[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Religion See other Religion Articles Title: What is Christianity? What is Christianity? This is the burning question of the ages, and perhaps we should address it here, if for no other reason than to enlighten ourselves. And that being said, if you will read this, I think you will begin to achieve, if nothing else, a sense of what has and is being done to the people of this earth by the liars and murders that would rule the earth. A short time ago, a statement was made to me; Your statemanship needs some work. I replied that I certainly agreed; Noted, and I agree. I am blunt, and as I grow older and as I see more nonsense, I grow blunter. I watch people self-destruct because they will not get over their delusions... because they will not learn, and change, and adapt. AND, all of the information is available, and most of it is free, but.... Jessica Simpson and her soul mate Bart occupy too much of their time. I continued; Another word for delusions is insanity; and by any criteria, most Americans are insane. And if you do not understand that, simply look into the LEGAL drug business, at the more than 135,000 people who died last year from complications caused by LEGAL drugs, and explain it to me; while less than 2,500 died from illegal drugs. We have a so-called war on drugs, yet people are buying more drugs today than ever before, because they are legal!? And then please explain cancer to me, which is a natural process, or, heart disease, which two doctors, in 1986, correctly identified as the final, fatal stage of Scurvy. Yet even when the info about these subjects is presented, and verified, 99% of Americans will not accept the facts, and persist in their delusions. They are insane. Care to discuss voting? Esp. in light of the last so-called election? Or, how about insisting, contrary to all common sense, that the government is violating the Constitution, when research will show this to be non-sense, and yet, when the evidence is presented, no one will drop their delusions? Or, that there is no law mandating that anyone pay the income tax? How many people have gone to jail over that delusion/non-sense? So, you tell me; where does statemanship get you when you are dealing with insanity? I am much more inclined to use a sledge hammer to put my point across. To hit someone so hard with what they need to know that they can not forget what was written, even if they wish to. Why? Because this way the information will not go away, and, eventually, as it meshes with additional information that people gain as they live, it will manifest itself in a change in mind-attitude-thinking-believing. Even if the people do not understand what happened, this will occur. For this reason, I am not interested in statesmanship, nor in being popular. I am interested in the truth, and nothing else. And what does this have to do with being a Christian? Read the following and begin to understand, please, what has/is being done to you: The mystery religionists have long know that casting spells is really about re-inventing words and language to control the marks' thoughts. The magician's brother, the illusionist, creates illusions for people to distract them from reality-- Ever wonder why/how Hollywood got it`s name? "Hollywood," wood of the holly tree, was the traditional wood used for the wands of witches, magicians, and illusionists. Or, how about television? "Tele-vision" actually means "know or teach the vision." And whose vision is being taught? http://www.rense.com/general44/sevenjewishamericans.htm "Today, seven Jewish Americans run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry. Most of these industries are bundled into huge media conglomerates run by the following seven individuals: I highly recommend that you go to the above site and read the information, so that you understand where the control of your thinking is coming from/generated, and why. A man I greatly admire recently had some correspondence with a White Surpremist, i.e., those who believe that the white race is/was created to rule the world. As you read the following, remember what was said above about wands and the Tele. He is Christian Identity, old law etc. I have seen his writings for years. He believes I am twisting the words to mean what I want them to mean but in fact I am trying to take the twist out and make the word straight again. I always learn from these encounter or engagement even if others do not. I share it here. The nonsensical word smithing has already brought about a very strong delusion. It is continually promoted by vanity to make sure as few as possible find out what Christ, Moses and Abraham were really talking about. So since you put such faith in your translation of Amos, let us look at facts as they are presented. Amos 3:2 You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities. These 21 words are derived from only 5 Hebrew words that are collectively translated over 150 different ways in the Bible. The Hebrew = Yada mishpachah adamah ; paqad avon yada =Translated know 645 times, known 105, knowledge 19, perceive 18, shew 17, tell 8, wist 7, understand 7, certainly 7, acknowledge 6, acquaintance 6, consider 6, declare 6, teach 5, misc 85 times But in Amos it is said to mean = You only have I known mishpachah = families 290 times , kindred 9, kinds twice, But in Amos it is said to mean = of all the families 'adamah = translated land( s) 125 times, earth 53, ground 43, country 1, husbandman 2, husbandry once but in Amos it is said to mean = of the earth paqad = is translated number 119 times, visit 59, punish 31, appoint 14, commit 6, miss 6, set 6, charge 5, governor 5, lack 4, oversight 4, officers 4, counted 3, empty 3, ruler 3, overseer 3, judgment 2, misc 28; but in Amos paqad becomes = therefore I will punish avon = is translated iniquity 220 times, punishment 5, fault 2, mischief 1, sin 1 But in Amos we are told it means = you for all your iniquities Where did "You only" and "of all the" "therefore I will", "you for all your" come from, but the imagination of men? Why so many different translations and who decides for you which to use? Who is adding to the text that which is not there? Who has sought to twist and turn and add their own details via obscure nonsensical word smithing? So you tell me who is the victim of word smiths? Gregory The above is food for thought, and to understand that most of what you have/are being told about Christianity is a lie. It is your responsibility to separate out the wheat from the chaff; to separate the lies from the truth. The following was shared with me, and others, from a friend I admire in 4um. I thanked the giver, as this is as plain as anything can be as too what Chrianity is all about, and what it is not, and why much of the confusion exists. Please, remember the above as you read the following! Global Elite Promoting ‘End Times’ Myth Television gurus preaching a fraudulent “end times” and “last days” theory popularized in the 19th century are helping lay the groundwork for world government by corralling good Christians into supporting a doctrine that has no Biblical basis. True Christian fundamentalism, based on the teachings of the Bible takes the Bible at its word and accepts that Christ accomplished all that he intended to do while on Earth and that His kingdom is here and is within you. That’s the powerful thesis put forth by John Anderson, producer of the video The Last Days. On Dec. 16, Anderson made a return appearance on Radio Free America (RFA), the weekly call-in talk forum sponsored by American Free Press with host Tom Valentine. (A transcript of Anderson’s first appearance on RFA was published in AFP’s issue No. 19.) What follows is an edited transcript of the interview. Comments by Valentine are in boldface. Anderson’s responses are in regular text. The person responsible for popularizing this clap-trap that the “end times” and “last days” are coming was a shady character named Cyrus I. Scofield. That’s true, but Scofield was not the originator. Scofield got these false teachings from John Darby, who got it from Edward Irving and Margaret McDonald, a 14-year-old girl who had a dream and began writing letters to Irving describing what she thought was going to happen. Darby was one of the Plymouth Brethren and when Scofield got hold of what Darby and others were teaching, he produced the Scofield Bible in 1909 and there have been many revisions of it since then. Although they never say “who” revised Scofield’s work. Researchers have said that it was a powerful New York attorney, Samuel Untermyer, who was instrumental in arranging for the Oxford Press, which was controlled by the Rothschild banking family, patrons of the Zionist movement, to publish the Scofield “bible.” Students of history recall that Untermyer, who was a major player in the Zionist movement, was the one who blackmailed President Woodrow Wilson with the love letters that Wilson sent to his mistress, a certain Mrs. Peck. The history of this sordid affair was described in The Barnes Review* in its March/April 2000 issue. In its January/ February 2001 issue, The Barnes Review described Untermyer’s famous “holy war” speech that helped launch World War II. So many people today believe that the words of Scofield are the words of the scripture. I tell people that if you’ve got a Scofield “bible,” then throw it away. Most people who call themselves Christians do not study and read God’s word for themselves or they allow their thinking to be influenced by what they have been told based on the teachings of Scofield. If you look at the Tim LaHaye series, Left Behind, he and his associate have each made some $10 million on this, playing on the fear and unknowing faith of the Christian public. Doom and gloom sells, but truth does not. Thanks to the influence of Scofield and his sponsors, Untermyer and the Rothschild family, many Christians today believe that God promised a certain tract of land in the Middle East to the people we know today as Israelis. You are referring to the promise that God made to Abraham. God keeps his word and he certainly did. In Joshua 21, verses 43-45, it says that the Lord God gave unto Israel all the land. So God did fulfill the promise that he made to Abraham. But was the promise of this land to those known as the Hebrews a promise that this would be their land forever? No, it was not. First of all, the old covenant between God and the Hebrews was conditional. Although God kept his word, there was nothing in that promise that it would be that way forever. The old covenant was conditional. The key word is “if.” That is, if the Hebrews kept their part in their covenant with God. But all throughout scripture the prophets continue to predict that the Hebrews will break that covenant by disobeying God and that, eventually, they will lose it all. And eventually, they did lose it all. This is what is important: it was never solely an ethnic issue as to who “Israel” was. The issue always had to do with those who had faith and believed in God. (Please, read this several times and understand the deep, deep meaning behind these few words; This is what is important: it was never solely an ethnic issue as to who “Israel” was. The issue always had to do with those who had faith and believed in God.) For example, the United States is often referred to as a “Christian nation.” That does not mean that everyone in the United States is a Christian. But those who follow Christ by faith and by faith alone are of that spiritual seed. In Numbers 9:14, if strangers came in and kept the ordinances and the males were circumcised, they were accepted as a part of Israel. So it was not that this exclusive, nationalistic issue that many people try to hang onto. Spiritual Israel was always the issue. (One again, note this; Spiritual Israel was always the issue.) God said that Israel as a racial entity was going to be the one that the prophecies were made to and the messiah was going to come through. God divorced Israel but he did not divorce Judah, because the messiah had to come through Judah, as the prophecy was made in Genesis 49:10. Remember the parable that Jesus used about wineskin? He said you did not put new wine into an old wineskin. The issue was that the new covenant was not going to be accepted by old covenant Israel. (And once again; Remember the parable that Jesus used about wineskin? He said you did not put new wine into an old wineskin. The issue was that the new covenant was not going to be accepted by old covenant Israel. ) That’s the key thing: people with power in this world refused to accept God’s prophecy and what He had brought about. You have people who call themselves “Christians” who believe that this “Israel” of today is still the Promised Land and that God’s promise is going on in perpetuity and that God has a hand in this modern-day political mess in the Middle East and that we have an “end times” coming. They suggest that Christ effectively failed and did not fulfill God’s plan. That is exactly what dispensational theology teaches: The Jews rejected the kingdom and, as a result, it was put on hold. That’s utter nonsense. When they came to Christ and tried to make him king after He had fed the 5,000, he slipped away from them. He had not come to set up a physical kingdom. That was never His intent. It was always a spiritual kingdom with a spiritual people. To expect Christ to return and rule over a literal kingdom is to believe that everything Christ did when he was here on Earth was a failure. How could the Son of God be a failure? Correct. The people who are saying that Christ failed and has to return are suggesting that God was caught off guard and He had to come up with a “Plan B.” That’s absurd. Yet we still have many evangelical Christians believing this nonsense, thanks to Scofield. The historical and Biblical truths about the destruction of Jerusalem are not something that is widely taught to Christians in America today. Christians are not taught that this was the fulfillment of God’s promise and was literally the hand of God Himself destroying the old order completely and totally. Every Jew knew that the “Heaven and the Earth” was the temple. That’s what Jesus meant when He said that “Heaven and Earth” would pass but that His word would not pass. That is the prophecy of Isaiah 65: the New Jerusalem that came out of Heaven, the new “Heaven and Earth” that John spoke about in Revelation 21 when he said he saw a new Heaven and Earth and no more sea. What John was saying was that there was no more separation, no more exclusivity. Now God’s kingdom was open to all. (And again; What John was saying was that there was no more separation, no more exclusivity. Now God’s kingdom was open to all. ) The destruction of Jerusalem and the physical destruction of the old temple by the Roman armies was a signal that God’s kingdom was now in place. Christ predicted in Matthew 24 what would happen, and the truth is that what happened in Jerusalem in the times of Titus—the Roman who destroyed Jerusalem—you cannot find anything else in history to match it for horrible events. Christ said that the whole system that the Pharisees stood for was going to be destroyed. His disciples came to him on the Mount of Olives and asked, “When shall these things be?” Every one of them knew that there was going to be a new Heaven and Earth, a new age, a new covenant. Christ described to them all that would happen before it would transpire. Today people say that we are living in “the last days” and the world is coming to an end, but in Luke 21 (which is parallel to Matthew 24 and Mark 13), Christ said, “Take heed that you be not deceived for many shall come in my name, saying, ‘I am Christ. The end draweth near.” He said you shall hear of wars and rumors of wars and then said that there would be wrath upon “this people.” That’s the key: he’s referring to the flesh-and-blood individuals he was talking to at that time. The issue in Luke 21 is that he said that only the apostles themselves would be able to say when the end had come. That means that anyone after them would be a false prophet if they were predicting the end times had come to Earth. (And; That means that anyone after them would be a false prophet if they were predicting the end times had come to Earth.) The prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem was made to those people in that land, not to the whole world and that is another key to understanding all of this. The people of Jerusalem practically ate each other. It was a horrendous end time in the most classic sense. Josephus, the historian, even said that if Titus, the Roman, had not lifted his finger, the Jews of the time would have probably destroyed themselves from within. More than a million were killed and, at the end, only 100,000 were left. They went into captivity. There is a well-known Christian columnist, Cal Thomas, who seems to believe that everything Israeli leader Ariel Sharon does is directed by God Himself. That is the sentiment today: that everything Israel does is because it is ordained by God. The original “Israel” was dissolved by God, and if you look at the world today from a correct Biblical sense, based upon what we have in the Bible, there is no such thing as a “Jew.” The Jewish Encyclopedia itself says there is no such thing as a Jewish race. There is only a Jewish religion now and that is what came out of Babylon and had nothing to do with the Bible and its times. Is today’s Judaism the religion of the tribe of Judah? Predominantly today, yes. Under the years of Babylonian captivity they came up with the synagogue-type of Judaism that is being practiced today. When you start looking at the Jewish Talmud, you find things to tally contrary to God’s word, yet there are some today who say that “Christianity came out of Judaism,” and that is absurd. We are not a Judeo-Christian country. The United States started out as a Godly, Christian country. Not all of those who founded this country were Christian but at least the ideas of the Bible were incorporated into our nation by many of the Founding Fathers. God had his prophets on the Earth and when Christ fulfilled the promise, the temple was gone and the old way of doing things was wiped out. It was fulfilled. It’s amazing to me that there are those