Title: Are biblical spouting “patriots” head cases? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jan 23, 2007 Author:me Post Date:2007-01-23 09:25:29 by Jethro Tull Keywords:None Views:5366 Comments:308
Yeah, they are. Im amazed at the arrogance of some self professed patriot Christians. IMHO, they do more to fracture those of us who get it than any elitist agenda ever could. They are unwitting foot soldiers of the globalists.
I mean once Germanics were considered violent, mindless beasts - so much so that one tribe's ethnic name gave the world the word and concept of 'vandal'.
It always seems to boil down to Germany in the end.
I think we are seeing Eye for an Eye carried out to the extreme.
I mean once Germanics were considered violent, mindless beasts - so much so that one tribe's ethnic name gave the world the word and concept of 'vandal'.
"Vandalism" is from the French vandalisme, which originated during the French revolution. The verb vandalize is first recorded in 1800. The term "vandalism" has come to mean senseless destruction as a result of the Vandals' sack of Rome under King Geiseric in 455. Historians agree that the Vandals were no more destructive than other invaders of ancient times. During the Enlightenment, Rome was idealized, so the Goths and Vandals were disparaged.
It's okey and even encouraged for other minorities and ethnic groups to embrace their cultures, but if white people want to hold onto their's they are deemed biased, ignorant rednecks.
This is an excellent point and one that ticks me off to no end. Multiculturalism is code-speak for the destruction of white culture. Today's American cultural elites deem it acceptable that our Attorney General Gonzalez attend and address the radical group, La Raza (The Race), but should a white person dare listen to David Duke or Jared Taylor, they're classified white separatists. I reject the effort to be made to feel guilty about being pro- white. Such pride is acceptable - and encouraged - among other cultures, therefore its only the politically correct among us who feel uncomfortable and theyre nothing more than the enemy within.
#200. To: All, Jethro Tull, lurkers, posters (#199)
Let me briefly climb on this soap box here and preachify awhile.
Now, I left this 4um in '05, after reaching an epiphany and realizing that 90% percent of my comrades on this site were morons, devoid of two brain cells to rub together, and it was impossible to have an intelligent conversation, among the five or six good posters on the site, in this days, because numbskulls were always intefering. Most posters on this site are both reactionaries and sensationalists by nature. Their hobbies are the hobbies of middle-aged and elderly women: sex gossip, bush bashing, and superfluous conversation. This makes the site quite boring and un-appealing.
Moreover, it further doesn't help that this board is run by women. A board run by women can only reach a certain, low level of prominence. I have said as much to Goldi-lox, on several occassions, on LP, and I have no fear of repeating it here.
So if you are an honest, intelligent and un-feminized member of this site you won't be offended by my frankness, because you will be among the 10% of decent posters.
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
Moreover, it further doesn't help that this board is run by women. A board run by women can only reach a certain, low level of prominence.
I understand your hostility considering how all of the women who post here have bested you in any argument you've engaged in. That said, you could always start your own forum. Stone's place is ripe for a hostile take-over. If that doesn't appeal to you, please ring Destro and meander off with him into the sunset like two Brokeback cowboys.
No need to post them, it's common knowledge. But if that isn't enough for the your inner misogynist, go pick a fight with one of the girls just like you did back in grade school. Yeah, what fun that was, eh?
Actually, it's bullshit, because I haven't seriously argued with anyone on this board.
Because aside from Burkeman1, the Mad Artist, Destro, and a few others, EVERYONE ELSE ON THIS BOARD ARE my intellectual inferiors. And that includes you.
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
I got the shivers a little while ago when I read the post further up by blackeagle where he pointed out hypothetically that in order to get rid of racism, if all third-worlders would immigrate only to black countries, how that would result in the genocide of the black population living in those black countries.
I never thought of it that way but he is right, and as we all know in reality this scenario is only happening to white countries.
When the Europeans came to the Americas, it pretty much spelled death to the native Americans who had been here for thousands of years.
I've read some material from La Raza, they talk about how the old (?) white people need to go back to Europe and give them their land back, even though indiginous Mexicans lived further south in pre-Columbian times, and TX for instance was inhabited by different tribes who hardly exist now. What I observed from living in TX for quite a few years was once the Mexicans came pouring in, they were not grateful or humble, they didn't try to fit in for the most part, many of them had a defiant attitude, many of them had nothing but comtempt for the gringo/gringa, and already in the early 90s they had radical groups telling them they deserved the land, free this and free that. I got tired of it all, feeling like a stranger in a place I had lived in for some years, and finally left in the late 90s.
Of course where I am now I'm in the minority again, but at least there are only two ethnic groups which makes things much easier, plus Eskimos are gentle people, aggression is taboo in their culture though the trouble-makers in the big cities do all they can to persuade them to hate the few white people in their midst. It doesn't work too well though since cooperation is so important in their culture, as survival is very important in this cold and rugged land, and traditionally difficult people were banished, so after living that way for at least 3000 years it's hard for them to act like jerks. In this sparsely-populated area the white people are like the guests and do their best to fit in and learn the customs like living off the land and sharing resources. The two groups get along well except for maybe a short period after the yearly hate-white-people convention in Anchorage put on by the radicals, who are not Eskimos or from any of the other Alaska native tribes.
It's okey and even encouraged for other minorities and ethnic groups to embrace their cultures, but if white people want to hold onto their's they are deemed biased, ignorant rednecks.
I'm tired of labels and accusations and pretension, we should not have to give in by being labeled as stupid and evil if we don't like our culture being destroyed and ridiculed.
Blacks are encouraged to embrace black culture, Jews embrace their culture and heritage, Asians the same and so on, but if white Americans want to retain their culture they get called racist and bigoted and to avoid being labeled as such they end up denying their own identity in order to fit in.
So if you are an honest, intelligent and un-feminized member of this site you won't be offended by my frankness, because you will be among the 10% of decent posters.
Bored?
I can't think of any other reason you'd post this drivel other than to get an inflammatory reaction to liven up a boring day.
Try video games.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
I agree, he expressed my thoughts exactly. The people supporting open borders are the same ones who gave us forced busing in the 60s. I was living in NYC when that scheme was launched and it fueled white flight to the suburbs and balkanized the city. It remains that way today, only it's worsened. Given that lack of success, it's only reasonable (not) that the elites force this integration on the scale of nations. We're old enough to remember the fall of white South Africa. Now Great Britain is a mixed mess, and last night I posted an article on Australia and it's failed attempt to assimilate races. Since the track record of forced integration is failure, my only conclusion is that this unfettered illegal invasion is an attempt to foster the destruction or our nation and culture. I still remain amazed at the naiveté of some Americans. The invaders arent quiet about their goals or hatred of whites, yet some otherwise reasonable folk choose to look the other way while our land is reclaimed block by block, city by city, all in the name of the NAU. When, and if, they wake up it just might be too late.
I've noticed these past couple years posts on forums and articles where women are blamed for the ills of American society, they talk about the "feminization" of America (police tasering people to death, the plethora of porn and torture videos on the net, Gitmo and Hummers, all that is feminine??).
They gripe that women get themselves pregnant so men will unlawfully be forced by courts to pay child suppport (whatever happened to marriage and raising children? Is that considered bad and abnormal now?) I just find it very strange, and I'm surprised at the number of men who seem to fall for it as it goes against nature.
Perhaps this is being done so that when they end up drafting women for combat people won't complain as much, who knows.
I'm telling you these radicals are busy stirring the pot all over the place targeting many groups, and doing a great job at breaking up American society.
So if you are an honest, intelligent and un-feminized member of this site you won't be offended by my frankness, because you will be among the 10% of decent posters.
Is it possible to be un-feminized and female at the same time?
Or do you mean that you think only men should post?
Well for starts, take any text used in a black study course at any of our major universities then substitute white for black, for both achievement and color. Think that would fly? No? Why not?
I work hard, every day of my life, just stayin' alive.
Americans have re-embraced the Millerite wave of old.
working my way through this....started to read about the Millerites....waste of time...doesn't apply to me....my sense of 'timing' is based on Red Jones' tagline, Gal. 3:29.....and things that have recently come to light.
I'll admit to being somewhat sad that the culture we knew is going, going, gone.
It's okey and even encouraged for other minorities and ethnic groups to embrace their cultures, but if white people want to hold onto their's they are deemed biased, ignorant rednecks.
I'm tired of labels and accusations and pretension, we should not have to give in by being labeled as stupid and evil if we don't like our culture being destroyed and ridiculed.
Blacks are encouraged to embrace black culture, Jews embrace their culture and heritage, Asians the same and so on, but if white Americans want to retain their culture they get called racist and bigoted and to avoid being labeled as such they end up denying their own identity in order to fit in.
It shouldn't have to be that way.
Word up sista!
*holds up African Marxist fist*
"I don't know how he does it...but I'll tell you the bottom line...
The man got a way with women...HE GOT AWAY WITH MINE!" ;)
YOu haven't been paying attention, one of my hobbies is baiting 4um posters. This Ponchy's reaction each time robin kicks his ass. He wasn't playing for real.
Well, he's apparently just a lightweight.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
You oght to read Lakoff's book "Don't think of an Elephant", about potitical framing. Bashing women is part and parcel of the new "conservativism" which is neither conservative nor new.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
#229. To: scrapper2, Destro, richard9151, Red Jones (#159)
So apply the advice you give to others about "doing concrete things" and start researching and posting articles on subjects you want discussion and opinions on.
scrolling through and for some reason that jumped out at me....richard posted an article that got 19 views the last time I looked [at least two were mine], that presented a huge problem with a concrete solution and nobody seems interested....I wondered last night where everyone was, now I know....
#231. To: rowdee, christine, Scrapper2, Destro (#178)
You need to dismount from your exceedingly tall horse and develop some communication skills--relax and have some discussions based on what you want the forum to focus on. Different strokes for different folks was a lesson I brought with me thru life from a Leadership and Motivation Seminar I attended.
He did admit earlier in this thread that he needs to work on his humility... At least he recognizes that, he is fun to argue with too. Plus isn't he only 23 or something?
I think Babylon here is spiritual, but here is another article that sheds more light on my first post, of America as "Israel".
richard...I think you'll appreciate this:
"The Talmud is the teaching of the Pharisee and originated in Babylon. It was sent out into the world in 1040 AD from Babylon. [Note - that is why the captors and plunderers named the tax form the 1040]....."