[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Soros-Funded Dark Money Group Secretly Paying Democrat Influencers To Shape Gen Z Politics

Minnesota Shooter's Family Has CIA and DOD ties

42 GANGSTERS DRAGGED From Homes In Midnight FBI & ICE Raids | MS-13 & Trinitarios BUSTED

Bill Gates EXPOSED: Secret Operatives Inside the CDC, HHS, and NIH REMOVED by RFK, Jr.

Gabriel Ruiz, a man who dresses up as a woman was just arrested for battery (dating violence)

"I'm Tired Of Being Trans" - Minneapolis Shooter Confesses "I Wish I Never Brain-Washed Myself"

The Chart Baltimore Democrats Hope You Never See

Woman with walker, 69, fatally shot in face on New York City street:

Paul Joseph Watson: Bournemouth 1980 Vs 2025

FDA Revokes Emergency Authorization For COVID-19 Vaccines

NATO’s Worst Nightmare Is Happening Right Now in Ukraine - Odessa is Next To Fall?

Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies?

Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class

SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video

Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: The YouTube Insurgency
Source: http://civillibertarian.blogspot.com
URL Source: http://civillibertarian.blogspot.com/2007/01/youtube-insurgency.html
Published: Jan 15, 2007
Author: Don Robertson
Post Date: 2007-01-16 07:00:25 by Kamala
Keywords: None
Views: 203
Comments: 10

Monday, January 15, 2007

The YouTube Insurgency

"They are all wage-slaves now. They thought they had an insurgency going, but it fizzled, just as the planners said it would.....John Brown found out, slaves do not revolt. And wage-slaves do not revolt either."

by Don Robertson, The American Philosopher

1/15/07

The YouTube Insurgency is over, finished, defeated and as it will be remembered, LAUGHABLE. The Internet has done its job, and everyone has grown so tired of reading how outrageous the conduct of this war has been, that they have simply forgotten about the war, and most have not even noticed the real setbacks that have come to pass in the interim. Is your door locked? You had better get up and check.

These kids today, the Nintendo Generation with their Transformer toys, their Internet, their Jessica Simpson and their Bon Jovi and their Britney Spears... Well, they're done. They are all wage-slaves now. They thought they had an insurgency going, but it fizzled, just as the planners said it would. Their Daily Kos and their http://WhatReallyHappened.com are still slugging away in the dark not knowing half what they should be aiming at, but to what end, if the insurgency is done? And it is done.

It is all very entertaining in a sick sort of way. The whole group, this whole generation has been sucked into a whirlwind of sidestepping, head fakes, low interest home loans, credit cards, cell phones, high speed Internet and they have been YouTubed into a discredited, discombobulated, minor disturbance on a Saturday night that went away all on its own accord because they had to get up early the next day to walk the dog, both of them, and then go to work.

I'm sorry kids, but it is over. You never had a chance of course. You twerps have been so strung out on 2 Liter Pepsi, pizza, and Ecstasy and some of you Oxycontin so long you never had any chance of organizing any real insurgency. John Brown found out, slaves do not revolt. And wage-slaves do not revolt either. It has just been one of those little-tifts kind of insurgencies that has not a chance in the world of gaining any traction, or even any chance of identifying the problems at the root of a cause worth fighting anyway.

And, those stupid soldier friends of yours signed up for what they are taking on for Big Oil, and really, they are getting what they deserved for not being as socially Darwinist smart as you anyway, you in your $200 grand condo, the forty-five mile commute, and your new Saab with 200k on the odometer, and you have payments to make right? And student loans to pay off, right? And, damn now your wife tells you she is a lesbian, right? Well, that is cool, Dude.

You suck. You are pigs at the trough. And, well... Someone had to say it. You really suck. What can you do about it? Maybe you could burn your degree? Or, I guess you can write a really-really-really nasty comment about this article, one maybe with a really-really-really nasty and animated frowning emoticon? Or, blurb out the "Take off the tinfoil hat?" Or maybe, "Time to go back on the meds..." Oh, Good one toothless-truth!

The YouTube Insurgency has been waylaid. The kids take your candy away from you. You've bought into just about every get-ahead gimmick that has been tossed to you just as if you were dogs following the butcher truck. Oh, yeh? Oh, yeh? Oh, this guy makes me sooooo mad! So? You know, most educated people spell hypocracy, H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y. And when they say, Your going to get it now, the spell "your" the other way with an apostrophe. And you know what else? When I went to college, they did not give out degrees in hair dressing or, interior decorating. Gee... I wonder how they got their hair done then? And, how the heck did they get their interior decorating done? Morons!

