[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Music The Ones That Didn't Make It Back Home [featuring Pacman @ 0:49 - 0:57 in his natural habitat] Let’s Talk About Grief | Death Anniversary Democrats Suddenly Change Slogan To 'Orange Man Good' America in SHOCK as New Footage of Jill Biden's 'ELDER ABUSE' Emerges | Dems FURIOUS: 'Jill is EVIL' Executions, reprisals and counter-executions - SS Polizei Regiment 19 versus the French Resistance Paratrooper kills german soldier and returns wedding photos to his family after 68 years AMeRiKaN GULaG... 'Christian Warrior Training' explodes as churches put faith in guns Major insurer gives brutal ultimatum to entire state: Let us put up prices by 50 percent or we will leave Biden Admin Issues Order Blocking Haitian Illegal Immigrants From Deportation Murder Rate in Socialist Venezuela Falls to 22-Year Low ISRAEL IS DESTROYING GAZA TO CONTROL THE WORLD'S MOST IMPORTANT SHIPPING LANE Denmark to tax livestock farts and burps starting in 2030 Woman to serve longer prison time for offending migrant men who gang-raped a minor IDF says murder is okay after statistics show that Israel killed 75% of all journalists who died in 2023 Boeing to be criminally INDICTED for fraud 0:35 / 10:02 Nigel Farage Embarrasses Rishi Sunak & Keir Starmer AGAIN in New Speech! Norway to stockpile 82,500 tons of grain to prepare for famine and war Almost 200 Pages of Epstein Grand Jury Documents Released UK To Install Defibrillators in EVERY School Due to Sudden Rise in Heart Problems Pfizer purchased companies that produce drugs to treat the same conditions caused by covid vaccines It Now Takes An Annual Income Of $186,000 A Year For Americans To Feel Financially Secure Houthis Unleash 'Attacks' On Israeli, U.S. And UK Ships; 'Trio Of Evil Hit' | Full Detail Gaza hospital chief says he was severely tortured in Israeli prisons I'd like to thank Congress for using my Tax money to buy Zelenskys wife a Bugatti. Cancer-causing radium detected in US city's groundwater due to landfill teeming with nuclear waste from WWII-era atomic bomb efforts Tennessee Law Allowing Death Penalty For Pedophiles Goes Into Effect - Only Democrats Oppose It Meet the NEW Joe Biden! 😂 Bovine Collagen Benefits

Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Are biblical spouting “patriots” head cases?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 23, 2007
Author: me
Post Date: 2007-01-23 09:25:29 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 3513
Comments: 308

Yeah, they are. I’m amazed at the arrogance of some self professed “patriot” Christians. IMHO, they do more to fracture those of us who get it than any elitist agenda ever could. They are unwitting foot soldiers of the globalists.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 215.

#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0) (Edited)

Those who use biblical prophecy especially those that insert 'Ezekiel' into their forum responses to explain today's events need to be stoned with big rocks.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-23   9:34:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

With what they say is going to happen to everyone else, you're letting them off easy.

My vote goes for burned at the stake... in the name of Mercy.

-Blackeagle

blackeagle  posted on  2007-01-23   9:43:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

My vote goes for burned at the stake... in the name of Mercy.

YES! And don't forget a book burning (please include all the versions they squabble over)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-23   9:47:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I'm tired of their petty squabbles, but I really don't want to burn a Bible.

What I think would be even worse is the knowledge that their ashes would be buried with a Koran.

-Blackeagle

blackeagle  posted on  2007-01-23   9:57:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

but I really don't want to burn a Bible.

Well, with these head cases it all depends on *which* bible is burnt. Apparently there are different versions and only THEY know the one which is real. As I said, they exhibit overt mental illness.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-23   10:01:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You're right, it is a severe mental illness.

I used to be a Catholic. The scandals, the money grubbing preists, but mostly the people drove me away. I couldnt take the "if god wills it" mentality. The smile in my face on Sunday spit on me Monday acts.

Why just this Sunday the church handed out petitions for an amendment to the Florida constitution banning embryonic stem cell research from public money. Like good sheep everyone signed it.

I hate dealing with religious nuts across the board.

-Blackeagle

blackeagle  posted on  2007-01-23   10:42:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I used to be a Catholic. The scandals, the money grubbing preists, but mostly the people drove me away. I couldnt take the "if god wills it" mentality. The smile in my face on Sunday spit on me Monday acts.