who don’t believe it. We say “trust in Jesus” and “take him at His word,” but many don’t. Every single person has Jesus right there if he so chooses. It has nothing to do with race or sex or height or anything. God’s kingdom is within us. It is open to any and all who believe in the finished work of Jesus Christ. • For information on ordering issues of The Barnes Review, call (877) 773-9077, email barnesrev@hotmail.com or write P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003. http://www.historici http://st.com/articles2/globalelite.htm To expect Christ to return and rule over a literal kingdom is to believe that everything Christ did when he was here on Earth was a failure. I will add my two cents worth. Jesus said "My kingdom is not of this world", yes, but in the next breath, He said "My kingdom is not NOW of THIS 'world.'" "World" there does not mean "earth" or "age" - see concordance. It basically, means "order of things" or "government". See the post; What does God mean.) Jesus came to establish HIS New World Order. What WE call the New World Order is actually the attempt to revive the Old World Order, the Order of Man/Lucifer, or a SECULAR Order [see your $1 bill, under the pyramid: NOVUS ORDO SECULORUM. See the Eagle with the Star of David, surrounded by the shekinah [kinda sounds like "Shock-and-Awe"] over its head and turn it upside down, and its' tail becomes a menorah. See David Rockefeller quote at Bankruptcy of America: Quote: We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we [ the CFR ] need is the right major crisis and the nation[s] will accept the New World Order. End Quote. David Rockefeller: Founder and Honorary Chairman, Council of the Americas; Chairman, Americas Society; Founder, Forum of the Americas; Chairman, Emeritus, Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]; Founder and Honorary Chairman, Trilateral Commission [TC]; Chairman, The Bilderbergs. [ How does the 11 Sept 2001 attack upon our country figure into this? CLMsr ] http://www.apfn.net/Doc- 100_bankruptcy.htm "The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." J. Edgar Hoover The world is in the malignant grip of a satanic cult. People recoil at the suggestion but proof stares us in the face every day......." http://www.savethemales.ca/000166.html Ezekiel 34:11-13/John 10; Micah 4:1; Psalm 2:6; http://www.nps.gov/archive/colo/capeheny/capeheny.html ; Ezekiel 17:1-10/Matthew 15:13. Jesus WILL rule over Israel, Ezekiel 20:33, but the church is Israel now: http://www.preteristarchive.com/PartialPreterism/provan- charles_dd_01.html Every Jew knew that the “Heaven and the Earth” was the temple. That’s what Jesus meant when He said that “Heaven and Earth” would pass but that His word would not pass. God has a new Temple, the church. It needed a new "city". It wouldn't fit in the old wineskin, either, so He appointed a NEW place for her: 2 Samuel 7:10, Zechariah 2:4: http://www.historicist.com/ojnj/ojnj1.htm [picture worth a thousand years - only bone to pick with this series of articles, is the fallacy that Israel/Jerusalem is all-white. It is not, of course, but of every nation, tribe and tongue John 3:16/Rev. 5:9-19.] wake up, church! (Thank you, my friend, for this message. Richard) Romans 4:13-16 : For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, [was] not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect: Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression. Therefore [it is] of faith, that [it might be] by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all, Romans 4:13-16 Romans 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law. And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed [it] unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. Matthew 16:16-18 (See the post, God is Eternal.) I am now going to do something which I did not intend to do. The following information is extremely mind altering if you have never been exposed to anything like it before. I suggest that you read it several times, and when that is done, get a copy of the book, Two Babylons, and read it. Twice. And see for yourself that the roots of the Roman church rest in Babylon, and not in Christ. (The book, Two Babylons, available on line, free, here; >http://www.biblebelievers.com/babylon/index.htm) THE ULTIMATE DELUSION http://www.apfn.org/apfn/queen.htm Subject: THE ULTIMATE DELUSION Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 17:40:27 EDT From: Noslavery@aol.com To the people, I found this paper while going through Stephen Ames' files. I am hoping that you will put it out on your E-mail and fax networks. This paper explains and documents very much. It is absolutely mind blowing! If you place this paper on your E-mail and fax networks I will be more than happy to respond to people's questions. I have all of the documents cited in this paper and they are available. This paper will shock even those who think that they know what has happened and what is now taking place. The deception is incredible. If the people do not respond to this information we can then truly say that it is over and that we will never be free. This paper is not opinion, but it is fact and is all documented. Now, what people have to realize is there are remedies for the problems that not just America faces, but the World. There are people all over the World that know what is going on and they are doing something about it. People all over America are emerging victorious over the images in their minds. Let us not forget the absolute astonishing amount of debt discharges that have taken place over the last few months. What is happening in America is unbelievable. People are coming out of the delusions, they have figured and realized that the United States is a fiction and that it only exists in our minds. Tens of thousands of people now know that the "United States" does not exist and that it never has. There is no such thing as the National debt or a loan from the bank. Has any one ever seen "current credit money?" The entire governmental system only exists in your mind. Nicole Terry - noslavery@aol.com By: Stephen Kimbol Ames Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows: S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty and pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows: "This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997." Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law. Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain, which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA 'plantation.' What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15). Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80. On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. Is this not incredible the King funded both sides of the War. But there was more work that needed to be done. Now the Articles of Confederation which was declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12," All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged." Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they were not done yet. Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there was a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of Confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so called founding fathers were acutely going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt. On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote. On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled; An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don't believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject. What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a Person. "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272," Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176. There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction. Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution. Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid; it states; All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One, Section Eight, clause Two, which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States (which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it. The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States Now the creditors of the United States which included the King wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax, which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the floundering fathers and their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!! If you don't believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah, 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states," But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it." Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15), which states that it is the militia's job to execute the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16), which states that Congress has the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States.... the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is there to collect our substance. (A note about the Second Amendment; let me add here what the people of the 1790s understood very well; the Second Amendment (thank you, Ken): Lost in the gun rights debate, much to the detriment of American freedom, is the fact that the Second Amendment is an "AMENDMENT". (Actually, the Second Amendment is an ARTICLE; not an Amendment. The Bill of Rights has it’s own Preamble, and stands as a separate document. However, what is being said here is correct, as far as the meaning of the “changes in intent” accomplished by the Second Article of the Bill of Rights. The Articles of the Bill of Rights did not change the wording “within” the Constitution, but they did clarify and, in this case in particular, add absolute prohibitions to the Constitution. – Richard) None of the "Articles in Amendment" to the Constitution (commonly referred to as the Bill of Rights) stand alone and each can only be properly understood with reference to what it is that each Article amended in the body of the original Constitution. It should not be knowledge to any American claiming patriot status that the Constitution was first submitted to Congress on September 17, 1787 WITHOUT ANY AMENDMENTS. After much debate, it was decided that the States would not adopt the Constitution as originally submitted until "further declamatory and restrictive clauses should be added" "in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its (the Constitution’s) powers". (This quote is from the Preamble to the Amendments.) The first ten Amendments were not ratified and added to the Constitution until December 15, 1791. (The Constitution was not officially “adopted” by the states until the Bill of Rights was presented, and both were adopted at the same time. The Constitution was not in force prior to the adoption of the Bill of Rights, and this is why George Washington did not take office prior to this. – Richard) In this Light: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.¨ What provisions of the original Constitution is it that the Second Amendment is designed to "amended"? THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS AMENDING THE PROVISIONS IN THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION APPLYING TO THE "MILITIA." The States were not satisfied with the powers granted to the "militia" as defined in the original Constitution and required an amendment to "prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers." What was it about the original Constitutional provisions concerning the "Militia" that was so offensive to the States? To answer this one must first understand that the word "militia" was used with more than one meaning at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. One popular definition used was one often quoted today, that the "Militia" was (and is) every able bodied man owning a gun. As true as this definition is, it only confuses the meaning of the word "militia" as used in the original Constitution that required the Second Amendment . "Militia" as amended by the Second Amendment is first found in the original Constitution at Article 1, Section 8, clause 15, where Congress is granted the power: "To provide for the calling forth the MILITIA to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrection and repel Invasions." Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16 further empowers Congress: "To provide for the organizing, arming, and disciplining, the MILITIA, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;" Any "patriot" still out there still want to be called a member of the "MILITIA" as defined by the original Constitution? If so, obey your commander: Article 2, Section 2, Clause 1 empowers Clinton: "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the MILITIA of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;" The only way the States would accept the "MILITIA" as defined in the original Constitution was that the Federal "MILITIA" be "WELL REGULATED." The States realized that "THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE" required that the "MILITIA" as originally created in the Constitution be "WELL REGULATED" by "restrictive clauses." How did the States decide to insure that the Constitutional "MILITIA" be "WELL REGULATED?" By demanding that the Second Amendment be added to the original Constitution providing: "THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED." The States knew that "PEOPLE" with "ARMS" would "REGULATE" the Federal "MILITIA!" Now the brightness of the Light may require sunglasses: "A WELL REGULATED MILITIA, BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE, THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED." Is it not amazing how understanding clears the air? And please note, in reading this with a new understanding, the Second Amendment becomes an absolute ban on any type of restrictions placed upon the people owning arms by the “government.” ANY restrictions. Want a machine gun? Well, if you are a United States citizen, no, because you have the same status as a slave/property, and as such, no Rights. Please see the federal court decisions regarding United States citizens and the Bill of Rights.) To continue; As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard the King's commerce and make us slaves. If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find "The Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation. This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794, which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King's Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was, he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly, the King wanted them here. Here is the key to where this started: Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems. Jewish Law governs the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit: "Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in (the) Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactment's and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher." (See the post, The Talmud Unmasked.) We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure"). (See the Post, God means what.) Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol. 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. The written credit agreement -- the Jewish shetar is a lien on all property (realty) and today it's called the mortgage! The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by Great Britain and the Jews are in charge of the Banking system. We are living under the Babylonian Talmud; it is where all of our problems come from. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the Christian churches ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things that do not exist. Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional, I'm sorry, people, you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below. (Actually, what you are subject to is called contract law; a freeman can not be a party to a contract which requires an oath or obedience to a foreign god.) "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520 You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution, not you. Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why ? Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters property! Here are just a couple of examples: "The primary control and custody of infant is with the government," Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62. "Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the state." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146. "The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session (Brown v. Welch supra). You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor. "The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were instituted, and never can exist under government." Wynehamer v. The People 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481. Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS is not an Agency of the United States Government. All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which is in code. By using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking series which shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. with holding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a. These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to the U.K. Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section One, and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine gets connected to it's udders? The answer is no. I have never known a cow that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever produced. You don't even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is measured in current credit money. You are allowed to retain a small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and most of all breed more slaves. Did you ever notice how many of the other slaves get upset if you try to retain your labor. You are called an extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They say that you are anti-government. When the truth of the matter is you just don´t want to be a slave. But, you do not have the right to force others to be free if they want to be a slave; that is entirely up to them. If they want to bow down and worship corporations, let them. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope are not the problem, it is the other slaves. We would be free if the want-to-be-slaves were gone. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope would not even exist, because no one would acknowledge them. I for a matter of fact, think that those who are in power are also tired of the slaves. All the slaves do is stand around and MOO!!! For free healthcare, free education, free housing and they beg those who are in power to disarm them I do agree that a slave should not have access to a firearm. How can you disagree with the government passing out birth control? I hope the breeding of slaves stops or at the very least slows down. You see, (to them) we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope. Now to Rome. "Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations." Article (3) Treaty of Varona (1822). If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence the jus nationale, (Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this be shown that the Pope rules the world? The Pope is the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal Bull of 1455 and 1492. I could go on and on; this is just the tip of the iceberg. Don't let this information scare you because without it you cannot be free. You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are nothing but fictional entities which have been placed into your mind, you will understand that your slavery was because you believed a lie. For more information: Nicole Terry 630K, Willow Street Highspire, Pennsylvania 17034 The end result of this is, we still do not know what being a Christian really is, and that is what this Post was purported to be about. Please, permit me to explain just a little of what I am, and what I am trying to become. I learn…. Do you? And I do not mean, do you accumulate information, for that is not learning. Learning is the process by which you take the information that you have learned and apply it to your mind and life. Learning is the process by which you change and adapt to the new reality/realities being exposed to you by the information that you accumulate. And if you are not changing and adapting, constantly, then you are not learning. A couple of examples; More than eighteen years ago, I sat down to have lunch with a friend, who happened to be a chemist. I ordered a Pepsi with my meal, and he asked me why I would ever do that. I shrugged, after all, everybody in sight in the restaurant seemed to be doing the same thing, and that is what I said. Well, he answered, obviously not! Because I certainly am not! And with that, he proceeded to explain to me what soda pop was/is, and what it does to my body. Half way through the explanation, I pushed the Pepsi, untasted, away, and in the next 18 years, I have not drank, nor paid for, a single soda pop. I learned, and I changed. More than twenty years ago, I first read the Bible. In it, one of the things I caught was about food, and especially about pork, which is named a number of times. On that day, knowing that God, the God of the Bible, does not talk of frivolous things nor about things which are not important, I threw away all of the pork in the house. And, I threw it away; I did not give it away and I did not feed it to my dog. I then prayed, and asked Him to explain to me what this was all about. Over the next year, every time I went to a meeting or met someone, all anyone wanted to talk about was pork, what it was, what it does to your body, what is in it, how it is made, and etc. etc. etc. I have not ate pork since then, and I can just about make myself ill remembering how much of it I ate when I was young. BUT! I learned, and I changed and adjusted to a new reality. At about that same time, I learned about the day of the Sun, i.e., Sunday, and how it is a perversion of God`s Word to use it as a day of worship. I changed. I quit going to any church which had a Sun-day school, or worshiped on Sun-day, or, finally, held sun-rise services. I took it further; I found out about all of the Holidays (Holidays = holi-days = change the i to y = Holy Days) and I quit. No more Xmas; i.e., the mass of X, X being known throughout history as Nimrod and December 25th being the birth day of his son, Tammuz, known throughout the Babylonian Mystery Religion as the son of god. I quit. I learned. I changed. I adapted. This is what it means to be a Christian. To learn. To seek… Him. We are not perfect, and we are here to learn and to seek Him. We are not here to practice religion. We are not here to be slaves. We are not here to live in delusion. We are here to accept responsibility, and with that responsibility, to learn how to live under His Perfect Law of Liberty. But, and this is a big but, you can not find Him, nor live under His Perfect Law of Liberty, until you have accepted the responsibility for your own life and health. Here is what I know to be a fact; unless your life is and has been changing, probably drastically, then you are not learning how to be a Christian. You have not yet learned that Christianity is a way of life, it is a seeking, and it is not a religion in the sense that man understands and practices. God Bless, Richard "When the male triangle penetrates the female triangle, it forms the six-pointed crest of the Seal of Solomon or hexagram, the most wicked symbol in witchcraft". 20. It should be noted that the Promise Keepers Sacred Assembly was held before the Washington Monument, an obelisk or phallic symbol built by the Freemasons. For a study of the occult symbolism of this event, please see A Sacred Assembly of Men. Further connections become apparent as stated by the Masonic J.D. Buck, who explains that the Star of David and "six-pointed star" or hexagram symbol of the House of Theosophy are identical to the compass of Freemasonry. "The perfect equilibrium of spirit and matter is symbolized by the six-pointed star, which is again only another form of the Square and Compass, each having a base-line from which to form a triangle." 21. …
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||