[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
World News See other World News Articles Title: Sibel Edmonds: Theft of nuclear secrets, no secret (Palo) the link to this article by Lukery was emailed me today by Sibel Edmonds Sibel Edmonds: Theft of nuclear secrets, no secret Fri Dec 08, 2006 Prior to the election, there were scattered reports of another 'security lapse' regarding nuclear secrets at Los Alamos. Some of these reports posited scary 'what if?' scenarios regarding the War on Terror(TM). Fair enough. But here's the thing: Sibel Edmonds has been trying to bring attention to the fact that terrorist/criminal groups have been 'stealing' nuclear secrets from the US for years - multiple branches of the US Government are aware of this - and yet they do nothing to prevent it. Nor does the media don't report it. Odd, huh? I'm not kidding. Sibel tried to raise the issue again last week in her blockbuster White Paper. Details downstairs. lukery's diary :: :: ******* In October, police raided a trailer home which doubled as a meth factory - and they stumbled across a treasure trove of nuclear secrets that had somehow escaped from Los Alamos. As CBS reported: Is this an innocuous 'breach'? I have no idea. But I think we can all agree that drugs and nukes shouldn't be mixed. Which brings me to Sibel Edmonds. Again. For years, Sibel has been talking about the intersection of the nuclear black market and heroin trafficking for years - with barely a mention in the US media. Sibel's case, however, isn't about 'breaches' or 'lapses' - Sibel's case is about the systematic, long-term, for-profit, looting of US nuclear secrets (and who knows what else) by criminal organizations who then sell the nuclear technology to the highest bidder(s) - including terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda. To make matters worse, this has been taking place with the full knowledge of the US government. I'm not kidding. In Sibel's blockbuster article last week, she wrote: How does she know this? Because it's on the wiretaps - probably from the American Turkish Council (ATC) which was apparently "being used as a front for criminal activity." David Rose has already reported on this theft of nuclear secrets in his 2005 Vanity Fair article: The FBI and the CIA had apparently been monitoring the ATC - a criminal front-organisation operating under the guise of a Turkish lobby group ("a mini-AIPAC") - for years (probably at least going back to 1996) - and they sat passively by, and watched as the ATC bribed congressmen and State and Pentagon employees, and placed spies in the nuclear labs and stole nuclear secrets (among other things). Again, this is not State espionage, this is a criminal gang - with criminal motives - with"direct and indirect role and ties to (9/11)" And the FBI et al did nothing, and apparently continues to do nothing, about the fact that these same people are stealing nuclear secrets! And it's not as though this was some isolated espionage within the FBI that has somehow been blocking all this from the CIA, WhiteHouse, DoJ, Congress etc. At a minimum, Sibel has testifiedbefore the Sept. 11 commission, the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Select Intelligence Committee - and of course, Ashcroft has gagged Sibel, and all of Congress. Everyone knows! For example, in her recent piece, Sibel mocked Porter Goss: I checked with Sibel about this statement to clarify what she was saying, and she confirmed my interpretation - that: a) Al Qaeda has attempted to procure some of these WMDs Surely that's not possible? Why doesn't the FBI launch an investigation? Why don't they stop it? Sibel describes the cover-up mechanism thusly: I'll add that Sibel has previously stated that another unit that counterintelligence refuses to pass information to is the counterterrorism division (which is presumably where the 'criminals stealing nuke secrets' case ought be handled): I can imagine how that might become problematic. One other point I wanted to raise is that the officials within the USG appear to be selling the country down the river for peanuts. It has long been a mystery to me that these people can be bought so cheaply - but perhaps Sibel has offered us an explanation. Firstly, here'sDaniel Ellsberg from September 05: Small potatoes indeed - but perhaps the 'thousands of dollars' are merely down-payments - with the promise of much greater pay-offs in the future. In Sibel's latest piece she writes about Marc Grossman (former Deputy Secretary of State): I'm not at all comforted by the fact that Grossman has sold everyone out for $1.2 million per annum rather than "thousands of dollars" - but at least Sibel's 'questions' help resolve that apparent mystery: deferred compensation. It would be interesting to know how explicit the 'arrangement' was. I wonder how many current USG employees have similar deals in place, and how we can stop it. Would it be feasible to institute lie-detector tests for departing USG employees? Perhaps we could ask three simple questions: Have you had discussions about future employment opportunities / business deals? Who with? When did these discussions begin? These lie-detector tests probably won't be successful in the long-term for a variety of reasons, but in the short-term it might help break the vicious cycle that Sibel describes in Part One of her White Paper: Maybe it's worth a try.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
Sibel's case, however, isn't about 'breaches' or 'lapses' - Sibel's case is about the systematic, long-term, for-profit, looting of US nuclear secrets (and who knows what else) by criminal organizations who then sell the nuclear technology to the highest bidder(s) - including terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda. To make matters worse, this has been taking place with the full knowledge of the US government." this is crux of the article so it is up to ordinary citizens to protect our country God bless Sibel Edmonds Love, Palo
Gee whiz palo, I wonder when Dubya will get around to doing anything about. Ever consider the rather strong possibility that he's in on the whole thing? BTW, nice to see you here palo.
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||