To: Jethro Tull You're right, it is a severe mental illness.

I used to be a Catholic. The scandals, the money grubbing preists, but mostly the people drove me away. I couldnt take the "if god wills it" mentality. The smile in my face on Sunday spit on me Monday acts.

Why just this Sunday the church handed out petitions for an amendment to the Florida constitution banning embryonic stem cell research from public money. Like good sheep everyone signed it.

I hate dealing with religious nuts across the board.

The Catholics you describe are more the exception than the mainstream, unless the church has turned into some kind of holy roller hang out since I was last there as a "regular."

I'm not sure what state you live in - if it's a Southern state maybe the Catholics got infected with the Bible Belt disease or something - but the Catholics I've known and my family are all practising Catholics except for me are pretty average people -flawed and not holier than thou- they definitely don't press their religion on strangers nor do they wear their religion on their sleeve like a badge of merit. And Catholics are not too terribly political - in fact, with their numbers, they could be far more political if they chose.

As for priests molesters - that was very ugly - but the percentage of priests who molested was similar to other church's clerics or so I've read - what was bad was the Catholic church tried to cover it up. Also the priest molestation thingie was primarily isolated to American Catholic churches for some peculiar reason.

As for money grubbing priests - the Catholic church is no different from other religions and certainly no worse than most.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-01-24   11:57:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

but the Catholics I've known and my family are all practising Catholics except for me are pretty average people -flawed and not holier than thou- they definitely don't press their religion on strangers nor do they wear their religion on their sleeve like a badge of merit. And Catholics are not too terribly political - in fact, with their numbers, they could be far more political if they chose.

I'm in the same boat as you, scrapper. What got me started on this rant is the outright hatred some otherwise kindred spirits have toward anything Catholic. The Catholics I know would stand with us on most issues, while never discussing religion. Who and what people choose to hold close is their business. IMHO, some people in this community of ours place religion and obscure conspiracies over the current events that are actively altering our culture and country. They divide rather than unify, and I find it impossible to keep quiet.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-24   14:33:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Catholics are one of the leading enablers of illegal immigration, JT. Them and evangelicals.

Redheadedstranger  posted on  2007-01-24   14:36:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Catholics are one of the leading enablers of illegal immigration, JT. Them and evangelicals.

Catholics and Jews and mainstream Protestants and Buddhists - just about all religious leaders are big sympathizers to illegals and unbridled legal immigration generally - it's the leftie slant of most religions that is the major reason for support of the "poor and disenfranchised" - equality of man - no boundaries for God's children schtick.

The Catholic leadership in S. California - Cardinal Mahoney - has been getting lots of publicity lately - pleading the case for Hispanic illegals - no secret why - Hispanics are Catholics. Also most Catholics I know are Democrats - and the Democrat Party itself is big on illegals - future Democrat voters, but not because Catholics exert any power within the Party - rather because of the party's self-serving reasons.

Evangelicals - are probably one religious group who are not sympathetic to illegals - they are only interested in Rapture and Catholic Mexicans don't play a part in bringing Rapture.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-01-24   15:12:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Who is for or against open borders is not cut and dried.

While I am against open borders - my reasons are not the same as those of others - my reasons being logical and rational while most of the other types want to close the border because of racial and religious reasons (irrational).

In other words I am against open immigration for economic reasons more so than cultural ones. Those that argue cultural reasons are playing with a losing hand/argument and thus those are the types the media highlights. Thus the media wants people like you using those arguments fronting the closed border debate.

Destro  posted on  2007-01-24   15:28:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

In other words I am against open immigration for economic reasons more so than cultural ones.

i'm in complete agreement with you on that one.

christine  posted on  2007-01-24   17:42:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Economic reasons are the only reasons I see posted here.

robin  posted on  2007-01-24   17:45:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Economic reasons are the only reasons I see posted here.

I'll admit to being somewhat sad that the culture we knew is going, going, gone.

It's okey and even encouraged for other minorities and ethnic groups to embrace their cultures, but if white people want to hold onto their's they are deemed biased, ignorant rednecks.

I'm tired of labels and accusations and pretension, we should not have to give in by being labeled as stupid and evil if we don't like our culture being destroyed and ridiculed.

Blacks are encouraged to embrace black culture, Jews embrace their culture and heritage, Asians the same and so on, but if white Americans want to retain their culture they get called racist and bigoted and to avoid being labeled as such they end up denying their own identity in order to fit in.

It shouldn't have to be that way.

Diana  posted on  2007-01-26   5:50:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It's okey and even encouraged for other minorities and ethnic groups to embrace their cultures, but if white people want to hold onto their's they are deemed biased, ignorant rednecks.

This is an excellent point and one that ticks me off to no end. Multiculturalism is code-speak for the destruction of white culture. Today's American cultural elites deem it acceptable that our Attorney General Gonzalez attend and address the radical group, La Raza (The Race), but should a white person dare listen to David Duke or Jared Taylor, they're classified white separatists. I reject the effort to be made to feel guilty about being pro- white. Such pride is acceptable - and encouraged - among other cultures, therefore it’s only the politically correct among us who feel uncomfortable and they’re nothing more than the enemy within.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-26   8:00:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I got the shivers a little while ago when I read the post further up by blackeagle where he pointed out hypothetically that in order to get rid of racism, if all third-worlders would immigrate only to black countries, how that would result in the genocide of the black population living in those black countries.

I never thought of it that way but he is right, and as we all know in reality this scenario is only happening to white countries.

When the Europeans came to the Americas, it pretty much spelled death to the native Americans who had been here for thousands of years.

I've read some material from La Raza, they talk about how the old (?) white people need to go back to Europe and give them their land back, even though indiginous Mexicans lived further south in pre-Columbian times, and TX for instance was inhabited by different tribes who hardly exist now. What I observed from living in TX for quite a few years was once the Mexicans came pouring in, they were not grateful or humble, they didn't try to fit in for the most part, many of them had a defiant attitude, many of them had nothing but comtempt for the gringo/gringa, and already in the early 90s they had radical groups telling them they deserved the land, free this and free that. I got tired of it all, feeling like a stranger in a place I had lived in for some years, and finally left in the late 90s.

Of course where I am now I'm in the minority again, but at least there are only two ethnic groups which makes things much easier, plus Eskimos are gentle people, aggression is taboo in their culture though the trouble-makers in the big cities do all they can to persuade them to hate the few white people in their midst. It doesn't work too well though since cooperation is so important in their culture, as survival is very important in this cold and rugged land, and traditionally difficult people were banished, so after living that way for at least 3000 years it's hard for them to act like jerks. In this sparsely-populated area the white people are like the guests and do their best to fit in and learn the customs like living off the land and sharing resources. The two groups get along well except for maybe a short period after the yearly hate-white-people convention in Anchorage put on by the radicals, who are not Eskimos or from any of the other Alaska native tribes.

Diana  posted on  2007-01-26   9:08:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

blackeagle

I agree, he expressed my thoughts exactly. The people supporting open borders are the same ones who gave us forced busing in the 60s. I was living in NYC when that scheme was launched and it fueled white flight to the suburbs and balkanized the city. It remains that way today, only it's worsened. Given that lack of success, it's only reasonable (not) that the elites force this integration on the scale of nations. We're old enough to remember the fall of white South Africa. Now Great Britain is a mixed mess, and last night I posted an article on Australia and it's failed attempt to assimilate races. Since the track record of forced integration is failure, my only conclusion is that this unfettered illegal invasion is an attempt to foster the destruction or our nation and culture. I still remain amazed at the naiveté of some Americans. The invaders aren’t quiet about their goals or hatred of whites, yet some otherwise reasonable folk choose to look the other way while our land is reclaimed block by block, city by city, all in the name of the NAU. When, and if, they wake up it just might be too late.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-01-26   9:29:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#236. To: Jethro Tull (#215)

Now Great Britain is a mixed mess, and last night I posted an article on Australia and it's failed attempt to assimilate races.

When I was in high school in the 70s I had this idea that I wanted to move to Australia. I really checked into it and found out that they had very strict immigration laws, only white people could move there and you had to have a skill that an Australian didn't have. It was almost impossible to move there, so I gave up on that idea, not that it would have panned out anyway as I was 15 and my family would not have allowed it, but it was a thought.

How things have changed there since! Of course this is not happening to the Asian countries with homogeneous populations. In fact I believe they are still allowed to have strict immigration laws so that their countries do not become destroyed too. It would be interesting to find out Japan's immigration laws, I think I'll look that up.

Diana  posted on  2007-01-26 10:53:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]