[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Real Monetary Reform

More Young Men Are Now Religious Than Women In The US

0,000+ online influencers, journalists, drive-by media, TV stars and writers work for State Department

"Why Are We Hiding It From The Public?" - Five Takeaways From Congressional UFO Hearing

Food Additives Exposed: What Lies Beneath America's Food Supply

Scott Ritter: Hezbollah OBLITERATES IDF, Netanyahu in deep legal trouble

Vivek Ramaswamy says he and Elon Musk are set up for 'mass deportations' of millions of 'unelected bureaucrats'

Evidence Points to Voter Fraud in 2024 Wisconsin Senate Race

Rickards: Your Trump Investment Guide

Pentagon 'Shocked' By Houthi Arsenal, Sophistication Is 'Getting Scary'

Cancer Starves When You Eat These Surprising Foods | Dr. William Li

Megyn Kelly Gets Fiery About Trump's Choice of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General

Over 100 leftist groups organize coalition to rebuild morale and resist MAGA after Trump win

Mainstream Media Cries Foul Over Musk Meeting With Iran Ambassador...On Peace

Vaccine Stocks Slide Further After Trump Taps RFK Jr. To Lead HHS; CNN Outraged

Do Trump’s picks Rubio, Huckabee signal his approval of West Bank annexation?

Pac-Man

Barron Trump

Big Pharma-Sponsored Vaccinologist Finally Admits mRNA Shots Are Killing Millions

US fiscal year 2025 opens with a staggering $257 billion October deficit$3 trillion annual pace.

His brain has been damaged by American processed food.

Iran willing to resolve doubts about its atomic programme with IAEA

FBI Official Who Oversaw J6 Pipe Bomb Probe Lied About Receiving 'Corrupted' Evidence “We have complete data. Not complete, because there’s some data that was corrupted by one of the providers—not purposely by them, right,” former FBI official Steven D’Antuono told the House Judiciary Committee in a

Musk’s DOGE Takes To X To Crowdsource Talent: ‘80+ Hours Per Week,’

Female Bodybuilders vs. 16 Year Old Farmers

Whoopi Goldberg announces she is joining women in their sex abstinence

Musk secretly met with Iran's UN envoy NYT

D.O.G.E. To have a leaderboard of most wasteful government spending

In Most U.S. Cities, Social Security Payments Last Married Couples Just 19 Days Or Less

Another major healthcare provider files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: President of Czech Republic Calls Man-Made Global Warming a 'Myth' Questions Gore's Sanity
Source: Drudge
URL Source: http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm
Published: Feb 12, 2007
Author: Vaclav Klaus
Post Date: 2007-02-12 20:39:26 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 77
Comments: 1

President of Czech Republic Calls Man-Made Global Warming a 'Myth' - Questions Gore's Sanity Mon Feb 12 2007 09:10:09 ET

Czech president Vaclav Klaus has criticized the UN panel on global warming, claiming that it was a political authority without any scientific basis.

In an interview with "Hospodárské noviny", a Czech economics daily, Klaus answered a few questions:

Q: IPCC has released its report and you say that the global warming is a false myth. How did you get this idea, Mr President?•

A: It's not my idea. Global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so. It is not fair to refer to the U.N. panel. IPCC is not a scientific institution: it's a political body, a sort of non-government organization of green flavor. It's neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment. Also, it's an undignified slapstick that people don't wait for the full report in May 2007 but instead respond, in such a serious way, to the summary for policymakers where all the "but's" are scratched, removed, and replaced by oversimplified theses.• This is clearly such an incredible failure of so many people, from journalists to politicians. If the European Commission is instantly going to buy such a trick, we have another very good reason to think that the countries themselves, not the Commission, should be deciding about similar issues.•

Q: How do you explain that there is no other comparably senior statesman in Europe who would advocate this viewpoint? No one else has such strong opinions...•

A: My opinions about this issue simply are strong. Other top-level politicians do not express their global warming doubts because a whip of political correctness strangles their voice.

• Q: But you're not a climate scientist. Do you have a sufficient knowledge and enough information?•

A: Environmentalism as a metaphysical ideology and as a worldview has absolutely nothing to do with natural sciences or with the climate. Sadly, it has nothing to do with social sciences either. Still, it is becoming fashionable and this fact scares me. The second part of the sentence should be: we also have lots of reports, studies, and books of climatologists whose conclusions are diametrally opposite.• Indeed, I never measure the thickness of ice in Antarctica. I really don't know how to do it and don't plan to learn it. However, as a scientifically oriented person, I know how to read science reports about these questions, for example about ice in Antarctica. I don't have to be a climate scientist myself to read them. And inside the papers I have read, the conclusions we may see in the media simply don't appear. But let me promise you something: this topic troubles me which is why I started to write an article about it last Christmas. The article expanded and became a book. In a couple of months, it will be published. One chapter out of seven will organize my opinions about the climate change.• Environmentalism and green ideology is something very different from climate science. Various findings and screams of scientists are abused by this ideology.•

Q: How do you explain that conservative media are skeptical while the left-wing media view the global warming as a done deal?•

A: It is not quite exactly divided to the left-wingers and right-wingers. Nevertheless it's obvious that environmentalism is a new incarnation of modern leftism.•

Q: If you look at all these things, even if you were right ...•

A: ...I am right...•

Q: Isn't there enough empirical evidence and facts we can see with our eyes that imply that Man is demolishing the planet and himself?•

A: It's such a nonsense that I have probably not heard a bigger nonsense yet.•

Q: Don't you believe that we're ruining our planet?•

A: I will pretend that I haven't heard you. Perhaps only Mr Al Gore may be saying something along these lines: a sane person can't. I don't see any ruining of the planet, I have never seen it, and I don't think that a reasonable and serious person could say such a thing. Look: you represent the economic media so I expect a certain economical erudition from you. My book will answer these questions. For example, we know that there exists a huge correlation between the care we give to the environment on one side and the wealth and technological prowess on the other side. It's clear that the poorer the society is, the more brutally it behaves with respect to Nature, and vice versa.• It's also true that there exist social systems that are damaging Nature - by eliminating private ownership and similar things - much more than the freer societies. These tendencies become important in the long run. They unambiguously imply that today, on February 8th, 2007, Nature is protected uncomparably more than on February 8th ten years ago or fifty years ago or one hundred years ago.• That's why I ask: how can you pronounce the sentence you said? Perhaps if you're unconscious? Or did you mean it as a provocation only? And maybe I am just too naive and I allowed you to provoke me to give you all these answers, am I not? It is more likely that you actually believe what you say.

[English translation from Harvard Professor Lubos Motl]

Developing...


Poster Comment:

I am inclined to believe that global warming on earth and mars is due to the extreme solar activity of the past couple of decades. All those solar flares must be doing something to us.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Horse, Uncle Bill, Simmering Frog, all (#0)

It's also true that there exist social systems that are damaging Nature - by eliminating private ownership and similar things - much more than the freer societies.

I think "global warming" is more of the Hegelian Dialectic at play BY THE GLOBAL ELITE FOR THE GLOBAL ELITE, for the purpose of total control of the earth's resources, and human behavior itself:

ENVIRONAZI QUOTES:

"...The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can't let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the U.S. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are. And it is important to the rest of the world to make sure that they don't suffer economically by virtue of our stopping them." - Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

"Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs." - John Davis, editor of Earth First Journal

***** "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." - H.L. Mencken

"Cannibalism is a radical but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation." - Lyall Watson, The Financial Times - July 15, 1995

***** "Protecting the environment is a ruse. The goal is the political and economic subjugation of most men by the few, under the guise of preserving nature." - J.H. Robbins

"Global sustainability requires: the deliberate quest of poverty....reduced resource consumption...and set levels of mortality control." - Professor Maurice King

"The environmentalist's dream is an Egalitarian society based on rejection of economic growth, a smaller population, eating lower on the food chain, consuming a lot less, and sharing a much lower level of resources much more equally." - Aaron Wildavsky

***** "A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect." - Richard Benedict, State Dept./Conservation Foundation

"Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun." - Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University

"The secret to David McTaggart's(early officer in Greenpeace) success is the secret to Greenpeace's success: It doesn't matter what is true...it only matters what people believe is true...You are what the media define you to be. Greenpeace became a myth, and a myth-generating machine." - Paul Watson, co- founder of Greenpeace.

"Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover the source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it." - Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute

****** "We've got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing--in terms of economic policy and environmental policy." - Timothy Wirth, former U.S. Senator (D-Colorado)

"We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects....We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of tens of millions of acres of presently settled land." - David Foreman, Earth First

"The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans." - Dr. Reed F. Noss, The Wildlands Project

"As radical environmentalists, we can see AIDS not as a problem, but as a necessary solution." - Miss Ann Thropy(pseudonym), Earth First Journal

"The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing....This is to say that the rise of human civilization is insignificant, but there is no way of showing that it will be much help to the world in the long run." - Economist editorial

"I suspect that the politicians and businessmen who are jumping on the environmental bandwagon don't have the slightest idea of what they are getting into. They are talking about emission control devices on automobiles, while we are talking about bans on automobiles." - Dennis Hayes, Eart Day Agenda

"The invention of the concept of sustainable human development and that of so- called human security, as opposed to territorial security of nation-states, and its promotion by the UN is in clear contradiction to all that we, the Group of 77, and the UN Charter itself consider inalienable, namely national sovereignty and security." - Pranab Mukherjee, India's Minister Of Commerce- Earth Times, Oct.15,1994

"It's(the prospect of cheap fusion energy) the worst thing that could happen to the planet." - Jeremy Rifkin

"If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels." - Prince Phillip, World Wildlife Fund

"Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition." - Peter Singer, the father of Animal Rights

"In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 per day." - Dr. Jacques Cousteau

"I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems." - John Davis, editor of Earth First Journal

"We reject the idea of private property." - Peter Berle, President of National Audubon Society

"People are the cause of all the problems, we have too many of them; we need to get rid of some of them, and this(ban of DDT) is as good a way as any." - Charles Wurster, Environmental Defense Fund

"This is a political game. It has nothing to do with science. It has nothing to do with health and safety." - Sherry Neddick, Greenpeace

-----------------

The Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto

Translated

In the early 1960's during the days of the "former" Soviet Union, Russian Premier Nikita Kruschev pounded his shoe on the podium of the United Nations and shouted to the West, "We will bury you!" Fearing an invasion from the Reds, America proceeded to build the most awesome military machine in history. Unfortunately, we forgot to guard our political homefront from being taken over by socialist - communist - liberal activists who would gain office and destroy American law by process of gradually installing the Communist agenda within our legal system and separate branches of government.

The Communist program from the start has been one which sees their revolution of 1917 succesful only upon total domination of the world. (See ***** Brain Washing, A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics) Americans, being the most naive people among the nations, now believe that Communism is dead because the Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain have been removed. The ironic truth is that ***** Communism has just switched names to become more "politically correct".

Today it is called international democracy. The reason that the Berlin Wall came crashing down is not because Communism is dead but because they have achieved the planned agenda to communize the West, including America. Washington D.C. has indeed become part of the New World Order of atheist governments. With the last vestiges of Christian law having been removed from "American government" over the last twenty years, there is no longer a threat of resistance against world Communism. In reality, "American government" became part of the Iron Curtain, thus there was no more need for the likes of a Berlin Wall.

Once again, in their foolishness, the American public has believed the lies of their "leaders" who applaud "the fall of Communism", while they have sold out the country to anti-Christian, anti-American statutes and regulations on the federal, state, and local levels. Posted below is a comparison of the original ten planks of the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848, along with the American adopted counterpart of each of the planks. The American people have truly been "buried in Communism" by their own politicians of both the Republican and Democratic parties.

One other thing to remember: Karl Marx was stating in the Communist Manifesto that these planks will test whether a country has become commmunist or not. If they are all in effect and in force the country IS communist. Communism, but by any other name...??

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose.

The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management.........

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

We call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

We call in government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process................

7. Extention of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

We call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Evironmental Protection Agency, [See THE REVEALING STORY OF THE RANCHER AND THE NATIONAL DEBT] Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations..........

http://www.wealth4freedom.com /10Planks.html

==============================

THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC

......This technique is named after a German named Hegel. His process is used by the planner to bring about a desired result using psychology, or a "mind trick". It is a very simple and powerful mechanism and works like this:

Step 1. Thesis - A problem is intentionally created ........... [GLOBAL WARMING]

Step 2. Antithesis - Opposition to the problem is created [High temps, hurricanes, flooding, earthquakes: HAARP: THE MILITARY'S PANDORA'S BOX http://haarp.net ; and http://educate- http://yourself.org/mc /mctotalcontrol12jul02.shtml TOTAL POPULATION CONTROL - Weather Warfare and Mind Control ; and WEATHER CONTROL AND WEATHER WARFARE http://www.cuttingedge.org/NEWS /n1694.cfm / CUTTINGEDGE.ORG WEATHER WARFARE INDEX **** http://www.cuttingedge.or g/articles/weather.cfm ; and ILLUMINATI'S MAN-MADE DISASTERS http://www.illuminati-news.com/disasters.htm ]

Step 3. Synthesis - The desired result is brought in as a solution: INDUSTRY, PRIVATE PROPERTY, PEOPLE CONTROLLED BY THE STATE THROUGH THEIR UN.

http://www.wea lth4freedom.com/truth/Hegelian_Dialectic.htm

see also:

The Mind-Changing Dialectic Process

Training the masses to think collectively and to serve a Greater Whole

by Berit Kjos

"...absolute behavior control is imminent.... The critical point of behavior control, in effect, is sneaking up on mankind without his self-conscious realization that a crisis is at hand. Man will... never self-consciously know that it has happened." [1] Raymond Houghton, To Nurture Humaneness, ASCD (curriculum arm of the NEA), 1970........"

"......This mind-changing (Hegelian dialectic) process required students in Communist nations to "confess" their thoughts and feelings in their respective groups. Trained facilitator-teachers would then guide the group dialogue toward a pre-planned consensus. The original thesis and antithesis -- opposing views such as Christianity versus Marxism -- would be merged or synthesized into ever-evolving higher "truths."

Huxley believed the same process, "the thesis, antithesis and synthesis of Hegelian philosophy," would mold global citizens committed to the oneness of all. Through "the Marxist 'reconciliation of opposites,'" conflicts would cease and a new manageable world would rise from the ashes of the old. [8]

This revolutionary program was officially incorporated into American education in 1985, when President Reagan and Soviet President Gorbachev signed the U.S.-USSR Education Exchange Agreement. It put American technology into the hands of Communist strategists and sanctioned our use of their psycho-social strategies, including the mass media. As Julian Huxley suggested back in 1947, "the techniques of persuasion and information and true propaganda" must be "deliberately" used "as Lenin envisaged - to 'overcome the resistance of millions' to desirable change."[9]

Today, a more sophisticated version of this brainwashing process drives the social transformation. Governments, schools, businesses and service organizations -- even churches -- are using it to mold compliant citizens and group thinkers. It usually serves their purpose, for it helps root out individualism and the "intolerant" attitudes that could bring conflict and division. When bonded to the group and trained in the new relational rules, few dare offend the majority by take a contrary stand.

"We have moved into a new era," said Dr. Shirley McCune, keynote speaker at the 1989 Governor's Conference on Education. "What we are facing is total restructuring of society.... We no longer are teaching facts to children." [10] The former Senior Director of the Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory knew well that "facts," like “fixed beliefs," anchor the mind in certain absolutes which block the dialectic process.

Propaganda, institutional pressures and financial incentives pull parents and other adults into the process as well. The masses must learn to feel that traditional values are an intolerable threat to peace, and Christians must be willing to trade their God-given absolutes for Huxley's view of evolving truths and collective thinking.

But God says, “do not be conformed to this world.” Therefore, we make it our aim to “obey God rather than men.” Though the world demands consensus, we take our stand on the unchanging, eternal Word of God. [Romans 12:2; Acts 5:29]........"

http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/Reinventing2.htm

----------------------------------

Weather "disasters" authorize the federal government [in their warped minds] to usurp the rights of the States and the RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE in order to impose the government's idea of "safety" [which is in reality, nothing but safety for the global elite to murder and steal from the rest of the world]. A very revealing blast from the past....if you do not have this one, I HIGHLY recommend you download it now....I said years ago that this was the culmination of decades of work via fraudulent "Executive Orders" et al to undermine this nation, and that this document was ready and waiting to be trotted out, dusted off, and given a new name....THE "PATRIOT ACT".......when the perps inside the government pulled off 9/11:

H.R. 4210, A REIGN OF TERROR - Which future will you choose?

".....Congress repeals the rights of states to use funds to prepare for 'hazards' (sec. 5. DEFINITIONS, "hazard" means an emergency or disaster resulting from a natural, accidental or man caused event - including a domestic terrorist attack involving a weapon of mass destruction.)

FEMA, an independent agency, reports to the President. Its original concept was to assure the survivability of the United States Government in the event of a nuclear attack on this nation. FEMA, sometimes referred to as the "secret government", does not involve itself in public disclosures and has a quasi- secret budget in the billions of dollars within its oversight. It is tasked, as a federal coordinating body during times of domestic disasters, with being America's mild-mannered St. Bernard dedicated to rescuing victims of national disasters ***** (floods, hurricanes, earthquakes and hazards).

Incrementally, FEMA has evolved into a massive entity holding many aspects of American life in its intrusive, far-reaching tentacles. With an amendment here, an executive order there, and the well known "bureaucrat shuffle," responsibility for many 'new' disasters including urban forest fires, home heating emergencies, refugee situations, urban riots, and emergency planning for nuclear and toxic incidents have been usurped from the government of the states. FEMA has even been given control of the State Defense Forces, that will substitute for the National Guard, ***** if the Guard is called to duty overseas. [5]

***** While FEMA grants states and local governments $100 million per year, national emergency only takes up approximately ***** 6 percent of its budget. The bulk of its funding maintains underground facilities for use in case of a major emergency - foreign or domestic. Mount Weather, a vast, self-sustaining military base, buried deep inside a mountain, about 46 miles from Washington, DC, is such a facility. [16]

MOUNT WEATHER: the operational center--the hub--of approximately 100 other Federal Relocation Centers, most of which are concentrated in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland and North Carolina. Together this network of underground facilities constitutes the backbone of America's "Continuity of Government" program. In the event of nuclear war, or other national emergency, the President, his cabinet and the rest of the Executive Branch would be "relocated" to Mount Weather. It is also known as the Western Virginia Office of Controlled Conflict Operations, perhaps more aptly so, for it is the command center for FEMA. [17]

FEMA now acknowledges the surface structures and dedicates an official webpage describing the activities at Mount Weather. However, only a few with top- security clearance really know what business is carried out in the deep, inner recesses of what is known to be the hardest concrete along the Eastern half of America. According to the Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights hearings in 1975, Congress has almost no knowledge and certainly no oversight - budgetary or otherwise - on Mount Weather. Retired Air Force General, Leslie W. Bray, in his testimony to the subcommittee said, "I am not at liberty to describe precisely what is the role and the mission and the capability that we have at Mount Weather, or at any other precise location." As reported in Time: "Few in the U.S. government will speak of it, though it is assumed that all along the Soviets have known both its precise location and its mission (unlike Congress, since Bray wouldn't tell); defense experts take it as a given that the site is on the Kremlin's targeting maps."[6]

Although "officially" Mount Weather (and its budget) does not exist. FEMA spokesman Bob Blair told Time magazine, "I'll be glad to tell you all about it, but I'd have to kill you afterward."

While tens of millions of dollars were being spent on maintaining and upgrading the complex to protect several hundred designated officials in the event of nuclear attack, the U.S. government drastically reduced its emphasis on war preparedness for U.S. citizens. A 1989 FEMA brochure entitled "Are You Prepared?" suggests that citizens construct makeshift fallout shelters using used furniture, books, and other common household items. Will H.R. 4210 produce an equally makeshift "end state of preparedness" for domestic terrorist attacks involving weapons of mass destruction?

The secrets of this privileged underground "capital" remain inaccessible to Congress and the U.S. taxpayers who paid for it. The Senate Subcommittee in 1975 learned that **** the "facility held dossiers on at least 100,000 Americans. [Senator] John Tunney later alleged that the Mount Weather computers can obtain millions of pieces of additional information on the personal lives of American citizens simply by tapping the data stored at any of the other ninety-six Federal Relocation Centers." [6].........."

FEMA refuses to address those unanswered inquiries about the facility; and the real agenda remains buried in concrete. The disturbing questions linger. [18]

"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government." - Patrick Henry

With a blind eye, and H.R. 4210 in the Senate, Congress, once again, is attempting major centralization. In the guise of concern for the welfare of its constituency, it routinely begs for the vote in the course of enacting legislation that disarms us of our civil liberties. It couches abuses in a practiced language. In H.R. 4210 read "authorizes the director to make grants to a state or local governmental entity to offset the costs of participation in any certified training or exercise program," as...money to offset the upgrading of our local police forces to paramilitary capabilities...payment in order that we may comply to support a federally controlled militarizing of all police operations. This so that citizens may be "safe" from terrorism.[19]........."

"....BTTT

223 Posted on 09/14/2001 21:20:48 PDT by Uncle Bill

H.R. 4210, A REIGN OF TERROR - Which future will you choose?

http://www.freerepubl ic.com/forum/a39da437b2387.htm

as I said, I'd download it now, before Jim Robinson takes it down.

FEMA, of course, has been incorporated into the new gestapo, THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

========================

Do a search on GORBACHEV, GREEN CROSS, CROSSROAD.TO .....also try GORBACHEV EARTH CHARTER. We are once again being BRAINWASHED, folks...it's old hat in the PUPLIC PROPAGANDA MILLS.

ONE SUCH ENTRY [and I'm posting the entire thing, because then people MAY be more inclined to read it, and because it helps to explain the web of deceit that is bringing us this phony crisis in order to totally enslave us all]:

THE E-FILES NUMBER EIGHT APRIL-JUNE, 2001

THE SUBJECT OF THIS E-FILE IS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION.

WHAT IS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION? "Environmental Action," one curriculum developer, says it can be called "a way of teaching that makes connections between science, technology, economics, policy, people, and the environment" http://(www.enviroaction.org /enviroed.html). To the public school student, environmental education means discussions of fossil fuel depletion; overpopulation; ozone layer damage; vanishing rainforests; poisoned air, soil and water; endangered species; global warming; overflowing landfills; and urban sprawl. These topics are covered in textbooks and are often integrated into many subject areas (thus one nickname for New-New Math, "Rainforest Math.") Students take field trips to beaches and forests, make art out of recycled trash, and write letters to elected officials. Modern society may be put "on trial." "We were supposed to learn about science, but it's political too" said one 5th grader about weekend nature camp ("Brave New Schools", Berit Kjos).

SOME HISTORY PERTINENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION:

"SILENT SPRING" by Rachel Carson can be said to have started the environmental movement in the classroom in 1962. It was assigned reading in many high schools. Many people are unaware that in 1962,"Silent Spring" was, and continues to be criticized for flawed science and emotionally charged writing. Many scientists criticized the book. Ornithologist Dr. Gordon Edwards has critiqued "Silent Spring"; see www.oism/ddp: "An Educational Atom Bomb", Newsletter of 11/94, Vol. XI, # 6). In "Since Silent Spring", by Frank Graham, Jr., a defender of Carson, Graham wrote: "She knew that her book must persuade as well as inform; it must synthesize scientific fact with the most profound sort of propaganda." The emotional tone of the book was disliked by many but was effective. Environmental writers subsequently wrote in highly dramatic terms. Reed Irvine of Accuracy in Media recently wrote: "Silent Spring" was not only junk science, but it is also responsible for the loss of millions of lives in tropical countries that quit using DDT to kill the mosquitoes that transmit malaria. DDT has been described as the greatest life-saving chemical discovered by man. It was banned in this country after lengthy hearings that found that it was not a carcinogen and that it posed no threat to human health. The decision to ban it was a political decision, not based on scientific evidence. There is no reason to believe that the ban has saved a single human life. It is estimated to cost a million to 2 million lives a year in India alone." (AIM Report, 4/23/01). Scientist James L. Moore noted recently, "Silent Spring was bad literature and bad science; yet it provided the political "reason" for creation of the EPA."

"REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN ON THE POSSBILITY & DESIRABILITY OF PEACE", a 1967 book, is said to be a "leaked government study produced by a special brain trust of 15 Insiders who met at a secret facility at Iron Mountain, New York. Their daunting task was to come up with a substitute for war that would provide the same 'stabilizing' function…Report From Iron Mountain examined a number of possible ***** "alternative enemies" which might be used as a substitute for war during a time of peace. It said, ****** "One exception might be the environmental-pollution model, if the danger to society it posed was genuinely imminent. The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction…It might be…that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species." While some claim the report was a hoax, J.K. Galbraith, writing under a pseudonym, said it was truthful (The New American, Special Report, 1997).

"THE POPULATION BOMB" by Dr. Paul Ehrlich, published in 1968, also was widely required reading in high school and college classrooms. Many high school students watched films about the population explosion in biology class. "Population Bomb" was written to terrify: "The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970's the world will undergo famines-hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now." The book was among the first to talk of the "carrying capacity" of the earth. Ehrich wrote "The U.S. cannot stand isolated" from the rest of the earth. "We must have population control at home, hopefully through a system of incentives and penalties, but by compulsion if voluntary methods fail. We must use our political power to push other countries into programs which combine agricultural development and population control." Subsequently, population control was made the basis of our foreign aid; funds to third world nations depend upon recipients' use of contraceptives, sterilization, or abortion. Much has been written to refute the overpopulation claim: www.informinc.co.uk/LM/LM71/LM71_Futures.html; http://www.Africa2000.com; http://www.pop.org; and Kasun articles at http://www.independent.org.

'THE ENVIRONMENTAL HANDBOOK PREPARED FOR THE FIRST NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TEACH- IN, APRIL 22, 1970" edited by Garrett De Bell, was used on the first Earth Day. "This handbook brings together students, writers, and others to focus on some of the major problems. It does not stop there-it suggests action that can be taken right now in any community." Earth Day celebrations are part celebrations of nature, part political activism. April 22, Earth Day, is Lenin's birthday.

"THE GREENING OF AMERICA", by Charles Reich, 1970, a huge bestseller, was dedicated to the students of Yale, but written for their parents. "Greening" described a "revolution of consciousness" that the book used to explain the attitudes of then-current crop of college students: "Freedom from outmoded economic and political doctrines, freedom from oppressive institutions…Freedom that is expressed in every metaphor of the new consciousness, long hair, a new way of walking, the ocean and the open road…if we think of all that is now challenged-the nature of education, the very validity of institutionalism and the legal system, the nature and purposes of work, the course of man's dealing with environment, the relationship of self to technology and society-we can see that the present transformation goes beyond anything in modern history. Beside it, a mere revolution, such as the French or the Russian, seems inconsequential- a shift in the base of power. Moreover, almost none of the views we have mentioned recognizes the crucial importance of choosing a new life-style." Environmental literature still uses terms such as "revolution" and "transformation".

"THE ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ACT OF 1970 established an Office of Environmental Education in the Department of Health, Education and Welfare to award grants for developing environmental curricula and training teachers. Congress moved the office to the newly formed Department of Education in 1979" (Congressional Research Service, http://www.cnie.org/nle/gen-8.html).

"THE INTERNATIONAL WORKING MEETING ON ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION IN THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM (organized by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources' Commission on Education under the sponsorship of the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization-UNESCO), in 1970 adopted the following definition of environmental education: 'Environmental education is the process of recognizing values and clarifying concepts in order to develop skills and attitudes necessary to understand and appreciate the interrelatedness among humans…culture, and…biophysical surroundings. Environmental education also entails practice in decision-making and self- formulation of a code of behavior about issues concerning environmental quality'," (Earth Island Journal, Fall 1998).

WHAT IS THE INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES (IUCN), named in the previous paragraph? We should be aware of this powerful group, AKA, the World Conservation Union. According to Henry Lamb, "it was created in 1948 by Julian Huxley, the same man who founded UNESCO. IUCN is the primary NGO (non-governmental organization) that produced the World Wildlife Fund as a public branch to raise money to fund the activities of the IUCN. These two groups share international headquarters in Gland, Switzerland, and together they created the World Resources Institute in 1982. These three NGOs are the driving force behind the global environmental agenda. The IUCN is called upon by UNESCO to evaluate biosphere reserves and World Heritage sites, among other things, and wrote the draft for the Convention on Biological Diversity and first proposed its adoption in 1981. Through its International Law Center, it has a draft form of a Covenant on the Environment and Development, the international treaty to codify in hard law Agenda 21…The document has been in preparation since 1989…is 205 pages, with 79 articles, and it provides a whole new enforcement regime to the UN if and when it is presented for ratification. The U.S. Secretary of State donates $1.2 million per year as an NGO. Almost nobody knows about it. It would require ratification by the U.S. Senate. The Covenant on the Environment and Government would instantly turn into hard, legally binding law, all the stipulations of Agenda 21…" President Clinton's Executive Order 12986 exempted the IUCN from ALL CIVIL LIABILITY. In "Global Greens: Inside the International Environmental Establishment" (highly recommended for its clear explanation of NGOs and the global conferences) author James M. Sheehan said that the IUCN is "an umbrella organization of private groups and government agencies that comprises approximately 450 members." http://(www.capitalresearch.org). These include the EPA, U.S. Forest Service, Department of Interior, National Park Service, World Bank, etc.

OF JULIAN HUXLEY OF UNESCO, it was noted in a preface to his book "Man in the Modern World" (1948): "Indeed he conceives the major role of the scientist today as that of planner, and of world government by experts in the fields of technology rather than by politicians…This revolution is the first in which scientific knowledge and conscious planning is able to play a part. History is being made at a greater speed than ever before, and if we are willing to make the effort, we who live in this revolution have the privilege of helping history." Meanwhile brother Aldous, author of 1932's "Brave New World", wrote in "The Double Crisis": "In all too many cases, the thing we call progress is merely an acceleration in the rate of exploitation…prosperity as we have known up to the present is the consequence of rapidly spending the planet's irreplaceable capital. Overpopulation and erosion constitute a Martian invasion of the planet…we continue to live on our planet like a swarm of destructive parasites…we condemn ourselves and our children to misery and deepening squalor…"

"THE LIMITS TO GROWTH: A REPORT FOR THE CLUB OF ROME'S PROJECT ON THE PREDICAMENT OF MANKIND", 1972 (Meadows, Meadows, Randers and Behrens) was another book widely assigned in classrooms. Full of charts and graphs, the book was the report produced by M.I.T scientists who used a computer program that predicted the complete "social and economic collapse" of civilization unless "drastic changes are made very soon." It noted that the scientists were seeking a model for a world system that would be "sustainable without sudden and uncontrollable collapse" and "capable of satisfying the basic material requirements of all of its people." ***** It recommended deliberate constraints on growth of population and industrialization, and called for government control over economic growth, resource use, and energy consumption. The book was dedicated to the founder of The Club of Rome, Dr. Aurelio Peccei (now deceased), a wealthy Italian industrialist and New Ager (see E-File Number Five, New Age Education http://www.e- files.org/archive/edition5.html). The Club of Rome is a mysterious, largely unknown organization thought to be very powerful. "Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300" by John Coleman, 1992, contains information that, if true, is quite alarming: that ***** the object of the "fake 'environmentalist' movement" by the Club was "to blunt and turn back industrial development" and, through its Anglo-American financiers, to "create and manage savage economic recessions and eventual depressions." Another source is a book called "The First Global Revolution" published by the Council of the Club of Rome, by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, 1991, Pantheon Books, p. 115: ************** "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers were caused by human intervention. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."

THE UN CONFERENCE ON THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT was held in 1972 in Stockholm, Sweden, chaired by Maurice Strong, a wealthy Canadian industrialist. After this conference, the U.S. established the Environmental Protection Agency, the Council on Environmental Quality, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and 114 other governments created national environmental ministries. The UN created its own environmental agency, the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), of which Maurice Strong served as first executive director. Maurice Strong is omnipresent at UN and other global conferences. At http://www.etexere.com/whereonearth find a description of his recent book, "Where On Earth Are We Going?" According to writers Peter Jones and Tal Brooke, Strong is a "new age billionaire, author of ***** the Earth Charter with Mikhail Gorbachev, and Under Secretary General of the UN, and charged with Kofi Annan to rewrite the reorganization of UN operations for the third millennium. Strong is an employee of the Rockefeller and Rothschild trusts….He is co- chairman of the World Economic Forum that meets in Davos every year. Strong has a 70-acre New Age ranch in Colorado, called "an international spiritual community" ( http://www.scp-inc.org). Dr. Stan Monteith says Strong is the Club of Rome's "best-known spokesman." ********Green Cross International was co- founded by Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev (www.gci.ch/). See also http://www.globaleduc.org/rwocont.h tm about Maurice Strong.

ABOUT THE 1972 ENVIRONMENTAL CONFERENCE, Sheehan noted, "the developing countries of the Third World did not welcome environmentalist victories…. Governments in Asia, Africa and Latin America wanted to utilize their natural resources. They were afraid that the international environmental lobby would stymie their efforts to use their resources to strengthen their economies and raise living standards, and they resented what they regarded as patronizing and colonialist environmentalist demands."

