[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Activism See other Activism Articles Title: Effective Tyrannicide or Why you shouldn't kill the President "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy We live in dark times, in what Mark Twain referred to as a 'gilded age'. We have all the comforts one could ask for available, from SUV's to large screen TV's with 200 channels. Bread and circuses for the masses. As long as we remain complacent and comfortable with that it might seem like we live in the freest, greatest country in the world. And maybe we really do, but at this stage that's kind of like being valedictorian at summer school; we're the best of a sorry lot. And even that is debatable, considering we have the world's highest rate of incarceration, and a hideously corrupt government that tries it's best to control, regulate, or criminalize every aspect of our lives. Some brave souls have struck out on their own, abandoning the job culture and living under the radar of the powers that be. I respect them for that, and even want to join them, but for some of us there are factors that keep us stuck in society. And as long as we are here, many of us face a daily risk of attack by criminals. Not the private citizen type, who simply want to take your possessions, but the massive criminal gang we call the government. These criminals want far more than our money; they want our freedom. So adamant are they about this that many of us fear the day will soon come when we have no choice but to 'plead the second'. In fact, there are some who have been pushed to that extreme already. And no doubt there are others who think it's past time for us to start killing politicians. I personally would not shed a tear over the loss of those parasites in our government, but as with all vermin, if you kill one there are unlimited others ready to take their place. Tyrants are the worst sort of vermin, and the most difficult to exterminate completely. We finally get rid of the tyrant klinton, and we end up with a worse sort in george bush. If one were to remove him from office, by voting either at the ballot box or from the rooftops, we would be stuck with an even worse parasite in the form of kerry or cheney. So what the hell can we do? The answer may be in the study of ideas and how they shape the world we live in. The study of memetics could give us the key we need to free us from our chains. Or maybe not. But it certainly warrants a look. There are some who dispute the notion of contagious ideas supposedly evolving under Darwinian rules of natural selection. Certainly, like all theorys about information, memetics is imperfect and cannot account for everything. But it remains a useful model. For most of human history one of the prevailing memes was that some authority figure was needed, either to speak to the gods on behalf of us mere mortals, or to create and enforce the rules without which, we are assured, society would collapse. Then a competing meme began to propagate. This meme was the idea of individual liberty, and it was spread by some of the finest minds our species has ever produced. But that meme has been targeted for destruction by authoritarians of all stripes, and today it is limited to a very few segments of the populace. And that, it seems to me, is the root of the problem. In order to regain our freedoms we have to spread that meme, and insure that it takes hold and flourishes. Not an easy task. So how can we replace the defective authority meme with the liberty meme? In the past memes were usually removed by killing those who had been infected. Typically this was done by groups advocating competing religious memes. Alternatively there is the possibility that people will see the benifits of a new meme over the currently accepted one. But this requires rational thought on the part of most humans, something which is not very likely. So what other options are there? What is needed is a memekiller, a method of destroying harmful memes without killing the person infected with the idea. Next - new ideas in memekilling. UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#0)
Because then Cheney would be President.
The religious memes could quit competing and join together to overpower the defective authority. And although the sheeple have drifted away from religion, they will still need more motivation than that they may lose their SUVs.
that's for sure...this is an amusing read.
exactly. imo, that's the only reason that no one has assasinated Bush thus far.
Yikes! If the religious memes were to quit competing and band together, we would see a level of tyranny seldom experienced in the history of man. In fact, to some degree that is what we are seeing today in the US as the religious authoritarian meme of the Armageddonist Christians and Zionist Jews is melding with the military empire meme of Pax Americana.
It wouldn't matter. The Zionist Hydra that runs the United States has an inexhaustable supply of heads.
It promises to be an interesting site. I think today is its first day. We should keep an eye on it for interesting content.
Exactly the point of Tyrannicide.org. You can kill the men all day long, but until you kill the idea behind it, there'll be a never ending supply of men to carry the banner.
Because then Cheney would be President. Sort of like "why they shouldn't convict Clinton after impeaching him". (I was in favor of going all the way.) How about this scenario: Bush is impeached and then thrown out of office; Cheney takes the reins and then has another of his unfortunate heart attacks... The ambitious democrats of the Nixon era knew to take the vice president out FIRST.
No, I didn't mean these fanatical factions. The latter is pulling the chain on the former at the request of the current defective authority. Our nation was founded by those seeking religious freedom, not religious tyranny. That's what we need to rediscover, IMO.
While many in the nation at the time the country formed were religious, they ordered their daily lives more strongly around the ideas of the enlightenment. Individual liberty and self determination were prime motivators.
Most were literally escaping religious persecution in UK and europe.
Yup. They had direct experience of living in a society where the religious authoritarian and political authoritarian memes merged. And, it looks as if we might suffer the same fate.
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|
||