[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

MAGA Protest

The Floodgates Are Breaking In Germany's Welfare State

“The government wants to make sure that that does not come out. A huge part of our political system is predicated on blackmail,”

You Know What Happens Next

Cash Jordan: Half-Built Tower Abandoned… as ICE Deports Entire ‘Migrant Workforce’

Heavy rainfall causes flash flooding Tuesday night, some cars stuck in high water on Chicago's West

Biden Doctor PLEADS THE FIFTH, Refuses To Testify To Congress, Biden Pardons ARE VOID

Joe Rogan says FBI director Kash Patel played him for a fool and maga for fools with the Jeff Epstein files

Elon's AI System "Grok" Went Rogue And Has Been SHUT DOWN in an Emergency!

Earthquake Swarms at One of the MOST DANGEROUS Volcanoes in the USA

Ben Shapiro Declares Epstein Case CLOSED: ‘Facts on the Ground Have Changed’

Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets

China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power

Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes

Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal

Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising?

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Flight 77 Maneuver/Hanjour Flying Skills
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_C ... Forum/index.php?showtopic=3550
Published: Feb 8, 2007
Author: NK-44
Post Date: 2007-02-08 18:49:35 by honway
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 2528
Comments: 68

Part One

Hanjour's flying skills

However, when Hanjour went on three test runs in the second week of August

He had trouble controlling and landing a single engine Cessna 172.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=3550

The best compilation of evidence concerning Hani Hanjour's flying skills I have read. Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 65.

#2. To: honway (#0)

An Analysis of the Flight 77 bu a Former Air Force Pilot

"Upon passing the Washington Monument, the plan may have been for the pilot to make a right turn and dive into the building. A right turn at this point would have led the airplane to hit Pentagon on the Potomac River side where the Secretary of Defense has his office.

But being unfamiliar with flying large airplanes at high speeds, the pilot wouldn't have taken into account the large radius required to make the turn. This would explain the circuitous 270 degree turn that was made to the impact point.

When he rolled out, he'd simply point the nose of the airplane at the center courtyard of the Pentagon and dive toward his target. What he wouldn't know without experience is that when you dive, you accelerate the airplane and the lift increases. This causes the nose to rise, which would cause him to overshoot the target. In a panic, he would push forward on the controls and overcompensate, which would account for eyewitness descriptions of the airplane striking the ground short of the Pentagon.

Of course, this is all speculation, not facts.

AGAviator  posted on  2007-02-08   23:12:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: AGAviator, skydrifter, honway, ALL (#2) (Edited)

Furthermore, as TheStateInc believers say, if Hanjour was a good enough pilot and trained in jet simulators to carry this out, he'd know enough about how to slow a jet, i.e. spoilers, flaps, reduce power, lower the gear...same things a good Private pilot knows and ALL Commercial pilots know. To say he was good enough to carry it out, and then for someone to state what was stated in your post by that author, is to totally destroy the credibility of the entire official 9-11 story. I don't honestly know how any trained pilot could believe these jokers did what they did, nor do I see how any sane individual with a brain could believe that 3 buildings, one of which was not hit by a plane, all collapsed the SAME WAY.

IndieTX  posted on  2007-02-08   23:23:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: IndieTX (#3)

The point of the link, which is written by a real airman who was in the FAA database with a commercial license when I checked, is the flight path of Flight 77 is consistent with a relatively inexperienced pilot putting the aircraft into situations he could not fully control.

I myself am a licensed pilot and find his explanations quite plausible. A novice pilot puts the plane into a dive, but doesn't remember to compensate for the increased lift which is caused by the increased speed. So he overshoots the target, and then has to go into a tight 270 degree turn to avoid losing the target completely.

I have been in extended arguments with other people on other sites who seem to have a lot invested in their own beliefs about this, and I am not going to repeat that here. That is just my 2 cents, and I will leave it at that.

AGAviator  posted on  2007-02-08   23:32:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: AGAviator, Skydrifter (#4)

From what I can recall about the path of desent, there wasn't a "dive" into or toward the Pentagon. The controllers reported a smooth 270-330 degree circle desent that took the aircraft right above the ground and smack into the empty side of the Pentagon.

No DNA has ever been matched or linked to said hijackers.

One more question.

Your stand on 911 is what?

Kamala  posted on  2007-02-09   6:33:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Kamala (#6)

From what I can recall about the path of desent, there wasn't a "dive" into or toward the Pentagon.

The Pentagon is almost at sea level, and the aircraft was over 5,000 feet when it started its descent. That is a dive for an aircraft that large and generating that much lift.

The controllers reported a smooth 270-330 degree circle desent that took the aircraft right above the ground and smack into the empty side of the Pentagon.

From the link:

"I based the turn radius on a 275 knot airspeed, since I doubt the airplane would have sufficient power and structural integrity to fly at 500 knots at low altitude. And unless the pilot had a lot of experience flying large airplanes at high speeds low to the ground, he would have avoided making a steep bank, so I based my turn radius on a 30 degree bank angle."

AGAviator  posted on  2007-02-09   7:04:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: AGAviator (#8)

...That is a dive for an aircraft that large and generating that much lift....

That isn't what was reported by the actual FAA controllers, and according to your link, the flight path isn't even lined up with the Pentagon.

The path of the airliner is exactly what was intended.

So then an inexperienced pilot "overshot" the Pentagon, then took the aircraft, made a 270 degree circle, and flew it 40-60ft above the ground, and smack the empty side of the Pentagon?

Like you said, its pure speculation.

Again, your stand on 911 is what?

Kamala  posted on  2007-02-09   7:19:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Kamala (#9)

That isn't what was reported by the actual FAA controllers, and according to your link, the flight path isn't even lined up with the Pentagon.

Please post a source which states exactly what the FAA controllers did report, then.

The path of the airliner is exactly what was intended.

How would you know what was intended?

So then an inexperienced pilot "overshot" the Pentagon, then took the aircraft, made a 270 degree circle, and flew it 40-60ft above the ground, and smack the empty side of the Pentagon?

(1) Are you a pilot?

(2) Do you know how lift, drag, thrust, and "ground effect" work?

Like you said, its pure speculation.

And alleging "The path of the airliner is exactly what was intended" isn't?

Again, your stand on 911 is what?

(1) There are many people who believe their passsionate and opinionated views on 911 can compensate for their lack of knowledge about technical details of various subjects pertaining to the details of 911,

(2) There are 2 sides that want war in the Middle East, not 1, and

(3) Certain small elements of individuals on the side associated with the US and Israeli governments had a pretty good idea of what was going to happen, wanted it to happen, and did nothing to prevent it from happening.

AGAviator  posted on  2007-02-09   8:43:34 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: AGAviator, *9-11* (#10)

From the NTSB

honway  posted on  2007-02-18   10:06:17 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 65.

#66. To: honway (#65)

Air Traffic Controllers Recall 911

BROKAW: How long were you able to track what turned out to be American 77?

Mr. LEWIS: Well, it--it was heading right towards a prohibited area in downtown Washington. And that--that covers the Capitol and the White House. We then called the White House on the hotline to let them know.

BROKAW: (Voiceover) Controllers activate a hotline to the Secret Service, and within seconds, agents are frantically evacuating the White House. The president is in Florida, but the Secret Service whisks Vice President Dick Cheney into an underground bunker.

(Controllers in control tower; men on top of White House; people running)

Mr. LEWIS: Then it turned south and away from the prohibited area, which seemed like a momentary sigh of relief, and it disappeared. But it was going away from Washington, which seemed to be the right thing.

AGAviator  posted on  2007-02-18 12:42:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 65.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]