[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Cash Jordan: “We’re Coming In"... Migrant Mob ENTERS ICE HQ, Get ERASED By 'Deportation Unit'
Opioids More Likely To Kill Than Car Crashes Or Suicide
The association between COVID-19 “vaccines” and cognitive decline
Democrats Sink to Near Zero in New Gallup Poll, Theyre Just Not Satisfied
She Couldn't Read Her Own Diploma: Why Public Schools Pass Students but Fail Society
Peter Schiff: Gold To $6,000 Next Year, Dollar Index To 70
Russia Just Admitted Exactly What Everyone – But Trump – Already Knew About Putin's Ukraine Plans
Sex Offenses in London by Nationality
Greater Israel Collapses: Iran the Next Target
Before Jeffrey Epstein: The FINDERS
Cyprus: The Israeli Flood Has Become A Deluge
Israel Actually Slaughtered Their Own People On Oct 7th Says Israeli Newspaper w/ Max Blumenthal
UK Council Offers Emotional Support To Staff "Discomforted" By Seeing The National Flag
Inside the Underground City Where 700 Trucks Come and Go Every Day
Fentanyl Involved In 70% Of US Drug Overdose Deaths
Iran's New Missiles. Short Version
Obama Can't Bear This. Kash Patel Exposes Dead Chef Revelation. Obama’s Legacy DESTROYED!
Triple-Digit Silver Imminent? Critical Mineral, Backwardation & Remonetization | Mike Maloney
Israel Sees Sykes-Picot Borders As 'Meaningless' & 'Will Go Where They Want': Trump Envoy
Bring Back Asylums: It's Time To Talk About Transgender Fatigue In America
German Political Parties (Ex-AfD) Sign 'Fairness Pact' That Prevents Criticizing Immigration
CARVING .45 CALIBER AUTOMATICS OUT OF STEEL WWII UNION SWITCH AND SIGNAL MOVIE
This surprising diabetes link could protect your brain
Putin and Xi to lay foundations for a new world order in Beijing
Cancer Natural Solutions Q&R
Is ANYONE buying this anymore? (Netanyahu)
Mt Etna in Sicily Eupting
These Soviet 4x4 Sedans Are Cooler Than You Think!
SSRIs and School Shootings, FDA Corruption, and Why Everyone on Anti-Depressants Is Totally Unhappy
St. Louis Man Who Gunned Down Police Officer Demond Taylor Is Released on $5,000 Bond
Title: Free Stater faces year in Jail for standing up to the theft of private property by the U.S. Government via the 'new Eminent Domain' standard Source: http://www.nhfree.com/ URL Source: http://www.nhfree.com/ Published: Oct 29, 2006 Author: Activist Post Date: 2006-10-29 12:19:06 by Ferret Mike Keywords: NoneViews: 332 Comments: 28
Lauren Canario Arrest http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaITPIRHJ3c NEW LONDON, Conn, Oct. 23, 2006 - After serving 31 days in prison, Free State Project member Lauren Canario of New London was ordered at yesterday's hearing to be held indefinitely pending a future trial. Canario was arrested on Sept. 22 for refusing to leave one of the properties seized in the controversial Kelo vs. New London decision, in which the Supreme Court ruled that government can take homes and give the land to private corporations. Anti-eminent-domain protestors held "Free Lauren Canario" signs at the city jail after she was arrested for sitting down in an attempt to prevent the boarding up of Fort Trumbull homes. The neighborhood was recently seized by the City of New London. She has been held for the past month pending a hearing and she is refusing to be represented by a lawyer. Protesters arrived early Monday to support Canario. But, according to Free State Project member Kat Kanning, "They told us she wouldn't be brought in until 2 p.m., so we went out until about 1:30 p.m. When we came back, it was done and no one got to see her." 10-year-old protester William asked his father, "Why would they trick us like that, Dad?" Video of last month's arrest shows two police officers dragging her away, leaving her on her knees in the street at one point, then forcing her into a police vehicle. In a Sept. 21 phone call, New London City Police Lt. Ackley claimed that Canario "victimized" him by refusing to cooperate. "I hurt my back when I had to drag her off the floor," he said. After the arrest, Judge Kevin P. McMahon ordered an evaluation of Canario's mental competence and raised her bond from $5,000 to $20,000. Recently, she was found competent to stand trial, and today she was ordered held until an unknown future trial date, sometime within the next year. The Connecticut jail system received global attention two weeks ago when Human Rights Watch censured the state, in a 20-page report, for using police attack dogs to force people from their cells. "Corrections officials in Connecticut and Iowa insist the use of attack dogs is justified because they deter prisoner misconduct and reduce staff injuries," the report said. "But 45 other states and the Federal Bureau of Prisons reject their views." Canario was also arrested during a public town meeting in September of 2005 after city officials refused to let voters into the room. Canario refused to leave the stairwell leading to the meeting room. For several weeks, she left the court, judge, and police in disarray while refusing to speak or walk as ordered. "I don't know what to do with this," Judge Hillary Strackbein said during Canario's second silent court appearance last year. Canario was eventually released and sentenced to time served. Fort Trumbull residents were forced to leave their homes after the New London Development Corporation seized the properties with the June 2005 approval of the U.S. Supreme Court. The case received global publicity at the time, and supporters across the country rallied to help, but failed to stop the city's property confiscations. The remaining families moved out of their homes in August, and the city has apparently left the abandoned neighborhood standing for the foreseeable future. Canario was on the porch of one of these properties reading a book when police arrested her. The property's ownership status was in limbo at the time; the owner had sold to the authorities but still had a transition phase ahead of him. She had his permission to be there but not that of the authorities who forced him to sell it. The Free State Project is an organization attempting to draw pro-liberty activists to New Hampshire. Canario and her husband are members who divide their time between New London, CT and Winchester, NH. Poster Comment:Stealing private property because corporations and capitalists can make more money on it for the state in taxes and revenue for business is classic corporate fascism. Without private property right respected profoundly, we are mere slaves or serfs, at best occasionally humored and tolerated by the system.
Lauren Canario Arrest http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaITPIRHJ3c
NEW LONDON, Conn, Oct. 23, 2006 - After serving 31 days in prison, Free State Project member Lauren Canario of New London was ordered at yesterday's hearing to be held indefinitely pending a future trial.
Canario was arrested on Sept. 22 for refusing to leave one of the properties seized in the controversial Kelo vs. New London decision, in which the Supreme Court ruled that government can take homes and give the land to private corporations.
Anti-eminent-domain protestors held "Free Lauren Canario" signs at the city jail after she was arrested for sitting down in an attempt to prevent the boarding up of Fort Trumbull homes. The neighborhood was recently seized by the City of New London. She has been held for the past month pending a hearing and she is refusing to be represented by a lawyer.
Protesters arrived early Monday to support Canario. But, according to Free State Project member Kat Kanning, "They told us she wouldn't be brought in until 2 p.m., so we went out until about 1:30 p.m. When we came back, it was done and no one got to see her." 10-year-old protester William asked his father, "Why would they trick us like that, Dad?"
Video of last month's arrest shows two police officers dragging her away, leaving her on her knees in the street at one point, then forcing her into a police vehicle. In a Sept. 21 phone call, New London City Police Lt. Ackley claimed that Canario "victimized" him by refusing to cooperate. "I hurt my back when I had to drag her off the floor," he said.
After the arrest, Judge Kevin P. McMahon ordered an evaluation of Canario's mental competence and raised her bond from $5,000 to $20,000. Recently, she was found competent to stand trial, and today she was ordered held until an unknown future trial date, sometime within the next year.
The Connecticut jail system received global attention two weeks ago when Human Rights Watch censured the state, in a 20-page report, for using police attack dogs to force people from their cells. "Corrections officials in Connecticut and Iowa insist the use of attack dogs is justified because they deter prisoner misconduct and reduce staff injuries," the report said. "But 45 other states and the Federal Bureau of Prisons reject their views."
Canario was also arrested during a public town meeting in September of 2005 after city officials refused to let voters into the room. Canario refused to leave the stairwell leading to the meeting room. For several weeks, she left the court, judge, and police in disarray while refusing to speak or walk as ordered. "I don't know what to do with this," Judge Hillary Strackbein said during Canario's second silent court appearance last year. Canario was eventually released and sentenced to time served.
Fort Trumbull residents were forced to leave their homes after the New London Development Corporation seized the properties with the June 2005 approval of the U.S. Supreme Court. The case received global publicity at the time, and supporters across the country rallied to help, but failed to stop the city's property confiscations. The remaining families moved out of their homes in August, and the city has apparently left the abandoned neighborhood standing for the foreseeable future.
Canario was on the porch of one of these properties reading a book when police arrested her. The property's ownership status was in limbo at the time; the owner had sold to the authorities but still had a transition phase ahead of him. She had his permission to be there but not that of the authorities who forced him to sell it.
The Free State Project is an organization attempting to draw pro-liberty activists to New Hampshire. Canario and her husband are members who divide their time between New London, CT and Winchester, NH.
Poster Comment:
Stealing private property because corporations and capitalists can make more money on it for the state in taxes and revenue for business is classic corporate fascism. Without private property right respected profoundly, we are mere slaves or serfs, at best occasionally humored and tolerated by the system.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
#12. To: Ferret Mike (#0) First, you need to lose the notion that you actually can own property. You can have a house and lands paid off, and the second you don't pay your property taxes, it can be seized, and taken from you. Your car, if your tags aren't up to date, can be towed, impounded and auctioned off. Your bank accounts, on a whim can be seized, all your assets forfeited. The idea that you as a citizen, a private individual have any rights what so ever, is an illusion. Sorry Mike, but we're all serfs and slaves. TommyTheMadArtist posted on 2006-10-29 15:39:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #16. To: TommyTheMadArtist, BTP Holdings, Lodwick, who knows what evil, ALL (#12) First, you need to lose the notion that you actually can own property. You can have a house and lands paid off, and the second you don't pay your property taxes, it can be seized, and taken from you. The second sentence is the key to the reason of truth for the first sentence.. Look at this legal scenario. If I give a note to my son to take to the grocery store that says "Greg, please let Bobbie have a gallon of milk and a loaf of bread, and I'll pay you next time I'm in the store. Joe Sixpack"; and Greg does it - legally, who is the owner of the milk and bread while Bobbie is on the way home with it? The answer (and it will hold up in any court in America) is ME, because I am the ISSUER of the note!!!! Greg is no longer the legal owner, because he agreed to take the note on it's terms. Bobbie is not the owner, he is merely the agent for me - the note issuer. When you "pay" for something, you use Federal Reserve Notes - a debt NOTE issued by the Federal Reserve... LEGALLY, you are nothing more than an agent for the Federal Reserve, and the purchase actually belongs to them!!! They will allow you use of THIER property, so long as you pay "rent" (via property taxes), but have no problem reclaiming THIER property the moment you become delinquent. innieway posted on 2006-10-29 16:00:32 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #25. To: innieway, Lodwick, who knows what evil, TommyTheMadArtist, Critter, All (#16) When you "pay" for something, you use Federal Reserve Notes - a debt NOTE issued by the Federal Reserve... LEGALLY, you are nothing more than an agent for the Federal Reserve, and the purchase actually belongs to them!!! They will allow you use of THIER property, so long as you pay "rent" (via property taxes), but have no problem reclaiming THIER property the moment you become delinquent. The gist of this is that when you use the slave owner's note to purchase (You can never "pay" for anything since there is no lawful money of account, but only discharge the debt as per "public policy".), the slave owner still holds an interest in the property. We merely have possession and use. We have a court case which states that even though a debt is discharged, it still maintains a legal character, though not of the same quality as one which has not been discharged. In other words, they can come back at you again later to collect on it. This means that unless you are the best record keeper in the world, that traffic ticket you paid 20 years ago may still come back to haunt you. I know of an instance where this happened. Luckily, this guy NEVER threw away his cancelled checks and he slam-dunked the collection outfit which was trying to scam him for a duplicate payment. There is something called the bankers "paramount lien" on which there was a book out. I never was able to pick it up. But the idea is that since all of the money in the world is debt-based, the bankers own everything by virtue of this paramount lien. BTP Holdings posted on 2006-10-29 20:25:37 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 25. There are no replies to Comment # 25. End Trace Mode for Comment # 25. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
First, you need to lose the notion that you actually can own property. You can have a house and lands paid off, and the second you don't pay your property taxes, it can be seized, and taken from you. Your car, if your tags aren't up to date, can be towed, impounded and auctioned off. Your bank accounts, on a whim can be seized, all your assets forfeited. The idea that you as a citizen, a private individual have any rights what so ever, is an illusion. Sorry Mike, but we're all serfs and slaves.
The idea that you as a citizen, a private individual have any rights what so ever, is an illusion.
Sorry Mike, but we're all serfs and slaves.
