[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination

CNN Stunned As Majority Of Americans Back Trump's Mass Deportation Plan

Israeli VS Palestinian Connections to the Land of Israel-Palestine

Israel Just Lost Billions - Haifa and IMEC

This Is The Income A Family Needs To Be Middle Class, By State

One Big Beautiful Bubble": Hartnett Warns US Debt Will Exceed $50 Trillion By 2032

These Are The Most Stolen Cars In Every US State

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Domestic Turkeys
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_05/mathid122706.html
Published: Dec 29, 2006
Author: Sam Mathid
Post Date: 2006-12-29 11:21:09 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 4007
Comments: 295

I buy gold (and silver) for one reason. That reason is that things are about to change. That was my conclusion in June of 2000 and I sense the approach of that change growing ever closer.

I am not just talking about the usual economic reasons such as the gross debasement of fiat currencies around the world, or the insane levels of debt created with enthusiastic abandon by our shifty, self-serving politicians or the equally idiotic levels of private debt; neither am I talking about the sheer indifference and/or incompetence of our governing officials and their enthusiastic squandering of the vast taxes confiscated from the peasants who continue to work and create and produce despite all inducements to not do so.

I am referring to the fact that Western civilisation is beset with a stupidity that is so rampant, so widespread and so ingrained that it cannot continue for much longer. 'Stupidity' is the opposite of 'smart' and both words can only exist in the context of survival in one form or another. We have drifted so far from survival as a race that we have placed survival itself at risk.

How is it possible for people to not understand that rewarding the incompetent by the process of penalising the able will lead to greater incompetence? How is it possible to believe that punishing producers to reward non-producers will do anything but eventually and logically cause a total cessation of production?

We live in a world where the mindless trilling of politicians and aging pop singers is regarded as the font of all wisdom; a world where some people really believe that the end is nigh because of global warming and that the government ought to spend itself billions of dollars even further into debt doing something about it… as if an organization that cannot deliver mail properly could save the world from a meteorological catastrophe. We live in a world where less than 50% of the workforce actually create wealth and who subsequently then have to support the more than 50% who do not; where private employers may no longer dictate the terms of employment to their own employees. A world where general practitioners who are trusted with nations' health are so ignorant of real causation, let alone healing, that it is usually safer not to go to them, and where psychiatrists drug human brains in crazed attempts to solve problems of the mind.

At the same time as our governments have confiscated most of the financial benefits from the most major technological advance of the human race ever, they have managed via their daft social engineering schemes and outright corruption to simultaneously bankrupt western civilisation in the manner of tin-pot African dictators peeling the skins off banana republics.

'Follow the money' has justifiably become the mantra of the age as it is often the only way to find out what is really going on. To do so shows an alarming discrepancy between appearance and reality. The wide-eyed young street activists campaigning for action against global warming are, in a bizarre fact, the unwitting foot soldiers of the nuclear power industry. The white coated psychiatrists cosily posing as healers of the mind are in reality extraordinarily well paid salesmen for unscrupulous pharmaceutical companies. Pious, tax funded promoters of the war against hunger cover their dirty dollar tracks back to vast agri-business concerns like Monsanto who are the manufacturers and promoters of genetically and atomically modified foods which threaten to monopolise the world's food supply.

We live in a world where new legislation banning something or other spews forth every week from our governing elite creating more and more criminals to the point where nothing, and I do mean NOTHING is not covered by some incomprehensibly complex piece of government legislation. The legislation is so obtuse that it is literally not possible to ever comply fully with any certainty even if one was so inclined.

I was speaking with a policewoman a few years ago who told me that she tends to only socially mix with other members of the force. The reason? "Everyone always looks so guilty and uncomfortable when I tell them that I am a police officer. Everyone has done something that breaks the law." And that sums up the truth of the matter. Our governments have made criminals of all of us whilst allowing real criminals to roam free and easy on the streets.

