[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

“The government wants to make sure that that does not come out. A huge part of our political system is predicated on blackmail,”

You Know What Happens Next

Cash Jordan: Half-Built Tower Abandoned… as ICE Deports Entire ‘Migrant Workforce’

Heavy rainfall causes flash flooding Tuesday night, some cars stuck in high water on Chicago's West

Biden Doctor PLEADS THE FIFTH, Refuses To Testify To Congress, Biden Pardons ARE VOID

Joe Rogan says FBI director Kash Patel played him for a fool and maga for fools with the Jeff Epstein files

Elon's AI System "Grok" Went Rogue And Has Been SHUT DOWN in an Emergency!

Earthquake Swarms at One of the MOST DANGEROUS Volcanoes in the USA

Ben Shapiro Declares Epstein Case CLOSED: ‘Facts on the Ground Have Changed’

Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets

China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power

Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes

Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal

Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising?

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Vote Fraud? How AIPAC Lieberman 'Won'
Source: Rense
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general74/leib.htm
Published: Nov 11, 2006
Author: Karl WB Schwarz
Post Date: 2006-11-11 16:44:09 by Eoghan
Ping List: *Israeli Espionage*
Keywords: None
Views: 578
Comments: 31

We may have the clearest evidence of vote fraud coming out of Connecticut with the re-election of Pro-Israel Joe Lieberman as an Independent. http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=95480 Now, how exactly did Lieberman win TWO elections and his two opponents got exactly the SAME number of votes at exactly 448,077 votes each time?!?! "In Connecticut Ned Lamont (Dem.) lost EXACTLY with THE SAME number of votes as did Phil Giordano (Rep.) collected in 2000." Any of you mathematical geniuses want to calculate the odds on that? It is beyond staggering. It is statistically IMPOSSIBLE and could not happen twice in one million years, much less twice in 6 years for one lucky Pro-Israel Jewish Senator. I think this matter needs to be investigated because it is smoking hot and beyond outrageous.

How Lieberman 'Beat' Anti-War Candidate Lamont In Connecticut

From James Morris

AIPAC and NeoCon (War for Israel) Policy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Rf16XjbOUs ISRAELI SPY RING PROBE WIDENS http://la.indymedia.org/news/2006/11/187362.php

Stephen Sniegoski wrote:

Jim,

The Lieberman victory is extremely significant. He now has great national importance as an "independent" and he retains his seniority in the Democratic Party. He can blackmail the Democrats to get what he wants; and the pro-Zionist Senate leadership wants to give in to him. Obviously, David Duke could not command such power if he were in Lieberman's position.

Reasons For Victory

Popularity because of Name Recognition Unfortunately, Lieberman, as an independent, was ahead of Lamont in the polls from the time he lost the primary to Lamont. Lieberman did get 48 percent of the primary vote. That was the official reason why Lieberman chose to run.

Zionist Money And Support

Also Lieberman received extensive support from billionaire New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/ 2003328796_joe2 9.html?syndicationfiltered=rss

It is possible that others of Bloomberg's ilk might have provided substantial financial support for Lieberman.

Weak Candidate

The Republicans ran a weak candidate, as you pointed out. Exit polls showed Lieberman winning with more than two-thirds of the Republican vote and one-third of the Democrats. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/09/nyregion/09conn.html

Seniority And Pork

From the get-go Harry Reid supposedly promised Lieberman that he would retain his seniority. Lieberman stated he would retain his seniority. Running the Committee on Homeland Security he can hand out money to Connecticut big wigs. Lamont would be in an important possible and could not bring in nearly as much pork.

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2006/aug/18/ct_sen_courant_says_ dems_might_drop_joe

Lamont Got Virtually No Help From The National Democratic Party

Lamont has received almost no money from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) and only token contributions from Senate Democrats' political action committees. The only support has been nominal. http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Campaign/110106_lamont.h tml

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

#8. To: Eoghan (#0)

got exactly the SAME number of votes at exactly 448,077 votes each time

this is extremely suspicious IMO.. it's possible of course but.. I wonder what the mathematical likelihood of this is..

Have you read other articles by Sniegoski??

Zipporah  posted on  2006-11-11   17:33:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Zipporah (#8) (Edited)

got exactly the SAME number of votes at exactly 448,077 votes each time

this is extremely suspicious IMO.. it's possible of course but.. I wonder what the mathematical likelihood of this is..

just another coinkeydink

And Lamont beat him in the primary.

robin  posted on  2006-11-11   17:39:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 10.

        There are no replies to Comment # 10.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]