[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Soros-Funded Dark Money Group Secretly Paying Democrat Influencers To Shape Gen Z Politics

Minnesota Shooter's Family Has CIA and DOD ties

42 GANGSTERS DRAGGED From Homes In Midnight FBI & ICE Raids | MS-13 & Trinitarios BUSTED

Bill Gates EXPOSED: Secret Operatives Inside the CDC, HHS, and NIH REMOVED by RFK, Jr.

Gabriel Ruiz, a man who dresses up as a woman was just arrested for battery (dating violence)

"I'm Tired Of Being Trans" - Minneapolis Shooter Confesses "I Wish I Never Brain-Washed Myself"

The Chart Baltimore Democrats Hope You Never See

Woman with walker, 69, fatally shot in face on New York City street:

Paul Joseph Watson: Bournemouth 1980 Vs 2025

FDA Revokes Emergency Authorization For COVID-19 Vaccines

NATO’s Worst Nightmare Is Happening Right Now in Ukraine - Odessa is Next To Fall?

Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies?

Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class

SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video

Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: U.S. Presses New Agenda on Iran
Source: Associated Press
URL Source: http://ap.washingtontimes.com/dynam ... AULT&CTIME=2006-11-14-05-58-06
Published: Nov 14, 2006
Author: GEORGE JAHN
Post Date: 2006-11-14 07:46:36 by leveller
Keywords: None
Views: 185
Comments: 14

Nov 14, 5:58 AM EST

VIENNA, Austria (AP) -- The Bush administration, frustrated by U.N. Security Council inaction on sanctions against Iran, is pressing a new agenda - trying to deny Tehran U.N. aid for a plutonium-producing reactor that could be used to make nuclear warheads.

Diplomats from nations on the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency say the U.S. is lobbying hard for denial of Iran's request for help on its Arak research reactor, where Iran says it wants to produce radio isotopes for diagnosing and treating cancer.

The American effort appears to be winning support. Seven diplomats, who demanded anonymity in exchange for discussing confidential information, told The Associated Press separately Tuesday that they believed that the 35 member nations of the Vienna-based U.N. nuclear watchdog would deny Iran's request when the IAEA meets next week.

But even a total denial of technical aid for Arak, while symbolically important, is expected to do little to slow the eventual completion of the reactor, let alone Iran's nuclear program. When finished - probably early in the next decade - Arak could produce enough plutonium for about two bombs a year.

Washington's new push appears to reflect U.S. recognition that the Security Council is hamstrung by East-West differences on how to sanction Tehran for its refusal to slow its nuclear program.

IAEA experts say that there is no legal reason to deny Iran the aid at Arak - one of 12 projects Iran has submitted for possible technical assistance but the only one the Americans are trying to block.

That IAEA finding may result in a compromise being floated by the majority of European Union nations, that the organization should defer a decision on IAEA aid for Arak, instead of rejecting it.

The U.S. mission refused to comment on whether that would be acceptable to Washington. But several diplomats familiar with the American stance said the U.S. might accept a freeze instead of an outright ban on Arak aid to build consensus.

Document Ahmadinejad's Letter to President Bush

Latest Iran News U.S. Presses New Agenda on Iran Bolton Says Russia Seeking Iran Changes

Iran Vows Retaliation if Israel Strikes

Ahmadinejad Blasts U.N. Security Council

Iran State Media Plays Down Argentina

Buy AP Photo Reprints

Interactives Construction of Nuclear Reactors Worldwide Yucca Mountain

Latest Nuclear News U.S. Presses New Agenda on Iran S. Korea: Nuke Talks May Begin in Dec.

Bolton Says Russia Seeking Iran Changes

France Nuke Waste Shipment Reaches Germany

Envoy: U.S. Eager for India Nuke Deal

Producing plutonium would give Iran a second possible path to a nuclear weapon; most international efforts have focused on Tehran's efforts to enrich uranium, which also can be used in a warhead.

Tehran's chief delegate to the IAEA said Iran only opted for a research reactor using heavy-water technology, which produces plutonium waste, after being denied the ability to buy both light-water reactors, and the enriched uranium that powers them, from overseas. It is far harder to use light-water reactors in a military program.

Ali Ashgar Soltanieh told the AP that Iran needs the IAEA technical aid to build environmental safeguards for the reactor at Arak, a city in central Iran. But that argument appears to have gained little traction.

"There is general agreement that at a time that the Security Council is focused on a possible attempt by Iran to make nuclear arms, the country should not be given a hand with a project that could be used for such a goal," said a senior diplomat.

Along with discussing hundreds of aid requests from member nations, the Nov. 20 board meeting also will hear a report - to be circulated internally to the 35 board member nations Tuesday - from IAEA head Mohamed ElBaradei on his agency's attempts to investigate Tehran's nuclear activities.

U.N officials told the AP that the report focuses on Iran's defiance of a Security Council demand for a halt to uranium enrichment, and generally reflects Iran's attempts to obstruct the agency's investigative efforts.

It was also to reveal further details of laboratory testing of enriched uranium samples, one of the officials said, without providing details. The official spoke on condition of anonymity in exchange for discussing the confidential report.

Critics argue that Iran's existing research reactor in Tehran - which uses light-water technology - is more than adequate for the Islamic republic's stated needs of producing cancer-fighting isotopes.

Soltanieh denied that, telling the AP that after three decades of operation that reactor's "lifetime is almost over."

"We have to substitute it for another research reactor," he said.

The IAEA board referred Iran to the Security Council in February, suggesting that Tehran had breached the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and might be trying to make nuclear weapons.

The five permanent Security Council members agreed to move toward sanctions after Tehran ignored an Aug. 31 council deadline to stop uranium enrichment activities.

Russia - backed by China - opposes tough action advocated by the United States, Britain and France. Russian amendments to a Western draft resolution floated last week seek to reduce sanctions to a minimum, deleting language that would have choked off Iran's access to foreign missile technology and most nuclear procurements.

Iran rejected a six-nation package of incentives that would have given it Western-produced light-water reactors for freezing both construction of Arak and its attempts to expand its enrichment program.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Iran only opted for a research reactor using heavy-water technology, which produces plutonium waste, after being denied the ability to buy both light-water reactors, and the enriched uranium that powers them, from overseas. It is far harder to use light-water reactors in a military program.

Unintended consequences of foolish policies?

leveller  posted on  2006-11-14   8:01:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#0)

IAEA experts say that there is no legal reason to deny Iran the aid at Arak - one of 12 projects Iran has submitted for possible technical assistance but the only one the Americans are trying to block.

The NPT promises assistance in developing peaceful nuclear power. Perhaps Iran should quit the NPT. Perhaps that is precisely what the US wants Iran to do.

leveller  posted on  2006-11-14   8:03:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: All (#0)

The IAEA board referred Iran to the Security Council in February, suggesting that Tehran had breached the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and might be trying to make nuclear weapons.

Might? After years of inspections, the IAEA turned up no evidence of nuclear weapons programs.

leveller  posted on  2006-11-14   8:06:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: leveller (#0)

Title correction:

U.S. Israel Presses New Agenda on Iran

I'm not goin' to Vegas...I'm just goin' to work. - Click on 'Dusted!'

Esso  posted on  2006-11-14   8:10:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Esso (#4)

Israel Presses New Agenda on Iran

Another 'oversight' (propaganda/perception management/psyops) by a Jew media entertainment combine news wire service.

Splitends  posted on  2006-11-14   8:58:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: leveller (#2)

The NPT promises assistance in developing peaceful nuclear power. Perhaps Iran should quit the NPT. Perhaps that is precisely what the US wants Iran to do.

That is EXACTLY the aim of current US "policy". No matter what Iran does or says- just keep ratcheting up the absurd and clearly illegal demands- violate the NPT treaty itself while doing so, basically ignoring it wholesale- and keep making utterly unsubstantiated claims that Iran is building a nuclear bomb- no matter what inspectors say.

And then, when Iran is finally confronted with a US demand (thinly shrouded under an arm twisted UN banner) that is just too absurd and too humiliating and they withdraw from the NPT treaty- our government and media will use that act as the basis for eventual war with Iran (and our media will not question, at all, what lead Iran to withdraw from the NPT or provide an ounce of context or nuance and will repeat administration lines about Iran without a critical remark or examiniation in the slightest.)

