[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Jury Orders Rancher to Pay Hunting Party
Source: www.wilmingtonstar.com
URL Source: http://www.wilmingtonstar.com/apps/ ... le?AID=/20061123/APA/611232426
Published: Nov 25, 2006
Author: AP
Post Date: 2006-11-25 17:37:41 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 4033
Comments: 107

SIERRA VISTA, Ariz. | An anti-illegal immigration activist accused of threatening to shoot a Mexican-American family of hunters with an assault rifle and using racial slurs against them was ordered to pay them $98,000.

A civil jury held rancher Roger Barnett only partly responsible, saying some of the blame lay with the man who sued and the man's father.

Ronald Morales and his father, Arturo, were with his two young daughters and their friend when Barnett confronted them near his Douglas-area ranch and accused them of trespassing Oct. 30, 2004.

Morales' lawsuit claims they were legally crossing land Barnett leases from the state. The Moraleses are U.S. citizens of Mexican descent.

Barnett, who claims to have detained more than 10,000 migrants in the last 10 years, denied threatening the hunting party. He testified that he only took out his AR-15 rifle because the adults in the group were carrying rifles.

Morales, a Navy veteran, said he felt justice had been served by the verdict.

"We came to court and spoke the truth, and the jury heard that truth," Morales said. "Hopefully this sends a message that you can't point a gun at little kids - or anybody for that matter - and then threaten to shoot them."

Barnett declined to comment, saying his lawyer advised him against speaking. His brother, Donald Barnett, expressed disappointment.

"In the Morales family, the father taught the son to trespass, and now the father's teaching the daughters how to trespass in blatant disregard for the law," said Donald Barnett, who was initially named in the suit but later dropped as a defendant. "I guess in this country, private property and a person's rights don't mean much any more."

The lawsuit was sponsored by the Border Action Network and the Southern Poverty Law Center, civil rights groups that have accused Barnett of acting as a vigilante and abusing illegal immigrants he detains on his ranch.

The family sued Barnett for assault, false imprisonment, negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The jury found in favor of all five plaintiffs Wednesday.

Morales said he asked the Cochise County Attorney to press criminal charges against Barnett, but was told no jury would convict him.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 90.

#84. To: Ferret Mike (#0)

J. The Commission may grant permission to lock or obliterate a gate or close a road or trail that provides legally available access to state lands for licensed hunters and fishermen if access to such lands is provided by a reasonable alternate route. Under R12-4-610, the Director may grant a permit to a state land lessee to temporarily lock a gate or close an existing road that provides access to state lands if the taking of wildlife will cause unreasonable interference during a critical livestock or commercial operation. This permit shall not exceed 30 days. Applications for permits for more than 30 days shall be submitted to the Commission for approval. If a permit is issued to temporarily close a road or gate, a copy of the permit shall be posted at the point of the closure during the period of the closure.

K. When hunting, fishing, or trapping on state land, a license holder shall not:

1. Break or remove any lock or cut any fence to gain access to state land;

2. Open and not immediately close a gate;

It would appear that hunters may lawfully access state lands that are leased to citizens except when limited permits are issued to deny access, and then for no more than 30 days.

And, I'm betting that this individual could tell at a glance that these Mexican-Americans were lawfully hunting or plinking, and were not your average mojados.

In other words, he was wrong to confront them.

An experienced "Wet Mex herder" should be savvy enough to tell the diff between them and legal residents and citizens.

So, he may have been venting his frustrations on browns with little regard for their rights, in which case the judgment was proper.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-11-26   6:17:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: HOUNDDAWG (#84)

Good post. I am irritated to see so many at LP sounding and acting so FReeperish on this story. Goldi has succeeded in driving any element of reasoned voice out of an argument when you hear a lynch mob's chorus instead of a reasoned discussion on issues.

This forum has that fault to in the irrational timbre of discussions on Zionists and Jews that begs a sane response of not wanting to listen to any of it the blurred dog snarl barking with the chain a tight guitar string between post and dog tightened to the key of blind hate.

I am disappointed that Goldi after flirting with free speech has donned the garb of an SS lyncher, baiter and whiner.

This guy got what he deserved, even thought the judgment was on the low side. I a satisfied by it.

The immigration problem denotes why I throw up at the hypocrisy of Christianity.

Anti-immigration people are so self righteous in decrying how they are hated and disrespected so much as Americans by the influx, but they are too chicken to take on those promoting the influx scared by their political and economic power and do exactly the wrong thing which is hate and bait the desperate mases coming in scapegoating them as the easier target.

Why can't they see how much like a cowardly bully this makes them look?

Criticism of one's neighbor as these folks surely are should come with an acknowledgment of their humanity and a warm hand of friendship and empathy.

Even if it is extended with the desire for them to go back home in he heart of the hand's owner.

Being concerned on an issue never is an excuse to blindly hate a group of people.

That is just wrong.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-11-26   7:31:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Ferret Mike (#85)

This guy got what he deserved ...

It was a civil suit. Why did he deserve a $98,000 judgement against him when he was defending his own cattle from rustlers?

buckeroo  posted on  2006-11-26   10:31:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: buckeroo (#86)

Where did he prove they were rustlers? Oh, I get it, if you look Mexican you are automatically guilty of the worst thing assumable.

Figures.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-11-26   11:09:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: Ferret Mike (#87)

The rustlers had highpowered loaded rifles.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-11-26   11:17:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: buckeroo (#89)

You didn't answer my question as to where is the proof these were rustlers.

I generally hunt with one of my compound bows myself. But I do carry the glock too.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-11-26   11:36:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 90.

#92. To: Ferret Mike (#90)

I think the "proof" was in the over 10,000 illegal aliens the rancher had already captured or runoff his property.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-11-26 11:43:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 90.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]