So, take a good look around, you fooled fools. Because, during your whole lifetime you are going to hear just how wonderful everything is going, the economy is good, the environment is getting cleaned up, crime is being fought effectively, and scientists are on the brink of building wonderful inventions and curing everything from acne to cancer, and another Congressman just got busted for screwing kids in the butt! So, that will never happen again. But, as I said, take a good look around. Feast your eyes. It will never again be as good as it is today, because that's the general trend and none of you today even has a clue about how to turn it around.

Everyone advertises against their weakness. America is a nation of immoral liars. Haven't you figured that out from the number of times you lied on your resume? The whole country is run on lies, from your pedophile priests, school teachers and Boy Scout leaders, to your Ivy League universities that cost $48 grand a year, and straight off to that shrink your wife ended up falling in love with, Miss What's-She-Stuffing? Ah, she has a good supply of the wonder-meds to keep her happy. You had better hope she does not come back, because that doctor interned at the White House and she has a terrific case of venereal warts. Oh. I didn't know you had already been afflicted. Well, good luck with that!

You know, this is a great country. It is not your country any more, but it is a great country. All the foreigners the government keeps coming across the border just love it! You know, when I was a kid, you had to be able to speak English reasonably well to be a doctor, or even to get a reasonably well paying job, because it just was reasonable, if you are going to pay someone good money, they ought to be able to speak the language, if not with a minimum of an accent.

The Mexicans lived in Mexico then too. And, the minimum wage in purchasing power was more than a Ph.D. gets today! Actually, when I started work, there wasn't a minimum wage. We didn't need one. The country was cleaner, and the dog shit did not clutter the streets and your nostrils in the spring, there were no homeless, there was a two cent deposit on a soda pop bottle, and you could buy another with five of them, because a soda pop cost a dime a piece then. The fat girl in class maybe weighed a hundred and forty pounds, that's 140 not 240 like your homecoming queens today, and no one I knew had a tattoo, but a few Pacific Front Second World War veterans, and, on their shoulders! But hey! To each his own, right?

It is like I said, look around. It won't get any better than this for you. That much is guaranteed. It is all down hill from here on out, and speeding up rapidly. You know what they say. If you are going to be really rich, it is best to do it in a poor country, and that is the goal today. (Did anyone ever tell you that people who do not have health insurance actually live longer than the people who do? Go figure, if you can figure without a calculator.) Lies! All lies, you freakin' fools!

And forget about the YouTube Insurgency, because Nancy Pelosi and her troop of scoundrels in Congress you keep sending those emails to, they are not going to end this war for you. She has five, count 'em 1-2-3-4-5, kids and a dozen or so grand kids she is busy setting up for life, so she does not want to see the war end, or stop the illegals from pouring over the border and keeping your wages down either. You just keep punching that time clock and translating for that Indian fellow who works in the cubicle next to yours. You might want to ask him about India, if he lived in Calcutta, because that is where the country you live in is headed. Oh, it will be a very rich Calcutta, but Calcutta just the same. All those fertile Nancies are going to make the whole country, shoulder to shoulder, one on top of another, like the Black Hole of Calcutta soon enough. We need a couple more billion people to keep the economy growing! Get me five hundred more Mexicans who will work down there in that greasy hole!

Do not worry about the future. The government has everything well under control, for themselves, and for all you YouTubers too.

Fifteen tons and what do you get?

Another day older and deeper in debt!

Look around kids! It will all be gone and buried in waste in a few more years. They are not just fighting the Iraqis now. They are fighting all the Muslims sitting on top of that oil. They declared war on Iran last week and did not even bother to tell you about it. Oh? You did hear about it? Well, then! Haul out the emoticons! Dust off the keyboard! And put on the coffee! There is an insurgency going on here!

They are threatening everyone in the world too. It is getting to the point where they figure the YouTube Insurgency has been so softened up, they are considering that tactical nuclear strike again. They have you YouTubers so poisoned up, you will never notice the difference, is the rationale. It is a pretty sound rationale too.

Just stay inside, stuff your face some more, sit in front of the Internet machine, or the Wii, or listen to your iPod... You might want to see if cable is playing Star Wars again, or maybe there are some old Star Trek episodes on, on one of the 240 channels, or maybe the new Discover Magazine is in the mail box?

There's always the porn channel, now that the wife is gone. posted by Jason Miller at 9:53 AM

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

#3. To: All (#0)

What does everyone think of this snip?

Technology is a More Powerful Social Force than the Aspiration for Freedom

It is not possible to make a LASTING compromise between technology and freedom, because technology is by far the more powerful social force and continually encroaches on freedom through REPEATED compromises. Imagine the case of two neighbors, each of whom at the outset owns the same amount of land, but one of whom is more powerful than the other. The powerful one demands a piece of the other's land. The weak one refuses. The powerful one says, "OK, let's compromise. Give me half of what I asked." The weak one has little choice but to give in.

Some time later the powerful neighbor demands another piece of land, again there is a compromise, and so forth. By forcing a long series of compromises on the weaker man, the powerful one eventually gets all of his land. So it goes in the conflict between technology and freedom.

Let us explain why technology is a more powerful social force than the aspiration for freedom.

A technological advance that appears not to threaten freedom often turns out to threaten it very seriously later on.

For example, consider motorized transport. A walking man formerly could go where he pleased, go at his own pace without observing any traffic regulations, and was independent of technological support-systems. When motor vehicles were introduced they appeared to increase man's freedom. They took no freedom away from the walking man, no one had to have an automobile if he didn't want one, and anyone who did choose to buy an automobile could travel much faster than the walking man. But the introduction of motorized transport soon changed society in such a way as to restrict greatly man's freedom of locomotion. When automobiles became numerous, it became necessary to regulate their use extensively.

In a car, especially in densely populated areas, one cannot just go where one likes at one's own pace one's movement is governed by the flow of traffic and by various traffic laws. One is tied down by various obligations: license requirements, driver test, renewing registration, insurance, maintenance required for safety, monthly payments on purchase price. Moreover, the use of motorized transport is no longer optional.

Since the introduction of motorized transport the arrangement of our cities has changed in such a way that the majority of people no longer live within walking distance of their place of employment, shopping areas and recreational opportunities, so that they HAVE TO depend on the automobile for transportation. Or else they must use public transportation, in which case they have even less control over their own movement than when driving a car. Even the walker's freedom is now greatly restricted. In the city he continually has to stop and wait for traffic lights that are designed mainly to serve auto traffic.

In the country, motor traffic makes it dangerous and unpleasant to walk along the highway. (Note the important point we have illustrated with the case of motorized transport: When a new item of technology is introduced as an option that an individual can accept or not as he chooses, it does not necessarily REMAIN optional. In many cases the new technology changes society in such a way that people eventually find themselves FORCED to use it.)

While technological progress AS A WHOLE continually narrows our sphere of freedom, each new technical advance CONSIDERED BY ITSELF appears to be desirable. Electricity, indoor plumbing, rapid long-distance communications . . . how could one argue against any of these things, or against any other of the innumerable technical advances that have made modern society? It would have been absurd to resist the introduction of the telephone, for example. It offered many advantages and no disadvantages. Yet as we explained in paragraphs 59-76, all these technical advances taken together have created world in which the average man's fate is no longer in his own hands or in the hands of his neighbors and friends, but in those of politicians, corporation executives and remote, anonymous technicians and bureaucrats whom he as an individual has no power to influence. The same process will continue in the future.

Take genetic engineering, for example. Few people will resist the introduction of a genetic technique that eliminates a hereditary disease. It does no apparent harm and prevents much suffering. Yet a large number of genetic improvements taken together will make the human being into an engineered product rather than a free creation of chance (or of God, or whatever, depending on your religious beliefs).

Another reason why technology is such a powerful social force is that, within the context of a given society, technological progress marches in only one direction; it can never be reversed. Once a technical innovation has been introduced, people usually become dependent on it, so that they can never again do without it, unless it is replaced by some still more advanced innovation. Not only do people become dependent as individuals on a new item of technology, but, even more, the system as a whole becomes dependent on it.

(Imagine what would happen to the system today if computers, for example, were eliminated.)

Thus the system can move in only one direction, toward greater technologization. Technology repeatedly forces freedom to take a step back, but technology can never take a step back -- short of the overthrow of the whole technological system.

Technology advances with great rapidity and threatens freedom at many different points at the same time (crowding, rules and regulations, increasing dependence of individuals on large organizations, propaganda and other psychological techniques, genetic engineering, invasion of privacy through surveillance devices and computers, etc.). To hold back any ONE of the threats to freedom would require a long and difficult social struggle. Those who want to protect freedom are overwhelmed by the sheer number of new attacks and the rapidity with which they develop, hence they become apathetic and no longer resist. To fight each of the threats separately would be futile. Success can be hoped for only by fighting the technological system as a whole; but that is revolution, not reform.

Technicians (we use this term in its broad sense to describe all those who perform a specialized task that requires training) tend to be so involved in their work (their surrogate activity) that when a conflict arises between their technical work and freedom, they almost always decide in favor of their technical work. This is obvious in the case of scientists, but it also appears elsewhere: Educators, humanitarian groups, conservation organizations do not hesitate to use propaganda or other psychological techniques to help them achieve their laudable ends.

Corporations and government agencies, when they find it useful, do not hesitate to collect information about individuals without regard to their privacy. Law enforcement agencies are frequently inconvenienced by the constitutional rights of suspects and often of completely innocent persons, and they do whatever they can do legally (or sometimes illegally) to restrict or circumvent those rights. Most of these educators, government officials and law officers believe in freedom, privacy and constitutional rights, but when these conflict with their work, they usually feel that their work is more important.

It is well known that people generally work better and more persistently when striving for a reward than when attempting to avoid a punishment or negative outcome.

Scientists and other technicians are motivated mainly by the rewards they get through their work. But those who oppose technilogical invasions of freedom are working to avoid a negative outcome, consequently there are a few who work persistently and well at this discouraging task. If reformers ever achieved a signal victory that seemed to set up a solid barrier against further erosion of freedom through technological progress, most would tend to relax and turn their attention to more agreeable pursuits. But the scientists would remain busy in their laboratories, and technology as it progresses would find ways, in spite of any barriers, to exert more and more control over individuals and make them always more dependent on the system.

No social arrangements, whether laws, institutions, customs or ethical codes, can provide permanent protection against technology. History shows that all social arrangements are transitory; they all change or break down eventually. But technological advances are permanent within the context of a given civilization. Suppose for example that it were possible to arrive at some social arrangements that would prevent genetic engineering from being applied to human beings, or prevent it from being applied in such a way as to threaten freedom and dignity.

Still, the technology would remain waiting. Sooner or later the social arrangement would break down. Probably sooner, given the pace of change in our society. Then genetic engineering would begin to invade our sphere of freedom, and this invasion would be irreversible (short of a breakdown of technological civilization itself). Any illusions about achieving anything permanent through social arrangements should be dispelled by what is currently happening with environmental legislation. A few years ago its seemed that there were secure legal barriers preventing at least SOME of the worst forms of environmental degradation. A change in the political wind, and those barriers begin to crumble.

For all of the foregoing reasons, technology is a more powerful social force than the aspiration for freedom. But this statement requires an important qualification.

It appears that during the next several decades the industrial-technological system will be undergoing severe stresses due to economic and environmental problems, and especially due to problems of human behavior (alienation, rebellion, hostility, a variety of social and psychological difficulties). We hope that the stresses through which the system is likely to pass will cause it to break down, or at least weaken it sufficiently so that a revolution against it becomes possible. If such a revolution occurs and is successful, then at that particular moment the aspiration for freedom will have proved more powerful than technology.

In paragraph 125 we used an analogy of a weak neighbor who is left destitute by a strong neighbor who takes all his land by forcing on him a series of compromises. But suppose now that the strong neighbor gets sick, so that he is unable to defend himself.

The weak neighbor can force the strong one to give him his land back, or he can kill him. If he lets the strong man survive and only forces him to give his land back, he is a fool, because when the strong man gets well he will again take all the land for himself. The only sensible alternative for the weaker man is to kill the strong one while he has the chance.

In the same way, while the industrial system is sick we must destroy it. If we ever compromise with it and let it recover from its sickness, it will eventually wipe out all of our freedom.

Since many people may find paradoxical the notion that a large number of good things can add up to a bad thing, we will illustrate with an analogy. Suppose Mr. A is playing chess with Mr. B. Mr. C, a Grand Master, is looking over Mr. A's shoulder. Mr. A of course wants to win his game, so if Mr. C points out a good move for him to make, he is doing Mr. A a favor. But suppose now that Mr. C tells Mr. A how to make ALL of his moves. In each particular instance he does Mr. A a favor by showing him his best move, but by making ALL of his moves for him he spoils the game, since there is not point in Mr. A's playing the game at all if someone else makes all his moves.

The situation of modern man is analogous to that of Mr. A. The system makes an individual's life easier for him in innumerable ways, but in doing so it deprives him of control over his own fate.

Kamala  posted on  2007-01-16   7:29:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Kamala (#3)

Technology is a More Powerful Social Force than the Aspiration for Freedom

The Unabomber's Manifesto? That guy was an absolute threat to the control of the system over the average sheep. Nevertheless, he made some good and quite provocative points which are quite true.

BTP Holdings  posted on  2007-01-16   9:56:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 7.

#9. To: BTP Holdings (#7)

Bingo. I knew someone here quickly would know where this is from. TK makes some good points, especially now that it is 10-12 years later. His methods of killing for resistance and revolution were extreme and unsound.

Kamala  posted on  2007-01-16 14:44:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]