[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Music The Ones That Didn't Make It Back Home [featuring Pacman @ 0:49 - 0:57 in his natural habitat] Let’s Talk About Grief | Death Anniversary Democrats Suddenly Change Slogan To 'Orange Man Good' America in SHOCK as New Footage of Jill Biden's 'ELDER ABUSE' Emerges | Dems FURIOUS: 'Jill is EVIL' Executions, reprisals and counter-executions - SS Polizei Regiment 19 versus the French Resistance Paratrooper kills german soldier and returns wedding photos to his family after 68 years AMeRiKaN GULaG... 'Christian Warrior Training' explodes as churches put faith in guns Major insurer gives brutal ultimatum to entire state: Let us put up prices by 50 percent or we will leave Biden Admin Issues Order Blocking Haitian Illegal Immigrants From Deportation Murder Rate in Socialist Venezuela Falls to 22-Year Low ISRAEL IS DESTROYING GAZA TO CONTROL THE WORLD'S MOST IMPORTANT SHIPPING LANE Denmark to tax livestock farts and burps starting in 2030 Woman to serve longer prison time for offending migrant men who gang-raped a minor IDF says murder is okay after statistics show that Israel killed 75% of all journalists who died in 2023 Boeing to be criminally INDICTED for fraud 0:35 / 10:02 Nigel Farage Embarrasses Rishi Sunak & Keir Starmer AGAIN in New Speech! Norway to stockpile 82,500 tons of grain to prepare for famine and war Almost 200 Pages of Epstein Grand Jury Documents Released UK To Install Defibrillators in EVERY School Due to Sudden Rise in Heart Problems Pfizer purchased companies that produce drugs to treat the same conditions caused by covid vaccines It Now Takes An Annual Income Of $186,000 A Year For Americans To Feel Financially Secure Houthis Unleash 'Attacks' On Israeli, U.S. And UK Ships; 'Trio Of Evil Hit' | Full Detail Gaza hospital chief says he was severely tortured in Israeli prisons I'd like to thank Congress for using my Tax money to buy Zelenskys wife a Bugatti. Cancer-causing radium detected in US city's groundwater due to landfill teeming with nuclear waste from WWII-era atomic bomb efforts Tennessee Law Allowing Death Penalty For Pedophiles Goes Into Effect - Only Democrats Oppose It Meet the NEW Joe Biden! 😂 Bovine Collagen Benefits

Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Are biblical spouting “patriots” head cases?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 23, 2007
Author: me
Post Date: 2007-01-23 09:25:29 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 3523
Comments: 308

Yeah, they are. I’m amazed at the arrogance of some self professed “patriot” Christians. IMHO, they do more to fracture those of us who get it than any elitist agenda ever could. They are unwitting foot soldiers of the globalists.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 182.

#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0) (Edited)

Those who use biblical prophecy especially those that insert 'Ezekiel' into their forum responses to explain today's events need to be stoned with big rocks.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-23   9:34:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

With what they say is going to happen to everyone else, you're letting them off easy.

My vote goes for burned at the stake... in the name of Mercy.

-Blackeagle

blackeagle  posted on  2007-01-23   9:43:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

My vote goes for burned at the stake... in the name of Mercy.

YES! And don't forget a book burning (please include all the versions they squabble over)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-23   9:47:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I'm tired of their petty squabbles, but I really don't want to burn a Bible.

What I think would be even worse is the knowledge that their ashes would be buried with a Koran.

-Blackeagle

blackeagle  posted on  2007-01-23   9:57:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

but I really don't want to burn a Bible.

Well, with these head cases it all depends on *which* bible is burnt. Apparently there are different versions and only THEY know the one which is real. As I said, they exhibit overt mental illness.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-23   10:01:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You're right, it is a severe mental illness.

I used to be a Catholic. The scandals, the money grubbing preists, but mostly the people drove me away. I couldnt take the "if god wills it" mentality. The smile in my face on Sunday spit on me Monday acts.

Why just this Sunday the church handed out petitions for an amendment to the Florida constitution banning embryonic stem cell research from public money. Like good sheep everyone signed it.

I hate dealing with religious nuts across the board.

-Blackeagle

blackeagle  posted on  2007-01-23   10:42:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I used to be a Catholic. The scandals, the money grubbing preists, but mostly the people drove me away. I couldnt take the "if god wills it" mentality. The smile in my face on Sunday spit on me Monday acts.

To: Jethro Tull You're right, it is a severe mental illness.

I used to be a Catholic. The scandals, the money grubbing preists, but mostly the people drove me away. I couldnt take the "if god wills it" mentality. The smile in my face on Sunday spit on me Monday acts.

Why just this Sunday the church handed out petitions for an amendment to the Florida constitution banning embryonic stem cell research from public money. Like good sheep everyone signed it.

I hate dealing with religious nuts across the board.

The Catholics you describe are more the exception than the mainstream, unless the church has turned into some kind of holy roller hang out since I was last there as a "regular."

I'm not sure what state you live in - if it's a Southern state maybe the Catholics got infected with the Bible Belt disease or something - but the Catholics I've known and my family are all practising Catholics except for me are pretty average people -flawed and not holier than thou- they definitely don't press their religion on strangers nor do they wear their religion on their sleeve like a badge of merit. And Catholics are not too terribly political - in fact, with their numbers, they could be far more political if they chose.

As for priests molesters - that was very ugly - but the percentage of priests who molested was similar to other church's clerics or so I've read - what was bad was the Catholic church tried to cover it up. Also the priest molestation thingie was primarily isolated to American Catholic churches for some peculiar reason.

As for money grubbing priests - the Catholic church is no different from other religions and certainly no worse than most.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-01-24   11:57:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

but the Catholics I've known and my family are all practising Catholics except for me are pretty average people -flawed and not holier than thou- they definitely don't press their religion on strangers nor do they wear their religion on their sleeve like a badge of merit. And Catholics are not too terribly political - in fact, with their numbers, they could be far more political if they chose.

I'm in the same boat as you, scrapper. What got me started on this rant is the outright hatred some otherwise kindred spirits have toward anything Catholic. The Catholics I know would stand with us on most issues, while never discussing religion. Who and what people choose to hold close is their business. IMHO, some people in this community of ours place religion and obscure conspiracies over the current events that are actively altering our culture and country. They divide rather than unify, and I find it impossible to keep quiet.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-24   14:33:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Catholics are one of the leading enablers of illegal immigration, JT. Them and evangelicals.

Redheadedstranger  posted on  2007-01-24   14:36:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Any Catholic who enables illegal immigration should be Saddam'ed. The same holds for anyone else including all those WASPS in the CFR who are driving this mess with their "Building a North American Community."

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-24   14:46:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So are godless libertarians

I remember arguing with the big "L" libertarians on tFR years ago. They adored open borders and free trade. Total fruitcakes, who haven't the balls to engage in debate.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-24   14:48:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Who is for or against open borders is not cut and dried.

While I am against open borders - my reasons are not the same as those of others - my reasons being logical and rational while most of the other types want to close the border because of racial and religious reasons.

In other words I am against open immigration for economic reasons more so than cultural ones. Those that argue cultural reasons are playing with a losing hand/argument and thus those are the types the media highlights.

Bluedogtxn is the only forum poster that ever got that point.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-24   15:14:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Bluedogtxn is the only forum poster that ever got that point.

Thanks for the compliment.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-01-25   9:37:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I am disappointed in this forum - I think DailyKos is a great forum but they are more lefty and I am more a traditionalist conservative. Still this forum is to me more like a freerepublic wannabe website - populated with Archie Bunker types - they mean well but are not sophisticated in their analysis. There are a great few exceptions of course but sadly not enough.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-25   11:04:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

My posting experience tells me that when a "debate" is concluded by one poster declaring the forum is "disappointing" h/she usually was pummeled about the head and body.

What exactly is a traditional conservative and why on earth would anyone choose to self identify, given today's politics?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-25   11:35:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What exactly is a traditional conservative and why on earth would anyone choose to self identify, given today's politics?

Someone steeped in the constitution more so than identifying being conservative with being Christian or a kind of 'white' person. Also someone who is educated reading classical literature - from Homer to Pericles to Cicero to Locke and Burke to Jefferson and the Founding fathers and are not conservatives based along Rush Limbough lines.

For example being against illegal immigration is fine - I am as well - I am also for limiting legal immigration and I say this as a naturalized citizen.

But the reasons stated here are for limits because the Mexicans are wetbacks and so on - not based on rational reasoned concerns. This does not mean I am better than you or smarter - far from it - but I don't understand why what I am thinking seems complex to some or that they have not thought of this themsleves - I keep reading talk radio talking points a lot on here over independent thinking.

It is OK - i did not fit in on Freerepublic nor Libertypost - I am a hybrid - European and American so I don't think like most nativist Americans.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-25   11:46:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

But the reasons stated here are for limits because the Mexicans are wetbacks and so on - not based on rational reasoned concerns.

When they break into my country illegally, organize and assemble in many of the major cities across the country and then march under the Mexican flag in an effort to affect American law, they're wetback sons of bitches. Period, end of discussion. You can stay busy reading Plato and Homer but be very clear about our future; we're under invasion by a nationalistic people who are demanding that portions of our country be returned to them. Wetback? The word is too kind for these scum.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-25   12:14:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Hence my need to disassociate myself with such a group - I am against illegal immigration same as you - but such sentiments expressed like that serve no purpose and don't juice up my intellect. I think the main difference is that this website is populated by people who are stirred with strong emotions over thoughts.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-25   12:28:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I think the main difference is that this website is populated by people who are stirred with strong emotions

Welcome to America. If it weren't for our strong emotions we'd never have tossed the Brits out the door, and we'd all be speaking German.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-25   12:35:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Welcome to America. If it weren't for our strong emotions we'd never have tossed the Brits out the door, and we'd all be speaking German.

Americans were already speaking German and Ducth before the Brits arrived.

So take that English as the official language nuts.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-25   12:44:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Americans were already speaking German and Ducth before the Brits arrived

You missed the point, Plato. Why am I not surprised?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-25   12:57:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Here we have a website with not much posting on Jim Webb's rebuttal. That is sad.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-25   13:08:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Here we have a website with not much posting on Jim Webb's rebuttal. That is sad.

There are probably under 80 regular posters here. How much stimulating cross-discussion do you expect on a forum that could hold all its members in the banquet hall of a Vermont Knights of Columbus?

SmokinOPs  posted on  2007-01-25   16:43:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

There are probably under 80 regular posters here.

And why are they not posting on Jim Webb? Lots of posts about the illuminati though....

Destro  posted on  2007-01-25   16:47:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

And why are they not posting on Jim Webb? Lots of posts about the illuminati though....

Firstly, several of us here posted quite abit about Jim Webb when he was running against Allen in November - long threads actually - I don't recall your getting involved in those discussions. But a couple of months ago, Webb wasn't a trendy household name as he is today after his rebuttal to the State of the Union speech.

Secondly before Webb's rebuttal speech and before you announced you independent registration status to all, there was a discussion thread about possible Presidential candidates and some of us then pointed out that Webb might make a good candidate to run for the Oval Office as an Independent because the Democrats would need to become more centrist to keep him and the GOP would need to lose the neocons and become more paleo dominated as before to attract him back - and some of us (hint: it wasn't you ) - noted that Webb was a rising star to be watched closely.

Thirdly, some of the good discussions about Webb's speech got hidden in the SOTU thread. You weren't on that thread as I recall.

Fourthly, what exactly have you contributed of note in the way of article postings to stimulate discussion about Webb that you so obviously want? Nada, zero. The last article you contributed to this forum as I recall was something about Israel and Russia in November.

Fifthly quit your bitching about illumanati articles and instead of picking up your marbles and walking away, roll up your sleeves and do some research and post some articles that would make for a different more realist take on politics. I'm with you. I am not much for the illuminati articles - they're not my cup of tea - so I don't post on those threads - it doesn't bother me that others do - I do something more concrete, I actually post articles and post to threads I am interested in. Maybe you should do the same - there's room for everybody's political bent on this forum - Christine hardly ever exercises her moderator censorship rights except for vanity threads that are out of control and burying real news articles and discussions.

So apply the advice you give to others about "doing concrete things" and start researching and posting articles on subjects you want discussion and opinions on.

Here's something that you can take as your own articles about Webb and his qualities to post for further discussion - I was thinking of doing it yesterday but I got called away from home:

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?bid=15&pid=160126

"Webb for President?" Posted 01/24/2007 @ 1:34pm by Ari Berman

AND

http://www.thenation.com/doc/ 20061023/moser

"Virginia's Rumbling Rebels" posted October 8, 2006 (October 23, 2006 issue)

By Bob Moser

Go for it, Destro, and show us the way. I'd love to post to such a thread and so would others, I'm sure.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-01-25   17:20:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

But a couple of months ago, Webb wasn't a trendy household name as he is today after his rebuttal to the State of the Union speech.

I don't have anything against Webb, but when it comes to candidates for Pres - Ron Paul is hard to beat.

Paul has been the ONLY true voice of reason in congress for many years. He has consistently voted in favor of "Joe Six Pack", has repeatedly called for an audit of America's gold holdings, has repeatedly called for a return of our currency to a gold standard, and is thoroughly aware of the many huge government frauds like the income tax (he was interviewed in Freedom to Fascism on the matter). He was one of only 6(!) to vote "Nay" on the invasion of Iraq. He knows how government has usurped the Constitution, and feels those wrongs need to be "undone" and return to abiding by the Constitution. He is against the Patriot Act, the North American Union, and the Military Commissions Act. I think we'd be hard pressed to do any better.

innieway  posted on  2007-01-26   2:11:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't have anything against Webb, but when it comes to candidates for Pres - Ron Paul is hard to beat.

I agree with you that Dr. Ron Paul is a quality candidate. But I think he's too old to be attractive to most Americans. And I suspect he's burned too many bridges within the GOP.

Sadly I think Americans are really stuck on youth and image. I think Jim Webb has that Kennedy all American look - he'd be easier to package and sell and he has not been in office or in gov't too long to have burned bridges. Although Webb is known as a bit of a hothead so he might burn bridges in short order too.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-01-26   2:21:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#183. To: scrapper2 (#182)

I agree with you that Dr. Ron Paul is a quality candidate. But I think he's too old to be attractive to most Americans. And I suspect he's burned too many bridges within the GOP.

Very sad but true. As much as I hate to admit it, I think his chances of winning the election are about on par with an ant climbing up an elephant's leg with rape on his mind.

Sadly, the most likely scenario is NOT going to be a real choice at all. Hillary vs McCain or some equally disgusting shit... It's not about who wins the popular vote. Bush lost the popularity contest twice.

innieway  posted on  2007-01-26 02:43:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]