[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days

Copper underpins every part of the economy. If you want to destroy the U.S. economy this is how you would do it.

Egyptian Pres. Gamal Abdel Nassers Chilling Decades-Old Prediction About Israel-Palstine Conflict.


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Here's the 9/11 smoking gun
Source: disc.server
URL Source: http://disc.server.com/discussion.c ... 9495;article=106045;title=APFN
Published: Nov 12, 2006
Author: craigthekid777
Post Date: 2006-11-12 19:22:13 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 540
Comments: 9

Here's the 9/11 smoking gun

Oh, the twist in this: the US Government…incriminated by its own
facts—so ironic and yet so perfect.
The perfect evidence, because it is from the US Government.
Please send this far and wide, now, before it's too late.
God bless America.


No one has debunked this yet…and it's not a "theory"—just the facts.
"Plane Impact" Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup & Complicity

"Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)"
Link
>http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc
By Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
http://www.st911.org

The official times for plane "impact" [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times. What can this factual contradiction mean? Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found the indisputable causal link:

One World Trade, September 11, 2001
American Airlines Flight 11 "impact" time:
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards
and Technology, 2005)
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final
Report, 2004)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds
before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many
eyewitnesses at the time.
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Notes: In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic event time (which had been, in error, attributed by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as "plane impact").
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission's later time for the aircraft's actual impact time.
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the basements before the plane crashed.

Summary:
This precision data has yet to be refuted by anyone. It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.

Before it is too late, demand a new 9/11 investigation, except this time a real one.

Justice waits...{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, *9-11* (#0)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?

A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.

Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-12   19:44:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building.

as does this ! eyewitness accounts and archived news footage that was shot on 911 but never replayed on television !

September 11th Revisited Video

christine  posted on  2006-11-12   21:15:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

This is all so simple to understand. If it’s possible for buildings like the Towers to be brought down by explosives, and if it’s a given that our government lies, then it’s entirely possible that both occurred.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-11-12   21:25:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: christine (#2)

Explosions, rumblings, and the symmetry and speed in which they all fell; it is so obvious now. How did we all miss it for so long?

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-12   21:27:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40? A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time. Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

I read in Chris Bollyn's original story on this in AFP that the seismic events occurred in the 10 seconds before the collapses of both buildings, not before the jets hit.

Psalm 137:1 By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-11-12   21:31:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: robin, all, *9-11* (#4)

Wait a second, little arab gremlins didn't bring down the towers? Thats what the government claims.

Asymmetrical damage and asymmetrical fire cannot result in identical symmetrical collapse of the two towers. Period.

Scientific method states that to prove a phenomenon to exist, one must duplicate and prove the phenomenon in a scientific controlled experiment. If one cannot duplicate and prove the phenomenon in a scientific controlled experiment, the claimed phenomenon does not exist.

Mark

The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent

"At temperatures above 800º C structural steel loses 90 percent of its strength. Yet even when steel structures are heated to those temperatures, they never disintegrate into piles of rubble, as did the Twin Towers and Building 7."-http://www.911research.net

Kamala  posted on  2006-11-13   7:04:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Kamala (#6)

Asymmetrical damage and asymmetrical fire cannot result in identical symmetrical collapse of the two towers. Period.

But a controlled demolition, like the fall of the towers and WT7 are symmetry in motion.

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-13   9:58:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: robin (#7)

You are correct. The NIST progressive gravity collapse theory cannot account for both towers exploding symmetrically.

Mark

The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent

"At temperatures above 800º C structural steel loses 90 percent of its strength. Yet even when steel structures are heated to those temperatures, they never disintegrate into piles of rubble, as did the Twin Towers and Building 7."-http://www.911research.net

Kamala  posted on  2006-11-13   15:15:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Kamala (#8)

The NIST progressive gravity collapse theory cannot account for both towers exploding symmetrically.

but the hour (give or take) long fires turning the steel into wet noodles can. :P

This election was a planned step back to take two steps forward.

christine  posted on  2006-11-13   15:28:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]