[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: THE WOMAN'S VOTE IN NOVEMBER "In the first place, it is to be remembered, that the general government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws: its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects, which concern all the members of the republic, but which are not to be attained by the separate provisions of any." James Madison, Federalist No. 14, November 30, 1787, 4th President of these united States of America and "Father of the Constitution" With the pretend election getting close, the old worn out chant from female politicians about "women's issues" once again dominates their campaigns, web sites and commercials. Out comes the same toxic rhetoric about "empowering women" and "our democracy." The feminization of Congress and our state legislatures is destroying constitutional government, running America into oceans of unpayable debt and breeding generations of helpless women, whining for mother government to take care of them and their every need. The U.S. Constitution, specifically Article 1, Section 8, succinctly enumerates the only areas where Congress can legislate. There are no "women's issues" in that section of the Constitution. That eliminates education, altering the Second Amendment, after school programs, studies for breast feeding, child care and a thousand other areas where women in elected office have been unconstitutionally introducing and passing bills for decades. No doubt this will bring a collective gasp from influential women like Oprah, First Lady of California, Maria Shriver Schwarzenegger and others. However, these so called "women's role models" are extremely wealthy and do not live in the same economic world as all the average, ordinary women out there struggling to make ends meet who are being manipulated into believing they are somehow entitled to certain goods or services NOT authorized by the U.S. Constitution. Should women serve in Congress and state legislatures? Yes, but ONLY if they have a full education on the historical founding of this republic, the Constitution and the restrictions it places on them as lawmakers. They also need to leave their hormones and maternal instincts at home. There isn't a single female member of Congress who doesn't daily violate her oath of office because she has no concept or understanding of constitutional government. They legislate for "the sisterhood." Nancy Levant recently wrote a superb column on the facilitators of this warped thought process: "At the very top of my list of despicable leadership is the political feminist lobbying groups and organizations. Their use of dialectic manipulations of American women is diabolical. They polluted the very essence of liberation for women. For women to be liberated by feminism, they have to agree with all aspects and agendas of feminist doctrine and missions. If you disagree with them, you are believed to be flawed and damaged, ignorant, and enslaved." Let me give you just one example of a woman in Congress who wouldn't know the U.S. Constitution if it were read to her line by line: Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y. Tragically, in 1993, her husband and son were shot on a commuter train by someone with a gun who went over the edge. Her husband died. Of course this is a terrible, terrible thing to happen in anyone's life. However, McCarthy then ran for Congress on an anti-Second Amendment platform. Since her election (she's in her fifth term), McCarthy has used her personal tragedy to continue her assault on my Second Amendment rights. Not only is she in violation of the law (see here), she is a foolish biddy out to cripple women in their ability to be free and independent. Other examples are women who have come from a disadvantaged background who get up in front of struggling women voters and promise all those "soccer moms" and the poor that mother government will look after their needs. These women then get elected, and the first thing they do is play mommy by introducing legislation that is unconstitutional and breeds women into dependence upon "mother government." Gus Hall, long time head of the Communist Party USA, said back in a 1996 interview with the Cleveland Plain-Dealer: "Socialism in America will come through the ballot box." He was right, and the feminization of American politics has hastened the process and it will continue unless the women of this country recognize the trap and vote out every female in Congress next month - especially Marxist Hillary Clinton. Women getting elected by promising to legislate "women's issues" has been a disaster both from an economic standpoint and socially destructive. By promising all these married and single working mothers everything from free child care, after-school programs, free medical and HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars in social welfare programs, these hormone-driven legislators are breeding generations of women who are not being "empowered"; they are being turned into whining, gimmee-gimmee females, helpless in taking care of themselves, never mind the children they are birthing. Each time I write these words, I get tons of e-mail from women who give me their life story of hardship and how they wouldn't have made it except for government hand outs. Well, life is tough, no doubt about it, but it's really about life's choices and bad choices by an individual and no matter how painful they might be to deal with, it still does not not justify violating the supreme law of the land. These mothers and grandmothers are coming into public office and allowing their hormones and backgrounds to influence them into introducing and voting for unlawful legislation, and the gutless men in Congress are letting them get away with it because they also want the "women's vote" in November. Instead of standing strong and for the law of the land, these sissy men stand up at women's groups and promise to break the law for their vote. It makes me puke to watch all these "empowered" women gush about "our democracy" while knowing nothing about our legal form of government or how it's supposed to operate. Decades ago, Ezra Taft Benson wrote an outstanding booklet titled "The Proper Role of Government." It's most unfortunate the last generation of America's school children have never had any exposure to this scholarly writing, but the schools are making sure your child is getting a massive dose of indoctrination into the world of sexual deviancy (sodomite and lesbian propaganda). As for a real "empowered woman," that perfectly describes a friend of mine. While Teri can shoot better than me (which I don't hold against her), is a martial arts expert while still being feminine and attractive, she would never ask you to pay for her obligations in life via unconstitutional legislation. In other words, Teri is truly empowered because she is the master of her own destiny. "Empowering women" is a stupid term that does just the opposite. I see these feminists and dependent women all the time in my travels. They radiate hatred for men and at the same time, hate themselves as women. They work real hard at trying to change Mother Nature, and it's been a dismal failure. Life is a tough road, no doubt about it. But, feminizing government is a failed disaster and has done nothing except promote laziness and dependency in women who look up to these female lawbreakers. One fact that Marxists like Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and Diane Feinstein neglect to tell the women of this country is that all these unconstitutional give a-ways they promote and vote for aren't free. (Lest people forget, Karl Marx was a communist.) These "empowered women" are actually burying their own children and grand babies into a live of indentured servitude. Did Oprah or Rosie tell you there is NO money in the U.S. Treasury and that all these unlawful expenditures have to be borrowed? Of course not. Did these role models ever take the time to explain to these fledgling "empowered women" that all those taxes they pay for unconstitutional "social programs" actually go towards enriching foreign dictators, funding political parties in foreign countries and providing free dental work for people in foreign countries - all against the law of the land? Of course not. Telling women the facts would take away their power over these women. The truth is the duped women in this country who enrich the coffers of these so called role models who know nothing about our constitutional republic are being led down the merry path of slavery dressed up as "women's issues." Women who listen to all this drivel need to take the time to understand that it is actually Congress and their state legislatures that have paved the way for their ever deepending financial straits in more and more taxation. I will also add the viciousness of the feminist movement has been killing this republic for decades; Carey Roberts always defines it so well in his columns. Every woman currently serving in the U.S. Congress needs to be thrown out of office in 2006 because they are all, without exception, guilty of violating their oath of office. Save the nasty-mail, please. My next column will be on voting out the sissy men in Congress. Women in this country need to take a hard look at their own behavior and choices in life before asking for someone else to fund their mistakes. I know this is a complete juxtaposition of the toxic message that has been pounded into women's heads for decades, but it is the raw truth. Women who think government is there to provide for their needs and replace a husband are only enslaving themselves and their children, and are binding themselves to a lifetime of debt and a slave mentality instead of being independent and self-reliant.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
#24. To: Buzzard (#0)
Women shouldn't be allowed to vote. 90% of them have only the vaguest understanding of what "reason" means. That's the reason they traditionally have been denied the vote.
Women shouldn't be allowed to vote. 90% of them have only the vaguest understanding of what "reason" means. That's the reason they traditionally have been denied the vote. Say what?? These are the most assinine remarks I've heard in a long time.. well since .. 'you want to spend the night in heaven'.. gad..which sex doesnt have the vaguest understanding of what 'reason' is?? please..
#30. To: Zipporah (#25)
Isn't that a quote from the Goldhag?
Varium et mutabile semper femina. :P
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||