See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Christopher Bollyn Interviewed by CNN This Afternoon
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.libertyforum.org/showfla ... s&Main=295213096#Post295213867
Published: Jan 23, 2007
Author: PatricK Henry
Post Date: 2007-01-24 08:09:28 by angle
Keywords: None
Views: 606
Comments: 17
Christopher Bollyn was interviewed by CNN this afternoon ( Topic.. the Crimes of 911) at our Public Library. This insightful and engaging Interview should be broadcast later this week on CNN. If someone here could record this interview and then post it on You Tube.. it would be greatly appreciated. P.H. was "allowed" to bring camcorder to the Interview.. but was asked not to record. An Audio of the complete interview may be available at a later time.. Stay Tuned.. Christopher hits this Topic .. OUT of the Park w/ CNN.. Oh.. and if you haven't guessed .. the Anti-Semitic/ sideways slander was raised at least five times during the Interview.. Christopher countered well by making clear the difference between a Jew, a Christian.. and those nasty Globe Grabbing Zionists.. Signing Off for Now, P.H. P.S. Helje was there too, making sure Christopher looked his best (TV camera lights are hot) and putting him at ease.. Kudos and well done to both of these very special Local (and World Trotting) Hero's. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.
#6. To: angle (#0)
It was a hit piece. Bollyn is very knowledgeable and I am sure in the unedited version of the interview he was allowed to put some facts on the table. My guess is Bollyn was feeling satisfied that he made the case and then started giving answers like: CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN, WRITER: Al Qaeda is in my opinion -- has been exploited. I question whether such a group even exists. FEYERICK: Chicago writer Christopher Bollyn is one of the conspiracy theorists. BOLLYN: I believe that there are Israeli elements that are connected to the Mossad, that are involved in this attack. -------------------------------------------------- Hopefully,Bollyn and others can learn from this example. Bollyn had an opportunity to get the facts out to a wider audience,but instead he played the role of useful idiot with his "in my opinion", "I believe" comments. He should have stuck to the facts in every response realizing the interview would be heavily edited. For example, instead of answering a question with something like ,Israelis had advance warning, he should have answered each question with a specific example: "Odigo employees received an advance warning of the WTC attack," then describe the specifics. "The state owned Israeli shipping company Zim abandoned a lease in the WTC days before the attack",then provide the specifics handing the interviewer a copy of the documentation. "According to the New York Times, the Israelis were setup to videotape the attack before the first impact, here is the exact quote and here is a copy of the NY Times article." "Here is a copy of the B.O.L.O, be on the look out, law enforcement issued for the Israelis, confirming the Israelis were setup prior to the first impact." "The very first suspects arrested and detained by law enforcement in connection with the WTC attack were Israelis, here is the article describing the arrest."
"Odigo employees received an advance warning of the WTC attack," then describe the specifics. That's good advice, but I won't fault him for saying "I believe" or "In my opinion". It makes him sound more reasonable, IMO ;)
Did you see the hit piece on CNN? The editting made Bollyn and all those that consider his views credible look like idiots.
hell no, people in the know consider the source...CNN merely confirmed the rationalizations of the 28%...their and faux news' listening audience.
There are no replies to Comment # 15. End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#7. To: honway (#6)
For example, instead of answering a question with something like ,Israelis had advance warning, he should have answered each question with a specific example:
#9. To: robin (#7)
That's good advice, but I won't fault him for saying "I believe" or "In my opinion". It makes him sound more reasonable, IMO ;)
#15. To: honway (#9)
The editting made Bollyn and all those that consider his views credible look like idiots.
Replies to Comment # 15.