[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump Says Coca-Cola Agreed On Major Reformulation To Use Real Cane Sugar

Garland Favorito and VoterGA Appeal Inexplicable Dismissal of Curling vs. Raffensperger Election Ruling

Born to Revolution: The “Red Diaper Baby” Roots of Zohran Mamdani and Today’s Democrats

These Are Richest People In Every US State

Education Department Investigates Foreign Funding At University Of Michigan After Arrests of Chinese Scholars

Israel editing WIkipedia, Former Israeli Prime Minister Debunks Epstein

Paul Joseph Watson:

The Duran: Decisive battle for Pokrovsk

MUST WATCH: Radical Change to the Financial System Is Maybe Coming Sooner Than We Thought

Putin launches MASSIVE strike on Ukraine, Trump admits Ukraine CAN'T win - Col. Douglas Macgregor

BREAKING: POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE: DOJ FIRES Maurene Comey, Federal Prosecutor Who Filed Key Court Docs to Keep Epstein Files Under Seal

Jimmy Dore: CHINA & 20 Nations To Intervene & End Israel’s Genocide!

20,000 Women. 350 Kilometers. Zero Pay. In One Week. How Did Ibrahim Traore Pull This Off?

Spain is in CHAOS! Revolution is in the air

Joe Rogan Ambushes Gavin Newsom Via Text With A COVID Question He Never Saw Coming

Batman Vs The Joker: Democrats Will Double Down On Chaos To Save Their Party

US Vows To Quit IEA If The Agency Keeps Pushing Green Transition

Tucker Carlson: People Are Frustrated That Certain Commit Crimes With Impunity

No news again, but the battle of the machines marches on...

Cash Jordan: Rioters ATTACK ICE HQ… Troops FLATTEN Uprising With ‘Zero Mercy’

Doctor Reveals What COVID Vaccines Do to the Lungs in Just One Week

Sorry paid off influencers, MAGA bot accounts, and Satan....but I'm not going to just "move on"

Marjorie Taylor Greene Bombshell Interview

Welcome To The Land Of The Free... Until You Express An Opinion

Putin ‘tells Iran to accept nuclear deal with no enrichment’

76% of Honey at Stores is Fake

"225,000 Ukrainians have now DESERTED the war" Ukraine is in a death spiral Col. Dan Davis

The New York Times Finally Stops Avoiding The G-Word

The Gaza Water Massacre: What Israel Just Confessed About Shooting Children

Powerful ERUPTION spit out volcanic mud and debris - Army Personnel ran for their lives


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Here's the 9/11 smoking gun
Source: disc.server
URL Source: http://disc.server.com/discussion.c ... 9495;article=106045;title=APFN
Published: Nov 12, 2006
Author: craigthekid777
Post Date: 2006-11-12 19:22:13 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 557
Comments: 9

Here's the 9/11 smoking gun

Oh, the twist in this: the US Government…incriminated by its own
facts—so ironic and yet so perfect.
The perfect evidence, because it is from the US Government.
Please send this far and wide, now, before it's too late.
God bless America.


No one has debunked this yet…and it's not a "theory"—just the facts.
"Plane Impact" Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup & Complicity

"Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)"
Link
>http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc
By Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
http://www.st911.org

The official times for plane "impact" [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times. What can this factual contradiction mean? Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found the indisputable causal link:

One World Trade, September 11, 2001
American Airlines Flight 11 "impact" time:
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards
and Technology, 2005)
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final
Report, 2004)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds
before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many
eyewitnesses at the time.
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Notes: In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic event time (which had been, in error, attributed by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as "plane impact").
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission's later time for the aircraft's actual impact time.
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the basements before the plane crashed.

Summary:
This precision data has yet to be refuted by anyone. It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.

Before it is too late, demand a new 9/11 investigation, except this time a real one.

Justice waits...{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, *9-11* (#0)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?

A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.

Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-12   19:44:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building.

as does this ! eyewitness accounts and archived news footage that was shot on 911 but never replayed on television !

September 11th Revisited Video

christine  posted on  2006-11-12   21:15:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

This is all so simple to understand. If it’s possible for buildings like the Towers to be brought down by explosives, and if it’s a given that our government lies, then it’s entirely possible that both occurred.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-11-12   21:25:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: christine (#2)

Explosions, rumblings, and the symmetry and speed in which they all fell; it is so obvious now. How did we all miss it for so long?

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-12   21:27:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40? A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time. Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

I read in Chris Bollyn's original story on this in AFP that the seismic events occurred in the 10 seconds before the collapses of both buildings, not before the jets hit.

Psalm 137:1 By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-11-12   21:31:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: robin, all, *9-11* (#4)

Wait a second, little arab gremlins didn't bring down the towers? Thats what the government claims.

Asymmetrical damage and asymmetrical fire cannot result in identical symmetrical collapse of the two towers. Period.

Scientific method states that to prove a phenomenon to exist, one must duplicate and prove the phenomenon in a scientific controlled experiment. If one cannot duplicate and prove the phenomenon in a scientific controlled experiment, the claimed phenomenon does not exist.

Mark

The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent

"At temperatures above 800º C structural steel loses 90 percent of its strength. Yet even when steel structures are heated to those temperatures, they never disintegrate into piles of rubble, as did the Twin Towers and Building 7."-http://www.911research.net

Kamala  posted on  2006-11-13   7:04:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Kamala (#6)

Asymmetrical damage and asymmetrical fire cannot result in identical symmetrical collapse of the two towers. Period.

But a controlled demolition, like the fall of the towers and WT7 are symmetry in motion.

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-13   9:58:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: robin (#7)

You are correct. The NIST progressive gravity collapse theory cannot account for both towers exploding symmetrically.

Mark

The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent

"At temperatures above 800º C structural steel loses 90 percent of its strength. Yet even when steel structures are heated to those temperatures, they never disintegrate into piles of rubble, as did the Twin Towers and Building 7."-http://www.911research.net

Kamala  posted on  2006-11-13   15:15:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Kamala (#8)

The NIST progressive gravity collapse theory cannot account for both towers exploding symmetrically.

but the hour (give or take) long fires turning the steel into wet noodles can. :P

This election was a planned step back to take two steps forward.

christine  posted on  2006-11-13   15:28:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]