See other Pious Perverts Articles
Title: Anal Sex in Accordance with God's Will
Source:
www.sexinchrist.com
URL Source: http://www.sexinchrist.com/
Published: Jan 30, 2007
Author: unknown
Post Date: 2007-01-30 18:15:39 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 1685
Comments: 67
Are you saving yourself for your wedding night? The Devil wants you to fail, that’s why he puts stumbling blocks in your way. But God wants you to succeed, and that’s why he has given us an alternative to intercourse before marriage: anal sex. Through anal sex, you can satisfy your body’s needs, while you avoid the risk of unwanted pregnancy and still keep yourself pure for marriage. You may be shocked at first by this idea. Isn’t anal sex (sodomy) forbidden by the Bible? Isn’t anal sex dirty? What’s the difference between having anal sex before marriage and having regular intercourse? Let’s address these issues by debunking some myths about anal sex and God's will. “I thought the Bible said anal sex was a sin.” This is a common misconception. Anal sex is confusing to many Christians because of the attention paid to the Bible’s condemnation of homosexual acts. However, it’s important to realize that these often quoted scriptures refer only to sexual acts between two men. Nowhere does the Bible forbid anal sex between a male and female. In fact, many Biblical passages allude to the act of anal sex between men and women. Lamentations 2:10 describes how “The virgins of Jerusalem have bowed their heads to the ground,” indicating how a virginal maidens should position themselves to receive anal sex. Another suggestive scripture tells of a woman’s pride in her “valley” (referring to her buttocks and the cleft between them) and entices her lover to ejaculate against her backside: "How boastful you are about the valleys! O backsliding daughter who trusts in her treasures, {saying,} ' Who will come against me?' (Jeremiah 49:4) And in the Song of Songs, the lover urges his mate to allow him to enter her from behind: “Draw me after you, let us make haste.” (Song of Solomon, 1:4) “Isn’t anal sex dirty?” The Bible says, “To the pure, all things are pure.” (Titus 1:15) The Lord created your body, and no part of it is imperfect or unclean. God also created our bodies for pleasure, and anal sex is just one of the many ways, including standard sexual intercourse, that we can enjoy this pleasure and share it with a partner. Although the anus is used for elimination, in reality it is not as dirty as you think, especially after a shower or bath. Elimination is also a natural process of our God-given bodies, so our conception of the anal area as dirty has more to do with our own psychological hang-ups. If the idea of direct contact with this area is still distasteful to you, the male can wear a condom as a barrier “If you’re going to have anal sex, why not just have regular sex?” This is a good question: If you’re going to have sexual contact before marriage, why not just go the whole nine yards and have regular sex? There are many good reasons for having anal sex instead. The first reason is practical: having conventional vaginal intercourse can lead to unwanted pregnancies. While it’s true that the Lord bade us to “be fruitful and multiply,” (Gen 1:22) the Bible also counsels that “For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven.” (Ecl. 3:1) Pregnancy outside of wedlock can have dire and life-altering consequences for all those involved. Having anal sex allows you to greatly reduce this risk. Second, for a young woman who has never engaged in sexual intercourse, having anal sex allows her to preserve her virginity (i.e., maintain an intact hymen) until marriage. There is no greater gift that a bride can give than to offer her pure, unsullied maidenhead to her husband on their wedding night. Finally, anal sex allows both partners to save the most intimate and powerful sexual act, that of face-to-face vaginal intercourse, for their mates in marriage. This type of sexual relationship represents the most powerful union between a man and a woman, and so it rightfully should be reserved for one’s life partner. Fortunately, you can engage in anal sex prior to marriage and still be able to share the deeper, more meaningful act of consecrated love through vaginal intercourse with your wedded spouse.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-27) not displayed.
.
.
.
#28. To: Redheadedstranger (#24)
You are only concerned about what I post to do some shake and bait fried flame posting. Post on what I thread up or do not. I don't care one way or the other. Why I get a notion to do one thing or another in a thread ain't your bother in any event. But thanks for sharing anyway. It's so special that you care.
Genesis 19:4-11 Don't you ever get tired of smashing your head agains tthe brick wall of my mind
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
Which is why you live in your wife's basement.
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
CHAPTER VI.-PIG AND PEPPER For a minute or two she stood looking at the house, and wondering what to do next, when suddenly a footman in livery came running out of the wood--(she considered him to be a footman because he was in livery: otherwise, judging by his face only, she would have called him a fish)--and rapped loudly at the door with his knuckles. It was opened by another footman in livery, with a round face, and large eyes like a frog; and both footmen, Alice noticed, had powdered hair that curled all over their heads. She felt very curious to know what it was all about, and crept a little way out of the wood to listen. The Fish-Footman began by producing from under his arm a great letter, nearly as large as himself, and this he handed over to the other, saying, in a solemn tone, `For the Duchess. An invitation from the Queen to play croquet.' The Frog-Footman repeated, in the same solemn tone, only changing the order of the words a little, `From the Queen. An invitation for the Duchess to play croquet.' Then they both bowed low, and their curls got entangled together. Alice laughed so much at this, that she had to run back into the wood for fear of their hearing her; and when she next peeped out the Fish-Footman was gone, and the other was sitting on the ground near the door, staring stupidly up into the sky.
sometimes there just aren't enough belgians
You have got style, though.
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
You would too if you knew my wife. Oh, except for your whole hating women thing I suppose.
sometimes there just aren't enough belgians
Actually I'm just substantiating my contention that this forum is a pretty sory place.
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
What's a 'sory'?
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
Never could sleep in a basement.
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
Radon keeps lunch meat fresh.
sometimes there just aren't enough belgians
So does blood.
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
When I want a straight-man to enlarge upon my wit and sarcasm, I'll ask for one.
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
So you agree that radon acts as a preservative regarding aforementioned product(s)?
sometimes there just aren't enough belgians
Yes. I recommend it...to you, anyway.
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
Oh I see. You have a beef so you are trying to prove there is no beef to 4UM. You do this driven by a very high opinion of yourself. But putting others down to build you up is not an intelligent undertaking. Think this is indicative of your opinion being somewhat overblown? I do.
Uh...how do you figure that, ferret? What's my ego got to do with this forum's lousy content?
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
Your opinion on the content is subjective. You are motivated to put it down because you are continually compelled to utter affirmations of your esteemed superiority of the 'mere mortals' around you in every way. You claim this forum is low brow and you can tell, because 'you are so incredibly formitable and smart.' This is not convincing. A legend in his own mind's tearing others down to build himself up is all I see here with you. You like smelling your own verbal farts in here, but we are hip to the real nastiness to the odor. Our subjective sizing of you up has the weight of numbers behind it. That so many agree on you means more then your opinion on you and the measuring sticks you use to prove it.
Ponchy, your bitter old man persona just doesn't fly.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
Words fail me. Here's the thing... I KNOW that there's a bunch of pastors, and various ministers all screaming "Hell Yeah" right now after reading this article. There's also a bunch of women right now saying "HELL NO" at the same time.
"Isn't this one of a series? I'm surprised Ferret hasn't posted them all. Now that would really boost traffic."
#29. To: Dakmar (#26)
But before they lay down, the men of the city, [even] the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where [are] the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them. And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him, And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly. Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as [is] good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof. And they said, Stand back. And they said [again], This one [fellow] came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed sore upon the man, [even] Lot, and came near to break the door. But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door. And they smote the men that [were] at the door of the house with blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied themselves to find the door.
#30. To: Dakmar (#27)
I understand human psychology.
#31. To: Redheadedstranger (#29)
#32. To: Dakmar (#31)
#33. To: Redheadedstranger (#30)
Which is why you live in your wife's basement.
#34. To: Ferret Mike (#28)
#35. To: Redheadedstranger (#34)
sory
#36. To: Dakmar (#33)
You would too if you knew my wife.
#37. To: Redheadedstranger (#36)
#38. To: Dakmar (#37)
#39. To: Esso (#14)
#40. To: Redheadedstranger (#38)
#41. To: Dakmar (#40)
#42. To: Redheadedstranger (#34)
"I'm just substantiating my contention"
#43. To: Ferret Mike (#42)
You do this driven by a very high opinion of yourself.
#44. To: Redheadedstranger (#43)
"Uh...how do you figure that, ferret? What's my ego got to do with this forum's lousy content?"
#45. To: Redheadedstranger (#43)
Uh...how do you figure that, ferret? What's my ego got to do with this forum's lousy content?
#46. To: Ferret Mike, *You Gotta Be Shitting Me* (#0)
 | This country's priorities are all fucked up. |
#47. To: Dakmar (#22)
I don't have anyone on bozo - I think bozoing people is a sign of mental weakness.
Do you still have me on bozo, boyo?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
#48. To: Ferret Mike, Redheadedstranger (#21)
I thought i was doing satire like the article you posted. Either that or the pot is calling the kettle black. So when it comes to gods you are a chubby chaser - no biggie - to each his own. Check out the ass on Mike's goddess: You are doing baiting level 101.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
#49. To: Redheadedstranger (#24)
The 'Technical Virgin' spoof web pages come to mind.
Isn't this one of a series?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
#50. To: Redheadedstranger (#12)
I do, but why I ask myself almost daily. Just look at this bullshit "non-news" thread. 48+ fucking replies. I'm about done.
Keep on posting, Brother. I always read your articles.
#51. To: Brian S (#50)
Stay with it bro. There is not another site like this. And for each one who replies tens are affected, or more.
#52. To: Brian S (#50)
I will admit I thought this site would have grown explosively. I was wrong. On reflection that is an important point to maintain posting here.
#53. To: Ferret Mike (#0)
Butt of course... Christian polyamorist sites: http://Tribe.net/Christian Polyamory/Polygamy Christian sex toys:Anal Sex in Accordance with God's Will
#54. To: Ferret Mike (#44)
I am compelled, but not willingly. Do you think I enjoy the idea that most of my ideological bretheren are morons? "You claim this forum is low brow and you can tell, because 'you are so incredibly formitable and smart.'" Yes, that's what you've said before. So now I'm giving you examples. Do you consider this piece "highbrow," ferret? "A legend in his own mind's tearing others down to build himself up is all I see here with you." What YOU see isn't always what is there. "Our subjective sizing of you up has the weight of numbers behind it." And the majority is always right, isn't it? "That so many agree on you means more then your opinion on you and the measuring sticks you use to prove it." I can be sweet and I can be mean...there's really no point being conciliatory towards the 4um. It isn't going to make me richer or wiser.
You are motivated to put it down because you are continually compelled to utter affirmations of your esteemed superiority of the 'mere mortals' around you in every way.
"How legitimate is the Onion as a source?"----noone222
#55. To: Redheadedstranger (#54)
The LF people? Yes, you like the fact that they are mostly morons. It helps you blend in with them.
Do you think I enjoy the idea that most of my ideological bretheren are morons?
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
#56. To: Redheadedstranger (#54) (Edited)
and there's no point in allowing you to remain here when you've admitted your purpose is to disrupt and that you have no intention of posting in good faith. now for the second time, we've all had enough of you, con op. back to 'lurker' status you go. :)
.there's really no point being conciliatory towards the 4um.
#57. To: Redheadedstranger (#54)
Happy landing Red. I see the eject button has been punched.
#58. To: Redheadedmuffinman (#54)
Looks like your cosmic muffin has crashed.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
#59. To: Redheadedstranger (#54)
goodby ponchy! be sure to come back when you learn to behave!
"And this is the end of my brilliant career on the 4um..." -- ponchy 12/20/2006
#60. To: Redheadedstranger (#54)
Good friggin riddance ...
“The First Highest Masonic Council was, as we have already said, formed on 31st May 1801 in Charleston, 33 degrees northern latitude, under the chairmanship of the Jew Isaac Long, who was made inspector general by the Jew Moses Cohen, and who had received his degree from Hyes, from Franken, and the Jew Morin.”
#61. To: Minerva (#58)
At least now he can say he got it up poop chute on an anal sex thread for being a pain in the ass. He should count his blessings, some fuss-budgets never have the luck to be booted with such harmony to the ritual of their 'buh bye.'
#62. To: Ferret Mike (#61)
I am going to try and channel Ponchy now: "Yaarg! ... (vomits pea soup and speaks in drunken, demonic voice) .... I'm really cool and everyone else on this site is stupid!!" (Returns to normal.) So how was that?
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
#63. To: Minerva (#62)
hilarious
#64. To: Minerva (#62)
Yup. That's him alright. I'm sure too he is indignant I am not defending his right to be here after that unwelcome thread to reinstate people like me at LP too. For such a cutting edge Braniac, he sure is predictable as which direction rain falls.
#65. To: Minerva (#62)
for the last couple of weeks i've got the impression that ponchy doesn't like us. i wonder if we accidentally said something to offend him?
"And this is the end of my brilliant career on the 4um..." -- ponchy 12/20/2006
#66. To: christine, ferret mike (#56)
Really that photo should go with all the "it's TOO much of you" lurker demerit status.
h of you, con op. back to 'lurker' status you go. :)
#67. To: Morgana le Fay, Minerva, christine (#65) (Edited)
She said, hey cowboy, where's your horse I said, I lost everything but this saddle in my second divorce... continental op posted on 2007-02-01 21:51:14 ET Reply Trace Private Reply She said, hey cowboy, where's your horse I said, I lost everything but this saddle in my second divorce... continental op posted on 2007-01-31 19:31:04 ET Reply Trace Private Reply See? He is not traumatized and still his usual bright and sunny self working the glad handling spot at Stone's place.
#223. To: Mudboy Slim, Fred Mertz (#222)
I'm sending Fred Mertz to spray Roundup on your roses. #219. To: Mudboy Slim (#218)
You ping me to one more post and I'm coming after you with my skinning scalpel.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest