[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
9/11 See other 9/11 Articles Title: JEB BUSH'S EXECUTIVE ORDER AND 9-11 JEB BUSH'S EXECUTIVE ORDER AND 9-11 PART 1 of 2 By: Devvy Kidd November 6, 2006 © 2006 - http://NewsWithViews.com The massive effort to expose the truth about 911 and what really happened leading up to and the day of horror continues by very dedicated Americans. Regular readers of my column know I have done a couple of different series on specific issues dealing with 911; Enron, Cheney, anthrax, dead microbiologists, live hijackers, Thomas E. White & Buckets of Money. All of those columns are archived here. Of one thing, I am certain: 9/11 is multi faceted, like a gigantic octopus with numerous, incestuous tentacles that reach far and wide. 9/11 is the Achilles Heel for all the draconian Nazi-style new laws virtually cementing totalitarian control of we the people and unlawfully burning the Bill of Rights. From the Enron disaster to Cheney's military exercises to the deliberate implosion of WTC Building 7 and unanswered questions about the twin WTC Towers, the Pentagon and Shanksville, they're all inter connected. Out of their mouths in unguarded moments George Bush speaking on September 15, 2006: "For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping." To hear audio, click here. Please note Bush's words: "...ensure that the explosives went off at a high....a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping." These comments were made during one of Bush's bizarre press conferences. Was this just another Bushism where he fires off his mouth without consulting his brain? I don't believe so anymore than I believe Rummy "misspoke" in this video when he very succinctly states Flight 93 was shot down. "The people who shot down the plane over Pennsylvania." Bush and his minions have always stated Flight 93 was not shot down, yet here Rumsfeld specifically says the plane was shot down. Anyone watching the media video tapes can see the white puffs systematically going off from the top down inside the twin WTC towers. Yes, the explosives were placed up high enough in the twin towers so that people were trapped and as they went off floor by floor, the building collapsed into itself. America watched mass murder in progress. As for "operatives," I offer you this: September 23, 2001. Over time, seven of the nineteen hijackers have come forward protesting their innocence. "Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well. The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt." This has been an ongoing cover up by the FBI and the Bush Administration. No, I haven't been drinking Bill O'Reilly's own personal mix of Kool Aid, but there is too much evidence that some of the alleged hijackers are alive, pointing to another bungled job by the thoroughly compromised FBI. Brother Jeb's Timely Executive Order On September 7, 2001, only four days before the "event," Florida Governor Jeb Bush issued an executive order. This was only one business day from 911. His brother, President Bush, is due in his state on September 11th. What is the significance of this rather timely EO? "Among the reasons cited in the document for the action was prophetically “potential massive damage to life and property that may result from an act of terrorism” (Executive Order #01-261, Section 3)....However, what is most startling about EO #01-261 is its predecessor. Executive Order #01-261 concludes by revoking Executive Order #01-17 which is nearly identical to EO #01-261 except for the language addressing “potential massive damage to life and property that may result from an act of terrorism.” Issued on January 19, 2001, EO #01-17 wasn't to expire until June 30, 2003. This raises the question as to what events occurred on or prior to September 7, 2001 that compelled the president's brother to replace an existing executive order with another executive order which effectively inserted a reference to “acts of terrorism.” Some will say it was just a coincidence, just like the biggest voting mess in a presidential election ever witnessed in this country just also happened to take place in the candidate's brother's state (brother Jeb, Florida) who also serves as governor. And, the candidate, George Bush, is also the governor of one of the biggest states of the Union! Gee, what a coincidence. Does brother Jeb's new EO, only four days before 911, indicate prior knowledge of something? That new EO gives Jeb the authority to call up the National Guard for "an act of terrorism" and declare martial law. Could the timing be anymore suspect? Why did Jeb issue this new EO four days before 911 when the existing EO, which didn't include terrorism, wasn't due to expire for two plus years? Jeb Bush needs to be put under oath and all the paper trail connected to this new EO (if it hasn't been shredded) be made available to we the people. Some will say it was also just a coincidence that Da Mayor Willie Brown (SF), also received a warning not to fly on September 11, 2001. Da Mayor claims it was his security people who warned him. If that's the case, who warned them? Some will say it was also just a coincidence that former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft was warned not to fly commercial planes beginning in July 2001: "On July 26, 2001, http://cbsnews.com reported that John Ashcroft had stopped flying on commercial airlines. Ashcroft used to fly commercial, just as Janet Reno did. So why, two months before Sept. 11, did he start taking chartered government planes?" Right under the noses of the American people, just as brother Jeb did on September 7, 2001, President Bush, just pulled another surprise attack on we the people. Frank Morales "Bush Moves Toward Martial Law" should be read by everyone because this is about as serious as it gets. Think this grotesque Bush-whack is just another coincidence like brother Jeb's Executive Order? Does he know something we don't? Let's move on to Chapter 22 of Michael Ruppert's book, Crossing the Rubicon. This chapter, Giuliani and Tripod II, is a damning recital of known facts based on Giuliani's testimony and the relationship of the war game exercises "coincidentally" being played out at the very same time as the attacks. Page 407: "When he testified before the Kean Commission, former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani provided new information and added even more weight to the evidence showing that the war games had been used with the intent of delaying response on 911. His testimony posses even more contradictions to the official testimonies from our nation's leaders as to who in the National Command Authority became aware and involved on 911, and at what times. Importantly, Giuliani also provided still another indirect corroboration that the war games, wither through radar "inserts" or live-fly exercises, had been used to delay and confuse emergency response." As I have said so many times, read Rubicon, Paul Thompson's time line and Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 911 Commission. If you click here, you can read the transcripts of the NORAD tapes. While reading this Vanity Fair piece, for me at least, it comes across as completely ignorant of all the problems with the government's version of events and how naive the author is when he states these military exercises were just a coincidence; I also felt he did the article to make our military look like buffoons although I'm certain he would deny it. A different analysis and excerpts from those tapes are here. I know it's a lot of reading, but in order to get all these events and time lines in order, you have to look at all the documented data/information available. A new investigation While Kool Aid drinkers like Bill O'Reilly and GOP apologists like Shawn Hannity would like America to think no one is paying attention to the 911 "crazies," I beg to differ. The Internet video, 911 Mysteries: Demolitions currently shows almost 700,000 views. Another 911 Controlled Demolitions video shows 1,131,806 views. Are these millions of Americans all crazies, left wingers and Bush haters? On August 11, 2006, CNN did a poll asking: Do you believe alternative theories for the September 11, 2001, attacks are credible? When I clicked on it, 23,615 people had voted: Yes 69% (16,251) vs No 31% (7,364). Of course it's not a scientific poll, but rather revealing I would say. The number of Americans demanding a new investigation continues to grow exponentially, but what kind of investigation? Certainly not another white wash like the first one Bush fought two years to keep from happening. The 911 Omission Commission was an utter failure in truth gathering and some of the witnesses, i.e., John Ashcroft, should be indicted by a federal grand jury for obstruction of justice. Not a single person has ever been held accountable as a result of that farce, not one. (For those who haven't been reading Patrick Briley's incredible research on the FBI and other higher ups sheltering and protecting known terrorists in this country, you really need to read his columns.) First, you would have to find a couple members of Congress who would agree to hold hearings. I can tell you unequivocally it will not be any current Republican or Democrat or their replacements should they lose in the pretend elections tomorrow. The Republicans currently serving in Congress are truly gutless, but the Democrats are far, far worse when it comes to anything remotely resembling courage, honor or ethics. The only way any new investigation will take place is if millions of Americans begin bombarding the "new" Congress in January 2007; an all out, constant and very vocal demand for a new investigation. If I were a member of Congress, this is the way I would do it: One Republican and one Democrat (wish we could include one newly elected Constitution Party congress person) would choose six special counsels to orchestrate the questioning of all witnesses who would be put under oath - every minute televised on C-SPAN. These special counsels would have subpoena power. They would be carefully selected individuals who have a complete command and knowledge of all the 911 questions and discrepancies. They would have the funding to hire four assistants each to orchestrate and facilitate all aspects of the hearings so that once they started, there would be no gas bag speeches, just begin peeling back the lies and get to the truth. I know the questions I would ask, methodically, issue by issue until everything is covered. I would make the transcripts of the entire process available free to the American people via the Internet and also on a DVD. In the meantime While millions of Americans (respected polling organizations show this to be true), know the government's rendition of events that day don't add up, millions more either don't know, feel something isn't quite right, but most of them simply do not have the time to sift through the thousands of pages on the Internet looking for facts. Is there a way to make it easy for Americans to get a good grasp of 911 so that they will become outraged enough to join the rest of us in demanding a real investigation? I believe there is. What's needed (and this would be invaluable for any new hearings) is a flash presentation or slide show for the Internet that can be downloaded onto CDs and a DVD for the millions of Americans pressed for time or who don't have computers; no copyright. Americans commute on the subway, trains and planes. When I took the high speed train from Boston to DC in 2003, every car was filled with people using laptops. Just think of how many millions we could reach with a professional package for both computers and on DVD! For part two click below. Click here for part -----> 2. Additional Information: 1, PROMIS Connections to Cheney Control of 9/11 Attacks Confirmed 2, 9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon 3, Twin Towers Story 1 - video 4, Government Releases Detailed Information on 9/11 Crashes 5, Short video of Sibel Edmonds 6, What Did He Know? (Bush's odd behavior the morning of 9/11) Video 7, Top GOP Senator Joins Critics of FBI Anthrax Probe 8, CENTCOM Sergeant Details Traitorous Stand Down Orders On 9/11 9, Important timeline: Government By Anthrax 10, Giuliani and the banks: The case of the missing $200 million 11, FYI/American Airlines Flight 77 © 2006 - http://NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty, which sold close to 2,000,000 copies. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Your complimentary copy of the 32-page report may be obtained from El Dorado Gold. Devvy is a contributing writer for http://www.NewsWithViews.com. Devvy's website: http://www.devvy.com E-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net http://newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd228.htm JEB BUSH'S EXECUTIVE ORDER AND 9-11 PART 2 of 2 By: Devvy Kidd November 6, 2006 © 2006 - http://NewsWithViews.com How could this get accomplished? I would start with the 911 Scholars for Truth. These folks most likely know college students with the technical know how to do slide shows/flash presentations. Due to their professions and connections, they also might know individuals who are financially blessed who could fund this project so it would be up and running by the end of January at the latest. Time is of the essence. These scholars could work with some of the prominent folks out there in the 911 truth movement to put all the pieces together for the presentations, one piece of the puzzle per segment. Believe me, if I had the money, I'd already have this project underway. I don't believe there will be any "smoking gun" in the near future, so logically you go forward with a massive educational effort to build momentum, crushing Congress with demands for a new investigation. I understand there is some movement out there to get 911 to grand juries, but because 911 is so vast in scope, we need a single tool to bring the entire picture into focus to benefit all these efforts. What would this flash presentation/slide show look like? Because 911 is such a complex puzzle, I would focus on very specific things, i.e., follow the money trail and science. No politics, no conclusions. None of the wild conspiracy garbage out there, i.e., no planes nonsense. Just lay out the facts as we know them and then the questions. Don't make the presentations so overwhelming and ponderous the viewer feels buried before they press 'next.' First you lay out the known facts and then questions - those all important questions which the viewer will see have no answers. This will prompt the viewer to want the answers, it's just a natural response. Presentation and delivery is everything. This could be one very powerful tool in reaching many more millions for a relatively small amount of money. Below are my suggestions for each presentation by issue in no particular order. I'm certain there's more than could be added, but at least it's a start in formulating a plan of action. All of these petitions to Congress are great, but, if we really want to cause a tsunami for a new investigation, we need to reach more Americans with a concise, professional presentation they can grasp without spending 1,000 hours combing the Internet and getting caught up in the morass of silly garbage being peddled out there. Americans could just slip the CD into the computer or the DVD into the player on the weekend (winter is almost upon us and people spend more time indoors) and get as much of the truth and facts as we have available at this time. Presentation One: Paul Thompson's Time Line. This would give the viewer a very good overall picture of the day. Two: The World Trade Center Towers bullet points bringing forth the science of fires destroying buildings, the molten steel burning for weeks after the event, brief sentences outlining findings by experts like Dr. Steven Jones, Marvin Bush's role regarding security and the unprecedented shut down of the towers only days before 911. At the end of those bullet points, bring forth the questions which need answers. While Webster Tarpley's work on "red flag" operations is superb, I would not include any of that in a slide presentation targeted at a general audience who have no idea about the "bigger picture," geopolitics and so forth. Keep it straight forward and crisp. Just my humble opinion. Three: WTC Tower 7: Again, stick to the science, the statement by Larry Silverstein, the fact that the building wasn't close to the towers nor was it hit, the marginal fires easily contained and very important: what was inside that building? There's no question in my mind Building 7 was deliberately destroyed (imploded). Besides government agencies DOD, CIA, SS, IRS and Giuliani's "Command HQ," it also was home to the Security and Exchange Commission. Remember this important fact: By end of summer 2001 was when all Hell was breaking loose at Enron, the bulk of all Enron's documents filed with the SEC likely went up in smoke when that building was deliberately blown. Follow the money and again, at the end of your bullet points, list the questions that need answers that will help connect the dots in people's minds. Four: I would combine the Pentagon with Flight 93 with the highlights being (1) debris from the plane found at Indian Lake, (2) the county coroner, Wallace Miller (see my personal interview with him) states there are several boxes of remains squirreled away at an unknown location - why? (3) Colonel Donn de Grand-Pre, U.S. Army (ret.) claims he has interviewed Major Rick Gibney who told him he was ordered and did shoot down Flight 93. Then list your questions with the point that Major Gibney, his commanding officer at Hector Field, Fargo, North Dakota and all other pilots who were in the air that day should all be put under oath and questioned publicly. Include Minetta's testimony - just his key statements with the proper footnote. As for the Pentagon, I would not include all the technical information on landing gear, etc., because the layman (like me) will not understand it and you'll lose your audience. I would only cover the autopsy discrepancies and the refusal by the Department of Justice to release all the videos - why not? Two sets have been released which are nothing but an insult to the American people; the second one purporting to show a plane on 911 is dated January 1, 1993! There is so much speculation about these two crime scenes, but until you can get key players under oath or hard documents, I would not throw a bunch of unverifiable stuff out there to the public because it only provides fodder for your opponents. Regular readers know I have filed a FOIA lawsuit on Flight 93 and am awaiting the government's response. Five: the military exercises which took place that day. Include the transcripts of the NORAD tapes at the end of this presentation so people don't get lost at the beginning. List all the military exercises by name, mission and how our front line defense was sent away from the targeted sites and then the questions. We know Dick Cheney was at the helm running the show and there are a hundred questions on just this one, extremely important aspect of the day. I agree with other experts: those military exercises were deliberately scheduled to run that day to confuse and delay our military's response until it was too late. Six: The hijackers. No Arab names on the passenger list for Flight 77 (Pentagon); see here. There are at least seven individuals who were named as hijackers who allegedly died on the planes, yet those seven individuals have been trying for years to get their names off the FBI list for years because they're alive. Cover their movements and lack of ability to fly a kite with any degree of competence. (The producers of 911 Demolitions are working on their next release and it will be on the hijackers). Include questions from the fine folks at Pilots for 911 Truth. Seven: Enron, the money trail, all players. Then a list of questions that have no answers. Eight: Anthrax and Thomas White; combine with White & New Buckets of Money. I would include the points made in this piece by Wayne Madsen because it touches on the murder of Dr. Don C. Wiley. (I have done extensive writing on dead microbiologists because I am convinced they are connected to 911. You can read the entire Memphis Police Department investigation into Dr. Wiley's murder on my CD.) Bullet points and then questions. Nine: All whistle blowers. List their names, credentials and brief statement about their story. Besides Sibel Edmonds, include people like Richard Grove, twice a National Security Whistle blower; see his story here. Grove's story is also along the same lines as Chapter Three in Crossing the Rubicon: The CIA is Wall Street and Drug Money is King. Follow the money because it's always about money. Ten - from the 911 Truth Movement: WTC Documents Seized By NYC Mayor -- Will Not Return. "New York City has entered into a contract with the Rudolph W. Giuliani Center For Urban Affairs to transfer custody of public records. World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audio tapes, and 15,000 videotapes, are also reported to be a part of the records covered by the contract. The records include those of his chief of staff and every deputy mayor, together with their chiefs of staff. "World Trade Center-related materials are alleged to be included as part of the records. All of these items were reported to have been delivered from the direct custody and control of the City where they are subject to the Freedom of Information Law to a private warehouse storage facility in Long Island City at the end of December 2001 where they are not subject to the requirements of the law." See: Statement and Questions Regarding the 9/11 Commission Interview of Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Members of his Administration - Note question #10 & 12 then see here. Why the eleventh hour agreement to seal all of Giuliani's records? Another stinky, inconvenient question. Eleven: Insider trading and put options on airline stock; see this important column. Follow the money because it's always about money. Twelve: The finale. Bring forth those last few questions: Jeb Bush's EO, the warning to SF Mayor Willie Brown not to fly that day, Ashcroft suddenly switching from commercial flights to charter. Make people wonder why and they will want answers. Recommend if viewers have access to the Internet, watch 911 Demolitions: Mysteries and 911 Press for Truth. Contact your member of Congress.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Kamala (#0)
(Edited)
This is something I might argue with Devvy about, otherwise I'd say she's right. No honor or ethics on either side of the aisle. 9-11 is the achilles heel, and the same scumbags that orchestrated it have been running Amerika into the ground since they killed JFK ... the Bush/CIA/MOSSAD- Mafia, The International Banker's "Murder Inc.".
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. When you give up that force, you are ruined." Patrick Henry
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|
||