[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

MAGA Protest

The Floodgates Are Breaking In Germany's Welfare State

“The government wants to make sure that that does not come out. A huge part of our political system is predicated on blackmail,”

You Know What Happens Next

Cash Jordan: Half-Built Tower Abandoned… as ICE Deports Entire ‘Migrant Workforce’

Heavy rainfall causes flash flooding Tuesday night, some cars stuck in high water on Chicago's West

Biden Doctor PLEADS THE FIFTH, Refuses To Testify To Congress, Biden Pardons ARE VOID

Joe Rogan says FBI director Kash Patel played him for a fool and maga for fools with the Jeff Epstein files

Elon's AI System "Grok" Went Rogue And Has Been SHUT DOWN in an Emergency!

Earthquake Swarms at One of the MOST DANGEROUS Volcanoes in the USA

Ben Shapiro Declares Epstein Case CLOSED: ‘Facts on the Ground Have Changed’

Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets

China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power

Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes

Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal

Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising?

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Who'll Claim the Center? (PEGGY NOONAN CONFIRMS BUSH HAS ENEMIES LIST)
Source: Wall Street Journal
URL Source: http://opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110009255
Published: Nov 17, 2006
Author: Peggy Noonan
Post Date: 2006-11-17 16:28:23 by aristeides
Keywords: None
Views: 175
Comments: 12

Who'll Claim the Center?

Republicans and Democrats adjust to last week's power shift.

Friday, November 17, 2006 12:01 a.m. EST

WASHINGTON--A postelection stay in the cool, cloudy capital reveals a sober Republican Party attempting every day in conversations throughout Capitol Hill a rancor-free analysis of why the party lost, and in a way that was so killingly close and yet brutally decisive. There is a general sense the loss was not undeserved--this is an unusual attitude for runners just back from the race--and that it was not so much a vote for something as against something: them. And roiling, rudderless Iraq. And an unpopular president.

There is a sense the nation's culture and politics are and have been changing, shifting, and agreement that the election was not a realigning one but could yet prove to be if, among other things, Republicans fail to step back, refind and rethink their philosophy, style, priorities and meaning. They must develop a conservatism that speaks for and to the times. And stop being pigs--i.e., earmarking careerists who started with belief and wound up with hunger.

As for Democrats, they have a unique opportunity, one they haven't had in 14 years, to redefine for the public what their party is. It is their chance to change their public label. Now, with the cameras of the country trained on Capitol Hill, they can throw off the old baggage of the 1960s and '70s and erase the cartoon version of their party, which is culturally radical, weak in its defense of America, profligate, McGovernite, bitterly devoted to the demands of its groups as opposed to the needs of America.

In 1992 the young Southern moderate Bill Clinton got a chance to erase the cartoon, and he did, for a while. But he quickly slid back, undone by his own confusion as to the purpose of his power, and reinforced the public's worst assumptions about his party with everything from the health-care fiasco to using the Lincoln bedroom as a comp room for big rollers to horrifying fund-raising and personal scandals. What he did prove--and the area in which he did break away from the cartoon version of Democrats--was that he didn't dislike money or its makers. He did nothing to harm Wall Street, little to slow the economy, displayed a personal tropism toward the rich. Beyond that he didn't change his party's rep.

Can Nancy Pelosi? She looked radiant when she was elected by the Democratic conference yesterday, and she was careful to speak--everyone was careful to speak--of children and grandchildren. No one held up a sign saying "We're Normal," but the message was sent.

Can the Democrats spend the next two years showing a moderate, centrist, mature face to the country? Republicans say--this is the big phrase--"It's not in their DNA." But betting on the other guy's inability to change is not, really, a plan. And these Democrats, or many of them, seem a rising generation of pragmatists. They seem to know what's at stake. If they scare America, they give Republicans a ready campaign theme for 2008: If you liked the crazy Democratic Congress, you'll love a crazy Democratic White House.

Can they go down the center, or will radicalism of various sorts erupt and gain sway? No one knows. The Democrats don't know. The answer is going to help shape America's future political history. And it will help shape George Bush's. If the Democrats are radical, he will look more reasonable, not only in the eyes of the public but of history. If the Democrats are moderate, I think he will do something surprising, and yet much in line with his personality and nature.

I am taken aback this week at the level of disenchantment with and dislike of the president and his men--not among Democrats, but among Republicans. On the Hill they no longer see the White House as talented and formidable. They see it as shuttered and second-rate. There are bitter anecdotes about the way the White House has rigged and controlled events, only to blame those who followed them when disaster ensues. There are more anecdotes about the president's refusal or inability to absorb information he emotionally resists: the senator who kept telling him the past year what trouble the party was in only to be ignored, the former congressman who pressed the point with the president and received a tongue lashing. There is increased criticism too of the habit of high White House staffers to muscle critics, silence dissent, force obedience.

It is assumed by everyone, and accepted as truth that hardly needs expression, that the brilliant and independent Michael Steele was not chosen as head of the RNC for the simple reason that he doesn't look like someone who'd simply take orders. Mel Martinez was chosen for the reason that he will. I heard talk of what is called "the list"--the lengthening White House list of those who are to be treated as enemies. A White House preoccupied with the petty gave too little attention to policy, to the big picture. Thus the history of bungles.

Old affection and regard for the White House and the president have dissipated. But fear remains. They have two more years, they have the power to nominate, they have money. And so a party that might begin the process of refinding itself by thoughtfully detaching from the White House will, likely, not.

But I see a surprise coming.

What is the first thing men do when they're drowning? They save themselves. With the waters rising on every side the president will attempt to re-enact his first and most personally satisfying political success when, as governor of Texas, he won plaudits and popularity for working hand in glove with Democrats. He accepted many Democratic assumptions--he shared them, it wasn't hard.

The White House's reaction to the recent election was, essentially, Now we can get our immigration bill through with the Democrats. That was a clue. I suspect the president will over the next two years do to Republicans what he did to Donald Rumsfeld: over the side, under the bus and off the sled.

He doesn't need them. They're not popular. They're not where the action is. He'll work closely with Democrats, gain in time new and admiring press--"Bush has grown," etc.

This is the path he will take to build his popularity and create a new legacy. If the Democrats let him. It would be in their interests, so I think maybe they will.

Ms. Noonan is a contributing editor of The Wall Street Journal and author of "John Paul the Great: Remembering a Spiritual Father" (Penguin, 2005), which you can order from the OpinionJournal bookstore. Her column appears Fridays on http://OpinionJournal.com.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

So Peggy Noonan not only confirms that the Bush White House has an enemies list, but also apparently suggests that a generally loyal Republican like Michael Steele can end up on it. I wonder if Trent Lott is on it.

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides  posted on  2006-11-17   16:29:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: aristeides, aristeides (#0)

There is increased criticism too of the habit of high White House staffers to muscle critics, silence dissent, force obedience.

Just like the White House's official forum 'Freerepublic', eh?

"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom

Destro  posted on  2006-11-17   16:35:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Destro (#2)

I have long thought that FR is a window into the soul of the Republican Party.

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides  posted on  2006-11-17   16:38:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: aristeides (#3)

Was skeptical of that viewpoint but that was a long time ago.

The constant muzzling, the skewing, and the gross over simplifications and the coerced adherence to the desired zeitgeist has been overwhelming.

FR - the Green Zone of American Polity.

swarthyguy  posted on  2006-11-17   16:44:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: aristeides, mehitable, angle, Zipporah, Mekons4, Esso, Itisa1mosttoolate, tom007, scrapper2 (#0) (Edited)

I heard talk of what is called "the list"--the lengthening White House list of those who are to be treated as enemies. A White House preoccupied with the petty gave too little attention to policy, to the big picture. Thus the history of bungles.

Smirk learned how to make this list from his Poppy. Careful Peggy, that you don't end up on this list too, unless of course, you realize it's an honor to be on this list.

"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer."
---Henry Kissinger, New York Times, October 28, 1973

robin  posted on  2006-11-17   16:47:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: aristeides (#3)

I have long thought that FR is a window into the soul of the Republican Party.

You're assuming that it has a soul in the first place.

"First I'm gonna bother everybody I meet, and then I'll probably go home and get drunk."

orangedog  posted on  2006-11-17   16:47:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: orangedog (#6)

I have long thought that FR is a window into the soul of the Republican Party.

You're assuming that it has a soul in the first place.

What a sickening but accurate dittohead image.

"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer."
---Henry Kissinger, New York Times, October 28, 1973

robin  posted on  2006-11-17   16:49:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: aristeides (#0)

It's not who claims the center, it's who defines the center.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2006-11-17   16:49:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: aristeides, all (#0)

I am taken aback this week at the level of disenchantment with and dislike of the president and his men--not among Democrats, but among Republicans. On the Hill they no longer see the White House as talented and formidable. They see it as shuttered and second-rate. There are bitter anecdotes about the way the White House has rigged and controlled events

I find this comment, right above your bold, to be sobering. This White House, according to some insiders, "rigged and controlled events."

Hmmmmmm...what event(s) might that be???

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-11-17   16:57:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Jethro Tull (#9)

There are bitter anecdotes about the way the White House has rigged and controlled events, only to blame those who followed them when disaster ensues.

Given the context, one such event I suspect these congressional Republicans have in mind is the debate and vote they staged a few months before this year's election on immediate withdrawal from Iraq.

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides  posted on  2006-11-17   17:02:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: swarthyguy (#4)

I'm wondering who was responsible for the leak last week that Michael Steele would be the one who replaced Mehlman. Did Rove get overruled? Or was it Josh Bolten?

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides  posted on  2006-11-17   17:08:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: aristeides (#0)

PEGGY NOONAN CONFIRMS BUSH HAS ENEMIES LIST

It must be written in crayon.

"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."

mehitable  posted on  2006-11-18   0:46:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]