[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Here's the 9/11 smoking gun
Source: disc.server
URL Source: http://disc.server.com/discussion.c ... 9495;article=106045;title=APFN
Published: Nov 12, 2006
Author: craigthekid777
Post Date: 2006-11-12 19:22:13 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 631
Comments: 9

Here's the 9/11 smoking gun

Oh, the twist in this: the US Government…incriminated by its own
facts—so ironic and yet so perfect.
The perfect evidence, because it is from the US Government.
Please send this far and wide, now, before it's too late.
God bless America.


No one has debunked this yet…and it's not a "theory"—just the facts.
"Plane Impact" Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup & Complicity

"Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)"
Link
>http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc
By Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
http://www.st911.org

The official times for plane "impact" [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times. What can this factual contradiction mean? Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found the indisputable causal link:

One World Trade, September 11, 2001
American Airlines Flight 11 "impact" time:
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards
and Technology, 2005)
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final
Report, 2004)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds
before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many
eyewitnesses at the time.
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Notes: In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic event time (which had been, in error, attributed by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as "plane impact").
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission's later time for the aircraft's actual impact time.
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the basements before the plane crashed.

Summary:
This precision data has yet to be refuted by anyone. It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.

Before it is too late, demand a new 9/11 investigation, except this time a real one.

Justice waits...{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, *9-11* (#0)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?

A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.

Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-12   19:44:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building.

as does this ! eyewitness accounts and archived news footage that was shot on 911 but never replayed on television !

September 11th Revisited Video

christine  posted on  2006-11-12   21:15:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

This is all so simple to understand. If it’s possible for buildings like the Towers to be brought down by explosives, and if it’s a given that our government lies, then it’s entirely possible that both occurred.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-11-12   21:25:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: christine (#2)

Explosions, rumblings, and the symmetry and speed in which they all fell; it is so obvious now. How did we all miss it for so long?

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-12   21:27:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40? A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time. Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

I read in Chris Bollyn's original story on this in AFP that the seismic events occurred in the 10 seconds before the collapses of both buildings, not before the jets hit.

Psalm 137:1 By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-11-12   21:31:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: robin, all, *9-11* (#4)

Wait a second, little arab gremlins didn't bring down the towers? Thats what the government claims.

Asymmetrical damage and asymmetrical fire cannot result in identical symmetrical collapse of the two towers. Period.

Scientific method states that to prove a phenomenon to exist, one must duplicate and prove the phenomenon in a scientific controlled experiment. If one cannot duplicate and prove the phenomenon in a scientific controlled experiment, the claimed phenomenon does not exist.

Mark

The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent

"At temperatures above 800º C structural steel loses 90 percent of its strength. Yet even when steel structures are heated to those temperatures, they never disintegrate into piles of rubble, as did the Twin Towers and Building 7."-http://www.911research.net

Kamala  posted on  2006-11-13   7:04:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Kamala (#6)

Asymmetrical damage and asymmetrical fire cannot result in identical symmetrical collapse of the two towers. Period.

But a controlled demolition, like the fall of the towers and WT7 are symmetry in motion.

Most Profound Man in Iraq — An unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

robin  posted on  2006-11-13   9:58:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: robin (#7)

You are correct. The NIST progressive gravity collapse theory cannot account for both towers exploding symmetrically.

Mark

The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.— Robert Wright - Former FBI agent

"At temperatures above 800º C structural steel loses 90 percent of its strength. Yet even when steel structures are heated to those temperatures, they never disintegrate into piles of rubble, as did the Twin Towers and Building 7."-http://www.911research.net

Kamala  posted on  2006-11-13   15:15:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Kamala (#8)

The NIST progressive gravity collapse theory cannot account for both towers exploding symmetrically.

but the hour (give or take) long fires turning the steel into wet noodles can. :P

This election was a planned step back to take two steps forward.

christine  posted on  2006-11-13   15:28:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]