TommyTheMadArtist posted on 2006-10-29 15:39:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
First, you need to lose the notion that you actually can own property. You can have a house and lands paid off, and the second you don't pay your property taxes, it can be seized, and taken from you. The second sentence is the key to the reason of truth for the first sentence.. Look at this legal scenario. If I give a note to my son to take to the grocery store that says "Greg, please let Bobbie have a gallon of milk and a loaf of bread, and I'll pay you next time I'm in the store. Joe Sixpack"; and Greg does it - legally, who is the owner of the milk and bread while Bobbie is on the way home with it? The answer (and it will hold up in any court in America) is ME, because I am the ISSUER of the note!!!! Greg is no longer the legal owner, because he agreed to take the note on it's terms. Bobbie is not the owner, he is merely the agent for me - the note issuer. When you "pay" for something, you use Federal Reserve Notes - a debt NOTE issued by the Federal Reserve... LEGALLY, you are nothing more than an agent for the Federal Reserve, and the purchase actually belongs to them!!! They will allow you use of THIER property, so long as you pay "rent" (via property taxes), but have no problem reclaiming THIER property the moment you become delinquent.
First, you need to lose the notion that you actually can own property. You can have a house and lands paid off, and the second you don't pay your property taxes, it can be seized, and taken from you.
The second sentence is the key to the reason of truth for the first sentence..
Look at this legal scenario. If I give a note to my son to take to the grocery store that says "Greg, please let Bobbie have a gallon of milk and a loaf of bread, and I'll pay you next time I'm in the store. Joe Sixpack"; and Greg does it - legally, who is the owner of the milk and bread while Bobbie is on the way home with it? The answer (and it will hold up in any court in America) is ME, because I am the ISSUER of the note!!!! Greg is no longer the legal owner, because he agreed to take the note on it's terms. Bobbie is not the owner, he is merely the agent for me - the note issuer.
When you "pay" for something, you use Federal Reserve Notes - a debt NOTE issued by the Federal Reserve... LEGALLY, you are nothing more than an agent for the Federal Reserve, and the purchase actually belongs to them!!! They will allow you use of THIER property, so long as you pay "rent" (via property taxes), but have no problem reclaiming THIER property the moment you become delinquent.
innieway posted on 2006-10-29 16:00:32 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
When you "pay" for something, you use Federal Reserve Notes - a debt NOTE issued by the Federal Reserve... LEGALLY, you are nothing more than an agent for the Federal Reserve, and the purchase actually belongs to them!!! They will allow you use of THIER property, so long as you pay "rent" (via property taxes), but have no problem reclaiming THIER property the moment you become delinquent. The gist of this is that when you use the slave owner's note to purchase (You can never "pay" for anything since there is no lawful money of account, but only discharge the debt as per "public policy".), the slave owner still holds an interest in the property. We merely have possession and use. We have a court case which states that even though a debt is discharged, it still maintains a legal character, though not of the same quality as one which has not been discharged. In other words, they can come back at you again later to collect on it. This means that unless you are the best record keeper in the world, that traffic ticket you paid 20 years ago may still come back to haunt you. I know of an instance where this happened. Luckily, this guy NEVER threw away his cancelled checks and he slam-dunked the collection outfit which was trying to scam him for a duplicate payment. There is something called the bankers "paramount lien" on which there was a book out. I never was able to pick it up. But the idea is that since all of the money in the world is debt-based, the bankers own everything by virtue of this paramount lien.
The gist of this is that when you use the slave owner's note to purchase (You can never "pay" for anything since there is no lawful money of account, but only discharge the debt as per "public policy".), the slave owner still holds an interest in the property. We merely have possession and use.
We have a court case which states that even though a debt is discharged, it still maintains a legal character, though not of the same quality as one which has not been discharged. In other words, they can come back at you again later to collect on it.
This means that unless you are the best record keeper in the world, that traffic ticket you paid 20 years ago may still come back to haunt you. I know of an instance where this happened. Luckily, this guy NEVER threw away his cancelled checks and he slam-dunked the collection outfit which was trying to scam him for a duplicate payment.
There is something called the bankers "paramount lien" on which there was a book out. I never was able to pick it up. But the idea is that since all of the money in the world is debt-based, the bankers own everything by virtue of this paramount lien.
BTP Holdings posted on 2006-10-29 20:25:37 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There are no replies to Comment # 25.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest