"The people who shot down the plane over Pennsylvania."
Misspoken my ass! Anyone that knows anything about flight 93 knows that it did not all crash where they claim it did. It was shot down without a doubt and Rumslfeld spilled the beans inadvertently by being so careless about remembering who it was that he was addressing.
I think there are two floating theories for flight 93 within the 911 truth movement, beyond the official line that the passengers brought it down. One is that it was shot down instead of being brought down by passengers, and the other is that it was not downed at all but landed in Ohio, in which case the official crash site in PA would have to have been faked.
If it didn't crash where they said it did then that means that it crashed somewhere else. If Rumsfeld's slip is taken as an admission that it really was shot down AND the official crash site was faked, THEN it means it did not land in Ohio AND that the true crash site was somewhere other than the official one.
To me that doesn't add up. Why would they fake one crash site when a second real crash site is available? And why would they shoot a plane down for real on a day they planned to fake a crash?
I think it's highly likely that if 93 was shot down, that the offical crash site is for real, and if it was faked, then 93 landed in Ohio and wasn't shot down at all. One or the other. I've not ever heard any proposal that 93 crashed someplace other than where officially claimed.