. as i have told buckeroo before, it takes a whole lot more courage to resist this evil once one comes to understand it than it does to go along--mistaken oath to the devil be damned.

christine  posted on  2006-10-17   10:23:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: christine, Ferret Mike (#66)

again, well said. as i have told buckeroo before, it takes a whole lot more courage to resist this evil once one comes to understand it than it does to go along--mistaken oath to the devil be damned.

Absolutely! (and thank you, BTW)

I remember reading about a young Mennonite soldier in The Great War who was sent to Leavenworth and dribbled like a basketball by those sadistic marine guards. (in the early 20th century the govt was still not convinced of the Mennonite resolve to resist going under arms, and this unfortunate man was to be an example to his brethren)

They chained him with his arms over his head standing in icey water in the winter, and he quite naturally sickened and died.

When his mother came to KS to claim his remains he had already been buried in his uniform.

Not only do those sadists not understand religious or moral objections, but, they are bound by nothing but loyalty to their paychecks and fear of their own medicine, and the systematic torture/murder of refuseniks doesn't cost them a single wink at night.

We've heard various stories about lawyers and even a chaplain in GITMO running afoul of BushCo's little harpies.

But, have you ever heard of an instructor at WHINSEC (formerly the SCHOOL OF THE AMERICAS) refusing to teach the finer points of connecting battery chargers to genitalia?

There is no shortage of sadists willing to teach banana republicans how to instill sheer terror in raggedy dirt farmers.

They'd have us believe that pure evil was represented by Christian Szell (as played by "Sir Laurence" in MARATHON MAN-he was allegedly based on Dr. Josef Mengele) but, in fact neither the Nazis nor the Israelis can teach Americans a goddam thing about the subject. (anymore-we studied with their experts once. But, as always our boys proved to be most apt pupils, and....)

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-10-17   10:59:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: HOUNDDAWG (#70)

Young man, you're on a real roll this morning......don't stop. Not ever. The truth may be painful at times, but it is what sets us free.

rowdee  posted on  2006-10-17   11:40:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: rowdee, HOUNDDAWG (#71)

Young man, you're on a real roll this morning

a man of substance (but i'm not pointing him out ;)

christine  posted on  2006-10-18   23:44:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: christine, HOUNDDAWG (#84)

a man of substance (but i'm not pointing him out ;)

Yeah....lets not discuss the substance :)

rowdee  posted on  2006-10-19   0:19:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: rowdee (#91)

lets not discuss the substance

A man/woman giving their oath ( for any reason, signing a check, providing a service as fixing an automobile, ensuring a family unit, a pledge towards their own military unit engaged in battle ) and not delivering their best efforts has no substance to themselves nor society at large.

Is your opinion nothing more than the removal of an oath so as to lower the bar upon honor?

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-19   0:43:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 95.

#97. To: buckeroo (#95)

Is your opinion nothing more than the removal of an oath so as to lower the bar upon honor?

Huh? Whew....think I'll go back to playing a card game.....have a good evening, buckeroo. Nite...

rowdee  posted on  2006-10-19 00:51:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: buckeroo, Ferret Mike (#95)

Is your opinion nothing more than the removal of an oath so as to lower the bar upon honor?

Give it up already. You are burying discussion threads of real importance regarding the Military Commissions Act.

Based on what our President just signed into codefied law, Buckeroo is right. End of story. The Geneva Conventions are toast. No one, including soldiers, have any right whatsoever to question anything the President requires of GI's of ordinary Joes on the street. America is under the rule of the President and the Secty of Defense. And if you think McNamara, Cohen, and RumDum sucked, wait until you get a load of Joseph Lieberman and Hadassah, his wife as back seat driver. And if you have any Democrat voting friends in Connecticut,I suggest you contact them tout de suite so they cast their vote against Joe, anyone but Joe. You don't need to believe in conspiracy theories to recognize/identify the train wreck that awaits America if Joe gets to be Secty of Defense. Over and out.

scrapper2  posted on  2006-10-19 00:58:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: buckeroo (#95)

"Is your opinion nothing more than the removal of an oath so as to lower the bar upon honor?"

Whether a soldier has honor lives or dies upon his conduct on the battlefield. If he violates the international law we are signed onto to capriciously follow bad orders asking him to do so, he has no honor at all. If he was dumb enough to not be able to ethically judge his conduct correctly, he can use that in mitigation and extenuation of the penalties, but he still would be violating international law.

Violating the Geneva Accords would be a violation of his oath of enlistment, not the disloyal of bad orders.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-19 01:00:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 95.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]