[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: Bush, the Inept Marionette Bush, the Inept Marionette
By Curt Maynard
Al-Jazeerah, December 25, 2006
The fact is, not a single holocaust
revisionist would state that the Nazis did not persecute Jews
during the Second World War, but most of them question the
idea that six million were killed or that any of them were
gassed at Auschwitz. By holding that conference and by
emphasizing the undeniable fact that the so-called modern
democracies in the west imprison skeptics, the Iranian
President has further highlighted the fact that Bush is a
“limp dick.” The media wants you to believe that anyone that
would question any aspect of the official holocaust story is
crazy and/or a “conspiracy theorist.” The fact is, the reason
some people question certain details associated with the
holocaust is for exactly the same reason that many people
question the “official version” of 9-11, because there are a
tremendous amount of perfectly legitimate questions and no
forthcoming answers.
The media would have you believe that
only uneducated fools, anti-Semites and racists would question
their version of what happened to Jewry during WWII, the
mainstream media pumped out more than 1,000 articles about the
holocaust conference in Iran, but not a single one of them
ever mentioned that every scholar that appeared in Tehran to
speak was a credentialed academic, meaning that they had at
least a graduate degree. Nope, the Mainstream Zionist media
doesn’t want you to know that. They do however want you to
know that David Duke appeared, so that they can cast
aspersions on the entire conference by dredging up the fact
that Duke was associated with the KKK some thirty years ago,
but at the same time not a single one of those so-called
“objective” articles mentioned the fact that
Duke has a PhD in history or
that he appeared, not to question the holocaust, but in order
to authoritatively speak about how the mainstream western
media spins and distorts the facts, as evidenced by their very
coverage of Dr. David Duke and what he actually said. I highly
encourage anyone and everyone to disregard what the media said
took place in Tehran and what the speakers said, and to see
for themselves what transpired there by
reading the words of the revisionists
that were there, and
by reading what Dr David Duke actually said in regards to free
speech and its suppression in the west,
in his own words.
No, it’s very difficult to tell whether
or not another staged terror attack like 9-11 will have the
desired effect, but that isn’t to say Bush and his Zionist
masters won’t attempt one, in fact, I’d say it’s inevitable, I
don’t think they see any other way out of the mess they
created, they’ll fabricate a new 9-11, not so much to provide
an excuse to nuke Tehran, which will come later, but to impose
Martial Law here in the United States - an attack can wait,
but the growing dissent among Americans cannot - that spells
imminent doom for the Zio-American entity. The question that
must be plaguing their minds though is whether or not Bush
still has enough credibility to compel Law Enforcement and the
National Guard to kill American citizens in the millions.
Personally I doubt it - the imposition of Martial law will
prove to be the final nail in the coffin of the Zionist-led
government in Washington. That doesn’t mean I’ll be around to
see it, the Neo-Cons will follow to the letter the policies of
their ideological predecessors and eliminate with extreme
prejudice any opponents, but nonetheless I’ll leave this world
knowing that they’ll soon follow. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
#1. To: Zoroaster (#0)
When you throw credentialed historians in jail for their opinions on a topic- it is only natural to start questioning that topic. The Professional Holocaust Cultists and the Holocaust Victim industry have overstepped.
Regardless of your view of the holocaust, this much is certainly true. When thought police can put you in jail for "denigrating" the holocaust, this is complete anathema to the free-speech/liberty myth of America.
Generally- "kooks" are not thrown in jail- they are laughed at, mocked, and or ignored. So when the state prosecutes and jails these "kooks" over their "kook" opinions - indeed- the only opinion that can land you in jail in a society that allows groups of organized pedophiles to exist to champion the cause of child-adult sex- the natural reaction is to wonder if these guys are not so kooky afterall.
I agree that the laws criminalizing holocaust debunking are idiotic and lend unintended (and IMO unwarranted) credence to the debunkers; but they came out of a period of European trauma we can hardly begin to imagine here in sunny Amurka. It wasn't just European Jewry who were fervently in the "never again" camp, it was most of Europe, too. Those who weren't opposed to what the Nazis had done were most likely complicit in it anyway, and weren't exactly speaking up.
The never again camp were comprised almost exclusively by the Zionists and their never again prop did not get wings, according to Dr. Norman Finkelstein's book The Holocaust Industry", until 1967, after the 6 Day War. It was done for political goals and not for some romanticized ideal of preventing future holocausts - certainly if the goal were the latter, it would be judged a failure if we just consider one recent example of genocide unfolding before our eyes - the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. The "other" Europeans had their homes and families destroyed during WWII and were too busy trying to put their lives together to be thinking theory ie " never again". And there were Europeans outside of the Jews who were sent to the death camps but we never hear about laws protecting their history of travails inflicted on them by the Nazis. In fact, we rarely hear their stories at all - some groups are still fighting for basic recognition - the Poles and the Ukrainians and the gypsies, for example - 3 Million Catholic Poles died in Nazi death camps - the first person imprisoned in Auschwitz was a Polish Catholic. The first people to liberate the Auschwitz captives were the Ukrainians. As for Europeans who weren't Naziis but did not stop what they were doing to the German Jews - the Germans had a well equipped military machine, so it was somewhat hard to "stop" the Naziis without dying yourself. And what exactly did the Europeans do to "help" the Ukrainians during the Holomodor or what did they do to help the Eastern Europeans generally during the time of the Soviet death camps known as gulags? Where are the laws to protect those events of shameful human history from being "diminished" and so they would happen "never again?"
I've said before that I don't agree with those laws and I think jailing someone for a political viewpoint is absurd and inconsistent with fundamentals of freedom. The Jewish holocaust and the Ukrainian holocaust and the Polish holocaust were very real, and certainly involved more than just Jews; Jews weren't even the majority among those put to death by the Nazis. As for Stalin's gulags, murder camps and genocides, he didn't lose the war, did he? Ergo, no one had the POWER to bring him to justice, so it never happened.
Well it was more than Joe not losing WWII. At the end of WWII Truman and Churchill were complicit in sending far far more than 6 million Eastern Europeans to their deaths in Joe's gulags. They did not even bother to raise their voices at Joe. The dirty little secret is that the allies (like the communists and the fascists) viewed Eastern Europeans as generally being of no value - they were subhuman, disposable - slavs, farmers, ergo, meaningless.
There are no replies to Comment # 17. End Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|