[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: Leaderless Resistence 2 There are so many things behind what is going on and that the average American is so unaware of that it is astounding! This is just a sample of some of the things that are being uncovered. Enjoy. First, the following was posted in answer to Leaderless Resistence in a very informative and informed group (Please note that I strongly disagree with this first paragraph because the One Supreme Court HAS never sat as authorized by the Constitution, which, of course, makes the Constitution simply a Con); First, I agree with most of the article, except I believe that the Constitution is NOT a Pyramid type organization. ... in fact, it is a CELL organization, in the nature of the one your article seems to promote. Due to the fact that the Three Powers of the constitution are SEPARATE and EQUAL, there is no "pyramid dictatorial nature" in the Constitution. However, the Executive and Legislative Powers have had to resort to pyramid structure within their own branches, in order to usurp power form the Judicial branch. All agencies that are created by government, are outside the Constitution, and basically are a foreign governments, based on Federal Reserve Notes, or Corporations. ...... This first occurred two years after the Constitution was ratified in 1789, when the Congress wrote the "Judiciary Act" which in turn created an INFERIOR COURT (agency) that made decisions based on "legislative" laws, not God's laws, and conveniently called the "supreme court", which is a "pyramid" structure of "justice" within the Legislative branch, which most people, by design, confuse with the Article III ONE SUPREME COURT. As it turns out, the Judicial Power, the one of three "cell", which is separate and equal, is the POWER that each individual can exercise in order to establish justice in their own particular case.... The Judicial power is that power that protects "free action", and is guaranteed to each individual and protected by the government, or the Constitution. The California Constitution lays out this particular power and explains how it is waived by the people when they fail to act.... or take action. It is this knowledge that is necessary in order for each participant to exercise their resistance to tyranny.... it can only be exercised in the Court.... in one's own particular case. The Judicial Power is the only political power that the people have that they don't give up by the vote.... this power is given up when one hires an attorney, or fails to take judicial action..... The separate powers of the constitution, are manifested in fact , when one is in the court. The prosecution brings in and represents the Legislative power, the judge exercises the Executive power, and the defendant, exercises Judicial Power, unless he waives it immediately upon entering the court.... darn, fooled again by the Judiciary Act of 1789! The Legislative Power of the Constitution, has adopted the "Roman Style Legal Procedure", or the dictatorial pyramid as opposed to the "English Common Law Style" that the Judicial Power of the Constitution, guarantees as well as the Civil Code of the State of California, and each state except Louisiana. Each person is a cell in the third branch of government, which is separate and equal to the other two. The problem is that very few people are aware of this power and immediately waive it due to fear, force or coercion. Zeke Then, the day after the above was posted, this info came through the group. The two posts together make a lot of sense! An unprecedented event happened in the USDC court before Judge Cooney in Medford, Oregon Monday. They were ready to arraign me and schedule a trial in January. Then I threw a wrench into the works. I declared for the record that I could not enter a plea until the Prosecution read and certified ALL the charges into the record. The U.S. Attorney squirmed at every angle and finally refused. The judge then stepped in and entered a plea of "Not Guilty." I objected and told the judge I would not accept his declaration. Then he declared for the record that he was not qualified, authorized nor did he have the jurisdiction to hear such a matter. He then acknowledged that he was turning the matter over to an Article III judge, Owen Panner. I was to meet with Mr. Panner this morning and in anticipation of that put together the parameters and requirements the Article III judge must comply with and the rules the District Court of the united States of America must follow in order to hear the matter. Needless to say they are in a quandary. They now appear ready to quietly dismiss the case and try to put it behind them. I do not seek revenge, but I am not willing to simply let them slip by it. I am reminded how Paul the Apostle dealt with the leaders in Phillippi when he was arrested, beaten and placed in chains in the town dungeon. The leaders realized their error and simply wanted Paul and Silas to quietly leave, but Paul demanded they come and walk them from the jail to the gates of the city. We seek the same. They have violated my rights and injured us causing much damage to my reputation and pocketbook. I want that publicly acknowledged. I want a restraining order against Michael Hunter, the IRS CID Agent who has displayed that he has a personal vendetta going against me and my family. The results of all this could well prove valuable to Eddie Kahn, Wesley Snipes and many others. My thanks to Winston, Sam, Vince and others. Pray that tomorrow will bring the results that will be honoring to the Lord and to truth. ____________ [12:19:09 PM] Barton Buhtz says: What USDC judge Cooley did Monday was monumental! I have talked with several legal experts who are astounded that this judge stated for the record that his court and his judgeship did not have the authority or the jurisdiction to hear this matter!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: richard9151 (#0)
Is there a part one to this....could you provide it, please. Thanks. Looks interesting.
The U.S. Attorney squirmed at every angle and finally refused. The judge then stepped in and entered a plea of "Not Guilty." I objected and told the judge I would not accept his declaration. Then he declared for the record that he was not qualified, authorized nor did he have the jurisdiction to hear such a matter........ I have talked with several legal experts who are astounded that this judge stated for the record that his court and his judgeship did not have the authority or the jurisdiction to hear this matter! yeah....that's the part that jumped out at ME. If a whole lot of people start doing this, they'll probably open the "camps" for business.
You are probably correct, as they would have no choice as too many people would have learned the difference between being a slave, and accepting the responsibility for themselves. In other words, being Christian, which is by far and away, the most dangerous thing possible for the so-called elite! And, why they hate Christianity so much!
The Solution is to apply, for the first time in the history of the United States, the Constitution to Washington, D.C.
For those of you interested in such matters, this has happened before, where a judge(s) declare that they do not have jurisdiction. The single most important time that I am aware of ocurred in the 1880s, in the, as I recall, Slaughter House cases where the so-called Supreme Court declared that, because the original Constitutional supreme court HAD NEVER SAT AND ACCEPTED THEIR RESPONSIBILITES, that the so-called Supreme Court, while not having jurisdiction, would rule on these cases in the interest of justice.
The Solution is to apply, for the first time in the history of the United States, the Constitution to Washington, D.C.
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||