See other Immigration Articles
Title: How to harass Illegal Aliens - Funny Vid
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.halturnershow.com/HowToHarassIllegalAliens.wmv
Published: Nov 27, 2006
Author: unknown
Post Date: 2006-11-27 19:09:11 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 2252
Comments: 143
http://www.halturnershow.com/HowToHarassIllegalAliens.wmv
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-63) not displayed.
.
.
.
#64. To: JohnGalt (#59)
i'm not understanding your point. we should be discouraging assimilation in what way then? it seems to me that keeping english the official language in this country is discouraging assimilation. what am i missing here?
They still get 40 bucks a pop for Tragedy & Hope on Amazon. Why, I don't know.
Perhaps we should look into Paraguayan real estate...
Yes, discourage assimilation. Official English is the gateway to Official Spanish. Either send them home or accept the consequences, at least, don't be a dupe.
I've decided to live and die here Jim, with the former being my preference :)
Context, that is all. If I am weary of my friends who get in line with Sean, Jerome and CNN Made For TV populists, that is the explanation.
Leftwing source with leftwing bias and baggage, but good place to start and first thing on google.
I don't care what they go back to. The business of sending them back will be dirty and make sinners of us all, but unlike the previous generations who drank the kool aid of their own vanity, I intend to at least prepare my mind for what must be done to salvage whatever is left.
Yeah - if things remain as they seem to be, I'm here with ya. Were I a single man, it would be different. All I can do is invest in the precious metals - lead, silver, and gold. And pray. Cheers, everyone.
Truth is what it is.
What then must be done? (Keep it simple.)
Give 'til it hurts. Gun Owners of America
Yeah- the dirty scummy mexicans and their diseases. Are you for real? Don't eat in restaraunts then. In fact, maybe you can scoot over to El Pee and ask to hide under their beds while they cower in fear of non existent Islamofascists. Geeese.
That is a fairly broad question, but lets keep it aimed, tactically, on the immigration question as it relates to the Rightwing. (There are, believe it or not, folks on the Left via the Greens who get it as well, but I think its hopeless to recruit work with them, and we just have to root for them to take over their various organizations etc.) Christians, one of the most active groups on the Right, were easily diverted from accomplishing anything by wasting all of their energy on teaching "creationism" in the public schools...do you see what is wrong with that as a strategy? How it serves the power elite? How it offends the general decentralist instinct of the American mob? Assimilation, Official English, a wall these have sell-out written all over them. The Conditioners have successfully convinced the masses that deportation means box cars and jackbooted thugs, but there are humane ways to tackle the question that simply aren't being discussed and if I can figure it out, if you sort of glimpse my point since you asked, and we just two hacks on the Internet, I assume someone smarter than us who wishes to control us has figured it out as well.
Truth being what? Our government with its massive police state resources won't enforce laws already on the books so the answer is to make English the Official Language? Does not compute.
The truth being our nation is being invaded from our South and to a far lesser degree to our North. With it comes a horde of uneducated Mexicans, and other than Mexicans, who have swollen our social services to the point of breaking. They come in advance of the creation of the North American Union. Despite me telling you this numerous times, you seem to be stuck on assimilation and English as our native tongue. Please don’t misunderstand me; I don’t want them to learn English or to assimilate. I don’t want them here ILLEGALLY. The kid in the vid did what I expect our border security to do – round their asses up and deposit them to the doorstep of the INS.
See, we agree on many things but have a tactical disagreement on approach. When you post a video of a similiar citizen making a citizen's arrest of an INS agent for derilection of duty, I will cheer bravo.
You are absolutely right on how these peripheral issues have been energized with the conivance, of course, of the mainstream. Nothing, for example, will provide fodder for endless wedge issues than an Official English. One need only look at Canada to see where that goes. I believe that we meed a "Minuteman" force to keep employers honest. That is the most important tool. It is the key issue in fact. Something must be done soon before the issue is legislated away in a flood of amnesty bills. This is our last chance and we must raise hell with the new Congress, or all will be lost in a few short months.
Give 'til it hurts. Gun Owners of America
it's really much simpler than that, imo. #1 we need to stop the incentives/welfare encouraging them to come. #2 if we had a government whose first interests were truly that of america and americans, then every troop who is now in iraq and in 140+ countries around the world at the behest of globalist elites, would instead be on our borders guarding and protecting them. at this point, i think we must be isolationists and protectionists, else this nation will be destroyed.
and i do not have a problem with immigration. i have no problem with someone coming here to try and make a better life for themselves. they just need to start on a level playing field like the rest of us. none of us is given governmental gifts. i'm italian and my sicilian ancestors weren't given a thing when they came here. they did it on their own.
common sense bump
It’s amusing watching us all try to develop some unique solution to the invasion of our nation. Any of the suggestions made would begin to yield results immediately, but keep in mind they’ll never be implemented. The elite are achieving their desired result; the integration of Mexico, Canada and the US. Is there anyone who disagrees with this? More importantly, is there anyone who welcomes it?
Sicilians and Italians tended to settle on the East Coast in already crowded cities. They brought with them Old World baggage and a tradition of corrupt big government habits. It was the Old line blue bloods of Boston, with Cal Coolidge as President and Henry Cabot Lodge in Congress who pushed through the immigration pause that began in the 20s through 1965. I also, looking at history, don't think Nordic immigration that settled in the Midwest worked out so great. Prussians brought with them a love of Union that was foreign and a tradition of bureaucracy and officialdom that again was also foreign to a land of Celts, Anglos, and Danes who had made something out of nothing and fought a war for the right of self-rule. If the issue was 12 million low class Irish being naturalized, I would still be against the idea as its simply never a good idea, but it seems it's a done deal, so I certainly understand the converse which is being against big government solutions that don't even begin to address the core questions.
It's a good question. One can sort of cop out and argue the obvious its a done deal so lets start addressing what it means to us, which includes the secessionist goals of patriots and to what degree do we give up our humanity getting angry at the pawns in a game bigger than us.
yep
No, and No. And at least 90% of Americans agree.
I don't think that the idea is to create a unique solution. I mean this is no brainstorming session in an English class. This stuff is for real, for keeps. There are three keys to this thing as I see it: 1) the border, 2) employers, 3) the system of benefits immigrants avail themselves of. If you can enlarge that list, please feel free to do so. Be mindful that you need to look where action has the most immediate effect. 1) The border. This is one area where uncontrolled immigration and the forces that promote it are most vulnerable. To make it short and sweet, this is also one area where we get LSO - lip service only from our govenrment. I don't have to quote you chapter and verse on this one. 3) Government benefits. Illegals to some extent use welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, unremunerated medical services, and get free public schooling and even tuition benefits at community colleges. It's important to remember that while the overall numbers are increasing that most of the immigrant coming here illegally are single men looking to to make a buck and trying stay below the radar. Most of them stay a year or two and return home with their savings. True some stay and have babies, and a few come with their families and the latter group probably burdens the system the most. However, it is also important to recognize that this is a system run by bureaucrats and Marxistas and they will not help us one bit. They have a burgeoning clientel and you can fight them tooth and nail for years and you will always outdone by their political operatives who are old hands at this game. 2) Employers. This is a most vulnerable group, and they do get cited and prosecuted for hiring illegal aliens. Employment is the real draw. It is the big magnet that drives immigration - legal and illegal. I think that you can make a strong case that this is in fact the Achilles' heel of the invasion. A lot of folks are in clear violation of the law, daily putting all their assets at risk. We have to put a big spotlight on people that hire labor illegally before the whole system is legitimized by accomodationists like the Big Decider in the White house. I welcome your critique of my opinions here. This is just how I see it.
Give 'til it hurts. Gun Owners of America
Your solutions would all stop the invasion cold had we a government that was responsive to the people. The problem is that they aren't, and what we're seeing on a daily basis is by design. I need to keep myself centered on the creation of the NAU for any of this to make sense. I remain amazed at people who are unfazed by what’s unfolding.
And what concerns you about the NAU that would be quantitatively worse than the political structure we have now? Or is yours just an irrational reactionary position? What will be worse under the NAU? You should explain the infringements on your rights you expect from a future action, before you ask others to take limited resources they are using to fight current infringements and dedicate them to your cause.
In other words be a snitch. No thanks. That's not how respectable people did things in my old neighborhood.
If ifs and buts were candied nuts. Just the absurdity of the proposition that a government can serve the "interests" of 300 million people boggles my mind. City councils in BFE can't even serve the "interests". Government is force and someone is going to be forced to serve someone else. It's inherent to the system. There is no reforming it. It must be abolished.
Besides the obvious death of our nation and culture, Americans will face an even greater tax burden as 3rd world scum cross over into our welfare state. Please note I didn’t say Mexican 3rd worlders; the new borderless NAU would have no way of recognizing the homeland of this flow of refugees. I’d expect to see the worlds most impoverished people flooding into our country bringing their culture, language, diseases and crime. No thanks.
Welcome to the new neighborhood.
Give 'til it hurts. Gun Owners of America
So I should direct energy to fighting future higher taxes instead of the almost 54% I already pay to all levels of government? How much effing higher can they go? This is why I part ways with your cause. It seems you've already given up on the last fight and moved on to the next one which only advances the other side. If all the people who are worried about the detrimental effects on the welfare, educational and healthcare systems by immigrants (and polls show it's quite a few) directed their efforts at getting rid of welfare, shitty government schools and hospital handouts, we wouldn't have the problem in the first place. But you seem to just be conceding defeat, giving up the old ground and moving on to the next battle. And then what? They'll get their NAU and you'll give up and move to the next fight. Always playing defense. That's how they want you.
Nah, I'll stick with the old one. You go tattle to Big Brother, I still remember where I come from. And I still remember who the enemy is. Hint: it's the guys with guns taking half your paycheck not the guy who hires someone in a voluntary transaction.
Yes, and you'll never live it down, will you? You have my sympathies.