BUCKMINSTER FULLER WAS AN INFLUENTIAL 'THINKER' READ BY COLLEGE STUDENTS. His "Earth, Inc." was published in 1973. In "Ten Proposals for Improving the World", Fuller called for an "Education Revolution: The Highest Priority of All", "Conversion of World Accounting System," "Elimination of Property by Making Ownership Onerous," "World Democracy by Electronic Referendum," "Elimination of All World Sovereignties," "Realization of Design Science Competence," "Identification of Mathematical Coordinate System of Universe", and other grand ideas.

TEXTBOOKS FOR HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE STUDENTS OF ECOLOGY/ ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE were published in the 1970s with titles such as "Living in the Environment: Concepts, Problems, and Alternatives," by G. Tyler Miller, Jr. (Wadsworth Publishing, 1975). This book contains topics such as Earthmanship Man in a Global Tribe, The Environmental Crisis as a Crisis in Human Values, Redistribution of Wealth as Ecosphere Shares, Bringing About Change: Projecting Alternative Futures, and How to Write Your Congressman. The first issue of concern was overpopulation.

"THE CITIZEN'S POLICY GUIDE TO ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: THE UNFINISHED AGENDA: A TASK FORCE REPORT SPONSORED BY THE ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND", edited by Gerald O. Barney, 1977, was a report of the members of The Environmental Agenda Task Force. Members were from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council, Friends of the Earth, The Wilderness Society, Zero Population Growth, National Wildlife Federation, Massachusetts Audubon Society, The Nature Conservancy, Environmental Defense Fund, Izaak Walton League of America, National Parks and Conservation Association, National Audubon Society, and Sierra Club. The report discussed the use of Public and Private Lands and Land-Use; The U.S. Role in Protecting the Global Ecosystem; National Planning; Technology Control; Educating the Public, and other topics. While ******* most environmental groups began as sincere grassroots efforts for conservation, many have since become funded by wealthy tax-exempt foundations and are used as vehicles to garner international power and influence. http://(www.undueinfluence.com) In 1997, Western Journalism Center reported: "Patrick Moore, founding member and former director of Greenpeace for 15 years, testified before a congressional subcommittee in support of logging. Moore said: ********** "much of the environmental movement has been hijacked by extremist activists who use the language of the environment for a movement that has more to do with class struggle and anti-corporatism" (Holly Swanson, "Set Up & Sold Out: Find Out What Green Really Means", 1995. Swanson compares tactics used in environmental education to those used in the Hitler Youth movement in the 1940s.)

MAY, 1977: PRESIDENT CARTER directed the Council on Environmental Quality and the State Department to study the world's population, natural resources, and environment. The Study Director for the report, "Global 2000", issued at 700+ pages, was Gerald O. Barney. (A follow-up report called "Global 2000 Revisited" prepared by Barney for the Millenium Institute reveals Barney's New Age outlook when he wrote, "Every person must learn to think like Earth, to act like Earth, to be Earth").

IN 1980, THE IUCN RELEASED "WORLD CONSERVATION STRATEGY: LIVING RESOURCE CONSERVATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. "This was the first major work to promote a new concept-"sustainable development."…(it) also requires *********large wealth transfers from industrial to developing nations….global wealth redistribution." (Global Greens, Sheehan, pg. 14-15).

THE GLOBAL POSSIBLE CONFERENCE was held at Wye Plantation in Maryland, May, 1984, sponsored by the World Resources Institute, was attended by about 80 representatives of NGOs, tax exempt foundations, corporations, universities, and government agencies, including Maurice Strong, Robert O. Anderson (ARCO and Aspen Institute), Lester Brown (Worldwatch Institute), and Kenton Miller (then director of the IUCN). ****** These men discussed how to manage the world's resources. About the conference sponsor, it was noted by James Sheehan that "Organizations like the World Resources Institute are already well-funded by large foundations. (It was set up with a $15 million grant from the MacArthur Foundation in 1982.) ****** Any action that empowers the United Nations is likely to empower them. Far from taking "non-governmental roles, they aspire to be extensions of a global governance system they have helped create." (Henry Lamb said that World Resources Institute was funded by other sources as noted previously.)

IN 1989 "THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CAREERS" was produced by The CEIP Fund, issued by Island Press, funded by Apple Computers and a large group of foundations including the Ford, Hewlett, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller Brothers, Kaplan, Joyce, and Pew Charitable Trust, and others. The book's preface notes: "CEIP, formerly The Center for Environmental Intern Programs, has become the largest on-the-job trainer for environmental careers in the country, placing college students and recent graduates in short-term, paid professional level positions with corporations, consultants, government agencies and nonprofit organizations." Thus there is the merging of the environmental and school-to-work programs (see E-File Number One on STW http://www.e- files.org/archive/edition1.html).

1990: THE NEW NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ACT was signed into law by President Bush. According to http://www.sierraclub.o rg/education/neea1990.asp, "It mandates that EPA make environmental education a priority through various activities administered by its Environmental Education Division." The Congressional Research Service notes, "The Act authorizes EPA to work with educational institutions, nonprofit organizations, the private sector, tribal governments, and state and local environmental agencies to educate the public about environmental problems and encourage students to pursue environmental careers…" http://(www.cnie.org/nle/gen-8.html).

JUNE, 1992: THE EARTH SUMMIT IN RIO DE JANEIRO was held. The Secretary- General was Maurice Strong. Sheehan wrote: "From this event came a number of major documents: The Rio Declaration, proclaiming "sustainable development" as the foundation of international environmental policy; Agenda 21, a blueprint outlining proposed governmental actions to implement sustainable development; ******************** Framework Convention on Climate Change, a treaty to curb emission of carbon dioxide and other "greenhouse gases"; and Convention on Biological Diversity, a treaty to protect the habitats of all living species, manage ecosystems, and to protect genetic resources by regulating scientific research and use of biotechnology."

RESEARCHER JEANNIE SODERMAN did a complete reading of the 1140 page "Biodiversity Assessment Report" that came out of Agenda 21. She noted that ICLEI, the International Committee of Local Environmental Initiatives is the group empowered to implement Agenda 21 worldwide. Soderman compiled a list of the ************** things that were named "unsustainable" in the report. Some of these are: automobiles, modern farm production systems (no use of machines is allowed), irrigation, chemical fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, farmlands, rangelands, pastures, fish ponds, plantations, forestry, urbanization, impervious surfaces, fisheries, grazing of livestock, disturbance of the soil surface, large hoofed animals, industrial activities, plastic production, synthetic products, the use of machines, CFCs, technology improvements, natural gas production, cemeteries, sewers, drain systems, pipelines, private property, land use that serves human needs, human made caves of brick and mortar, concrete and steel, paved and tarred roads, highways and trails, railroads, floor and wall tiles, aquaculture, dams, reservoirs, straightening of rivers, power line construction, golf courses, scuba diving, modern hunting, picking of berries, ski runs, fossil fuels used for driving various types of machines, building materials, synthetic drugs, population growth, convenience foods. Soderman has a list in which each of these page- referenced. (Interview with Joan Soros, re: Sustainable Development, http://www.radioliberty.com).

THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and the Global Biodiversity Assessment Report also call for "the conversion of 'at least 50% of the land area in the United States to be converted to wilderness, off limits to human beings. An additional 25% of the land area is to be designated as 'buffer zones' that are to be managed collaboratively. People are to relocated into "sustainable communities," the design for which is presented in the President's Council on Sustainable Development report, "Sustainable America: A New Consensus." http://(www.wildlandsproject.org). [see ******* The Wildlands Project [Home Page]A factual and accurate account of the goals and objectives of The Wildlands Project. ******* http://www.wildlandsprojectrevea led.org/ ]

BACK TO THE STUDENTS IN THE CLASSROOM: If environmental education classes are to be truthful and balanced, students should be told honestly the meaning of "sustainability" ******* (feudalism). Students should know that scientists are not in agreement about many claims by environmentalists. They should understand why property owners, especially in rural areas where livelihoods depend on ranching, farming and logging are being forced to fight for their property rights when government agencies claim their activities threaten endangered species. Parents and teachers can use the book, "Facts, Not Fear: A Parent's Guide to Teaching Children About the Environment" by Michael Sanera and Jane S. Shaw to learn the facts. Older students should be able to understand that****** very wealthy and powerful interests are driving the international global conferences, not grass roots individuals, and that these interests have ulterior motives that are not as benevolent as they appear-i.e., containing the growth and development of Third World countries so they remain less powerful, and taking of property from Americans to limit their freedom and wealth. Since the same powerful interests are directing the education of public school students around the world http://(www.unesco.org/education/t lsf) it will be up to parents and other interested adults to teach students the truth. Some soul- searching about how much you and your students value freedom, the right to own property, etc. might be in order-since these are truly threatened. These values are not incompatible with loving nature.

FURTHER INFORMATION SOURCES ON THE WEB: On environmental science and enviroeducation: http://www.junkscience.com; http://www.sepp.org; http://www.nhes.com; http://www.heartland.org; http://www.marshall.org; http://www.oism.org; http://www.cei.org; http://www.co2science.org; http://www.independe nt.org/archive/environment.html; http://www.pallet enterprise.com/Fossil_Bill/fbbody.htm; http://www.perc.org/envedviews.htm; http://www.globalwarming.org; http://www.greeningearthsociety.org; http://www.anxietycenter.com; http://www.fee.or g/education/research.html#Environment; www.crossroad.to/; http://www.capitalism.org/ faq/environment.htm; http://www.capitalism.org/earth; http://www.rppi.org; http://www.objectivescience.com; http://www.sitewave.net/news; http://earth4man.com; http://www.aynrand.org/med ialink/environ.html; http://www.capitalism.net (see "Environmentalism Refuted" article); http://www.nationalcenter.org/ept f.html (see links too); http://www.fumento.com; http://www.discerningtoday.org; http://www.newaus.com.au; http://www.cato.org; http://www.acsh.org; www.hillsdale.edu/imprimis/2001/february/article1.asp. On global conferences (including the many since Rio conference) and sustainability: http://www.womensgroup.org; http://sovereignty.freedom.org; http://www.ecofreedom.org; http://www.americanpolicy.org; http://www.account abilitynow.net/greenout/index2.html; http://themustardseed.home.min dspring.com; http://www.green- watch.com; http://www.freedom.org; http://unisevil.com. Some property rights groups: http://www.nodarbyrefuge.org; http://www.mtmultipleuse.org; http://www.takebackarkansas.org; http://www.landrights.org; http://www.prfamerica.org; http://www.klamathbasincrisis.org. Media Research Special Report about news reporting on global warming: http://www.mediaresearch.org/specialreports/fmp/2001/globalwarming.html.

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE.

The E-Files Susan O’Donnell efiler@pacbell.net

http://www.e- files.org/archive/edition8.html

--------------------

sorry to take up so much space, but I hate to see people not seeing through the lies and deception.....it's understandable....most of you are children of light, not children of darkness.....but we have to think outside of the box they have created for us.

====================================

one final word....I think a lot of you missed the following article....it deserves to be re-formatted:

"...........To all Jews, even if they are atheists, the name of Jesus is the symbol of a threat not surprisingly, in the United States, where there is a large number of Jews and Jewish influence is strong, Jews have been leaders in a long campaign to keep all Christian activities, including the singing of Christmas carols, out of the public schools."

Douglas went to the core of the "Jewish Question" in the following comment in 'Whose Service Is Perfect Freedom': "Everything of which we have knowledge is relative. The fact that the Dark Forces seem to be in the ascendant is a proof that they are temporarily in the ascendant over something else. You cannot have light without shade, you cannot know what anything is, if you don't know what it is not. It is just as certain as anything can be in this uncertain world, that Christianity is not a Plan, it is a Philosophy which we have hardly begun to grasp. As such, it must have a policy. That policy was and is rejected by the Jews, consequently it cannot be a Jewish Policy. That is to say, Jewish Policy is what Christianity is not. What is Jewish Policy? That is much easier to answer, because the present state of the world is the result of it. **** The short answer is, 'Power Politics -- The Servile State'." As all policies are rooted in 'philosophies', it is not surprising to find that **** Jews have played a prominent role in collectivist and power activities subverting Christian societies. The distinguished Jewish author, Dr. Alfred Nossig, wrote in his 'Intergrades Judentum'; *****"The modern Socialist movement is in great part the work of the Jews, who impress on it the mark of their brains ... The present world socialism forms the first step of the accomplishment of Mosaism, the start of the realisation of the state of the world announced by our prophets . . . It is only a League of Nations penetrated with the Socialist spirit that will render possible for us the enjoyment of our international necessities, as well as our national ones."

In The Social Crediter of February 7, 1948, Douglas elaborated on the relationship of Social Credit to the 'Jewish Problem.' "We believe that there is a small number - loyal and valued members of our public - who, although, because their loyalty, they accept our views on certain aspects of the Jewish race, yet have an idea that these are an excrescence on 'Social Credit' and, they feel, might have been left unnoticed. We are not concerned with the reactions of the crypto-Communists and their accusations 'anti-Semitism', 'racism', 'negative criticism' and other catchwords - but we are ready at all times to explain to our friends what we recognise as a very excusable failure of comprehension. Perhaps the simplest way in which to deal with this matter is to enunciate certain propositions:- 1 Both Judaism and Social Credit are rooted in philosophies. Even in the case of non-orthodox Jews, race and philosophy are inseparable. Heine refers to Judaism as the portable Fatherland. [please see Genesis 15:14 - "nation"]