The constant promises of governments to end corruption and inequality and monopolies inevitably lead to greater corruption and greater inequality and greater monopolies and still people cannot see the obvious which is that government control is the problem, not the solution. It is as though the spirit of Walt Disney rules the western world and is producing a vast Road Runner fantasy whereby society can fall over steep cliffs and then pick itself up, dust itself off and carry on as though nothing had really happened. Well we are heading over a cliff, but society will not be able to pick itself up and dust itself off afterwards. Things are going to change big time when and after we reach the bottom.

Survival is based upon making decisions that result in actions conducive to survival. Such decisions can only sanely be made at the level of the individual. Sometimes individuals get it wrong and suffer the consequences, so be it, but with governments taking over the decision making role you can be sure that those wrong calls will become institutionalised; and you can also be sure that there will be an awful lot of wrong calls. That is what has got us to where we are now.

Heading down the path that we are currently treading it is a foregone conclusion that both personal and business initiative will cease to exist and that we will be reduced to the intellectual and economic level of Cuba or North Korea. In its ever more obsessive pursuit with saving our bodies our governments are killing our souls and in the process are reducing people to a level of apathy. Most people don't like it, but they don't feel that they can change anything. Is that a definition of apathy, or what leads to apathy? I'm not sure.

Domestic turkeys don't have a high IQ and over the generations have had responsibility for their own survival bred out to the point that when born they have to be trained how to drink water by placing sparkling coloured marbles at the bottom of the water bowl for them to play with. Without this aid the poults (young turkeys) die of thirst. There is a similarity between these poults and the citizens of modern societies who rely on and trust governments to such a degree that they feel no personal responsibility for their own survival.

To place that much faith in unaccountable governments is a sure recipe for non-survival. Because people start with a higher IQ than turkeys the process takes longer, but the result will eventually be the same. The poults actually have the advantage in that it is in the interests of the farmer to keep the turkeys alive… at least until Christmas. No such incentive exists for the politicians. Why would they really care whether you live or die unless it is some way affects their electoral standing? The survival traits of the human race are being bred out by a lazy illusion of permanent prosperity and safety brought about by wise and benevolent Great Nanny States. It is all madness.

Of course it will come to an end. Eventually our apathetic tolerance of such foolishness will give way to anger which will quickly become rage. Change is on the way because we either change or we cease to exist as a civilisation. Our civilisation is like a dule of young turkeys who are in danger of losing their marbles.

One day in the not too distant future I believe that gold and silver will be great investments; almost as good as a stockpile of baked beans.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 201.

#70. To: christine (#0) (Edited)

Selling gold and silver to people as a protection from currency crash is the act of fools or scam artists.

At least you are consistent. You are still the ignorant schmuck you proved yourself to be in our last conversation!

Why on earth would I entrust my financial security with any one else?? When the shit hits the fan, I am the only person I want to have access to my funds!!!

Limited world view is what you hold. You are still looking through that toilet paper tube, insisting that it is a telescope!! (Thank you for that analogy Randge!!! It will be the first thing that comes to mind every time I read something stupid from Destro!)

You may want to consider running a "get out of dodge scenario" yourself, especially living in such a populated area. In your neck of the woods, it will be difficult protecting your stores.

You may want to consider relocating to one for the above mentioned reasons. Not only does the local grocer accept precious metals, so does the local bar, and could easily talk the local gas station into it as well. Plus in the event of emergency relocation (though we plan on sticking it out as long as possible) the horses don't require fuel, and I am sure they would appreciate the lighter burden, and fewer pack animals would attract less attention from the desperate.

Your average American will have a hell of a time leaving this country when the shit hits the fan. The restrictions are being put in place as we speak, do you really think they will just let all of the little sheep run in fear and lighten security for us to leave?? I suppose you think other countries will come to our aid and assist American refugees as America has done for so many countries in the past?? Get real, you had best be where you are safe before it gets deep, travel out of the country will be impossible for all but the richest, and travel within the country will be greatly restricted.

Once again my friend, you remain true to your character. You have talked yourself full circle until you have supported the very point you were against in the beginning.

Reserving part of your assets in precious metals is in my opinion among the wisest of financial moves one could make, especially in this day and age. Not only can it be a quality investment when the economy is stable, but it can be liquid if the need arises, and when the economy turns turtle, eventually, when the new currency is established and the economy running on an even keel again, you have an easier means to reestablish your wealth.

I am not saying that stores of other tangibles is a bad thing. Food, munitions, smokes, beer, whatever you may need is a very wise choice. But any money that I will have available will be in precious metals. I hope to do very little trading for goods. Seeing how with a very large garden, and meat animals here on the farm, supplemented by stores of items that we do not raise here, we should need very little in the way of trade goods. Also, in times of economic strife, if we do trade off any of our stores, it will be for gold and silver, or some other form of barter. As we are fairly well prepared, there will be little that we would prefer over the precious metals.

Remember, Every time a country has hit hyperinflation, the government has seized funds from anyone transferring too large of an amount. When the government issues a currency, they do own those notes. When life gets tough, they can easily seize them.

ladybug  posted on  2006-12-30   23:32:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: ladybug (#70)

You may want to consider relocating to one for the above mentioned reasons.

Not really - Survivalist mentality is based on a fantasy that the world will become like the 'Mad Max' movies.

The survivalist approach is just not a practical approach.... You can't head for the hills because everybody else is going to be in the hills.... This is a communal problem that needs a communal approach

In any case I view survivalists like I view the militia movements - dress up fantasists.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-01   1:11:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Destro (#72)

In any case I view survivalists like I view the militia movements - dress up fantasists.

Well, then all I have to say is that I am very glad that I desended from "fantasists" as if they had not been such, they may not have survived the Great Depression, and thus being the case, I would not be in existence to listen to your drivel.

innieway  posted on  2007-01-01   15:00:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: innieway (#75)

Well, then all I have to say is that I am very glad that I desended from "fantasists" as if they had not been such, they may not have survived the Great Depression, and thus being the case, I would not be in existence to listen to your drivel.

There was no militia/survivalist movement during the great depression so what fantasy are you talking about? In fact the last I remember Hoover ordered the army to shoot at the closest thing to a militia movement of that era the so called 'Bonus Marchers'.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-01   19:57:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: Destro (#78)

There was no militia/survivalist movement during the great depression so what fantasy are you talking about?

OK schmuck, there you go putting words in peoples mouths again, I don't believe that he mentioned anything about a militia mentality during the great depression.

Yes there are those who are both survivalist and militia type of people, but there can be a survivalist who wants nothing to do with militia (George Gordon perhaps??) and there are people who have the militia mentality yet have no survival instinct. Granted, those with the militia mentality typically are survivalist as well.

Myself, I am a survivalist. I have no desire to go down shooting. On the other hand, if the battle is brought to me, I will defend what is my own and fight along those I love to keep it. This, in my humble opinion, is not a militia mentality, as I do not get off on the idea of having to kill someone, nor am I in any hurry to see it happen. I would far prefer if it never came to that!

ladybug  posted on  2007-01-02   1:34:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: ladybug (#80) (Edited)

OK schmuck, there you go putting words in peoples mouths again, I don't believe that he mentioned anything about a militia mentality during the great depression.

Who knew you knew Yiddish?

Here you are putting words in my mouth - or to be correct words to my fingertips:

I wrote: There was no militia/survivalist movement during the great depression so what fantasy are you talking about?

Since the person above mentioned he was one of those 'fantasists' from the past I enquired which one? Survivalist or militia? That is why that line "/" in "militia/survivalist" implies.

Since the only militia that comes to mind that meets that criteria remotely is the 'Bonus Army' which Hoover busted with force of arms. So since that leaves out the militia what was the survivalist aspect that person was talking about in the 30s?

With that said I consider the militia movements in America as currently comprised and the survivalist movement (Survivalist meaning people going off to live separate from society waiting for the melt down which they will survive with stocked supplies) as wrong headed fantasists.

If you want real world examples of an economic melt down and solutions see what the people of Argentina did - they did not resort to cannibalism like was implied in the 80s Survivalist/Militia movement I grew up around. For some reason the Survivalist literature given to me back in the day always talked about bands of cannibals roaming the country side after the dollar collapsed or a nuclear war went off or Y2K or whatever.

At least they don't talk about the Black Helicopter delusions these days nor the fact that the UN is setting up concentration camps in Alaska for the NWO these days.

I wonder what other delusion has come down the pike to replace the Black Helicopters?

Destro  posted on  2007-01-02   2:25:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: Destro (#81)

Who knew you knew Yiddish?

You are the language expert, you should know that schmuck is in the English dictionary and does have English usage. I do believe that we have discussed before that I prefer to use the modern definitions of the English language. Fair is fair, after all, you choose to define words for your own purpose, so I shall be allowed to follow in suit. The main difference is that the definitions that I choose to use are all readily accessible in any English dictionary.

What was the survivalist mentality??? Hmm, let me see here, if trying to figure out how to feed your family is not a survivalist mentality, then I guess I have been incorrect. My mistake is that either you are even more ignorant than I gave you credit for, or those who survived were just lucky. But I am sure that if another "Great Depression" or any comparable event were to hit our society today, the mortality rate would be astonishing. Very few within the cities would have a clue how to feed themselves, and the percentages would only be slightly higher in the country. But according to you, this has nothing to do with survival.

Odd, I did not know that you had to "drop-out" of society to have the mentality and ability to survive if and when the shit hits the fan. Damn, guess I have had it wrong all along. If disaster hit today I would be doomed. Here on the farm we can produce all of our own food, have horses for transportation, and have stores for things that we cannot raise But I am doomed Destro said so, because I am an active member of my community, I AM DOOMED!!!

I guess I had best inform the local business owners that accept silver that it will do them no good to be prepared, because they are active members in our society, They are doomed as well.

ladybug  posted on  2007-01-02   13:42:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: ladybug (#87) (Edited)

But I am doomed Destro said so, because I am an active member of my community, I AM DOOMED!!!

There you go again putting words into my mouth -

Words do have meaning:

Survivalist is a specific type of person/movement - surviving the Great Depression is not being a 'Survivalist'. So stop with the BS.

Secondly, twit - I am against Survivalist mindsets because these Survivalists are not active members of their community - they run away rather than confront.

Where did I write being an active community member leads to your doom? In fact i wrote that being inactive in politics or the affairs of your world is to be an idiot.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-02   15:17:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#121. To: Destro (#92)

For starters, I would like to apologize for my delayed response. Do to my job, I am often away from home for a couple of days at a time. This is also the reason that there are times where I must reply to several of your posts at once, as I will be doing here.

I was simply trying to show you how ridiculous your statement appeared to the reader.

In your world, maybe every thing can be so narrowly defined. In the real world it is not so. As inniway showed you in his reply to you, survival, survivalism, survivalist, and survive all take root meaning in the ability to survive. No where in any of those definitions did it say anything about running, retreating, or that someone who "survived" the Great Depression was unworthy of the term survivalist.

You, yourself pulled up wikipidia's definition of survivalism which reads as follows:

May I point out that in your own reference "survivalism" include the practice of being prepared for an event, even one such as a natural disaster. I am taking for granted here that we can both agree that a "survivalist" is someone who practices survivalism.

In preparing for a natural disaster, food shortage, and other such events, a survivalist would have no need, and I doubt any desire to "retreat" nor need for a "militia mentality". A survivalist who practices survivalism does not require the readiness nor desire to retreat or kill.

Here is the comment you made that I facetiously replied to in order to illustrate how ridiculously ignorant your posts may seem to the reader, no matter how perfectly they make sense to you: If my only chance of surviving an event is to drop out or retreat, I would far rather become a statistic. In my humble opinion, I believe that there would be a lesser chance of surviving such an event if you respond by leaving shelter and stores of food behind for the sake of running. And lastly, if being a drop-out or a retreater has anything to do with being a survivalist, hence practicing the ability to survive, I must be blind, because I fail the see that they are unfailingly intertwined.

Granted, I do understand, that in your narrow point of view (as Randge stated, looking through a toilet paper tube, calling it a telescope...) that because some survivalists had retreated in the past, and even labeled themselves as retreater's, you are now convinced that the word survivalist shall now be replaced by retreater forever, no argument, and no one else's view is welcome.

I have to beg to differ, many people posses survivalist ability, but some people of this fiber also tend to retreat. Some people of this fiber have a militia mentality. I simply wish to clarify that not all of us plan nor desire to retreat, neither do all of us have the militia mentality. Granted, some of the survivalists have both.

Also here are a few more quotes from you that I would like to address:

There is one form of "retreat" that I condone %100. That is retreat from the system that is wrongfully and unlawful abusing the citizens that have been faithfully following. The longer people blindly slave for our government, the more of our rights that are forfeited.

When you hold a Social (in)Security card, you hold a taxpayer identification number which obliges you to adhere to a tax code that not even law. The system originally began as a voluntary benefit program. Take it or leave it, but if you desire retirement benefits, you sign up, get a card, pay in all your life and then get some benefits back when you are old.

Don't get me wrong, I am not against the idea, I appreciate that the government cares enough to offer assistance in retirement planning. But this program has gotten blown way out of proportion.

The program is still voluntary, you can walk in to any Social Security office and request the form to withdraw yourself from it(or even download it online), and relinquish any and all money that you have paid in, and give up your association to that number.

But thanks to further illegal legislation, if you choose to not participate in this voluntary program, you have a miserable time trying to find work, you cannot obtain a drivers license, you cannot hook up a telephone, internet, or any bank accounts or many other things that you need this number for. Hmmm, does not sound very voluntary to me. Granted, you can still get out of the system, but not without making your life difficult.

Here is where I do condone one form of retreating. If more and more people were to disassociate themselves from this voluntary program (I believe that it may take hundreds of thousands for this to happen,I am not holding my breath), and deal with a few hardships for a while, then the government would eventually see that they cannot continue to keep the country in this daily increasing strangle hold that we are currently in.

Now this is not necessarily retreating from society. It is standing up for your rights in a very noticeable manner and peacefully requiring the government to make legislative changes.

What makes this system an issue for some, is that the Lord describes many times in the statues that he requires his people to live by strict liability. Also the the constitution and the bill of rights both allow for religious free exercise. Essentially, the God expects us to be liable for our own choices, and the government allows for us the worship as we wish, but if we choose to not participate in Social Security our lives become very difficult. This in my opinion, is very conflicting.

But pulling out of the system does not mean that you are a poor citizen, in fact it tends to bring citizens (at least of the local community) closer together. Employers have to appreciate their employees enough to pay cash and lose some of their normal tax deductions, employees work harder in appreciation of the employer paying cash, and knowing the difficulty of finding a job, if paid my check, the employee has to rely on local merchants to cash it for them as they cannot obtain a bank account, also, for private work done, barter becomes far more common, your grocer, bar, or gas station may even accept silver as payment when you do not have cash available.

You can dispute all of the above as much as you wish, but the above situation is not hypothetical. In my local community this is fact. I do know a couple of people that do not participate in Social Security, and it has caused them to become better and more productive citizens, and because they work so much harder and are so much more appreciative of being hired to work, those in the community that are still tied to Social Security and such are much more willing to help these people trade as needed.

As a matter of fact, in the near future, I will be giving up my social security number as well. Unfortunately I do have a few small debts to clear up before this can happen. This is not an easy choice for me. I am a truck driver, and I really enjoy my job, but there is no way I can hold a CDL (or any other class of drivers license) without a Social Security number. I am not delusional, I do not believe that my giving up my SSN will necessarily change legislation, but do to the fact that participating in this program conflicts with what know from the Bible, I can not continue on in good conscience since I have learned that Social Security is a voluntary program.

ladybug  posted on  2007-01-04   20:28:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#124. To: ladybug (#121)

There is one form of "retreat" that I condone %100. That is retreat from the system that is wrongfully and unlawful abusing the citizens that have been faithfully following. The longer people blindly slave for our government, the more of our rights that are forfeited.

That is fine - but you can not call that being a good citizen. Which is the point you are avoiding I think.

Take for example this article - you fear fiat money collapse. Instead of organizing to get the govt to follow the will of the majority and back the dollar with gold reserves you all engage in the alternative of hording gold as the alternative.

Instead of trying to change the system you are dropping out of it - already admitting defeat.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-05   9:19:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#126. To: Destro (#124)

Instead of trying to change the system you are dropping out of it - already admitting defeat.

The system will never change if we continue to blindly comply.

We can grumble all we want, but unless we hit the legislators where it hurts, in the pocket book, they will not change the way things are.

Furthermore, as I explained in my post, there are many reasons that I am withdrawing from the Social Security system. One of the major reasons is that this system violates my personal beliefs.

How is this being a "bad" citizen if the government it self has made sure to keep this program at least somewhat voluntary, and allow a means to remove yourself from it??

It is not breaking any laws, violating any ones rights, I am not running off to some cave to be a hermit. I have simply decided that participating in this voluntary program is against what I feel is right for me, that since I do not feel it is right I will never draw benefits from it, and I shall no longer pay into it either.

Granted that this will add a few difficulties into my life, but I believe that they are worth it.

I do not understand how this is admitting defeat, I am intelligent enough to understand that I do still have a few unadulterated rights left in this country, and I have chosen to exercise the right to not participate in this program.

Admitting defeat would be something more along the lines of, "yeah, I know it is wrong, and it violates my personal beliefs, but the government has me over a barrel, there is nothing I can do". Myself, on the other hand, I have chosen to take a course of action that will no longer violate my personal beliefs. I am willing to give up my career, and work harder for less, but I can take relief that I am living my life the best way that I know how. That, my friend, is not defeat, but a small personal victory.

But I cannot understand where you think that you have the right to judge whether a persons chosen plans make them a good citizen or not. Could it be that because you are prepared to cut-and-run that you have a guilty conscience. Is that why you insist that all survivalists are retreaters? Because that is a large part of your survival plan? And because of your guilty conscience, you feel the need to demean someone else's citizenship.

You can rest assured, that I know that I am a good citizen, despite your two-bit opinion. Nothing will change in this country unless citizens stand up and lawfully demand change. Think about it this way, if 10% of each of our states population were to follow in the footsteps of myself and the couple of other local citizens who have withdrawn from Social Security, the impact from this would have a ripple effect that would have some of the big money lobbyists screaming for change for our benefit.

I could continue on all day about the repercussions that this would inflict, but right there I highlighted three of the major one's that would start demanding changes, the individual states, the banking industry, and the insurance industry. The voice of any one of the above is much louder than the voices of 100,000 citizens. They have either people already in the house or congress, or lobbyists there to influence the house and congress.

This route would probably take far less than 10% of the population, but I can promise that if people started taking quiet, legal action, in a way that influences the right people, there would be change.

Once again, I am not delusional, I don't believe that my stepping out of the system will be the straw that broke the camel's back, it will take many more people following in suit to implement change. I am doing this because I believe it is right, and if eventually enough people follow in suit to create change, all the better.

Also, I do not run around telling people that they should withdraw. Yes, I believe that it is the best choice for me, but I am also prepared to handle the repercussions. I have horses here I can saddle up instead of driving, my bills are minimal enough that I do not have to chase the almighty dollar, I have already removed my self from the banking system and so on. I am sure to warn anyone who is interested in this course of action of the privileges that they will be giving up.

There are also many privileges to be gained as well. For instance, did you know that if you do not get a birth certificate or a SSN for your child at birth that Social Services can never say one word about how you raise your child. You can educate that child at home in the manner you desire and never have to deal with the government to do it, also that child could never be drafted for the military. But there is also the fact that that child could never attend public school, never qualify for college loans and so on and so forth.

There are many things to balance and consider before one makes such a life changing decision. But making this decision in no way admits defeat. Just the opposite, it is taking action that can implement change, and accepting that your life will be more difficult for doing it. That is something you can take pride in.

ladybug  posted on  2007-01-05   14:07:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#157. To: ladybug, Destro, Arete (#126)

It is not breaking any laws, violating any ones rights, I am not running off to some cave to be a hermit.

There have always been people who were loners who wanted to leave society, get away from people and become mountain-men or just go to the backwoods and live off the land. No one ever suggested such people were bad citizens, maybe a bit eccentric, but they were never thought of in the least bit as being bad and certainly not criminal. I find this thread very interesting, reading between the lines of Destro's posts is very telling.

No one should have to be defensive about their choice of life-style as long as no laws are broken and no one gets hurt, isn't that what the media repeatedly tells us, Destro? In fact the homosexual lifestyle is often touted as a positive form of diversity. So what is the big deal if someone chooses to live as a "retreater"?

Diana  posted on  2007-01-16   6:59:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#162. To: Destro (#157)

I was NOT implying that you are a homosexual if that is what you are so angry about, I was using that as an example of an alternative, acceptable life-style that we are all very familiar with.

Diana  posted on  2007-01-16   11:30:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#180. To: Diana (#162)

I meant that the notion that some on the fringe hold that roving bands of Americans will degenerate into gangs - some add on cannibalistic gangs - is an old American nightmare - recently reused in 'The Turner Diaries'. It was even the central plot to the silent movie 'Birth of a Nation'. It was even a story told about New Orleans during Katrina - mass rapes and cannibalism - which turns out to have been false.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-16   16:39:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#196. To: Destro (#180)

If there were a major economic collapse it could be dangerous to be out in the streets, when Katrina hit New Orleans it was a nightmare to be there, for one people were in danger of drowning and many did. The lucky ones drove out of there before it hit (like my cousin and her husband who lost their home and he lost the building where he had his medical practice), I probably would have done the same had I lived there, seeing how it turned into a toxic cesspool with chemical spills and all kinds of bad stuff in that water, and of course there was no power and no food, and many ended up dying.

I never heard the stories of mass rapes or cannibalism, but I know that all the refineries dump their wastes in the Mississippi River and that water that flooded and touched everything made a lot of people sick and ruined many buildings.

Diana  posted on  2007-01-16   21:29:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#201. To: Diana, Redheadedstranger (#196) (Edited)

If there were a major economic collapse it could be dangerous to be out in the streets, when Katrina hit New Orleans it was a nightmare to be there

The solution is to elect people who know how to get things done. Maybe some Americans of the right wing should think less of surviving in some armed camp and elect men who don't spend this nation's wealth on the military but on public infrastructures.

I always ask so called survivalists if they are for cutting the armed forces budget? Most say no and look at me like I am some commie - yet they are in the woods eating bark waiting for the day the same military they want to fund to the max comes and gets them for some reason.

If any survivalist can explain to me this dichotomy let me know.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-16   21:37:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 201.

#204. To: Destro (#201)

The solution is to elect people who know how to get things done.

Yeah, with electronic voting machines where the elections can be rigged...

ladybug  posted on  2007-01-16 21:40:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#210. To: Destro (#201)

The solution is to elect people who know how to get things done. Maybe some Americans of the right wing should think less of surviving in some armed camp and elect men who don't spend this nation's wealth on the military but on public infrastructures.

You tell 'em! Maybe now Bush admin will straighten up and fly right.

Dakmar  posted on  2007-01-16 21:48:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#213. To: Destro (#201)

I don't favor maintaining a standing army AT ALL.

And I think that this system is too rotten to repair. Let it crash and let us start over anew.

Redheadedstranger  posted on  2007-01-16 21:57:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#219. To: Destro (#201)

The solution is to elect people who know how to get things done. Maybe some Americans of the right wing should think less of surviving in some armed camp and elect men who don't spend this nation's wealth on the military but on public infrastructures.

I vote, but I have little control over who runs for office. Most people running for office do so for the wrong reasons, so it's a matter of voting for the least of the worst.

The money being spent on these war adventures is going to break the back of this country, many people are not too hopeful because of that, and our elected officials are hellbent on continuing these destructive policies.

I don't think there are a lot of these armed camps of survivalists you speak of, at least to my knowledge, I think the heyday for that was in the early 90s, though there will always be such groups and always have been.

Diana  posted on  2007-01-16 22:14:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 201.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]