Give 'til it hurts. Gun Owners of America
My issue is not really illegals per se, but the legals via the absurd refugee system who settle here cause of the bennies. You start talking about the Wall, and I hear sell-out and fear of being called a racist by our eternal enemy the Left, and retreat to "if they come here legally to work that is fine." I don't care for the cat eaters, the clitordectomists, etc etc and when I see these sorts of folks in suped up cars that must run 30K, I can damn angry...but our enemies figured out that its pretty easy to pay the Matt Hales or the Fred Phelps to turn up as reinforcements and insure no political solution. Hence, tactically speaking, not appealing to hate, but aggressively appealing to culture must be the theme of attack.
Sorry, I don’t know the tax ramifications you’ll experience after America is morphed into a CFR sponsored trading zone, but the influx of human welfare sponges that will follow won’t decrease them. Any plan sponsored by an unelected elite, supported by Bush and Fox in secret, should be viewed with a great deal of skepticism. But that’s me.
Appealing to culture is not a plan of attack. That sounds like high-brow journalism. And it is readily coopted by the Whiner/Savages ("Borders, Language, Culture") for other purposes.
Give 'til it hurts. Gun Owners of America
Geeese. I believe you're putting
words in my mouth AND assuming something that I didnt mean whatsoever.. LEGAL
aliens.. have to take a health exam.. period.. illegals DO NOT.. have you done
any research whatsoever on this?? There IS a reason we have a CDC and a reason
aliens do have to have a health okay to come into this country.. it's to
protect the health of the citizens in this country. GEEESE is right..
is it not possible to have a government for, by, and of the people? a servant government? did we ever? if this thing we have now is abolished, what do we replace it with?
Comments (104 - 143) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestLou favors making English the official language and stronger public school to promote the butcher Lincoln and fascist FDR ie assimilation...
#65. To: JohnGalt (#54)
Yes, and its been public knowledge since at least the 70s, earlier if you are a Bircher or even a lefty of the Quigley variety.
#66. To: Jethro Tull (#30)
...that would interfere with the creation of the North American Union, a concept some traitorous leaches (posing as free men and women) want and desire.
-Thomas Paine
#67. To: christine (#64)
#68. To: lodwick (#66)
#69. To: Jethro Tull (#62)
#70. To: christine (#63)
(Edited)
#71. To: christine (#61)
#72. To: Jethro Tull. all realists here (#68)
I've decided to live and die here Jim, with the former being my preference :)
-Thomas Paine
#73. To: JohnGalt (#69)
#74. To: JohnGalt (#71)
#75. To: Zipporah (#50)
#76. To: randge (#74)
#77. To: Jethro Tull (#73)
#78. To: JohnGalt (#77)
#79. To: Jethro Tull (#78)
#80. To: JohnGalt (#76)
#81. To: JohnGalt (#77)
(Edited)
#82. To: JohnGalt (#79)
#83. To: christine (#81)
#1 we need to stop the incentives/welfare encouraging them to come. #2 if we had a government whose first interests were truly that of america and americans, then every troop who is now in iraq and in 140+ countries around the world at the behest of globalist elites, would instead be on our borders guarding and protecting them. at this point, i think we must be isolationists and protectionists, else this nation will be destroyed.
-Thomas Paine
#84. To: all (#81)
#85. To: christine (#82)
(Edited)
#86. To: Jethro Tull (#84)
#87. To: JohnGalt (#85)
(Edited)
#88. To: Jethro Tull (#84)
Is there anyone who disagrees with this? More importantly, is there anyone who welcomes it?
-Thomas Paine
#89. To: Jethro Tull, JohnGalt, All (#84)
(Edited)
#90. To: randge, lodwick, christine, all (#89)
(Edited)
critique
#91. To: Jethro Tull (#40)
NO, my beef is with the creation of a North American Union, a plan sponsored by the elites at the CFR.
#92. To: randge (#89)
We have to put a big spotlight on people that hire labor illegally ...
#93. To: christine (#81)
#2 if we had a government whose first interests were truly that of america and americans...
#94. To: SmokinOPs (#91)
(Edited)
And what concerns you about the NAU that would be quantitatively worse than the political structure we have now?
#95. To: SmokinOPs (#92)
#96. To: Jethro Tull (#94)
Americans will face an even greater tax burden as 3rd world scum cross over into our welfare state
#97. To: randge (#95)
(Edited)
Welcome to the new neighborhood.
#98. To: SmokinOPs (#97)
(Edited)
I still remember where I come from.
#99. To: randge (#89)
#100. To: SmokinOPs (#96)
How much effing higher can they go?
#101. To: JohnGalt (#99)
aggressively appealing to culture must be the theme of attack.
#102. To: Burkeman1 (#75)
(Edited)
Yeah- the dirty scummy mexicans and their diseases. Are you for
real? Don't eat in restaraunts then. In fact, maybe you can scoot over to El
Pee and ask to hide under their beds while they cower in fear of non existent
Islamofascists.
#103. To: SmokinOPs (#93)
.
.
.