See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: America's Injustice System is Criminal
Source:
Lew Rockwell
URL Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts187.html
Published: Dec 12, 2006
Author: Paul Craig Roberts
Post Date: 2006-12-12 03:56:04 by Zoroaster
Ping List: *Paul Craig Roberts* Subscribe to *Paul Craig Roberts*
Keywords: None
Views: 166
Comments: 10
America’s Injustice System Is Criminal by Paul Craig Roberts by Paul Craig Roberts DIGG THIS The Christmas season is a time to remember the unfortunate. Among the most unfortunate people are those who have been wrongly convicted and imprisoned. The United States has a large number of wrongfully convicted. There are many reasons for this. One is that the US has the largest percentage of its citizens imprisoned of all countries in the world, including China. One of every 32 US adults is behind bars, on probation or on parole. Given a wrongful conviction rate, the larger the percentage of citizens in jails, the greater the number of wrongfully convicted. According to the International Center for Prison Studies at King’s College in London, the US has 700,000 more of its citizens incarcerated than China, a country with a population four to five times larger than that of the US, and 1,330,000 more people in prison than crime-ridden Russia. The US has 5% of the world’s population and 25% of the world’s prisoners. The American incarceration rate is seven times higher than that of European countries. Either America is the land of criminals, or something is seriously wrong with the criminal justice (sic) system in "the land of the free." In the US the wrongful conviction rate is extremely high. One reason is that hardly any of the convicted have had a jury trial. No peers have heard the evidence against them and found them guilty. In the US criminal justice (sic) system, more than 95% of all felony cases are settled with a plea bargain. Before jumping to the conclusion that an innocent person would not admit guilt, be aware of how the process works. Any defendant who stands trial faces more severe penalties if found guilty than if he agrees to a plea bargain. Prosecutors don’t like trials because they are time consuming and a lot of work. To discourage trials, prosecutors offer defendants reduced charges and lighter sentences than would result from a jury conviction. In the event a defendant insists upon his innocence, prosecutors pile on charges until the defendant’s lawyer and family convince the defendant that a jury is likely to give the prosecutor a conviction on at least one of the many charges and that the penalty will be greater than a negotiated plea. The criminal justice (sic) system today consists of a process whereby a defendant is coerced into admitting to a crime in order to escape more severe punishment for maintaining his innocence. Many of the crimes for which people are imprisoned never occurred. They are made up crimes created by the process of negotiation to close a case. This takes most of the work out of the system and, thereby, suits police, prosecutors, and judges to a tee. Police do not have to be careful about evidence, because they know that no more than one case out of twenty will ever be tested in the courtroom. Prosecutors do not have to make decisions about which cases to prosecute or risk losing cases. By coercing pleas, prosecutors can prosecute every case and boast of extremely high conviction rates. When prosecutors had to decide which cases to prosecute, they had to examine the evidence and to investigate the defendant’s side of the story. No more. The evidence seldom comes into play. In place of a determination of innocence or guilt, prosecutors negotiate with lawyers the crimes to which a defendant will enter a plea. Prosecutors have lost sight of innocence and guilt. What we have today is a conveyor belt that convicts almost everyone who is charged. Every defense attorney knows that today prosecutors can purchase testimony against a defendant by paying a "witness" with money, dropped charges, or reduced time to testify against the defendant. Many prosecutors become highly annoyed at any disruption of the plea bargain conviction process. A defendant that incurs the prosecutor’s ire is certain to be framed on far more serious charges than a negotiated plea. Going to trial is no guarantee that an innocent person will be acquitted. Prosecutors routinely withhold exculpatory evidence and suborn perjury. Generally, jurors trust prosecutors and are unaware of their inventory of dirty tricks. Few jurors can tell the difference between bogus evidence and real evidence. For example, psychologists and criminologists have established beyond all doubt that eye-witnesses are wrong 50% of the time. Yet, jurors usually believe eye-witnesses unless they think the witness has it in for the defendant and is lying. Prosecutors – and there are still a few – who are meticulous about their cases and fair to defendants show poor results compared to the high convictions attained by prosecutors who run plea bargain mills and frame-up factories. Today’s criminal justice (sic) system is results orientated, not justice orientated. In the past judges could give light sentences to people they believed had been wrongfully convicted. But "law and order conservatives" have taken sentencing discretion away from judges. Today prosecutors hold all the cards. Many conservatives believe that prisons are full of hardened criminals who liberal judges are determined to release to prey upon society. In truth, the largest percentage of prisoners are drug users who are victims of the conservatives’ "war on drugs." Drug offenses account for 49 percent of federal prison population growth between 1995 and 2003. Many of these prisoners are mothers arrested for drug use. The greatest victims of the drug laws are the children whose mothers are incarcerated. As females become sexually active at younger and younger ages, state legislatures have stupidly raised the age at which it is legal to engage in sexual activity. Today, a significant percentage of new prisoners are young men imprisoned for engaging in sexual activity with teenage girls. In the US, criminal justice (sic) has more to do with ruining people than with punishing criminals. I have written often about wrongful convictions. We know that wrongful conviction is a serious problem when the advent of DNA evidence has led to the release of a significant number of innocent people who were convicted of murderer and rape, and when a number of law schools feel that it is necessary for them to operate innocence projects that work for the release of the wrongfully convicted. Prosecutors are like President Bush. They absolutely refuse to admit that they ever make a mistake and have to be forced to disgorge their innocent victims. Nothing makes a prosecutor more angry than to have to give back a wrongfully convicted person’s life. Lt. William Strong and Christophe Gaynor are two of the hundreds of thousands of wrongfully convicted Americans whose lives have been ruined by an irresponsible and corrupt criminal justice (sic) system. In Virginia, Lt. William Strong, the son of a military family, grew tired of his wife’s unfaithfulness and filed for divorce. The unfaithful wife retaliated by accusing Strong of marital rape. Neither police nor prosecutor investigated the charge. Instead, they proceeded to set Strong up for plea conviction. The arresting officer recommended Strong’s attorney, an incompetent who owed his cases to the police. Strong insisted on a trial, but the arresting officer and attorney convinced Strong’s parents that with a plea their son would be out in a year. No one told Strong or his parents the implications of a plea, and Virginia Judge Westbrook Parker, playing to feminist voters, gave Strong a life sentence of 60 years. The case has many unsavory appearances. If reports are true, the arresting officer paid numerous visits to Strong’s unfaithful wife, as did Strong’s attorney, and the arresting officer ended up separating from his wife and leaving the police force. The perk kit exists and Strong could be given a DNA test, but Virginia refuses on the grounds that Strong admitted his guilt. Strong says the semen, if any, is that of the wife’s boyfriend. Strong has been in prison for 15 years on the basis of zero evidence. He is in prison because he and his parents trusted the police officer and the criminal justice (sic) system. Another Virginia case is that of Christophe Gaynor. Gaynor was the coach of an adolescent skate board team, which he took to New York City for a competition. One of the adolescents expressed his intention to buy drugs. Gaynor forbade it and threatened to report the boy to his parents. The irresponsible kid retaliated by accusing Gaynor of sex abuse. There was no evidence. There was no investigation. Gaynor had never displayed any homosexual tendencies. The entire team knew the accusation was false. Gaynor went to trial. He was framed by the prosecutor with the help of the judge, who intimidated Gaynor’s witnesses by incarcerating one of the kids overnight without cause. Gaynor was sentenced to 32 years with no possibility of parole on the basis of no evidence, just an unproven accusation. His trial was full of irregularities, and the same judge who sentenced him denied Gaynor a new trial. Ten years later, this past summer Noah J. Seidenberg, who brought the unproven accusation against Gaynor, died apparently of drug overdose at the age of 24 years. There is no institution in America that is a greater failure than the criminal justice (sic) system. The system can do nothing but fail, because the search for truth and justice plays no part in the system. The prosecutor’s career depends on his conviction rate, not on discovering the guilt or innocence of the accused. Virginia’s governor could pardon Strong and Gaynor. But feminists and "child advocates" would scream and yell, as would prosecutors and "law and order conservatives." Nothing matters to these groups but their own single-issue, and justice is not part of it. In America justice cannot be done unless a governor is prepared to sacrifice his own political career in the interest of justice. What kind of people are we when we exercise no oversight over a criminal justice (sic) system that destroys the lives of innocent people with lies? December 12, 2006 Paul Craig Roberts [send him mail] wrote the Kemp-Roth bill and was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is author or coauthor of eight books, including The Supply-Side Revolution (Harvard University Press). He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair in Political Economy, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He has contributed to numerous scholar journals and testified before Congress on 30 occasions. He has been awarded the U.S. Treasury's Meritorious Service Award and the French Legion of Honor. He was a reviewer for the Journal of Political Economy under editor Robert Mundell. He is the co-author of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Zoroaster, *LEAP* (#0)
As well as those convicted for no crime at all such as possessing or using a God given plant such as cannabis via the illegal "laws" made in the name of profit for the System.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act - - George Orwell You have the Dupont family to thank for the outlawing of hemp, or marijuana. Big Pharma also has a major stake in it as well. If it were made legal today, who do you think would be selling it? Big Pharma. One would think that they'd be pushing for legalization in the worst way, considering how profitable it would be.
The Christmas season is a time to remember the unfortunate. Among the most unfortunate people are those who have been wrongly convicted and imprisoned. What kind of people are we when we exercise no oversight over a criminal justice (sic) system that destroys the lives of innocent people with lies?
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
In a CorporoFascist capitalist society, there is no money in peace, freedom, or a healthy population, and therefore, no incentive to achieve these - - IndieTX
#2. To: IndieTX (#1)
 | This country's priorities are all fucked up. |
#3. To: Zoroaster, IndieTX, all (#0)
What isn't broken in our country?
-Thomas Paine
#4. To: Zoroaster (#0)
No justice for those in prison anywhere near New Orleans before Katrina: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=41362&Disp=0
"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer."
---Henry Kissinger, New York Times, October 28, 1973
#5. To: Zoroaster (#0)
Well, Paul is right about most of the symptoms, but I think the root cause is this push toward higher penalties for all crimes (and the absurdities of prohibition). Americans love to lock each other up.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
#6. To: bluedogtxn (#5) (Edited)
So do the stormtroopers, formerly known as cops. When I was out there, we thought long and hard before placing someone in the system and always gave the benefit of the doubt. We understood the Constitution and respected it. I can't tell you how much evidence [pot] I dumped on the street before letting the "criminals" [lol] loose. The police, by use of DISCRETION, should be the first line of defense to keep people FREE and instead, now they throw you in jail first "and let the courts take care of it" regardless of innocence. Of course, one you're in TheSystem, your life and finances are immediately destroyed. Well, Paul is right about most of the symptoms, but I think the root cause is this push toward higher penalties for all crimes (and the absurdities of prohibition). Americans love to lock each other up.
There was no such thing as "burglary tools"..i.e. throwing people in jail for having screwdrivers or bolt cutters in their car. That is NOT evidence of a crime. If we didn't catch them inside a building and eyeball the burglary in progress, they did NOT go to jail. Same with "drug paraphernalia." There was no such crime in the abscense of drugs. [We let them go even if there were.] Domestic calls...no broken nose or blood, the alledged abuser and their spouse were told it was a civil case and tried to get one to spend the night w a friend. When the law changed, when we HAD to take in someone accused of battery even without visible evidence, the first thing I did upon arrival was WARN the complainant before they said anything that if they accused someone of domestic violence, the law required us to make an arrest. After that, most people worked it out and we left. The new "thought crime" laws on the books are fascist and an insult to all America once was. Inshort, we saw ourselves as peace officers, and our job was to keep the peace, not to bust people.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
In a CorporoFascist capitalist society, there is no money in peace, freedom, or a healthy population, and therefore, no incentive to achieve these - - IndieTX In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act - - George Orwell
#7. To: Zoroaster (#0)
Makes perfect sense. Damn near every human action or inaction is deemed a color of law violation by the heavily armed police state apparatus.
#8. To: IndieTX (#6)
Naw. This IS what America is and was. The idea that "back in the good ole days" people cared more about each other or weren't so tough on each other or whatever... I just don't believe it. Give me a time frame, and I'll show the absurd injustices taking place during that time frame. Whether it's the rape of the South by the Union, the rotten way southerners treated their slaves before that, or moving forward, the awful things done to the Irish and Chinese immigrants, alcohol prohibition, the terrible poverty in which people lived even before the depression, followed, of course by the poverty afterward, the murders and jailings and hangings of strikers or political dissidents, Jim Crow, lynchings, McCarthyism, and now the "war on drugs" and our war on freedom ... We've never really lived up to the promises our ancestors made at the founding of our nation. We've never been far from the "awful tyranny of the majority", and we've always been ready, willing, able and eager to hurt or imprison each other.
The new "thought crime" laws on the books are fascist and an insult to all America once was.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
#9. To: bluedogtxn (#8)
I have to agree with you. I should have expanded on that sentence. I meant fascist laws are an insult to what ameriKa once was respective to today.
You're right, it's only a matter of degrees. We've never been really Free.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
In a CorporoFascist capitalist society, there is no money in peace, freedom, or a healthy population, and therefore, no incentive to achieve these - - IndieTX In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act - - George Orwell
#10. To: IndieTX (#9)
What they really are is a slap in the face of our guiding principles. They are, in effect, a repudiation of our ideals, a challenge to our cherished identity and sense of self as Americans. There is something distinctly otherworldly about the "Patriot Act" and "Department of Homeland Security", something Orwellian or European. The War on Drugs? Well, that's insane and ludicrous, but it's distinctly American.
I meant fascist laws are an insult to what ameriKa once was respective to today.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest