See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Aaron Russo, Gore Vidal on Alex Jones TODAY
Source:
Alex Jones
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com
Published: Oct 23, 2006
Author: Alex Jones
Post Date: 2006-10-23 12:33:31 by who knows what evil
Keywords: 9/11, taxes, constitution
Views: 232
Comments: 20
Just heard in the first few minutes of today's 'Alex Jones' show that he will interviewing Gore Vidal in the second hour and AARON RUSSO (America: From Freedom to Fascism) in the third hour. He also announced that 'Terrorstorm' WILL be available at Barnes and Noble AND Amazon as of October 31st. The movie IS listed at the websites of both companies. Breakout?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: robin, Kamala, christine (#0)
Can you 'ping' the appropriate parties to this thread? Thank you!
Gore Vidal? Really? It will be interesting to hear this. Vidal has come close to the edge of the official parameter of debate on 9/11 and almost stepped off- but not quite. He remains, as far as I know, as an acceptor of the "19 Hi-jacker" conspiracy theory.
Aaron was on ThePowerHour this morning, did you hear him?
No, but I am listening to Jones right now, and will be around for the whole thing. How did Russo do on TPH?
That's why I am interested in hearing this interview...
Gore Vidal on NOW.
So far- skirting it- Bush stole the elections talk- ramping up of the police state- bankruptcy of the country . . . but no 9/11 (unless I missed them talking about it in the first minute.)
"Let it happen on purpose". That is the first step one takes when emerging from the lies of 9/11. That is definetly off the reservation. Not as far as I would like- but he took a new step.
Considering the source; I believe that to be a rather significant step. I thought his comment on "US bankruptcy in the next two years" was quite relevant, as well.
Me too.
H. R. 6166 = "invasion of Poland". This is a great interview...I might have to purchase a copy for download.
Well I've been on that first step since very early on and I've never moved past it. I understand the reasons people say that controlled demolition were used. And the question is certainly understandable in light of the way the buildings (3) fell. I have a very hard time believing, however, that some people (even a very few) could wire that whole building for controlled demolition (it would take a lot of explosives) and not have anyone notice. I should think it would take weeks for a small team to do it. If the team was large enough to wire a building quickly they would be very noticeable. What is your answer to this point?
great interview with Aaron. i'm very impressed with him.
Further to my question J.L. Hudson Department Store Click Here to watch the video (Windows Media, Real, or Quicktime 6 Player) With the press of a button at 5:47 PM on October 24, 1998, Detroit Mayor Dennis Archer dropped the J.L. Hudson Department Store from his city’s skyline and into the history books and record books. Hudson’s was the tallest department store in the country and was second in square footage only to Macy’s anchor Store in New York. It dominated the retail market in the city through the 1970’s before closing its doors in 1983. The store was built in 12 separate stages, the first in 1911 and the last in 1946. The complex had two retail basements and 23 above grade retail floors, including mezzanines. Two additional basements and six upper stories in a tower, provided storage and mechanical support for the 2.2 million square foot building. In all there were 33 levels in the structure. ... "CDI’s 12 person loading crew took twenty four days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI’s implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequence and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lb of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition." http://www.controlled-demolition.com/default.asp?reqLocId=7&reqItemId=20030225133807
Loopy, have you watched 911 Mysteries: Demolitions? I believe the information presented in that will answer some of your questions-- at least there is a very plausible scenario for how and when the *prep* work may have been done.
People did notice unusual work going on at the towers. Check out the links from this site.
People DID notice. On some of the floors in the period before the demolition men were "re-wiring" for the Internet. No legitimate firm or employer has stepped forward since tenants started to compare notes to show work orders or contracts for this work. People heard heavy equipment and allot of activity on vacant floors. Some of it so loud and pervasive it was starting. Also in the weeks before the demolition tenants would come to work and find gritty dust on everything. Dust that had never been there before. People are now realizing there was strange activities in the weeks before the white elephants were destroyed because it would have cost hundreds of millions to refurbish them, they never were going to have enough occupants, and most importantly, because the Neo Cons in control of the government needed a false flag operation to change the mood of the country to make a friendlier climate for war and the reduction of our rights.
Mark The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent "At temperatures above 800º C structural steel loses 90 percent of its strength. Yet even when steel structures are heated to those temperatures, they never disintegrate into piles of rubble, as did the Twin Towers and Building 7."— Esso-Freedom4um - 10/23/2006
Even though I saw Aaron's movie at the theatre during its limited run; I will purchase a copy of the DVD, and maybe a few others to give away at the end of December. Hell...maybe I'll just throw in a few copies of 'Terrorstorm', as well.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#2. To: who knows what evil (#0)
#3. To: who knows what evil (#0)
#4. To: christine (#3)
Aaron was on ThePowerHour this morning, did you hear him?
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#5. To: Burkeman1 (#2)
Gore Vidal? Really? It will be interesting to hear this. Vidal has come close to the edge of the official parameter of debate on 9/11 and almost stepped off- but not quite. He remains, as far as I know, as an acceptor of the "19 Hi-jacker" conspiracy theory.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#6. To: Burkeman1 (#2)
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#7. To: who knows what evil, *9-11* (#0)
#8. To: who knows what evil (#6)
#9. To: who knows what evil (#6)
#10. To: Burkeman1 (#9)
Not as far as I would like- but he took a new step.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#11. To: who knows what evil (#10)
I believe that to be a rather significant step.
#12. To: Burkeman1 (#11)
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#13. To: Burkeman1 (#9)
#14. To: who knows what evil, all (#6)
#15. To: Burkeman1 (#11)
#16. To: Loopy, Kamala (#13)
#17. To: Loopy (#15)
#18. To: Loopy (#13)
"I have a very hard time believing, however, that some people (even a very few) could wire that whole building for controlled demolition (it would take a lot of explosives) and not have anyone notice."
#19. To: who knows what evil, *Alex Jones* (#1)
PING!
#20. To: christine (#14)
great interview with Aaron. i'm very impressed with him.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest