See other Editorial Articles
Title: AN ISOLATED PRESIDENT WHO DOESN'T CARE
Source:
Capitol Hill Blue
URL Source: http://www.capitolhillblue.com/news2/2007/01/an_isolated_pre.html
Published: Jan 15, 2007
Author: BEN FELLER
Post Date: 2007-01-15 16:47:43 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 142
Comments: 11
President Bush concedes he isn't popular, and that the war in Iraq isn't either. Yes, progress is overdue and patience is all but gone. Yet none of that changes his view that more U.S. troops are needed to win in Iraq. "I'm not going to try to be popular and change principles to do so," Bush said in a television interview that aired Sunday night. Digging in for confrontation, Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney say they will not budge from sending more U.S. troops to Iraq no matter how much Congress opposes it. "I fully understand they could try to stop me," Bush said of the Democrat-run Congress. "But I've made my decision, and we're going forward." As the president talked tough, lawmakers pledged to explore ways to stop him. "We need to look at what options we have available to constrain the president," said Democratic Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, a possible White House candidate in 2008. Democrats remain wary, though, of appearing unsupportive of American troops. A defiant Cheney, meanwhile, said Democrats offered criticism without credible alternatives. He pointedly reminded lawmakers that Bush is commander in chief. "You cannot run a war by committee," the vice president said of congressional input. The aggressive White House reaction came as the House and Senate prepare to vote on resolutions opposing additional U.S. troops in Iraq. As the White House watched even some GOP support peel away from the war plan, it went all-out to regain some footing. Bush gave his first interview from Camp David, airing Sunday night on CBS' "60 Minutes." It was his second prime-time opportunity in five days to explain why he thinks adding U.S. troops can help stabilize Iraq and hasten the time when American soldiers can come home. He addressed the nation from the White House last Wednesday evening. "Some of my buddies in Texas say, 'You know, let them fight it out. What business is it of ours?'" Bush said of Iraqis. "And that's a temptation that I know a lot of people feel. But if we do not succeed in Iraq, we will leave behind a Middle East which will endanger America." Yet when asked if he owes the Iraqi people an apology for botching the management of the war, he said, "Not at all. "We liberated that country from a tyrant," Bush said. "I think the Iraqi people owe the American people a huge debt of gratitude." Bush announced last week he will send 21,500 more troops to Iraq to halt violence, mainly around Baghdad, as an essential step toward stabilizing the country's government. Democrats in Congress — along with some Republicans — were unimpressed and frustrated. Beyond promising to go on record in opposition to the president's approach, the Democratic leadership is considering whether, and how, to cut off funding for additional troops. "You don't like to micromanage the Defense Department, but we have to, in this case, because they're not paying attention to the public," said Rep. John Murtha, a Pennsylvania Democrat who helps oversee military funding. It is unclear how any effort by Congress could affect Bush's plan. National security adviser Stephen Hadley said the White House already has money appropriated by Congress to move the additional forces to Iraq. GOP Sen. John McCain of Arizona, a potential 2008 presidential contender who endorses Bush's call for more troops, said votes to express disapproval were pointless. "If they're dead serious then we should have a motion to cut off funding," he said of those fighting Bush's strategy. Many Democrats favor a phased withdrawal of U.S. troops, along with new diplomatic efforts with Iraq's neighbors. The Bush administration had hoped that the president's overhauled strategy would lead to some bipartisan unity or that the White House would at least get an extended hearing before legislative leaders made up their minds. Instead, it encountered majority opposition in Congress and a public that rejected by large polling margins the military and political ideas Bush announced. In the CBS interview, Bush rejected an assertion that, time and again, his administration hasn't been straight with the American people about Iraq. He said his spirits were strong. "I really am not the kind of guy that sits here and says, 'Oh gosh, I'm worried about my legacy,'" Bush said. The president also said he saw part of the Internet-aired video of the execution of Saddam Hussein, which showed some Iraqis taunting Saddam as he stood with a noose around his neck on the gallows. He said it could have been handled a lot better. Bush said he got no particular satisfaction from seeing Saddam hang. "I'm not a revengeful person," he said. Hadley was interviewed on "This Week" on ABC and "Meet the Press" on NBC. Cheney was on "Fox News Sunday." Obama was on CBS' "Face the Nation." Murtha appeared on "This Week."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Ada (#0)
madness bump
"Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win." Sun-tzu
Bush, once again, and quite openly, demonstrates that his working vocabulary (words that he knows the full meaning and proper use of) more than likely does not surpass 3000. Here he demonstrates he believes his judgement calls and policy decisions are principles. Having seen Bush speak at even highly managed and staged "press conferences" I am not joking when I estimate that he has the functioning vocabulary of a 9 year old. Being older- he has heard quite a few more words than your average 9 year old- but his brain stopped being able to process and file them correctly so they could be used well and intelligently. He angers easily because he knows he is stupid. And there is nothing more sinister than a stupid with power.
This is the kicker right here.. He has an inferiority complex..
Shoulda' thought of that before you started a war you fucking moron. In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act - - George Orwell Bush isn't the first stupid person to find himself the leader of a powerful country. But in post modern America where image and the bullshit mist of spin defines reality- stupid people are more dangerous. We live in a culture that rewards people not based upon their performances in the real word- but upon their performances in false realities of their own making. Our media discusses Iraq and ME policies upon a platform built of lies and false assumptions- thus the air of total unreality when listening to each side "Debate" each other. And what is amazing about Bush is that even in this false world of our MSM- Bush still manages to sound insane- but yet by the mere fact that he is President- he is able to push the margins of this fake world to ever more absurd distances away the real world- and our media follows along.
That Bush really enjoys lying.
Katrina was America's Chernobyl.
Israel- has more industrial capacity than the Arab ME combined. Finland makes more manufactured goods than the ME combined. The middle east is not a threat that will ever "endanger" this country. No hordes of Moslems are going to blockade Boston harbor. No landings on the beaches of Delaware. No trenches around a besieged Atlanta. There is no chance that dumb shit war supporter in North Dakota is going to see his mud sack town invaded by "terrorists". We are not going to ever have to "fight them over here." Bush means that "our interests" in the ME will be endangered. And when he says "our interests" he means the interests of a handful of DC connnected parasites and his friends. Since I have yet to get my Iraq war dividend check in the mail- I don't have any "interests" in the ME that I am aware of. In fact- since about 18 grand of my money has been spent on this evil war- it is not in my "interests" at all- rather- it is a big red ink stain in my balance ledger. So to all the potential recruits out there for the DC Merc military- if you need money for college or want to learn about them fancy computer gadgets that the recruiter commercials talk about- then by all means- join up the Fed military to go fight in the ME wars for your DC paymasters. But please! Please! Don't EVER feed me that line of shit that you did so to "Defend" me or that you were protecting my "Freedom"- because frankly I don't want to hear it and it isn't true. When you lie in that bed and stare at the empty space one of your limbs used to occupy- you can fool yourself all you want about the reasons- but don't ask me to "thank you."
Good point. Additionally, GWB may be presenting with characteristics associated with the "dry drunk" syndrome: "..."dry drunk" traits consist of: Exaggerated self-importance and pomposity. Grandiose behavior. A rigid, judgmental outlook. Impatience. Childish behavior. Irresponsible behavior. Irrational rationalization. Projection. Overreaction...To a state ruler, depending upon the weaponry at command, they become dangerous to an entire universe." http://www.counterpunch.org /mccarthy1019.html "George W. and Alcoholism" Also, there's another article written by Katherine van Wormer, a Professor of Social Work at the University of Northern Iowa Co-author of Addiction Treatment: A Strengths Perspective (2002). http://www.counterpunch.org/w ormer1011.html "Dry Drunk Syndrome and George W. Bush"
Having some knowledge of that area- I would say that was spot on. Another poster- Johngalt- noted some time back that Bush has the personality and emotional maturity of a 15 or 16 year old. That is more than likely when he started his drinking and drug use. He stopped growing up as a result. The "Twelve Steps" of groups like AA and NA is a painful process of growing up and facing up to your past of prolonged adolescence. Men in their 50's- men with famiies and even grandkids- after a life time of drinking- will tell you that they didn't feel like adults and men until they went through it. Bush never went through it. He just stopped drinking and never changed his thinking. Galt also made an observation about Bush that I think is another tell tale sign that we are being ruled over by a man child. He pays an innordiante amount of deference to men his senior- like a teen would to an older role model. The Cheney-Bush relationship is a warped one in which Bush acts like a teenager trying to impress an older cool cousin.
Somebody just pointed something out to me. Buried in the interview is a statement that Bush would take funding "from other sources" if the Democrats cut funding. He plans to go ahead even if Congress gives him a resounding no. For a long time I favored a winding down of the war over an immediate pull out. I figured that we did break it so we owed an honest shot at fixing it. But no more. I now think a higher duty takes the place of this moral duty. Bush is utterly incompetent and probably not sane. He overseas adventures have to be shut down now as a matter of survival. It's more important to me to see the US come out alive than it is to see a fair shake given to the Iraqis. Whatever has to be done to stop these dog wagging wars needs to be done and done immediately.
.
"I'm not going to try to be popular and change principles to do so," He has no other choice, he's got principles.
The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. – Tacitus
#2. To: Ada (#0)
"I'm not going to try to be popular and change principles to do so,"
#3. To: Burkeman1 (#2)
He angers easily because he knows he is stupid
#4. To: Ada (#0)
(Edited)
But if we do not succeed in Iraq, we will leave behind a Middle East which will endanger America." -- Chimp in Chief
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
In a CorporoFascist capitalist society, there is no money in peace, freedom, or a healthy population, and therefore, no incentive to achieve these - - IndieTX
#5. To: Lady X (#3)
#6. To: Ada (#0)
Bush said he got no particular satisfaction from seeing Saddam hang. "I'm not a revengeful person," he said.
#7. To: IndieTX (#4)
#8. To: Burkeman1 (#2)
He angers easily because he knows he is stupid. And there is nothing more sinister than a stupid with power.
#9. To: scrapper2, John Galt (#8)
#10. To: Ada (#0)
#11. To: ... (#10)
Bush would take funding "from other sources" if the Democrats cut funding. He plans to go ahead even if Congress gives him a resounding no.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest