[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

BBC Under Fire for CENSORING Gaza Medic Documentary

US is Agreement Incapable

Blow to Israeli Intelligence. taping Israelis in bathrooms

“They have 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline.”

A US federal judge has DENIED Gavin Newsom's request to stop Trump from using the National Guard in Los Angeles.

Have You Noticed That Seismic Activity Has Been Going Nuts All Over The Globe

The Vax was meant to CAUSE cancer.... listen to this - this clip from RFK Jr's site

CNN Immediately Cuts Off Panelist Who Tells the Truth About the LA Riots

Army Secretary declares war on the military industrial complex

Former Israeli PM Threatens U.S. Will Get 'A Re-Run Of 9-11' If It Doesn't Fight Israel's Wars

7 Examples Of The “Mostly Peaceful” Los Angeles Riots Becoming Even More “Peaceful”

Biden Admin and ActBlue Funded Group Behind Abolish ICE Protests in LA

Murderers, rapists, gang members: ICE busts 12 of LA's 'worst' illegal alien criminals amid riots

LA Mayor Karen Bass Threatens Feds: Withdraw From LA Or the Violence Will Escalate –

Woman points gun at police and finds out

EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Ronny Jackson Accuses Biden Doctor Kevin O’Connor Of Sexual Misconduct

WHAT YOU’RE WITNESSING IN LOS ANGELES ISN’T JUST UNREST—IT’S MORAL COLLAPSE

Anna Paulina Luna Exposes the Guy Behind the Anti-ICE Riots

Mike Huckabee Working To Keep Netanyahu in Power

Israeli Military and Israeli-Backed Gang Shoot Aid Seekers in Gaza, Killing 14

Only 68 Building Permits Issued for Pacific Palisades After Wildfires Destroyed 6800 Structures

Violent Rioters Fire Off Exploding Projectiles at Police Horses Use Fireworks and Explosives to Attack Police

ICE Just Shattered Records With One Massive Operation That Has Democrats Fuming

Nolte: Insurrectionist Democrats Plan Another Summer of Blue City-Riots

Violent riots have now been reported in over 30 American cities. Heres a full list:

Mass shooter opened fire at graduation party was an migrant who was busted in LA ICE raids:

Cash Jordan: ICE Raids Home Depot... as California Collapses

Silver Is Finally Soaring: Here's Why

New 4um Interface Coming Soon

Attack of the Dead-2025.


All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Lieberman, Vice-President of the United States?
Source: Me
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 6, 2006
Author: Me, Me, Me
Post Date: 2006-11-06 18:51:34 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 527
Comments: 19

The scenario is simple:

The Demos + Lieby add up to 51 senate seats. CT gets a GOP gov'nor.

Rove offers Libby the Ministry of War but Lieby says 'no'. Cheney ups the ante and suggests Secy of the State. Lieby disagrees.

W makes the final phone call and offers Libby the VP-ship if he agrees to support the Bush in the senate when it counts and Lieby says 'YES, YES, YES!!!'

The CT gov'nor names a GOP to replace Lieby.

And... VOILA - the GOPs get back the Senate.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

support the Bush in the senate when it counts and Lieby says 'YES, YES, YES!!!'

Rockefeller came within one gunshot of being president.

Cynicom  posted on  2006-11-06   18:54:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

I do not see any benefit for Lieberman to take VP and turn down Secty of Defense. I could see him turning down Secty of State - not much power there as opposed to Secty of Defense ( at least to suit Lieberman's ambitions).

Apart from voting for war 24/7, Joel is a Democrat on all other issues.

The GOP will pluck some guy they think might be able to run for President in and plunk him in VP at the end of 2007 - maybe give him 1 year of exposure before the election so he does not get too icky sticky with GWB caca.

Joe Lieberman is yesterday's news as far as serving as VP. He tried, he failed, end of story. But I think the DC elites are clamoring to put Joe in Rumdum's position to march on Iran with conscripted warm bodies. Rumdum is a no go on either issue.

scrapper2  posted on  2006-11-06   19:10:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: scrapper2 (#2)

Joe Lieberman is yesterday's news as far as serving as VP. He tried, he failed, end of story. But I think the DC elites are clamoring to put Joe in Rumdum's position to march on Iran with conscripted warm bodies. Rumdum is a no go on either issue.

And when did being alive have anything to do with holding a position in government? Stalin? Alive. Lenin? Alive.

jessejane  posted on  2006-11-06   19:31:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: scrapper2 (#2)

The purpose of making Lieby VP is for the GOP to control the Senate's agenda.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2006-11-06   19:40:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#4)

The purpose of making Lieby VP is for the GOP to control the Senate's agenda.

It is unlikely that the Democrats will need the VP's tie breaking vote, if that is what you mean.

scrapper2  posted on  2006-11-06   19:42:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: scrapper2 (#5)

All the GOPs need is for Lieby to cast the tie-breaking when deciding which party names the committee chairmanships and therefore controls the agenda.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2006-11-06   19:45:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#6)

All the GOPs need is for Lieby to cast the tie-breaking when deciding which party names the committee chairmanships and therefore controls the agenda.

Why does any of that matter, really? When the President can add a signing statement to anything, what difference does it make?? Not a dimes worth of damn. None.

Harborers of two party religion, please get over it.

jessejane  posted on  2006-11-06   19:49:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: jessejane (#7)

Who controls the senate is not important to me. To Bush and Rove, however, it is.

Think of the possibility of a Bush impeachment drive.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2006-11-06   19:57:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#8)

Think of the possibility of a Bush impeachment drive.

Thinking of it is not going make it happen.

Dem's are not a different party. Just the left wing of the same bird.

jessejane  posted on  2006-11-06   20:07:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: jessejane (#9)

Some of them may try to impeach the Bush and control of both houses would embolden them.

It would be important for the next congress to rollback the prez power because if they don't, then we would be irreversibly set on the path to some form of nearly-absolute monarchy, supported by an ever growing and increasingly intrusive state machine. If Lieberman becomes VP and the GOPs get to control the senate agenda, it would no be possible to rollback the prez power grab.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2006-11-06   20:13:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: jessejane (#9)

Dem's are not a different party. Just the left wing of the same bird.

Amen.

Cynicom  posted on  2006-11-06   20:15:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#10)

You act like there is hope without draining the swamp first. There isn't.

All of this, COULD have set in motion already... all of it. But, as you see, they work in concert with bipartisan BS, and not a word about what helps and protects the American citizen.. only their own power..

There is far too much signed and done now to believe a fantasy.. sorry.

jessejane  posted on  2006-11-06   20:19:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#8)

Think of the possibility of a Bush impeachment drive.

Nancy Pelosi has already announced that impeachment is "off the table." She said it "would be a waste of time."

Two rival political parties? No, just 2 sides of the same coin.

Also even if Bush were impeached, America would be left with President Cheney at the helm. Thanks but no thanks. If I have to choose my nation's poison, I'll go with the one known rather than the one unknown.

scrapper2  posted on  2006-11-06   20:22:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: jessejane (#7)

Harborers of two party religion, please get over it.

Yes indeed ... and quit saying God bless Amerika ... that'd be like puttin pearls on a pig.

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

Samuel Adams

noone222  posted on  2006-11-06   20:42:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: scrapper2, thread (#13)

If I have to choose my nation's poison, I'll go with the one known rather than the one unknown.

Huh ? Poison is poison ain't it ???

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

Samuel Adams

noone222  posted on  2006-11-06   20:44:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: noone222 (#15)

Huh ? Poison is poison ain't it ???

One can be more painful than the other. One may not be deadly - just cause a bad bout of malaise from which the body politic may recover as the poison passes through the system.

My best guess is that a President Cheney would be deadly for the republic and the poison would cause a lot of pain on the journey.

scrapper2  posted on  2006-11-06   20:57:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: scrapper2 (#16)

My best guess is that Cheney would be marvelous for the republic as it would no doubt awake a great deal of the sheeple..

Lady X  posted on  2006-11-06   21:35:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: jessejane (#12)

You act like there is hope without draining the swamp first. There isn't.

I would not object to the creation of a 4th branch of gov't - the 'executioners' branch, to make sure that the checks stay balanced but I doubt that most citizens/consumers are mature enough to support this.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2006-11-06   21:59:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: jessejane (#12)

You act like there is hope without draining the swamp first. There isn't.

All of this, COULD have set in motion already... all of it. But, as you see, they work in concert with bipartisan BS, and not a word about what helps and protects the American citizen.. only their own power..

There is far too much signed and done now to believe a fantasy.. sorry.

"Yup" thas right massa please extend your noble hand so I can kiss your arse.

(Many appear afraid of a Cheney Presidency ... when they already have it).

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. When you give up that force, you are ruined."

Patrick Henry

noone222  posted on  2006-11-07   6:54:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]