[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

CNN doctor urges neurological testing for Biden Nashville Trans Shooter Left Over 100 GB Of Evidence, All To Be Kept Secret Who Turned Off The Gaslight? Head Of Chase Bank Warns Customers: Era Of Free Checking Is Likely Over Bob Dylan - Hurricane [Scotty mar10] Replacing Biden Won't Solve Democrats' Problems - Look Who Will Inherit His Campaign War Chest Who Died: Late June/Early July 2024 | News A top Russian banker says Russia's payment methods should be a 'state secret' because the West keeps shutting them down so fast Viral Biden Brain Freeze During Debate Sparks Major Question: Who’s Really Running the Country? Disney Heiress, Other Major Dem Donors: Dump Biden LAWYER: 5 NEW Tricks Cops Are Using During DWI Stops 10 Signs That Global War Is Rapidly Approaching Horse Back At Library. This Video Needs To Be Seen By Every Cop In America 'It's time to give peace another chance': Thousands rally in Tel Aviv to end the war Biden's leaked bedtime request puts White House on damage control Smith: It's Damned Hard To Be Proud Of America Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi slams ‘deranged rant’ calling for assassination of Trump Stalin, The Red Terror | Full Documentary Russia, Soviet Union and The Cold War: Stalin's Legacy | Russia's Wars Ep.2 | Documentary Battle and Liberation: The End of World War II | Countdown to Surrender – The Last 100 Days | Ep. 4 Ethereum ETFs In 'Window-Dressing' Stage, Approval Within Weeks; Galaxy Americans Are More Likely To Go To War With The Government Than Submit To The Draft Rudy Giuliani has just been disbarred in New York Israeli Generals Want Truce in Gaza, Joe Biden's felon son Hunter is joining White House meetings The only Democrat who could beat Trump Ukraine is too CORRUPT to join NATO, US says, in major blow to Zelensky and boost for Putin CNN Erin Burnett Admits Joe Biden knew the Debate questions.. Affirmative Action Suit Details How Law School Blackballed Accomplished White Men, Opted For Unqualified Black Women

Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: BAC: Goldi-Lox is a Kook!
Source: LP
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... i?ArtNum=175627&Disp=All&#C185
Published: Feb 6, 2007
Author: BAC
Post Date: 2007-02-06 11:38:51 by BAC
Keywords: None
Views: 14328
Comments: 199

ROTFLOL!

Clintonistas!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

http://www.ssa.gov/pressoffice/factsheets/USandMexico.htm

UNITED STATES/MEXICO TOTALIZATION AGREEMENT

Looks like this is part of the proposed law.

honway  posted on  2007-02-06   14:47:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I get the image of BAC & Goldi doing a 69er with bared fangs.

AND - you know I love it!

"ROFL" - as BAC would say!

Thanks!

SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-02-06   14:59:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

guess he'll oose himself back on over to FR aka GoPville.

Well if JimRob doesn't pat his little head and reinstate him, perhaps the Clowns will welcome him as their own.

Then again, perhaps he already IS a Clown..

..or, he'll just ooze back as some other anonymous poster. He'll be forever trying to keep himself from ROTFLOL while screeching KOOK though.

Poor BAC, he finally did himself in.

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   16:40:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Near the end of my participation there it appeared the fact that poll after poll indicated the American people were rejecting the Bush Administration lies concerning 9/11 was taking a serious emotional toll on him.

As much as he liked to hurl the word KOOK at people he accused of being nuts, he actually became a REAL KOOK that was genuinely NUTS.

Tsk, tsk. We'll miss the hearty ROTFLOL! after a round or two of his KOOK talk.

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   16:45:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I get the image of BAC & Goldi doing a 69er...

Thanks, now I don't have to worry about what to have for dinner. I won't be able to eat for a day after getting that mental picture.

"First I'm gonna bother everybody I meet, and then I'll probably go home and get drunk."

orangedog  posted on  2007-02-06   16:48:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Hey BTW honway, did you know that Ooser was accusing you and I of plotting against him, in that he was accusing a new poster TwentyTwelve, of being you, and found it strange that I was posting on LP a day after TwentyTwelve signed up?

He must have pinged Goldi at least 20 times with those suspicions..

What a KOOK!! ROTFLOL!!

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   16:49:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

guess he'll oose himself back on over to FR aka GoPville.

I'm wondering if he'll roll the dice and try to sign up as a poster here. It'd be fun to slap him around a bit, but I think his pride will keep him from doing it, at least for awhile.. LOL

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   17:11:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Thanks, now I don't have to worry about what to have for dinner. I won't be able to eat for a day after getting that mental picture.

You probably want to evade anything with Tuna.

(Couldn't resist!)

SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-02-06   17:12:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Hey BTW honway, did you know that Ooser was accusing you and I of plotting against him, in that he was accusing a new poster TwentyTwelve, of being you, and found it strange that I was posting on LP a day after TwentyTwelve signed up?

That is bizarre and confirmation of his deteriorating mental state.

I have never posted on LP under any name other than honway and never will.

I have a great deal of information archived on LP concerning the WTC 1993 bombing, the OKC bombing and 9/11 and would not risk that being pulled by trying to bypass a banning by the webmaster.

honway  posted on  2007-02-06   17:28:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I hope BAC doesn't try to make this his new home.

"First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win." --Mahatma K. Gandhi

angle  posted on  2007-02-06   17:35:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Don't forget that we have a Bozo filter.

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides  posted on  2007-02-06   17:36:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I have a great deal of information archived on LP concerning the WTC 1993 bombing, the OKC bombing and 9/11 and would not risk that being pulled by trying to bypass a banning by the webmaster.

That's probably one of the reasons why he made the accusation, to see if he could trick Goldi into doing something extreme. Although it's never good to see someone get banned, I think in his case, it was for the best.

He was determined to intimidate and badger anyone not falling into line with his "official view", and if someone was a bit more than he could personally handle, he'd cry to Goldi with all sorts of wild stories and accusations.

Unfortunately for him, he pulled his crap at the wrong time, on the wrong thread, trying to silence a few people who had just recently opened their eyes concerning 9/11, who were talking about the amnesty provision in the minimum wage bill.

He got his ass whooped by the posters for one, and Goldi had already told him several times to cut the crap, she wasn't interested. But he persisted...

Oh well, as already mentioned, he'll probably ooze his way back, if he's not already there as someone else. He'll just have to watch the words KOOK and ROTFLOL!...

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   17:38:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Oh well, as already mentioned, he'll probably ooze his way back, if he's not already there as someone else.

He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser. And now those many hours,weeks,months and even years are gone. Wasted.He can't show up anywhere with that screen name again. That has got to be difficult.

honway  posted on  2007-02-06   17:52:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser. And now those many hours,weeks,months and even years are gone. Wasted.He can't show up anywhere with that screen name again. That has got to be difficult.

Excuse me if a shed a tear..ok, I'm better now. ROTFLOL!!!!!

His name is carved into Internet lore as a government shill. He and/or his handlers probably decided it best he do a hari-kari and resurrect himself as a new identity, as BeAChooser was no longer effective.

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   17:57:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

His name is carved into Internet lore as a government shill.

Well put.

honway  posted on  2007-02-06   18:03:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser.

He, or they?

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides  posted on  2007-02-06   19:04:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

honway: He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser.

aristeides: He, or they?

He, they, whatever - BAC has been quite successful in deflecting everyone's attention on this forum at least from the issue that might be more worthy of discussion ie. the amnesty bill hidden in the minimum wage pending legislation and the ramifications.

Doesn't anyone at 4um care about that issue and what if anything can be done to stop it from becoming law?

Maybe it's because I don't share a common history with you guys and BAC - but honestly if he's as much of a gov't shill as you describe him to be - why waste your energy on the guy? I don't get it.

Goldi seems to have been right to bounce him and she seems right to focus everyone's energies at LP discussing the amnesty leg. Perhaps that's something we should do here too, do you think???

scrapper2  posted on  2007-02-06   19:25:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Perhaps that's something we should do here too, do you think???

What do you suggest? It certainly would need its own thread. There's numbers to call as far as senators, congressmen, as well as the news media. Do we have the people here to take that sort of initiative?

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   19:32:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Register as a Democrat, that will show them!

sometimes there just aren't enough belgians

Dakmar  posted on  2007-02-06   19:41:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

As much as I find BAC annoying, he backs up most of his points of view with (goobermint) documentation.

Manufactured facts are so often contrary to real facts, Fred.

I thought you knew that?

sometimes there just aren't enough belgians

Dakmar  posted on  2007-02-06   19:43:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

What do you suggest? It certainly would need its own thread. There's numbers to call as far as senators, congressmen, as well as the news media. Do we have the people here to take that sort of initiative?

a. I'd suggest we link to the LP thread as it's own article - LP has done the foot work so why re-work the wheel. I can do that.

b. And I'd also suggest that like LP'ers, we email a dozen of the talk jocks even if it means we have to contact folks we normally don't like to listen to regarding war - the talking heads on radio are more likely to run with this story than the TV guys who by and large want shamnesty to take place. There was a site that an LP'er posted that gave most of the email addressses of the top 100 radio talk show hosts in the country.

http://www.talkers.com/main/index. php? option=com_content&task=view&id=19&Itemid=44

"The 100 most important hosts now ranked"

c. Whether or not 4um folks have the initiative to do this type of email canvasing, I can't say. But it wouldn't hurt to put up the info. Who knows - maybe even some lurkers might do it, too.

d. I don't like this amnesty bill being hidden in another one, for one thing, that smells to me. And also I don't like the fact that there are so many oddball phrases in it - referring to worldwide quotas, the Sect'y of State under taking this immigration guest worker legislation, and also our government "helping" the Mexican gov't build hospitals there ( why?)don't the Mexican oligarchs have enough stolen $ to afford building the basic necessities themselves? and also there's no mention of changing the anchor baby practice so what if those guest worker families have an American born kid, who's going to force the whole lot of them to go back to Mexico once their job dries up stateside?

scrapper2  posted on  2007-02-06   20:32:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

He, they, whatever - BAC has been quite successful in deflecting everyone's attention on this forum at least from the issue that might be more worthy of discussion ie. the amnesty bill hidden in the minimum wage pending legislation and the ramifications.

Doesn't anyone at 4um care about that issue and what if anything can be done to stop it from becoming law?

Could you cut and paste the specific language in the pending legislation that discusses amnesty to a reply on this thread? Thanks.

honway  posted on  2007-02-06   20:46:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I'm amused at this thread, quite amused. ROTFLOL!

"We are Americans. This is our country. He, who would take it from us, by force or by stealth, is our enemy. And it is our purpose -- nay, it is our duty, to our children and to their children and to our yet unborn posterity -- to use all feasible means to destroy him." Dr. Revilo P. Oliver

BTP Holdings  posted on  2007-02-06   20:54:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Hey SKY, remember when we double teamed BAC and had him posting gibberish? Soon thereafter he disappeared for a couple months for a PSYOPS refresher course. ;0)

"We are Americans. This is our country. He, who would take it from us, by force or by stealth, is our enemy. And it is our purpose -- nay, it is our duty, to our children and to their children and to our yet unborn posterity -- to use all feasible means to destroy him." Dr. Revilo P. Oliver

BTP Holdings  posted on  2007-02-06   20:57:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yeah, that was fun. BAC regained ten years on his life, when Goldi banned me.

What a sorry piece of shit, BAC is. {.... and Goldi.}

SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-02-06   21:07:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Register as a Democrat, that will show them!

Hmmm. Don't think so, but I might just for grins... (chuckle)

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   21:14:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I'd suggest we link to the LP thread as it's own article - LP has done the foot work so why re-work the wheel. I can do that.

Looks like those folks got all riled up over nothing. There's nothing concerning amnesty in any of the amendments, or in the bill itself. I couldn't figure out what they were so worked up about, as I didn't see anything definitive last night.

As I looked into it a bit further, there's nothing in regards to amnesty in any part of the bill or the amendments.

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   21:16:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Have you considered a bumper sticker? That seems to be the forum of the future.
please kill me :)

sometimes there just aren't enough belgians

Dakmar  posted on  2007-02-06   21:16:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Could you cut and paste the specific language in the pending legislation that discusses amnesty to a reply on this thread? Thanks.

There's nothing that I could find honway, I think it's a false alarm.

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   21:17:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Have you considered a bumper sticker?

please kill me :)

How about, "I voted for Bush". That might work.

That's a joke BTW... LOL

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   21:18:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There's nothing that I could find honway, I think it's a false alarm.

It's not a false alarm.

I just posted the LP thread with the Senate Amendment 187 to the previous House Resolution and previous Senate Bill.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=175808&Disp=Refresh&

AND

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=175627&Disp=283#283

This was the original SB 1097-1102 passed January 24, 2007. Just page forward.

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi? dbname=2007_record&page=S1091&position=all

You need to cut and paste the urls. Neil's software is not agreeable to any long links I try to post as live links here.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-02-06   21:29:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't see anything about amnesty. Please post an excerpt that refers to that topic.

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   22:27:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't see anything about amnesty. Please post an excerpt that refers to that topic.

Thank you for revealing yourself and your hidden agenda.

Forgiving illegals for breaking our national immigration laws and giving them "magique" rabbit out of the hat legal status is AMNESTY, n'est pas?

Or are you going to argue that paying a fine makes everything fair and square with the US taxpayers and we should overlook the fact that illegal aliens not only broke our laws but also took advantage of our education, social, and welfare services in many many instances, not to mention that their illegal behavior served to displace those who have patiently waited in the legal immigration queue for years.

You and I are done.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-02-06   22:40:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Thank you for revealing yourself and your hidden agenda.

Quit your bitching and post the damn info if you have it.

Or is it that you DON'T know what the hell you are talking about maybe, and that is why you need to get all pissy when I ask a simple question?

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   22:41:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Forgiving illegals for breaking our national immigration laws and giving them "magique" rabbit out of the hat legal status is AMNESTY, n'est pas?

As far as I can tell, you're talking to yourself, as I'm certainly not for granting amnesty to illegals. I just asked for something other than links to thousands of pages of legalize in regards to what you are claiming. So far, I've seen NOTHING that reflects what you and others on LP are claiming.

If you have a problem with that, tough shit.

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   22:44:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You and I are done.

Ah shucks, and I was starting to have fun. Good riddence asshole.

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   22:45:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Here is the actual ban notice to BeAChooser:

293. To: BeAChooser (#235)

Okay that's IT!!

Your actions here can be categorized as clearly disruptive.

Disruptive to this thread and disruptive to it's important message

Disruptive to everyone of those who are working to get info out that is critical for this nation.

And frankly...I've had enough. As has everyone else on this board.

SO, You are ...

TOTALLY AND FOREVER OUTTA HERE!!!

Take your crap and post it someplace else. I'm classifying you now as a disruptor.

You are BANNED!!!

Goldi-Lox posted on 2007-02-06 11:12:05 ET Reply Trace

Coral Snake  posted on  2007-02-06   23:12:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

She didn't really ban me. The Ron Brown zombie was standing in for me there. The same one that Clinton brought back to life and used to hide the WMD in Syria. That's who she actually banned.

ROTFLOL!

KOOKS!

BAC  posted on  2007-02-06   23:19:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I located the following info by looking up Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act with Google, then correlating the appropriate section with Senate Amendment 187, HR.2, that I found on Thomas.

In the PROPOSED McCain Kennedy Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act, the text reads as follows;

From Summary of the Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act

TITLE VII – H-5B Non-Immigrants 

• Title VII creates a new H-5B non-immigrant visa that is open to people in the US residing illegally in the US before the date SAOIA was introduced in May 2005. Applicants must have resided continuously since that time.
• Spouses and children are eligible and certain ex-spouses are eligible in cases of domestic violence.
• Grounds of inadmissibility tied to being out of status on the date SAOIA was introduced are waived, but not criminal and security inadmissibility grounds.
• DHS may waive inadmissibility grounds for humanitarian, public interest or family unity reasons. 
• Applicants must show that they were employed in the US full time, part time, seasonally or were self- employed before the date SAOIA was introduced and have been in the US since that date. Evidence of employment can be made by presenting documentation from the Social Security Administration, IRS, or any other government agency. Also, documentation from employers, unions, work centers may be presented. Workers unable to show this evidence can present two other types of evidence including bank records, business records, affidavits, or remittance records. SAOIA directs DHS to interpret this section liberally given the difficulties encountered by aliens in obtaining evidence of employment due to the undocumented status of the alien. The requirement will be met if the alien has produced “sufficient evidence to demonstrate such employment as a matter of reasonable inference.”
• The employment requirement does not apply to people under twenty-one and people attending school.
• H-5B applicants must provide fingerprints and additional information in order to conduct a background check. Background checks are to be conducted expeditiously.
• H-5Bs are authorized for up to six years of H-5B non-immigrant status. Changes of status to other non- immigrant classifications are not permitted until the six year period is over.
• H-5Bs must pay a penalty fee of $1000 unless they are under the age of twenty-one.
• H-5Bs, their spouse and children shall be granted employment authorization and the right to travel while the H-5B application is pending and may not be detained pending final adjudication of the petition unless there is a criminal history.
• Applicants apprehended after SAOIA is enacted but before regulations are issued shall be permitted to file for an H-5B after regulations are promulgated. People in removal proceedings will also have an opportunity to apply for an H-5B unless a final administrative determination has been made. Applicants in the US who have been ordered removed or issued a voluntary departure order may still apply for an H- 5B and need not file a motion to reopen, reconsider, or vacate the prior order. If the H-5B is not granted, the original order shall still be effective and enforceable as if the H-5B application had not been made.
• USCIS will provide a single level of administrative appellate review authority for denied H-5B applicants. Federal courts will be allowed to review denials based on the administrative record established at the time of the review.
• SAOIA guarantees the confidentiality of information provided in H-5B applications and limits disclosure of information to anyone other than the officers and employees of USCIS reviewing the application. Exceptions are provided for criminal or national security investigations. Privacy violations can be penalized by a fine of up to $10,000.
• People who file or assist others in filing applications containing false or fraudulent statement or representations shall be subject to fines and/or imprisonment for up to five years as well as a lifetime bar on entry. However, anyone submitting an employment record that contains incorrect data used to verify prior employment shall not be considered to be in violation of this section of SAOIA.
• H-5Bs can adjust to permanent residency if they meet the following requirements:
  • The applicant has been employed in the US during the required period.
  • A penalty of $1000 is paid (that is in addition to the $1000 paid to get the H-5B visa).
  • The applicant is not inadmissible under any ground that would cause the applicant to be ineligible for the original H-5B.
  • The applicant has taken a conforming medical examination.
  • The applicant has paid all takes during the requisite employment period.
  • The applicant can meet the naturalization civics and English test or is pursuing a course of study to achieve such an understanding of English and civics. Applicants who can show they can meet these naturalization requirements need not do so again later during the naturalization process.
  • The applicant passes a new criminal and security background check.
  • The applicant has complied with draft registration requirements.
  • Spouses and children are eligible to adjust with the principal applicant. An applicant no longer living with the principal applicant because of domestic violence may still be able to qualify.
• The number of H-5Bs eligible to adjust to permanent residency is not capped.
• Employers of H-5B applicants are protected from civil and criminal tax liability relating to the employment of the applicant prior to the applicant receiving employment authorization under the H-5B program. But employers are not insulated from liability relating to violating other labor or employment laws.
• SAOIA provides for necessary funding to be appropriated to implement this program.  

From TEXT OF AMENDMENTS -- (Senate - January 24, 2007)

   ``Sec..250A..H- 5B nonimmigrants.''.

   SEC. 1702. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS FOR H- 5B NONIMMIGRANTS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 5 of title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 245A the following:

   ``ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS OF FORMER H-5B NONIMMIGRANT TO THAT OF PERSON ADMITTED FOR LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENCE

    ``Sec. 245B. (a) Requirements.- -The Secretary shall adjust the status of an alien from nonimmigrant status under section 101(a)(15)(H)(v)(b) to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence under this section if the alien satisfies the following requirements:

    ``(1) COMPLETION OF EMPLOYMENT OR EDUCATION REQUIREMENT.--The alien establishes that the alien has been employed in the United States, either full time, part time, seasonally, or self- employed, or has met the education requirements of subsection (f) or (g) of section 250A during the period required by section 250A (e).

    ``(2) RULEMAKING.--The Secretary shall establish regulations for the timely filing and processing of applications for adjustment of status for nonimmigrants under section 101(a)(15)(H)(v) (b).

    ``(3) APPLICATION AND FEE.--The alien who applies for adjustment of status under this section shall pay the following:

    ``(A) APPLICATION FEE.--An alien who files an application under section 245B of the Immigration and Nationality Act, shall pay an application fee, set by the Secretary.

    ``(B) ADDITIONAL FINE.--Before the adjudication of an application for adjustment of status filed under this section, an alien who is at least 21 years of age shall pay a fine of $1,000.

    ``(4) ADMISSIBLE UNDER IMMIGRATION LAWS.--The alien establishes that the alien is not inadmissible under section 212(a), except for any provision of that section that is not applicable or waived under section 250A(d) (2).

    ``(5) MEDICAL EXAMINATION.--The alien shall undergo, at the alien's expense, an appropriate medical examination (including a determination of immunization status) that conforms to generally accepted professional standards of medical practice.

    ``(6) PAYMENT OF INCOME TAXES.--

    ``(A) IN GENERAL.- -Not later than the date on which status is adjusted under this section, the alien shall establish the payment of all Federal income taxes owed for employment during the period of employment required by section 250A(e) by establishing that--

    ``(i) no such tax liability exists;

    ``(ii) all outstanding liabilities have been met; or

    ``(iii) the alien has entered into an agreement for payment of all outstanding liabilities with the Internal Revenue Service.

    ``(B) IRS COOPERATION.--The Commissioner of Internal Revenue shall provide documentation to an alien upon request to establish the payment of all income taxes required by this paragraph.

    ``(7) BASIC CITIZENSHIP SKILLS.--

    ``(A) IN GENERAL.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the alien shall establish that the alien--

    ``(i) meets the requirements of section 312; or

    ``(ii) is satisfactorily pursuing a course of study to achieve such an understanding of English and knowledge and understanding of the history and government of the United States.

    ``(B) RELATION TO NATURALIZATION EXAMINATION.--An alien who demonstrates that the alien meets the requirements of section 312 may be considered to have satisfied the requirements of that section for purposes of becoming naturalized as a citizen of the United States under title III.

    ``(8) SECURITY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT BACKGROUND CHECKS.--The Secretary shall conduct a security and law enforcement background check in accordance with procedures described in section 250A(h).

    ``(9) MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE.--The alien shall establish that if the alien is within the age period required under the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.), that such alien has registered under that Act.

    ``(b) Treatment of Spouses and Children.--

    ``(1) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall--

    ``(A) adjust the status to that of a lawful permanent resident under this section, or provide an immigrant visa to the spouse or child of an alien who adjusts status to that of a permanent resident under this section; or

    ``(B) adjust the status to that of a lawful permanent resident under this section for an alien who was the spouse or child of an alien who adjusts status or is eligible to adjust status to that of a permanent resident under section 245B in accordance with subsection (a), if--

    ``(i) the termination of the qualifying relationship was connected to domestic violence; and

    ``(ii) the spouse or child has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by the spouse or parent who adjusts status to that of a permanent resident under this section.

    ``(2) APPLICATION OF OTHER LAW.--In acting on applications filed under this subsection with respect to aliens who have been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall apply the provisions of section 204(a)(1)(J) and the protections, prohibitions, and penalties under section 384 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1367).

    ``(c) Judicial Review; Confidentiality; Penalties.--Subsections (n), (o), and (p) of section 250A shall apply to this section.''.

    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 245A the following:

   ``Sec..245B..Adjustment of status of former H- 5B nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for lawful permanent residence.''.

   

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-02-06   23:21:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Comments (55 - 199) not displayed.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]