Burkeman1  posted on  2006-11-14   11:20:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Burkeman1 (#6)

eventual war with Iran

Conventional air strikes, without troops, would seem to be th elogical first US move. Will Iran leap to the bait, by retaliating upon Israel or upon US troops in Iraq? Either one will get the convoy started from Iraq to Tehran.

Does Ahmadinjad believe that he can play for time until 2009?

leveller  posted on  2006-11-14   16:26:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: leveller (#7)

No government could survive an unprovoked attack on their country and NOT respond. Ahmadinjad factors little into this as his power doesn't match that of our Maximum Leader. Iran's government doesn't have an unchecked executive branch like ours.

Burkeman1  posted on  2006-11-14   16:29:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Burkeman1 (#8)

No government could survive an unprovoked attack on their country and NOT respond. Ahmadinjad factors little into this as his power doesn't match that of our Maximum Leader.Iran's government doesn't have an unchecked executive branch like ours.

Khameini, the Supreme leader, is supposedly commander-in-chief and only he has the power to declare war. Ahmadinejad, however, has been carrying the ball in public. How can we in AmerCanaMexico know who really holds the reigns of power in Iran? I'll ask the question more generally. Will Iran succumb to the temptation to retaliate? Do Iranians in power understand what that will mean?

What if Iran did nothing in response to bombing sorties? They would certainly win the public relations war in the rest of the world, if not at home. Their oil would permit them to survive the loss of what negligible nuclear power they have. The US would lose the excuse for futher efforts at forcible regime change. Iran itself would survive intact until 2009, when the new US president might be less hostile. Iran's rulers, however, might not survive whatever Iranian public outrage would follow their inaction.

If, on the other hand, Iran were to retaliate, it would play into the NeoCons' hands, giving Bush the excuse to defend the victims of the retaliation, whether they be US soldiers or Israelis or both. Iran would suffer from carpetbombing, invading troops, and the possible use of nukular weaponry.

Retaliation would bring war, but might assure the wartime survival of the Iranian rulers. Inaction might bring regime change. Would Iranian rulers choose their own power over their nation's well-being? Saddam did not retaliate against Israel in 1981, although he may not deserve much credit, since he was very busy, involved as he was in a little war with Iran.

leveller  posted on  2006-11-14   17:04:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: leveller (#9)

The government wouldn't survive doing nothing. It would have to retaliate or fall. Governments take their own power and preservation into consideration above all else.

Burkeman1  posted on  2006-11-14   17:15:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: leveller (#9)

If, on the other hand, Iran were to retaliate, it would play into the NeoCons' hands, giving Bush the excuse to defend the victims of the retaliation, whether they be US soldiers or Israelis or both. Iran would suffer from carpetbombing, invading troops, and the possible use of nukular weaponry.

The sad part of this is that Americans are so filled with insane self absorbtion and hubris that they would actually consider an Iranian retaliation for an unprovoked bombing to be an act of "aggression" AGAINST an innocent United States.

Burkeman1  posted on  2006-11-14   17:32:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Burkeman1 (#11)

Americans are so filled with insane self absorbtion and hubris that they would actually consider an Iranian retaliation for an unprovoked bombing to be an act of "aggression" AGAINST an innocent United States.

You bet. No one has any right to retaliate against one of our police actions. The world is lucky we picked up the white man's burden.

leveller  posted on  2006-11-14   18:44:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Burkeman1 (#10)

The government wouldn't survive doing nothing. It would have to retaliate or fall. Governments take their own power and preservation into consideration above all else.

Governments thrive in crises and wars; peasants and power-brokers usually rally around the flag and the dictator when pressure comes from abroad; war is the health of the state, etc. Agreed.

Then the stage is set. Israel or the US will bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran will retaliate, and the US will invade. All for an imaginary weapons program.

leveller  posted on  2006-11-14   18:49:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: leveller (#0)

LOL! Why not just sell them reactors like ABB did Rumsfeld was on the Board of Directors?

"...it is unlawful in the ordinary course of things or in a private house to murder a child; it should not be permitted any sect then to sacrifice children." -Thomas Jefferson

bluegrass  posted on  2006-11-14   19:04:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]