See other Editorial Articles
Title: BAC: Goldi-Lox is a Kook!
Source:
LP
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... i?ArtNum=175627&Disp=All&#C185
Published: Feb 6, 2007
Author: BAC
Post Date: 2007-02-06 11:38:51 by BAC
Keywords: None
Views: 17214
Comments: 199
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-18) not displayed.
.
.
.
#19. To: honway (#13)
As much as he liked to hurl the word KOOK at people he accused of being nuts, he actually became a REAL KOOK that was genuinely NUTS. Tsk, tsk. We'll miss the hearty ROTFLOL! after a round or two of his KOOK talk.
Thanks, now I don't have to worry about what to have for dinner. I won't be able to eat for a day after getting that mental picture.
"First I'm gonna bother everybody I meet, and then I'll probably go home and get drunk."
Hey BTW honway, did you know that Ooser was accusing you and I of plotting against him, in that he was accusing a new poster TwentyTwelve, of being you, and found it strange that I was posting on LP a day after TwentyTwelve signed up? He must have pinged Goldi at least 20 times with those suspicions.. What a KOOK!! ROTFLOL!!
I'm wondering if he'll roll the dice and try to sign up as a poster here. It'd be fun to slap him around a bit, but I think his pride will keep him from doing it, at least for awhile.. LOL
You probably want to evade anything with Tuna. (Couldn't resist!)
That is bizarre and confirmation of his deteriorating mental state. I have never posted on LP under any name other than honway and never will. I have a great deal of information archived on LP concerning the WTC 1993 bombing, the OKC bombing and 9/11 and would not risk that being pulled by trying to bypass a banning by the webmaster.
I hope BAC doesn't try to make this his new home.
"First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win." --Mahatma K. Gandhi
Don't forget that we have a Bozo filter.
Katrina was America's Chernobyl.
That's probably one of the reasons why he made the accusation, to see if he could trick Goldi into doing something extreme. Although it's never good to see someone get banned, I think in his case, it was for the best. He was determined to intimidate and badger anyone not falling into line with his "official view", and if someone was a bit more than he could personally handle, he'd cry to Goldi with all sorts of wild stories and accusations. Unfortunately for him, he pulled his crap at the wrong time, on the wrong thread, trying to silence a few people who had just recently opened their eyes concerning 9/11, who were talking about the amnesty provision in the minimum wage bill. He got his ass whooped by the posters for one, and Goldi had already told him several times to cut the crap, she wasn't interested. But he persisted... Oh well, as already mentioned, he'll probably ooze his way back, if he's not already there as someone else. He'll just have to watch the words KOOK and ROTFLOL!...
He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser. And now those many hours,weeks,months and even years are gone. Wasted.He can't show up anywhere with that screen name again. That has got to be difficult.
Excuse me if a shed a tear..ok, I'm better now. ROTFLOL!!!!! His name is carved into Internet lore as a government shill. He and/or his handlers probably decided it best he do a hari-kari and resurrect himself as a new identity, as BeAChooser was no longer effective.
Well put.
He, or they?
Katrina was America's Chernobyl.
aristeides: He, or they? He, they, whatever - BAC has been quite successful in deflecting everyone's attention on this forum at least from the issue that might be more worthy of discussion ie. the amnesty bill hidden in the minimum wage pending legislation and the ramifications. Doesn't anyone at 4um care about that issue and what if anything can be done to stop it from becoming law? Maybe it's because I don't share a common history with you guys and BAC - but honestly if he's as much of a gov't shill as you describe him to be - why waste your energy on the guy? I don't get it. Goldi seems to have been right to bounce him and she seems right to focus everyone's energies at LP discussing the amnesty leg. Perhaps that's something we should do here too, do you think???
What do you suggest? It certainly would need its own thread. There's numbers to call as far as senators, congressmen, as well as the news media. Do we have the people here to take that sort of initiative?
Register as a Democrat, that will show them!
sometimes there just aren't enough belgians
Manufactured facts are so often contrary to real facts, Fred. I thought you knew that?
sometimes there just aren't enough belgians
a. I'd suggest we link to the LP thread as it's own article - LP has done the foot work so why re-work the wheel. I can do that. b. And I'd also suggest that like LP'ers, we email a dozen of the talk jocks even if it means we have to contact folks we normally don't like to listen to regarding war - the talking heads on radio are more likely to run with this story than the TV guys who by and large want shamnesty to take place. There was a site that an LP'er posted that gave most of the email addressses of the top 100 radio talk show hosts in the country. http://www.talkers.com/main/index. php? option=com_content&task=view&id=19&Itemid=44 "The 100 most important hosts now ranked" c. Whether or not 4um folks have the initiative to do this type of email canvasing, I can't say. But it wouldn't hurt to put up the info. Who knows - maybe even some lurkers might do it, too. d. I don't like this amnesty bill being hidden in another one, for one thing, that smells to me. And also I don't like the fact that there are so many oddball phrases in it - referring to worldwide quotas, the Sect'y of State under taking this immigration guest worker legislation, and also our government "helping" the Mexican gov't build hospitals there ( why?)don't the Mexican oligarchs have enough stolen $ to afford building the basic necessities themselves? and also there's no mention of changing the anchor baby practice so what if those guest worker families have an American born kid, who's going to force the whole lot of them to go back to Mexico once their job dries up stateside?
Doesn't anyone at 4um care about that issue and what if anything can be done to stop it from becoming law? Could you cut and paste the specific language in the pending legislation that discusses amnesty to a reply on this thread? Thanks.
I'm amused at this thread, quite amused. ROTFLOL!
"We are Americans. This is our country. He, who would take it from us, by force or by stealth, is our enemy. And it is our purpose -- nay, it is our duty, to our children and to their children and to our yet unborn posterity -- to use all feasible means to destroy him." Dr. Revilo P. Oliver
Hey SKY, remember when we double teamed BAC and had him posting gibberish? Soon thereafter he disappeared for a couple months for a PSYOPS refresher course. ;0)
"We are Americans. This is our country. He, who would take it from us, by force or by stealth, is our enemy. And it is our purpose -- nay, it is our duty, to our children and to their children and to our yet unborn posterity -- to use all feasible means to destroy him." Dr. Revilo P. Oliver
Yeah, that was fun. BAC regained ten years on his life, when Goldi banned me. What a sorry piece of shit, BAC is. {.... and Goldi.}
Hmmm. Don't think so, but I might just for grins... (chuckle)
Looks like those folks got all riled up over nothing. There's nothing concerning amnesty in any of the amendments, or in the bill itself. I couldn't figure out what they were so worked up about, as I didn't see anything definitive last night. As I looked into it a bit further, there's nothing in regards to amnesty in any part of the bill or the amendments.
Have you considered a bumper sticker? That seems to be the forum of the future. sometimes there just aren't enough belgians
There's nothing that I could find honway, I think it's a false alarm.
Have you considered a bumper sticker? please kill me :) How about, "I voted for Bush". That might work. That's a joke BTW... LOL
It's not a false alarm. I just posted the LP thread with the Senate Amendment 187 to the previous House Resolution and previous Senate Bill. http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=175808&Disp=Refresh& AND http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=175627&Disp=283#283 This was the original SB 1097-1102 passed January 24, 2007. Just page forward. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi? dbname=2007_record&page=S1091&position=all You need to cut and paste the urls. Neil's software is not agreeable to any long links I try to post as live links here.
I don't see anything about amnesty. Please post an excerpt that refers to that topic.
Thank you for revealing yourself and your hidden agenda. Forgiving illegals for breaking our national immigration laws and giving them "magique" rabbit out of the hat legal status is AMNESTY, n'est pas? Or are you going to argue that paying a fine makes everything fair and square with the US taxpayers and we should overlook the fact that illegal aliens not only broke our laws but also took advantage of our education, social, and welfare services in many many instances, not to mention that their illegal behavior served to displace those who have patiently waited in the legal immigration queue for years. You and I are done.
Quit your bitching and post the damn info if you have it. Or is it that you DON'T know what the hell you are talking about maybe, and that is why you need to get all pissy when I ask a simple question?
As far as I can tell, you're talking to yourself, as I'm certainly not for granting amnesty to illegals. I just asked for something other than links to thousands of pages of legalize in regards to what you are claiming. So far, I've seen NOTHING that reflects what you and others on LP are claiming. If you have a problem with that, tough shit.
Ah shucks, and I was starting to have fun. Good riddence asshole.
Here is the actual ban notice to BeAChooser: 293. To: BeAChooser (#235) Okay that's IT!! Your actions here can be categorized as clearly disruptive. Disruptive to this thread and disruptive to it's important message Disruptive to everyone of those who are working to get info out that is critical for this nation. And frankly...I've had enough. As has everyone else on this board. SO, You are ... Take your crap and post it someplace else. I'm classifying you now as a disruptor. You are BANNED!!! Goldi-Lox posted on 2007-02-06 11:12:05 ET Reply Trace
She didn't really ban me. The Ron Brown zombie was standing in for me there. The same one that Clinton brought back to life and used to hide the WMD in Syria. That's who she actually banned. ROTFLOL! KOOKS!
I located the following info by looking up Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act with Google, then correlating the appropriate section with Senate Amendment 187, HR.2, that I found on Thomas. In the PROPOSED McCain Kennedy Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act, the text reads as follows; From Summary of the Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act TITLE VII – H-5B Non-Immigrants From TEXT OF AMENDMENTS -- (Senate - January 24, 2007) ``Sec..250A..H- 5B nonimmigrants.''. SEC. 1702. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS FOR H- 5B NONIMMIGRANTS. (a) In General.--Chapter 5 of title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 245A the following: ``ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS OF FORMER H-5B NONIMMIGRANT TO THAT OF PERSON ADMITTED FOR LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENCE ``Sec. 245B. (a) Requirements.- -The Secretary shall adjust the status of an alien from nonimmigrant status under section 101(a)(15)(H)(v)(b) to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence under this section if the alien satisfies the following requirements: ``(1) COMPLETION OF EMPLOYMENT OR EDUCATION REQUIREMENT.--The alien establishes that the alien has been employed in the United States, either full time, part time, seasonally, or self- employed, or has met the education requirements of subsection (f) or (g) of section 250A during the period required by section 250A (e). ``(2) RULEMAKING.--The Secretary shall establish regulations for the timely filing and processing of applications for adjustment of status for nonimmigrants under section 101(a)(15)(H)(v) (b). ``(3) APPLICATION AND FEE.--The alien who applies for adjustment of status under this section shall pay the following: ``(A) APPLICATION FEE.--An alien who files an application under section 245B of the Immigration and Nationality Act, shall pay an application fee, set by the Secretary. ``(B) ADDITIONAL FINE.--Before the adjudication of an application for adjustment of status filed under this section, an alien who is at least 21 years of age shall pay a fine of $1,000. ``(4) ADMISSIBLE UNDER IMMIGRATION LAWS.--The alien establishes that the alien is not inadmissible under section 212(a), except for any provision of that section that is not applicable or waived under section 250A(d) (2). ``(5) MEDICAL EXAMINATION.--The alien shall undergo, at the alien's expense, an appropriate medical examination (including a determination of immunization status) that conforms to generally accepted professional standards of medical practice. ``(6) PAYMENT OF INCOME TAXES.-- ``(A) IN GENERAL.- -Not later than the date on which status is adjusted under this section, the alien shall establish the payment of all Federal income taxes owed for employment during the period of employment required by section 250A(e) by establishing that-- ``(i) no such tax liability exists; ``(ii) all outstanding liabilities have been met; or ``(iii) the alien has entered into an agreement for payment of all outstanding liabilities with the Internal Revenue Service. ``(B) IRS COOPERATION.--The Commissioner of Internal Revenue shall provide documentation to an alien upon request to establish the payment of all income taxes required by this paragraph. ``(7) BASIC CITIZENSHIP SKILLS.-- ``(A) IN GENERAL.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the alien shall establish that the alien-- ``(i) meets the requirements of section 312; or ``(ii) is satisfactorily pursuing a course of study to achieve such an understanding of English and knowledge and understanding of the history and government of the United States. ``(B) RELATION TO NATURALIZATION EXAMINATION.--An alien who demonstrates that the alien meets the requirements of section 312 may be considered to have satisfied the requirements of that section for purposes of becoming naturalized as a citizen of the United States under title III. ``(8) SECURITY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT BACKGROUND CHECKS.--The Secretary shall conduct a security and law enforcement background check in accordance with procedures described in section 250A(h). ``(9) MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE.--The alien shall establish that if the alien is within the age period required under the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.), that such alien has registered under that Act. ``(b) Treatment of Spouses and Children.-- ``(1) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall-- ``(A) adjust the status to that of a lawful permanent resident under this section, or provide an immigrant visa to the spouse or child of an alien who adjusts status to that of a permanent resident under this section; or ``(B) adjust the status to that of a lawful permanent resident under this section for an alien who was the spouse or child of an alien who adjusts status or is eligible to adjust status to that of a permanent resident under section 245B in accordance with subsection (a), if-- ``(i) the termination of the qualifying relationship was connected to domestic violence; and ``(ii) the spouse or child has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by the spouse or parent who adjusts status to that of a permanent resident under this section. ``(2) APPLICATION OF OTHER LAW.--In acting on applications filed under this subsection with respect to aliens who have been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall apply the provisions of section 204(a)(1)(J) and the protections, prohibitions, and penalties under section 384 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1367). ``(c) Judicial Review; Confidentiality; Penalties.--Subsections (n), (o), and (p) of section 250A shall apply to this section.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 245A the following: ``Sec..245B..Adjustment of status of former H- 5B nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for lawful permanent residence.''.
Hey pal, if you want to see my "agenda", take a look at what I just found. If you didn't jump to your mistaken conclusions, and start ragging on me, I might have been more polite. I don't deal well with those that give me a hard time.
good lord, my head is spinning. i mean no offense, but it seems to me that this is minutiae at this point. one need only look at the large picture--the plan for the North American Union--this is what americans need to be made aware of. do you realize how few even know of its existence? how many politicians do you hear talking about it? any other than Ron Paul? the reason? it's because they all support it. look how many of them are CFR! and you all think writing to any of these traitors is going to do a thing? if they intended to do anything, the borders would have been secured and CLOSED years ago. no, the solution to this is not working within the 'political' system. they are the enemy of we the people. imo, our activism efforts should be educating as many people as we can. bring them here to get the information. post and send articles and google videos to your email list. make copies of DVDs as wake up does and pass them around everywhere you go and tell them about alternative media like RBN and GCN!
Could you unban Ponchy for a day or two? We want to bend him to our will and make him do criminal acts.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
maybe just unnatural acts, but that might be too easy. he seems to be inclined that way already.
"And this is the end of my brilliant career on the 4um..." -- ponchy 12/20/2006
Comments (59 - 199) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestNear the end of my participation there it appeared the fact that poll after poll indicated the American people were rejecting the Bush Administration lies concerning 9/11 was taking a serious emotional toll on him.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#20. To: SKYDRIFTER (#17)
I get the image of BAC & Goldi doing a 69er...
#21. To: honway (#13)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#22. To: christine (#12)
guess he'll oose himself back on over to FR aka GoPville.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#23. To: orangedog (#20)
Thanks, now I don't have to worry about what to have for dinner. I won't be able to eat for a day after getting that mental picture.
#24. To: FormerLurker (#21)
Hey BTW honway, did you know that Ooser was accusing you and I of plotting against him, in that he was accusing a new poster TwentyTwelve, of being you, and found it strange that I was posting on LP a day after TwentyTwelve signed up?
#25. To: aristeides (#1)
#26. To: angle (#25)
#27. To: honway (#24)
I have a great deal of information archived on LP concerning the WTC 1993 bombing, the OKC bombing and 9/11 and would not risk that being pulled by trying to bypass a banning by the webmaster.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#28. To: FormerLurker (#27)
Oh well, as already mentioned, he'll probably ooze his way back, if he's not already there as someone else.
#29. To: honway (#28)
He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser. And now those many hours,weeks,months and even years are gone. Wasted.He can't show up anywhere with that screen name again. That has got to be difficult.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#30. To: FormerLurker (#29)
His name is carved into Internet lore as a government shill.
#31. To: honway (#28)
He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser.
#32. To: aristeides, honway, Former Lurker (#31)
honway: He spent years establishing the screen name persona of BeAChooser.
#33. To: scrapper2 (#32)
Perhaps that's something we should do here too, do you think???
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#34. To: FormerLurker (#33)
#35. To: Fred Mertz (#2)
As much as I find BAC annoying, he backs up most of his points of view with (goobermint) documentation.
#36. To: FormerLurker (#33)
What do you suggest? It certainly would need its own thread. There's numbers to call as far as senators, congressmen, as well as the news media. Do we have the people here to take that sort of initiative?
#37. To: scrapper2 (#32)
He, they, whatever - BAC has been quite successful in deflecting everyone's attention on this forum at least from the issue that might be more worthy of discussion ie. the amnesty bill hidden in the minimum wage pending legislation and the ramifications.
#38. To: christine (#12)
#39. To: SKYDRIFTER (#23)
#40. To: BTP Holdings (#39)
#41. To: Dakmar (#34)
Register as a Democrat, that will show them!
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#42. To: scrapper2 (#36)
I'd suggest we link to the LP thread as it's own article - LP has done the foot work so why re-work the wheel. I can do that.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#43. To: FormerLurker (#41)
please kill me :)
#44. To: honway (#37)
Could you cut and paste the specific language in the pending legislation that discusses amnesty to a reply on this thread? Thanks.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#45. To: Dakmar (#43)
(Edited)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#46. To: FormerLurker, honway (#44)
There's nothing that I could find honway, I think it's a false alarm.
#47. To: scrapper2 (#46)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#48. To: FormerLurker (#47)
I don't see anything about amnesty. Please post an excerpt that refers to that topic.
#49. To: scrapper2 (#48)
Thank you for revealing yourself and your hidden agenda.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#50. To: scrapper2 (#48)
Forgiving illegals for breaking our national immigration laws and giving them "magique" rabbit out of the hat legal status is AMNESTY, n'est pas?
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#51. To: scrapper2 (#48)
You and I are done.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#52. To: BAC (#0)
(Edited)
TOTALLY AND FOREVER OUTTA HERE!!!
#53. To: Coral Snake (#52)
#54. To: honway, scrapper2, christine (#37)
Whereas what Congress actually passed is as follows;
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#55. To: scrapper2 (#48)
Thank you for revealing yourself and your hidden agenda.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#56. To: FormerLurker, scrapper2, wake up (#54)
#57. To: christine (#56)
#58. To: christine (#56)
.
.
.