[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Report: Longtime Friends Of Biden Disturbed, Shocked He Didnt Remember Their Names

New York City Giving Taxpayer-Funded Debit Cards To Over 7,000 Migrants

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker Opens More Migrant Shelters in Chicago Ahead of Democrat National Convention

CNN doctor urges neurological testing for Biden

Nashville Trans Shooter Left Over 100 GB Of Evidence, All To Be Kept Secret

Who Turned Off The Gaslight?

Head Of Chase Bank Warns Customers: Era Of Free Checking Is Likely Over

Bob Dylan - Hurricane [Scotty mar10]

Replacing Biden Won't Solve Democrats' Problems - Look Who Will Inherit His Campaign War Chest

Who Died: Late June/Early July 2024 | News

A top Russian banker says Russia's payment methods should be a 'state secret' because the West keeps shutting them down so fast

Viral Biden Brain Freeze During Debate Sparks Major Question: Who’s Really Running the Country?

Disney Heiress, Other Major Dem Donors: Dump Biden

LAWYER: 5 NEW Tricks Cops Are Using During DWI Stops

10 Signs That Global War Is Rapidly Approaching

Horse Back At Library.

This Video Needs To Be Seen By Every Cop In America

'It's time to give peace another chance': Thousands rally in Tel Aviv to end the war

Biden's leaked bedtime request puts White House on damage control

Smith: It's Damned Hard To Be Proud Of America

Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi slams ‘deranged rant’ calling for assassination of Trump

Stalin, The Red Terror | Full Documentary

Russia, Soviet Union and The Cold War: Stalin's Legacy | Russia's Wars Ep.2 | Documentary

Battle and Liberation: The End of World War II | Countdown to Surrender – The Last 100 Days | Ep. 4

Ethereum ETFs In 'Window-Dressing' Stage, Approval Within Weeks; Galaxy

Americans Are More Likely To Go To War With The Government Than Submit To The Draft

Rudy Giuliani has just been disbarred in New York

Israeli Generals Want Truce in Gaza,

Joe Biden's felon son Hunter is joining White House meetings

The only Democrat who could beat Trump


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Here's the 9/11 smoking gun
Source: disc.server
URL Source: http://disc.server.com/discussion.c ... 9495;article=106045;title=APFN
Published: Nov 12, 2006
Author: craigthekid777
Post Date: 2006-11-12 19:22:13 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 263
Comments: 9

Here's the 9/11 smoking gun

Oh, the twist in this: the US Government…incriminated by its own
facts—so ironic and yet so perfect.
The perfect evidence, because it is from the US Government.
Please send this far and wide, now, before it's too late.
God bless America.


No one has debunked this yet…and it's not a "theory"—just the facts.
"Plane Impact" Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup & Complicity

"Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)"
Link
>http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc
By Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
http://www.st911.org

The official times for plane "impact" [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times. What can this factual contradiction mean? Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found the indisputable causal link:

One World Trade, September 11, 2001
American Airlines Flight 11 "impact" time:
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards
and Technology, 2005)
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final
Report, 2004)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds
before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many
eyewitnesses at the time.
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Notes: In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic event time (which had been, in error, attributed by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as "plane impact").
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission's later time for the aircraft's actual impact time.
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the basements before the plane crashed.

Summary:
This precision data has yet to be refuted by anyone. It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.

Before it is too late, demand a new 9/11 investigation, except this time a real one.

Justice waits...{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, *9-11* (#0)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?

A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.

Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-12   19:44:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building.

as does this ! eyewitness accounts and archived news footage that was shot on 911 but never replayed on television !

September 11th Revisited Video

christine  posted on  2006-11-12   21:15:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

This is all so simple to understand. If it’s possible for buildings like the Towers to be brought down by explosives, and if it’s a given that our government lies, then it’s entirely possible that both occurred.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-11-12   21:25:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: christine (#2)

Explosions, rumblings, and the symmetry and speed in which they all fell; it is so obvious now. How did we all miss it for so long?

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-12   21:27:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40? A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time. Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

I read in Chris Bollyn's original story on this in AFP that the seismic events occurred in the 10 seconds before the collapses of both buildings, not before the jets hit.

Psalm 137:1 By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-11-12   21:31:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: robin, all, *9-11* (#4)

Wait a second, little arab gremlins didn't bring down the towers? Thats what the government claims.

Asymmetrical damage and asymmetrical fire cannot result in identical symmetrical collapse of the two towers. Period.

Scientific method states that to prove a phenomenon to exist, one must duplicate and prove the phenomenon in a scientific controlled experiment. If one cannot duplicate and prove the phenomenon in a scientific controlled experiment, the claimed phenomenon does not exist.

Mark

The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent

"At temperatures above 800º C structural steel loses 90 percent of its strength. Yet even when steel structures are heated to those temperatures, they never disintegrate into piles of rubble, as did the Twin Towers and Building 7."-http://www.911research.net

Kamala  posted on  2006-11-13   7:04:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Kamala (#6)

Asymmetrical damage and asymmetrical fire cannot result in identical symmetrical collapse of the two towers. Period.

But a controlled demolition, like the fall of the towers and WT7 are symmetry in motion.

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-13   9:58:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: robin (#7)

You are correct. The NIST progressive gravity collapse theory cannot account for both towers exploding symmetrically.

Mark

The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent

"At temperatures above 800º C structural steel loses 90 percent of its strength. Yet even when steel structures are heated to those temperatures, they never disintegrate into piles of rubble, as did the Twin Towers and Building 7."-http://www.911research.net

Kamala  posted on  2006-11-13   15:15:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Kamala (#8)

The NIST progressive gravity collapse theory cannot account for both towers exploding symmetrically.

but the hour (give or take) long fires turning the steel into wet noodles can. :P

This election was a planned step back to take two steps forward.

christine  posted on  2006-11-13   15:28:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]