Without naming names at this point, people hostile to rationality and the scientific method are close to completely taking over Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Such people claim that "space beams" destroyed the World Trade Center, that no planes hit the Twin Towers, and that the Twin Towers fell faster than free-fall speed. None of the scientists in the Scholars' group buy these theories.
These people throw out false arguments and then -- when caught in an untruth -- start calling anyone who raises contrary facts names and attempts to bully them into submission. They used the Karl Rove "slime and defend" tactics. Even though all of the group's scientists disclaim these claims, the Rovians shout them from the rooftops on websites and radio broadcasts and every other soapbox they can find.
One of the Twin Cities largest papers is covering the story, and Jeff Wells of Rigourous Intuition says "scholars for 9/11 Truth [are] tearing one another new impact holes over speculation on space-based beam weaponry."
Will cloudy thinkers and disinformation agents win? Or will rationality prevail?
Even though the Scholars' group includes stellar scientists, and heroes like Bob Bowman, David Ray Griffin, and many others, everyone will need to ignore the group if the hostile takeover is completed. If the ship sinks, the good people will find better homes, because you cannot keep good men (or women) down.
Poster Comment:
The problem with equality is that any moron with an Internet connection thinks he is the equal of David Ray Griffin.