4um: BAC: Goldi-Lox is a Kook!

[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Title: BAC: Goldi-Lox is a Kook!
Source: LP
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... i?ArtNum=175627&Disp=All&#C185
Published: Feb 6, 2007
Author: BAC
Post Date: 2007-02-06 11:38:51 by BAC
Keywords: None
Views: 17022
Comments: 199

ROTFLOL!

Clintonistas!

Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

#1. To: BAC (#0)

There's a claim on this thread, http://www.libertypost.org/cgi- bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=175794&Disp=14#C14, that Goldi just banned BAC.

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides posted on 2007-02-06 11:54:41 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#2. To: aristeides (#1)

As much as I find BAC annoying, he backs up most of his points of view with (goobermint) documentation. I rarely read his lengthy posts but I don't think he deserves banning. A timeout might be the appropriate measure of discipline.

Fred Mertz posted on 2007-02-06 12:25:31 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#3. To: aristeides (#1)

There's a claim on this thread that Goldi just banned BAC.

Her loss is your gain. Guess I'll be posting here full time.

ROTFLOL!

KOOKS!

Clintonistas!

BAC posted on 2007-02-06 12:26:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#4. To: SKYDRIFTER (#0)

fyi

christine posted on 2007-02-06 12:29:03 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#5. To: All (#0)

ROTFLOL!!

BAC posted on 2007-02-06 12:52:07 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#6. To: aristeides (#1) (Edited)

There's a claim on this thread, http://www.libertypost.org/cgi- bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=175794&Disp=14#C14, that Goldi just banned BAC.

Poor Ooser got himself banned. Tsk tsk.

TOTALLY AND FOREVER OUTTA HERE!!!

You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker posted on 2007-02-06 12:57:40 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#7. To: Fred Mertz, Uncle Bill, Bill D Berger, malador, christine (#2)

As much as I find BAC annoying, he backs up most of his points of view with (goobermint) documentation. I rarely read his lengthy posts but I don't think he deserves banning. A timeout might be the appropriate measure of discipline.

He brought his fate upon himself, as he was demanding that Goldi "do something" about "KOOKS" like Uncle Bill, myself, and others, who were "destroying the credibility of her forum". He finally hit the wrong button one too many times, and he got what he was asking for.

You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker posted on 2007-02-06 13:01:29 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#8. To: FormerLurker (#7)

Like I said, I rarely read his posts so I'll take your word for it.

Fred Mertz posted on 2007-02-06 13:05:29 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#9. To: Fred Mertz (#2)

As much as I find BAC annoying, he backs up most of his points of view with (goobermint) documentation. I rarely read his lengthy posts but I don't think he deserves banning. A timeout might be the appropriate measure of discipline.

Goldie is only a two issue person -she afraid the border crossing darkies will rape her (which is also her hottest fantasy no doubt) and support for the Neocon middle east agenda.

"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom

Destro posted on 2007-02-06 13:09:50 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#10. To: All (#6)

BTW, I messed up the link at first, but I just edited the post and fixed it. Edit is a nice feature to have..

You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker posted on 2007-02-06 13:18:29 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#11. To: BAC (#3)

Her loss is your gain. Guess I'll be posting here full time.

Oh lucky us!

You want to censor those folks who challenge the official fairie tale.

Answer two questions, will you?

Do you believe the govt told us the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about 9/11?

Does BushCo tell the truth for its own sake or, only if the truth serves their purposes better than lies?

If you tell me that the govt was completely forthcoming with the facts, and that BushCo cannot tell a lie, then that will reveal more than enough about you and I'll have no reason to ask anything else.

HOUNDDAWG posted on 2007-02-06 13:26:40 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#12. To: FormerLurker (#7)

guess he'll oose himself back on over to FR aka GoPville.

christine posted on 2007-02-06 13:37:47 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#13. To: Fred Mertz (#2)

As much as I find BAC annoying, he backs up most of his points of view with (goobermint) documentation.

I am not sure my opinion counts for much,since I was banned from LP,but here it is. Any genuine search for the truth benefits from honest debate from people of different view points.
Early on in the threads concerning 9/11, BAC contributed to many 9/11 threads by challenging what frankly needed to be challenged.

However,as BAC saw the tide of public opinion being turned by the obvious U.S. government cover-up of important events concerning 9/11 like Able Danger, he abandoned any pretense of objectivity or honesty and assumed the position that his ends justified the means.

Near the end of my participation there it appeared the fact that poll after poll indicated the American people were rejecting the Bush Administration lies concerning 9/11 was taking a serious emotional toll on him.

I have great respect for all people and their opinions who are genuinely interested in the truth. There was no room for truth concerning the Bush Administration and 9/11 in BAC's agenda.

honway posted on 2007-02-06 14:05:42 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#14. To: All (#13)

I will add one other comment. Fortunately for BeAChooser and his ilk, I don't decide where individuals that sell their souls to defend participants in a conspiracy to commit mass murder spend eternity.

honway posted on 2007-02-06 14:16:41 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#15. To: Destro, christine, robin, Brian S, All (#9)

Goldie is only a two issue person -she afraid the border crossing darkies will rape her (which is also her hottest fantasy no doubt) and

Hey you guys, did you read the contents of the thread wherein BAC got bounced? I think Goldi and LP are onto something important and that's why BAC trying to get them off point was so distracting.

Actually it might not hurt for a similar thread to be started here.

What I could gather from the thread is that the foxy congresscritters tried to introduce new immigration legislation hidden in the minimum wage hike law.

This is a very BIG change. The Secretary of State (????) may be given authority to develop a guest worker plan, and quotas will be based on percentages of WORLD WIDE levels. What the heck is that ???

It's all included in SB 1097. You may need to cut and paste the following url.

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi? dbname=2007_record&page=S1097&position=all

I think this may mean the USA will be flooded with low skill labor, which is exactly what we don't need what with our nation's entitlement programs and also these low skilled immigrants will not help America be competitive in a high tech world.

And there's also SB 1091

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi? dbname=2007_record&page=S1091&position=all

Here's the whole thread:

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=175627&Disp=49#C36

scrapper2 posted on 2007-02-06 14:33:08 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#16. To: scrapper2 (#15)

http://www.ssa.gov/pressoffice/factsheets/USandMexico.htm

UNITED STATES/MEXICO TOTALIZATION AGREEMENT

Looks like this is part of the proposed law.

honway posted on 2007-02-06 14:47:03 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#17. To: Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#4)

I get the image of BAC & Goldi doing a 69er with bared fangs.

AND - you know I love it!

"ROFL" - as BAC would say!

Thanks!

SKYDRIFTER posted on 2007-02-06 14:59:16 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#18. To: christine (#12)

guess he'll oose himself back on over to FR aka GoPville.

Well if JimRob doesn't pat his little head and reinstate him, perhaps the Clowns will welcome him as their own.

Then again, perhaps he already IS a Clown..

..or, he'll just ooze back as some other anonymous poster. He'll be forever trying to keep himself from ROTFLOL while screeching KOOK though.

Poor BAC, he finally did himself in.

You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker posted on 2007-02-06 16:40:50 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#19. To: honway (#13)

Near the end of my participation there it appeared the fact that poll after poll indicated the American people were rejecting the Bush Administration lies concerning 9/11 was taking a serious emotional toll on him.

As much as he liked to hurl the word KOOK at people he accused of being nuts, he actually became a REAL KOOK that was genuinely NUTS.

Tsk, tsk. We'll miss the hearty ROTFLOL! after a round or two of his KOOK talk.

You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker posted on 2007-02-06 16:45:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#20. To: SKYDRIFTER (#17)

I get the image of BAC & Goldi doing a 69er...

Thanks, now I don't have to worry about what to have for dinner. I won't be able to eat for a day after getting that mental picture.

"First I'm gonna bother everybody I meet, and then I'll probably go home and get drunk."

orangedog posted on 2007-02-06 16:48:09 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#21. To: honway (#13)

Hey BTW honway, did you know that Ooser was accusing you and I of plotting against him, in that he was accusing a new poster TwentyTwelve, of being you, and found it strange that I was posting on LP a day after TwentyTwelve signed up?

He must have pinged Goldi at least 20 times with those suspicions..

What a KOOK!! ROTFLOL!!

You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker posted on 2007-02-06 16:49:37 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#22. To: christine (#12)

guess he'll oose himself back on over to FR aka GoPville.

I'm wondering if he'll roll the dice and try to sign up as a poster here. It'd be fun to slap him around a bit, but I think his pride will keep him from doing it, at least for awhile.. LOL

You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker posted on 2007-02-06 17:11:56 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#23. To: orangedog (#20)

Thanks, now I don't have to worry about what to have for dinner. I won't be able to eat for a day after getting that mental picture.

You probably want to evade anything with Tuna.

(Couldn't resist!)

SKYDRIFTER posted on 2007-02-06 17:12:06 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#24. To: FormerLurker (#21)

Hey BTW honway, did you know that Ooser was accusing you and I of plotting against him, in that he was accusing a new poster TwentyTwelve, of being you, and found it strange that I was posting on LP a day after TwentyTwelve signed up?

That is bizarre and confirmation of his deteriorating mental state.

I have never posted on LP under any name other than honway and never will.

I have a great deal of information archived on LP concerning the WTC 1993 bombing, the OKC bombing and 9/11 and would not risk that being pulled by trying to bypass a banning by the webmaster.

honway posted on 2007-02-06 17:28:29 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#25. To: aristeides (#1)

I hope BAC doesn't try to make this his new home.

"First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win." --Mahatma K. Gandhi

angle posted on 2007-02-06 17:35:18 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#26. To: angle (#25)

Don't forget that we have a Bozo filter.

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides posted on 2007-02-06 17:36:44 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#27. To: honway (#24)

I have a great deal of information archived on LP concerning the WTC 1993 bombing, the OKC bombing and 9/11 and would not risk that being pulled by trying to bypass a banning by the webmaster.

That's probably one of the reasons why he made the accusation, to see if he could trick Goldi into doing something extreme. Although it's never good to see someone get banned, I think in his case, it was for the best.

He was determined to intimidate and badger anyone not falling into line with his "official view", and if someone was a bit more than he could personally handle, he'd cry to Goldi with all sorts of wild stories and accusations.

Unfortunately for him, he pulled his crap at the wrong time, on the wrong thread, trying to silence a few people who had just recently opened their eyes concerning 9/11, who were talking about the amnesty provision in the minimum wage bill.

He got his ass whooped by the posters for one, and Goldi had already told him several times to cut the crap, she wasn't interested. But he persisted...

Oh well, as already mentioned, he'll probably ooze his way back, if he's not already there as someone else. He'll just have to watch the words KOOK and ROTFLOL!...

You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker posted on 2007-02-06 17:38:18 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#28. To: FormerLurker (#27)

Oh well, as already mentioned, he'll probably ooze his way back, if he's not already there as someone else.

He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser. And now those many hours,weeks,months and even years are gone. Wasted.He can't show up anywhere with that screen name again. That has got to be difficult.

honway posted on 2007-02-06 17:52:36 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#29. To: honway (#28)

He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser. And now those many hours,weeks,months and even years are gone. Wasted.He can't show up anywhere with that screen name again. That has got to be difficult.

Excuse me if a shed a tear..ok, I'm better now. ROTFLOL!!!!!

His name is carved into Internet lore as a government shill. He and/or his handlers probably decided it best he do a hari-kari and resurrect himself as a new identity, as BeAChooser was no longer effective.

You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker posted on 2007-02-06 17:57:47 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#30. To: FormerLurker (#29)

His name is carved into Internet lore as a government shill.

Well put.

honway posted on 2007-02-06 18:03:24 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#31. To: honway (#28)

He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser.

He, or they?

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides posted on 2007-02-06 19:04:07 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#32. To: aristeides, honway, Former Lurker (#31)

honway: He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser.
aristeides: He, or they?

He, they, whatever - BAC has been quite successful in deflecting everyone's attention on this forum at least from the issue that might be more worthy of discussion ie. the amnesty bill hidden in the minimum wage pending legislation and the ramifications.

Doesn't anyone at 4um care about that issue and what if anything can be done to stop it from becoming law?

Maybe it's because I don't share a common history with you guys and BAC - but honestly if he's as much of a gov't shill as you describe him to be - why waste your energy on the guy? I don't get it.

Goldi seems to have been right to bounce him and she seems right to focus everyone's energies at LP discussing the amnesty leg. Perhaps that's something we should do here too, do you think???

scrapper2 posted on 2007-02-06 19:25:20 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#33. To: scrapper2 (#32)

Perhaps that's something we should do here too, do you think???

What do you suggest? It certainly would need its own thread. There's numbers to call as far as senators, congressmen, as well as the news media. Do we have the people here to take that sort of initiative?

You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker posted on 2007-02-06 19:32:27 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#34. To: FormerLurker (#33)

sometimes there just aren't enough belgians

Dakmar posted on 2007-02-06 19:41:25 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#35. To: Fred Mertz (#2)

As much as I find BAC annoying, he backs up most of his points of view with (goobermint) documentation.

Manufactured facts are so often contrary to real facts, Fred.

I thought you knew that?

sometimes there just aren't enough belgians

Dakmar posted on 2007-02-06 19:43:31 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#36. To: FormerLurker (#33)

What do you suggest? It certainly would need its own thread. There's numbers to call as far as senators, congressmen, as well as the news media. Do we have the people here to take that sort of initiative?

a. I'd suggest we link to the LP thread as it's own article - LP has done the foot work so why re-work the wheel. I can do that.

b. And I'd also suggest that like LP'ers, we email a dozen of the talk jocks even if it means we have to contact folks we normally don't like to listen to regarding war - the talking heads on radio are more likely to run with this story than the TV guys who by and large want shamnesty to take place. There was a site that an LP'er posted that gave most of the email addressses of the top 100 radio talk show hosts in the country.

http://www.talkers.com/main/index. php? option=com_content&task=view&id=19&Itemid=44

"The 100 most important hosts now ranked"

c. Whether or not 4um folks have the initiative to do this type of email canvasing, I can't say. But it wouldn't hurt to put up the info. Who knows - maybe even some lurkers might do it, too.

d. I don't like this amnesty bill being hidden in another one, for one thing, that smells to me. And also I don't like the fact that there are so many oddball phrases in it - referring to worldwide quotas, the Sect'y of State under taking this immigration guest worker legislation, and also our government "helping" the Mexican gov't build hospitals there ( why?)don't the Mexican oligarchs have enough stolen $ to afford building the basic necessities themselves? and also there's no mention of changing the anchor baby practice so what if those guest worker families have an American born kid, who's going to force the whole lot of them to go back to Mexico once their job dries up stateside?

scrapper2 posted on 2007-02-06 20:32:56 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#37. To: scrapper2 (#32)

He, they, whatever - BAC has been quite successful in deflecting everyone's attention on this forum at least from the issue that might be more worthy of discussion ie. the amnesty bill hidden in the minimum wage pending legislation and the ramifications.
Doesn't anyone at 4um care about that issue and what if anything can be done to stop it from becoming law?

Could you cut and paste the specific language in the pending legislation that discusses amnesty to a reply on this thread? Thanks.

honway posted on 2007-02-06 20:46:31 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#38. To: christine (#12)

I'm amused at this thread, quite amused. ROTFLOL!

"We are Americans. This is our country. He, who would take it from us, by force or by stealth, is our enemy. And it is our purpose -- nay, it is our duty, to our children and to their children and to our yet unborn posterity -- to use all feasible means to destroy him." Dr. Revilo P. Oliver

BTP Holdings posted on 2007-02-06 20:54:01 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#39. To: SKYDRIFTER (#23)

Hey SKY, remember when we double teamed BAC and had him posting gibberish? Soon thereafter he disappeared for a couple months for a PSYOPS refresher course. ;0)

BTP Holdings posted on 2007-02-06 20:57:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

#40. To: BTP Holdings (#39)

Yeah, that was fun. BAC regained ten years on his life, when Goldi banned me.

What a sorry piece of shit, BAC is. {.... and Goldi.}

SKYDRIFTER posted on 2007-02-06 21:07:44 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

.
.
.

Comments (41 - 199) not displayed.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]