See other Editorial Articles
Title: America's Media-Driven Descent Into Depravity
Source:
SaveTheMales.ca
URL Source: http://savethemales.ca/
Published: Oct 21, 2006
Author: Henry Makow, Ph.D.
Post Date: 2006-10-22 18:38:25 by Red Jones
Keywords: None
Views: 598
Comments: 39
America's Media-Driven Descent Into Depravity By Henry Makow Ph.D. October 21, 2006 By Henry Makow Ph.D. "...We aspire to corrupt in order to govern… We have taken from the people all the gods of heaven and earth, which had their homage. We have torn from them their religious faith, their faith in monarchy, their honesty and their family virtues…" (Giuseppe Mazzini, 1805-1872, Revolutionary, Founder of Italian Freemasonry and the Mafia) Many prime time TV programmes today would have been considered obscene just 20 years ago. They present outrageous and shocking behavior as if it were normal and this creates cognitive dissonance. Thus they condition us to accept depravity as the new societal norm. Thursday at 8p.m. I sat down with my wife to watch one of her favorite shows, NBC's "My Name is Earl" starring Jason Lee. My wife likes this show because it deals with morality or "karma." The premise is that Earl has a list of people he has wronged and believes he will be rewarded if he makes it right with each one. Thursday's episode may have been a departure but what a jaw-dropping one! It was a sneak attack in what Senator Jesse Helms called the "systematic psychological warfare" the Eastern Establishment is waging against the American people. Wrongdoing: Earl had sexual intercourse with the mother of his good friend Ralph. Flashback: He and Ralph have a band. One night after a gig they were partying at Ralph's house with some female groupies. Ralph's mother served rice crispy squares. Everyone else wore nothing but their underwear. Eventually the group paired off to have sex. (The new party norm?) However Earl's partner had passed out. Not to worry. Ralph's mother, a woman in her fifties, came on to Earl and he was too drunk to resist. Monkey see; monkey do. Call me old fashioned but this portrayal degrades our image of motherhood and family, something the Illuminati-owned mass media want to happen. (The Illuminati is the top rung of Freemasonry. ) When motherhood is degraded, we are all degraded. Readers inform me that often recurring themes on prime time TV are incest, intergenerational and gay-lesbian sex and even bestiality. Ralph resolves to kill Earl and gives his friend 12 hours to settle his affairs. Earl appeals to Ralph's mother. Sure she'll speak to her son; Ralph will do anything for her but, in return, Earl will have to provide regular stud service. Please do not mistake this for a porn flick. This is prime-time TV watched by children and their parents. Resigned to his fate, Earl visits his parents to say goodbye. To his surprise, he finds Ralph alone with his mother. Ralph is wearing nothing but a bathrobe. (He spilled some tomato juice on his pants.) Ralph has determined that he can avoid killing Earl by having sex with Earl's mother. When Earl's mother bends over to get something, Ralph makes suggestive sex doggy-style gestures. Earl apparently is so morally compromised he cannot intervene.(Similarly, I wonder if anyone expressed their disgust to NBC.) Off camera, Ralph gropes Earl's mother's breasts. Flustered she comes rushing out and leaves the house. Ralph describes how he came up behind her and grabbed them in an "under over" action. Ralph now determines that Earl can live if he marries his mother. The wedding takes place and Earl is expected to consummate the marriage. Not being drunk he doesn’t want to. The tables have turned. Now Ralph is threatening to kill Earl if he doesn't have sex with his mother. At this point I switched channels. You can see an excerpt from this episode at the show's NBC website. Listen carefully and you'll hear Ralph say to Earl, "Don’t touch me with the hand with which you fondled my mother." When a man wants to really offend and insult another, this is what he says he'll do. Earl has broken a visceral human taboo yet the show treats it as if Earl had broken a favorite fishing rod. As Luciferians, the Illuminati wish to break all natural and spiritual taboos in the name of "freedom" and "rebellion," no matter how destructive and dysfunctional this is. "Do what thou wilt," is their motto. Last week, President Bush apparently was granted power to suspend Habeas Corpus and throw anyone he disliked into jail. There is evidence he was complicit in 9-11. Now you know why Americans are paralysed to act. Like Earl, we are so morally compromised we cannot defend Mother Liberty. America is in the grip of a satanic sex cult that "corrupts in order to govern." Unconsciously we have been inducted into this cult.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.
#4. To: Red Jones, robin, All (#0)
There is most certainly an effort to break down the morality of this country with the promotion of shows/entertainment that appeal to the baser instincts and twists and distorts norms of behavior. People watch this stuff and then after a while it becomes normal and acceptable to the viewer. I notice too there is a new show called Dexter which has been heavily adverstized. I've never seen it but it appears to glamorize a serial killer of women. Earlier I was thinking about the recent attempts to degrade women with countless articles blaming them for all of societies ills, while porn is everywhere, and wondered what the true motive is for all this. They are going out of their way to attempt to break down the natural protective instinct men have for women, that much is obvious. Perhaps it's so no one will complain when our nation's child- bearing age women are sent off to combat in large numbers, or perhaps it's being done so that when multitudes of women are sent off to camps there will be less complaints, after all the men left behind will still have their porn.
Diana, you seem to think that "they" are victimizing women by showing women degraded in violent movies and in porn and that women are powerless, helpless to stop "them." Who do you think stars in TV serials - just men and robots with female likeness? Who do you think make their livelihood from starring in porn movies - just men and computer generated female co-stars? Who do you think watches TV along side their significent male others - dogs and cats? Who do you think are listed as co-producers for programs like Law and Order: SVU and Criminal Minds. My name is Earl ( the program under discussion for its vulgarity) is co- produced by Barbie Feldman Adler,for heaven's sake! Women are equally at fault as men for producing, starring, and consuming this post modern crap. As for "child bearing" women being sent into combat - well,golly gee, I guess you have not received the memo that says that mainstream women are not having children much these days - oh there's the occasional one that slips through the birth control or abortion efforts, I'll grant you that. Women are not about nurturing or families anymore. Women are about self-fullfillment, sex for fun not procreation, careers come first - and if it were not for immigration both legal and illegal, America would not be "replacing" itself per birth rates except for the black and Hispanic sectors of our society. So you darn rights, affirmative action girlie girls who want to have all the advantages of "equality" ( with a good deal of help for the next 25 years from Supreme Court enforced quotas)but no disadvantages ( eeek - like risk and possible death???)should get their promotion seeking military butts into combat areneas like boys, whom they argue they are equal to and deserve equal pay and opportunity. Since women are no longer family unit builders but instead are self fullfillers, then I see no need for society in general or men in particular to feel a need to protect them. Women have gotten what they want - they are considered equal and therefore they are equally disposable on the front lines of our fraudulent wars. They did not vote out the war mongers when they had a chance either. Soccer moms were a big help to the chickenhawks, lest you forget - so their sisters can reap what these foolish soccer moms (along with their equally foolish hubbies) have sown.
Right, right, right, RIGHT, right. I have heard all that before, "it's the fault of ALL women because A FEW of them star in porn films, take naked pictures of themselves, so all women are guilty." It sounds to me that you are passed being brainwashed, so there is no point in trying to reason. You are aware, aren't you, that there have always been prostitutes from the beginning of time, but in normal societies not all women are blamed for their existence. You are making broad generalizations regarding women, each woman is an individual and all have different characters, personalities and opinions, and the same is true of men. However there is a collective effort at work to reduce the morals and concerns of those in our society, and sadly I see it is working all too well.
Diana, I suggest you re-read your original post to which I replied. You are the one who is brainwashed into thinking women are helpless little bitty creatures who have been degraded by the media and by degrading women the family unit is being assaulted and women will soon be marched off to war, to boot. Women have been full partners in their own degradation. Women make many of the consumer decisions in a family - if women wanted to put anti-women media types out of business, women could do so very quickly and easily by not buying advertisers' products and by turning off the family television sets every night when they are at home and also by making big squawks to politicians and the FCC. Women motherhood and apple pie are still a sacred subject to most politicians and their appointees so women's backlash would have lots of psychological leverage. If you think I am ranting to you, it's because I'm weary of reading your women as victims, please don't send us into combat posts. Your post in the Devvy thread had a familiar ring to what you claim in this thread. And please don't assume I am an embittered male chauvanist...
Well you sound like one, but it's your right to feel the way you do. I am just curious to know why you feel so strongly as you do. When I left the continental US some years ago, this new trend of female-bashing was not yet present. I noticed it somewhat recently, and to read things such as "feminists are feminizing the US" is just crazy to me as there is nothing feminine about feminists whatsoever, they have more in common with men than with women, and a good number of them are lesbians. They do not represent the typical woman at all. It's not so much "women are victims" that is disturbing to me as are these new phrases and ideas that I am encountering recently blaming women for so many of the ills in society. The Devvy article said as much, using many derogatory terms. I found her article to be a lose-lose situation for women in general as she was putting down the feminists who want women to be independant from men, and at the same time was putting down women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. This is just all very new to me and perplexing. I do remember shortly before moving here listening to Rush Limbaugh on the radio going on about "soccor moms" and making a big fuss over a case where some woman charged a man with sexual harrassment, and I thought to myself that Rush Limbaugh is picking on women today. How this attitude seems to have caught on since then! Our whole society is being exposed to bad elements, and I see it as a virus of evil (no I'm not a fundie Christian), as it spreads, people begin to hate and fear where before they had a healthy outlook and were more content. I am certainly no man-hater, I've always gotten along very well with men, have no grudges against them, but to see all these odd articles slamming women, blaming them for affirmative action even, this is just all very new and strange (and sad) to me.
but to see all these odd articles slamming women, blaming them for affirmative action even, this is just all very new and strange (and sad) to me. Diana, I'll leave it to your imagination as to the reason why I can speak so fearlessly and why I have the confidence to touch on untouchable aspects of womanhood the way I do. I too have lived and travelled abroad ( though not to Israel)and I can say without a doubt there are no other women who can be as obnoxious and pushy and unfeminine as a goodly number of the American women with whom I have interacted in school and in business. As for women being blamed for affirmative action ...well duh, there was a feminine hand in the Supreme Court decision - and I did not see too many women's organizations petitioning the Supreme Court to end affirmative action. The justice who had the deciding vote and who wrote the majority opinion was a woman - Sandra Day O'Connor. While not all the blame can be placed on women (I think that your paranoia is just that)let's face it, women certainly benefited from the end result. Did you know that currently 56% of college students are women and men are at highest risk for dropping out at high school? There was no need for QUOTAS for women to continue the next 25 years and in fact the opposite was true - the playing field is so anti-males it's worrisome for society's long term well being. And with regards to media productions involving gratuitous sex and violence against women, check out the Academy and Emmy Awards to find out what actresses are wearing that night and what roles they are playing by and large. Look in department stores and try to find pants that are not belly button showing or T-shirts that do not show every nipple line. What does that tell you - it says women and their daughters are supporting a fashion industry that clothes them to look like sluts. That's the "in" look these days. The media is merely giving American society (that is comprised of 50% women fyi) what society wants and demands and enjoys. Consider what female politicians take pride in fighting for these days in America - even in today's article about powerful Jewish female politicians - women are taking pride in abortion rights - that is what defines the women's cause these days! And it's not lesbians who are prideful of "a woman's right to choose" - it's mainstream married women like Hilary Clinton and grandmothers like Nancy Pelosi. Now adays mothers' main choice with raising their daughters is what age to give them birth control pills. Girls and their Moms just want to have fun, yes? Wake up and smell the coffee - women are not victims in America - they are masters of their own fate and position in society! And face up to the fact that women are the family unit cornerstone of today's society, and that's by their own choice, I might add. Diana, men are not very complicated creatures ( no offense to 4um men)in their goals for life. Women are the complicated gender and it's modern day women's screwed up life's goals that has changed and not to benefit the family unit or society.
Regarding the single mother issue, in most cases the mothers don't want to be single. Too often teenage girls will go out and get drunk and have sex with a boy, or they go out with a guy and end up pregnant, and upon hearing that news in most cases the guy flees. I had a friend in Houston who was married and they had 2 girls, and her husband decided he didn't want to work anymore. Instead of at least staying home with the kids when she went to work, he spent his days in strip clubs. My friend was exhausted and he finally left, then he went to Dallas so he could move in with his parents. He didn't want to get a job because he didn't want to pay child support, and my friend didn't have money to get a lawyer, though a lawyer couldn't have done anything in that case anyway since her ex had no job. You can blame her for making a poor choice in whom she married, but he could have lived up to his role as husband and father. There are too many cases where a female ends up pregnant, and then finds herself alone raising kids. It's tough and exhausting and they really don't like it. You say that the media mirrors society, I see it as the other way around. People are taught to expect instant gratification, for instance many marriages which could be saved are breaking up. Those girls who are dressing in slut styles are doing so because their fashion magazines and favorite singers send the message that boys will like them better if they dress that way, and teenagers of either sex don't have much sense. They certainly don't have the capacity to make sound judgments, it's more important for them to bow to peer-pressure. In many cases the mothers/parents probably hate it but it's too easy for kids to sneak over to friends' houses and borrow clothes, or look at bad things on the internet. I don't think any of this is happening by chance or accident, it's a perfect setup to roll in a new communist-style America. I get the sense you live in the Northeast? I say that because I find it almost comical the idea that Hillary Clinton would be considered mainstream, but in places like NY or MA that would not be too far- fetched an idea, as those areas tend to be more militant. Hillary is a battle- axe, not a good role model to women any more than the other militant feminists are. It's those types who are intent on destroying the family unit, whether they are men or women. It has much more to do with idealogy rather than sex. Simply stated, I do believe our society is in a state of decay, which has been skillfully planned out for some time now.
diana: Regarding the single mother issue, in most cases the mothers don't want to be single You say that the media mirrors society, I see it as the other way around. People are taught to expect instant gratification, I don't think any of this is happening by chance or accident, it's a perfect setup to roll in a new communist-style America. I say that because I find it almost comical the idea that Hillary Clinton would be considered mainstream... Simply stated, I do believe our society is in a state of decay, which has been skillfully planned out for some time now. Diana...sorry I made a typo error...I meant to say that women are NOT the family unit cornerstone of today's society and it's by their own choice...I'm terribly sorry because I was typing so quickly with great passion. Anyways, I'm sorry to hear about your friend who married a deadbeat and was away from the family home trying to earn a wage to support her family. Not all women are Wall Street lawyers farming out their children to nannies nor are all women Brittany Spears promiscuous airheads. I'll meet you half way - yes, media does a lot of shaping of public attitudes to sex, violence, and social decadence. BUT I'd also say that women should be the bedrock of family values but unfortunately, they, like their gadfly male counterparts, have allowed themselves to be seduced by the temptation of self fullfillment. Women have gone against their nurturing instincts to grab money, promotions, and serial sexual relationships for fun, all that is anti-family, just self-serving values. I will grant you that there is something sick about American media - we export our values world wide, but it's mainly us who succum - look at Asian and Indian families who immigrate here - they keep their nuclear and extended family units alive and well. It's only us born and raised Americans who have the high divorce rates, the high abortion rates, the high alcohol and drug abuse rates. It's very sad. My point about combat still stands - a useless war is a useless war - and if none of us are willing to cry out that the emperor and his congressional lap dogs wear no clothes, then young women as well as young men should be equally disposable until we reach a point where all of us stand up and say this empire building, these foreign wars are wrong and are very anti-American and deadly to American girls and boys.
The reason I'm against women in combat is because they are not cut out for fighting, they lack the upper body strength and the fearlessness necessary for combat. Granted there are some rather tough women who could make it physically and emtionally but for the most part it's not in the nature of women to fight, they are designed to raise children and to nurture. Too if women are sent to war, who will have the babies? As everyone knows men are capable of making many women pregnant, but women only produce one egg a month to be fertilized. So it's unwise IMO biologically to send the childbearing aged women into war. If I were in charge and wanted to lose a war, the first thing I would do would be to send women into combat! I don't like this war either, I wish everyone could come home.
i enjoyed reading both of your points of view. nice dialog, girls. ;)
#30. To: christine (#27)
This discussion thread has 154 views and only 29 posts - in the main from Diana and myself - so it would appear that more than you, christine, are enjoying reading through the back and forth debate, but most are too timid to venture into the fray of this battle of words, yes?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestMonkey see; monkey do. Call me old fashioned but this portrayal degrades our image of motherhood and family, something the Illuminati-owned mass media want to happen. (The Illuminati is the top rung of Freemasonry. ) When motherhood is degraded, we are all degraded.
#12. To: Diana (#4)
There is most certainly an effort to break down the morality of this country with the promotion of shows/entertainment that appeal to the baser instincts and twists and distorts norms of behavior. People watch this stuff and then after a while it becomes normal and acceptable to the viewer...Earlier I was thinking about the recent attempts to degrade women with countless articles blaming them for all of societies ills, while porn is everywhere, and wondered what the true motive is for all this. They are going out of their way to attempt to break down the natural protective instinct men have for women, that much is obvious. Perhaps it's so no one will complain when our nation's child- bearing age women are sent off to combat in large numbers, or perhaps it's being done so that when multitudes of women are sent off to camps there will be less complaints, after all the men left behind will still have their porn.
#15. To: scrapper2 (#12)
Women are equally at fault as men for producing, starring, and consuming this post modern crap.
#20. To: Diana (#15)
It sounds to me that you are passed being brainwashed, so there is no point in trying to reason. You are making broad generalizations regarding women, each woman is an individual and all have different characters, personalities and opinions, and the same is true of men. However there is a collective effort at work to reduce the morals and concerns of those in our society, and sadly I see it is working all too well.
#21. To: scrapper2 (#20)
And please don't assume I am an embittered male chauvanist...
#22. To: Diana (#21)
Well you sound like one, but it's your right to feel the way you do. I am just curious to know why you feel so strongly as you do.
#23. To: scrapper2 (#22)
And face up to the fact that women are the family unit cornerstone of today's society, and that's by their own choice, I might add.
#25. To: Diana (#23)
scrapper2: And face up to the fact that women are the family unit cornerstone of today's society, and that's by their own choice, I might add.
#26. To: scrapper2 (#25)
#27. To: Diana, scrapper2 (#26)
Replies to Comment # 27. i enjoyed reading both of your points of view.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.