2 Social Credit is Christian, not primarily because it was designed to be Christian, but because it was painstakingly 'dis' (un) -covered reality. If Christianity is not real, it is nothing. it is not "true", it is not Truth. "Ye shall know the Truth, and the'Truth shall make you free" 3. Judaism is implacably anti-Christian, and it is, by definition, an Incarnate Lie. "Ye do the deeds of your father . . . he is a liar, and the father of it.". 4. Both philosophies have a policy and these policies cannot live together. The Founder of Christianity was quite unequivocal on the question. "I came not to bring peace, but a sword." It is remarkable that many people who complain of the suppression of vital information by the press and Broadcasting Agencies, will resent the exposure of Jewish policy, even if the exposure is merely the publication of statements made by Jews themselves. Douglas observed that the practical problem to be faced was militant, not intellectual. Mere conversion to an understanding of the credit swindle of itself leads nowhere. People must know who is preventing effective rectification and who benefits most from a continuation of present policies. Douglas concluded: "For all these reasons and others, we conceive it to be our vocation to indicate, without prejudice but without favour, those whom we conceive to be the enemies of our culture and ideals, to unmask their aims. It does not make a cheerful story; many people would prefer to escape into Utopia, just as 'the workers' have been hypnotised into the Utopia which is spreading over Eastern Europe; but it is our conception of Reality at this time, and only from Reality can you proceed to Realisation." As the central feature of Social Credit policy is the principle of the individual receiving a dividend based upon the cultural heritage, it is not surprising that Jews have been to the forefront in attacks upon Social Credit. In a comment in The Social Crediter of March 13,1948, Douglas referred to a revealing quotation from a review of the work of the historian Wernher Sombart by Dr. Jacob Fromer in 'Die Zukunft' of October 28, 1911. Fromer observed that "Nothing in the Jewish religion is done for nothing," commenting that it is "diametrically opposed to the Christian doctrine of unearned grace." **** The same opposition to the doctrine of unearned grace is expressed in the Communist view that the principle of inheritance should be abolished. As with other Jewish revolutionaries, who became atheists, Marx advocated policies rooted in the Judaic philosophy. Bernard Lazare, writing in 'Antesemitism', answered the objection that the Jewish, revolutionary who turns atheists ceases practically to be a Jew. Lazare wrote: "The objection may be raised that, in joining the ranks of revolution, the Jew as a rule, turns atheist, and ceases practically to be a Jew. This, however, is true only in, the sense that the children, of the Jewish radical, lose themselves more easily in the surrounding population, and that as a result the Jewish revolutionist is more easily assimilated. But as a general thing, the Jew, even the extreme Jewish radical, can not help retaining his Jewish characteristics, and though he may have abandoned all religion and all faith, he has none the less received the impress of the national genius acting through hereditary and early training. This is especially true of those Jews who lived during the earlier half of the nineteenth century, and on whom Heinrich Heine and Karl Marx may serve as fitting examples." Heine, who in France was regarded as a German and was reproached in Germany with being French, was before all things a Jew . . . The only philosophy that ever really attracted him was pantheism, a doctrine which seemed to come naturally to the Jewish philosopher who in speculating upon the unity of God by, instinct transforms it into a unity of substance. His sensuosness, that sad and voluptuous sensuosness of the Intermezzo, is purely oriental, and has its source, in the Song of Songs. The same is true of Marx. The descendant of a long line of rabbis and teachers he inherited the splendid powers of his ancestors. He had that clear Talmudic mind which does not falter at petty difficulties of fact. He was a Talmudist devoted to sociology and applying his native power of exegesis to the criticism of economic theory. . . . Marx was not merely a logician, he was, also a rebel, an agitator, an acrid controversalist, and he derived his gift for sarcasm and invective, as Heine did, from his Jewish ancestry." As Lazate indicates. Jews are Orientals. Writing in 'Programme for The Third World War' (1943) Douglas commented: "Such ideas as 'fairness', 'decency' and what we call the realistic Christian virtues, convey nothing to the Oriental as such. Perhaps I might with advantage observe ... that many Orientals compare very favourably with many Europeans on every ground. That does not invalidate the main contention, which is that the Oriental has virtues of his own, but they are not in the main the same virtues of those of the European." In a further clarification of this question Douglas observed that the day-to-day behaviour and family life of many Jews compared more than favourably with that of non-Jews. But Douglas came back to the fundamental philosophic and religious cleavage between Christianity and Judaism. Once this is grasped, no one should be surprised to note **** the attraction of collectivism and power movements for the great majority of Jews. All policies are rootcd in philosophies. It is impossible to get Christian figs from Judaic thistles. Commenting on the Jewish Question and "religious freedom," Douglas said in a letter (July 27, 1939) to Mr. Ralph Duclos, prominent Canadian Social Crediter, that "certain philosophies may constitute a social danger. I consider . . . that **** the 'chosen race' philosophy of the Jews with the idea that the whole world is destined to be ruled by a Jewish Junta, and the idea that there is one morality as between Jews and no limitations of morality in the dealing of a Jew with a non-Jew, comes under the category of ***** anti-social and seditious propaganda." In his great classic, **** 'The Iron Curtain Over America', the American historian and former intelligence expert, Dr. John Beaty, documents how ************ the dominating influence in American collectivist movements has been Jewish, with a big percentage of those engaged it treacherous and revolutionary activities also being Jews. Nathaniel Weyl. himself a former Communist and a Jew, demonstrates in his book 'The Jew In American Politics,' (Arlington House. U.S.A., 1968) that the Jewish voting pattern in the U.S.A. from 1932 onwards had demonstrated overwhelming Jewish support for politicians espousing collectivist causes. Even Barry Goldwater, who is proud of ' his Jewish ancestry, was strongly rejected by Jewish voters in the 1964 American Presidential Elections. He was considered too ..right-wing." Christianity stresses the value of each separate individual, and the importance of personal responsibility for one's behaviour. Malcolm Muttgeridge, wrote in 'Chronicles of Wasted Time' (1972), "Was it not two bourgeois Jews ... Freud and Marx who undermined the whole basis of Western European civilisation as no avowedly insurrectionary movement ever has or could, by promoting the notion of determinism, in the one case in morals, in the other in history, thereby relieving individual men and women of all responsibility for their personal and collective behaviour?" "By their fruits ye shall know them," said the Founder of Christianity. The only realistic approach to the basic teachings of Christ is to assess their impact on history when applied. Douglas said "that which works best is moral." It partakes of Truth. The lessons of history show conclusively that Christianity does work successfully when the Truths of Christianity are applied. Traditional Christian philosophy has always insisted that God reveals Himself through history; through the continuous application of policies - economic, financial, political and social - rooted in philosophies. The very chaos of today's world is a demonstration of God's power; that ****** God does not permit a violation of His truths to take place without a price being paid. The disintegration of Civilisation is not sin in itself; it is the wages of sin.............."

Social Credit" Versus "Finance Capitalism"'s Monopoly of Money, Land, & Tools; & the Jewish Question

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=45598

I AM the Way, the Truth, and the Life......Ye shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall set you free......something to think about.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-02-14   9:59:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]