[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Two thirds of all federal law enforcement funding in the United States for fiscal year 2025 is going to immigration and border enforcement

MAGA Protest

The Floodgates Are Breaking In Germany's Welfare State

“The government wants to make sure that that does not come out. A huge part of our political system is predicated on blackmail,”

You Know What Happens Next

Cash Jordan: Half-Built Tower Abandoned… as ICE Deports Entire ‘Migrant Workforce’

Heavy rainfall causes flash flooding Tuesday night, some cars stuck in high water on Chicago's West

Biden Doctor PLEADS THE FIFTH, Refuses To Testify To Congress, Biden Pardons ARE VOID

Joe Rogan says FBI director Kash Patel played him for a fool and maga for fools with the Jeff Epstein files

Elon's AI System "Grok" Went Rogue And Has Been SHUT DOWN in an Emergency!

Earthquake Swarms at One of the MOST DANGEROUS Volcanoes in the USA

Ben Shapiro Declares Epstein Case CLOSED: ‘Facts on the Ground Have Changed’

Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets

China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power

Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes

Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal

Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising?

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: SAPF Update: Judge issues Stay in Enforcement of Injunction
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Dec 19, 2006
Author: SAPF
Post Date: 2006-12-19 15:21:21 by Neil McIver
Keywords: None
Views: 2111
Comments: 101

Judge Nickerson issued a stay against his own injunction order today. SAPF can disregard the order pending appeal.

I'll write up a report more fully tonight.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 87.

#1. To: All, Starwind (#0)

From SAPF:

****COURT GRANTS MOTION TO STAY INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST SAPF***

December 19, 2006 -- Today, Judge Nickerson of the U.S. District Court granted Defendants' motion to stay the permanent injunction order against them. This motion is granted pending the Court's decisions on the Motion for a New Trial and the Motion for Modification of the Permanent Injunction Order which were also submitted to the District Court.

Therefore, there is no injunction order in effect against the Fellowship at the present time. The Fellowship will keep its members apprised of any new developments, and members will be more fully informed in the next Liberty Tree.

For the latest motions by all parties and decisions by the Court, please visit http://www.Save-a-Patriot.org and click on the link to the Complaint and then the link to the Complete Docket.

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-12-19   15:25:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: Neil McIver, Starwind, noone222 (#1)

pdf LINK

Case 1:05-cv-01297-WMN - Document 74 - Filed 12/19/2006 - Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V.
JOHN BAPTIST KOTMAIR et al.

Civil No. WMN-05-1297

ORDER

On November 29, 2006, this Court entered an order granting Plaintiff summary judgment.On that same date, the Court also entered a permanent injunction order requiring Defendants to refrain from certain activities that interfere with the enforcement of the internal revenue laws.In that permanent injunction order, the Court also required Defendants to take certain affirmative actions, including: posting the injunction order on their website, notifying their members of the outcome of this litigation, and providing the government with a listing of the "Save-A-Patriot Fellowship's" membership.Under the terms of the order, Defendants were to complete the requirements of the order by December 20, 2006, and to file a certification of said compliance by December 21, 2006.Defendants have filed the following three motions: Motion for New Trial, Paper No. 71; Motion for Modification of the Permanent Injunction Order, Paper No. 72; and a Motion for a Stay Pending Resolution of Motion for Modification of Permanent Injunction Order and for New Trial, Paper No. 73.

Although the Court has not had the opportunity to fully


Case 1:05-cv-01297-WMN - Document 74 - Filed 12/19/2006 - Page 2 of 3

consider the motion for new trial as it is not yet ripe, the Court can say with some certainty that it will be denied. Defendants raise the same arguments in that motion that were raised and fully considered in the cross motions for summary judgment.The motion for modification of the injunction order is also not yet ripe, and the government has yet to respond.This motion, however, might prove to have some merit, particularly as it relates to assisting Defendants in discerning what is protected political speech and what is prohibited false commercial speech. [1] Once that motion is fully briefed, the Court may find it necessary to hold a hearing to assure clarity as to what is prohibited under the injunction.

In the meantime, it seems prudent to grant Defendants' request for a stay.While the harm to the government caused by Defendants' activities is not unsubstantial, the additional harm caused by a brief delay in the enforcement of the injunction is less than the potential immediate harm to Defendants once the injunction is in force.While Defendants are unlikely to succeed on the ultimate merits of their claims, they may be entitled to some minor modifications or clarifications of this Court's

----------------------

[1] That said, the Court notes that much of Defendants' "confusion" results from their own intentional ignorance and obfuscation. As noted in the memorandum resolving the cross motions for summary judgment, Defendants continue to tout their chimerical theories despite the consistent rejection of those theories by all courts to have considered them. Nov. 29, 2006 Memorandum Opinion at 12 ("just because courts have followed that course of conduct does not make it valid," quoting SAPF's Opp. to Pl.'s Mot. for Summ. J. 28 n.67).


Case 1:05-cv-01297-WMN - Document 74 - Filed 12/19/2006 - Page 3 of 3

injunction.

Accordingly, IT IS this 19th day of December, 2006,
by the United StatesDistrict Court for the District of Maryland,
ORDERED:

1) That Defendants' Motion for a Stay, Paper No. 73, is
GRANTED; and

2) That the Clerk of Court shall mail or transmit copies of
this Order to Mr. Kotmair and all counsel of record.

/s/
William M. Nickerson
Senior United States District Judge

nolu_chan  posted on  2006-12-28   5:43:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 87.

        There are no replies to Comment # 87.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 87.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]