Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech ArticlesTitle: President of Czech Republic Calls Man-Made Global Warming a 'Myth' Questions Gore's Sanity
Source:
Drudge
URL Source: http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm
Published: Feb 12, 2007
Author: Vaclav Klaus
Post Date: 2007-02-12 20:39:26 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 82
Comments: 1
President of Czech Republic Calls Man-Made Global Warming a 'Myth' - Questions Gore's Sanity Mon Feb 12 2007 09:10:09 ET Czech president Vaclav Klaus has criticized the UN panel on global warming, claiming that it was a political authority without any scientific basis. In an interview with "Hospodárské noviny", a Czech economics daily, Klaus answered a few questions: Q: IPCC has released its report and you say that the global warming is a false myth. How did you get this idea, Mr President?• A: It's not my idea. Global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so. It is not fair to refer to the U.N. panel. IPCC is not a scientific institution: it's a political body, a sort of non-government organization of green flavor. It's neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment. Also, it's an undignified slapstick that people don't wait for the full report in May 2007 but instead respond, in such a serious way, to the summary for policymakers where all the "but's" are scratched, removed, and replaced by oversimplified theses.• This is clearly such an incredible failure of so many people, from journalists to politicians. If the European Commission is instantly going to buy such a trick, we have another very good reason to think that the countries themselves, not the Commission, should be deciding about similar issues.• Q: How do you explain that there is no other comparably senior statesman in Europe who would advocate this viewpoint? No one else has such strong opinions...• A: My opinions about this issue simply are strong. Other top-level politicians do not express their global warming doubts because a whip of political correctness strangles their voice. • Q: But you're not a climate scientist. Do you have a sufficient knowledge and enough information?• A: Environmentalism as a metaphysical ideology and as a worldview has absolutely nothing to do with natural sciences or with the climate. Sadly, it has nothing to do with social sciences either. Still, it is becoming fashionable and this fact scares me. The second part of the sentence should be: we also have lots of reports, studies, and books of climatologists whose conclusions are diametrally opposite.• Indeed, I never measure the thickness of ice in Antarctica. I really don't know how to do it and don't plan to learn it. However, as a scientifically oriented person, I know how to read science reports about these questions, for example about ice in Antarctica. I don't have to be a climate scientist myself to read them. And inside the papers I have read, the conclusions we may see in the media simply don't appear. But let me promise you something: this topic troubles me which is why I started to write an article about it last Christmas. The article expanded and became a book. In a couple of months, it will be published. One chapter out of seven will organize my opinions about the climate change.• Environmentalism and green ideology is something very different from climate science. Various findings and screams of scientists are abused by this ideology.• Q: How do you explain that conservative media are skeptical while the left-wing media view the global warming as a done deal?• A: It is not quite exactly divided to the left-wingers and right-wingers. Nevertheless it's obvious that environmentalism is a new incarnation of modern leftism.• Q: If you look at all these things, even if you were right ...• A: ...I am right...• Q: Isn't there enough empirical evidence and facts we can see with our eyes that imply that Man is demolishing the planet and himself?• A: It's such a nonsense that I have probably not heard a bigger nonsense yet.• Q: Don't you believe that we're ruining our planet?• A: I will pretend that I haven't heard you. Perhaps only Mr Al Gore may be saying something along these lines: a sane person can't. I don't see any ruining of the planet, I have never seen it, and I don't think that a reasonable and serious person could say such a thing. Look: you represent the economic media so I expect a certain economical erudition from you. My book will answer these questions. For example, we know that there exists a huge correlation between the care we give to the environment on one side and the wealth and technological prowess on the other side. It's clear that the poorer the society is, the more brutally it behaves with respect to Nature, and vice versa.• It's also true that there exist social systems that are damaging Nature - by eliminating private ownership and similar things - much more than the freer societies. These tendencies become important in the long run. They unambiguously imply that today, on February 8th, 2007, Nature is protected uncomparably more than on February 8th ten years ago or fifty years ago or one hundred years ago.• That's why I ask: how can you pronounce the sentence you said? Perhaps if you're unconscious? Or did you mean it as a provocation only? And maybe I am just too naive and I allowed you to provoke me to give you all these answers, am I not? It is more likely that you actually believe what you say. [English translation from Harvard Professor Lubos Motl] Developing...
Poster Comment: I am inclined to believe that global warming on earth and mars is due to the extreme solar activity of the past couple of decades. All those solar flares must be doing something to us.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
http://www.e- files.org/archive/edition8.html -------------------- sorry to take up so much space, but I hate to see people not seeing through the lies and deception.....it's understandable....most of you are children of light, not children of darkness.....but we have to think outside of the box they have created for us. ==================================== one final word....I think a lot of you missed the following article....it deserves to be re-formatted: "...........To all Jews, even if they are atheists, the name of Jesus is the symbol of a threat not surprisingly, in the United States, where there is a large number of Jews and Jewish influence is strong, Jews have been leaders in a long campaign to keep all Christian activities, including the singing of Christmas carols, out of the public schools." Douglas went to the core of the "Jewish Question" in the following comment in 'Whose Service Is Perfect Freedom': "Everything of which we have knowledge is relative. The fact that the Dark Forces seem to be in the ascendant is a proof that they are temporarily in the ascendant over something else. You cannot have light without shade, you cannot know what anything is, if you don't know what it is not. It is just as certain as anything can be in this uncertain world, that Christianity is not a Plan, it is a Philosophy which we have hardly begun to grasp. As such, it must have a policy. That policy was and is rejected by the Jews, consequently it cannot be a Jewish Policy. That is to say, Jewish Policy is what Christianity is not. What is Jewish Policy? That is much easier to answer, because the present state of the world is the result of it. **** The short answer is, 'Power Politics -- The Servile State'." As all policies are rooted in 'philosophies', it is not surprising to find that **** Jews have played a prominent role in collectivist and power activities subverting Christian societies. The distinguished Jewish author, Dr. Alfred Nossig, wrote in his 'Intergrades Judentum'; *****"The modern Socialist movement is in great part the work of the Jews, who impress on it the mark of their brains ... The present world socialism forms the first step of the accomplishment of Mosaism, the start of the realisation of the state of the world announced by our prophets . . . It is only a League of Nations penetrated with the Socialist spirit that will render possible for us the enjoyment of our international necessities, as well as our national ones." In The Social Crediter of February 7, 1948, Douglas elaborated on the relationship of Social Credit to the 'Jewish Problem.' "We believe that there is a small number - loyal and valued members of our public - who, although, because their loyalty, they accept our views on certain aspects of the Jewish race, yet have an idea that these are an excrescence on 'Social Credit' and, they feel, might have been left unnoticed. We are not concerned with the reactions of the crypto-Communists and their accusations 'anti-Semitism', 'racism', 'negative criticism' and other catchwords - but we are ready at all times to explain to our friends what we recognise as a very excusable failure of comprehension. Perhaps the simplest way in which to deal with this matter is to enunciate certain propositions:- 1 Both Judaism and Social Credit are rooted in philosophies. Even in the case of non-orthodox Jews, race and philosophy are inseparable. Heine refers to Judaism as the portable Fatherland. [please see Genesis 15:14 - "nation"] 2 Social Credit is Christian, not primarily because it was designed to be Christian, but because it was painstakingly 'dis' (un) -covered reality. If Christianity is not real, it is nothing. it is not "true", it is not Truth. "Ye shall know the Truth, and the'Truth shall make you free" 3. Judaism is implacably anti-Christian, and it is, by definition, an Incarnate Lie. "Ye do the deeds of your father . . . he is a liar, and the father of it.". 4. Both philosophies have a policy and these policies cannot live together. The Founder of Christianity was quite unequivocal on the question. "I came not to bring peace, but a sword." It is remarkable that many people who complain of the suppression of vital information by the press and Broadcasting Agencies, will resent the exposure of Jewish policy, even if the exposure is merely the publication of statements made by Jews themselves. Douglas observed that the practical problem to be faced was militant, not intellectual. Mere conversion to an understanding of the credit swindle of itself leads nowhere. People must know who is preventing effective rectification and who benefits most from a continuation of present policies. Douglas concluded: "For all these reasons and others, we conceive it to be our vocation to indicate, without prejudice but without favour, those whom we conceive to be the enemies of our culture and ideals, to unmask their aims. It does not make a cheerful story; many people would prefer to escape into Utopia, just as 'the workers' have been hypnotised into the Utopia which is spreading over Eastern Europe; but it is our conception of Reality at this time, and only from Reality can you proceed to Realisation." As the central feature of Social Credit policy is the principle of the individual receiving a dividend based upon the cultural heritage, it is not surprising that Jews have been to the forefront in attacks upon Social Credit. In a comment in The Social Crediter of March 13,1948, Douglas referred to a revealing quotation from a review of the work of the historian Wernher Sombart by Dr. Jacob Fromer in 'Die Zukunft' of October 28, 1911. Fromer observed that "Nothing in the Jewish religion is done for nothing," commenting that it is "diametrically opposed to the Christian doctrine of unearned grace." **** The same opposition to the doctrine of unearned grace is expressed in the Communist view that the principle of inheritance should be abolished. As with other Jewish revolutionaries, who became atheists, Marx advocated policies rooted in the Judaic philosophy. Bernard Lazare, writing in 'Antesemitism', answered the objection that the Jewish, revolutionary who turns atheists ceases practically to be a Jew. Lazare wrote: "The objection may be raised that, in joining the ranks of revolution, the Jew as a rule, turns atheist, and ceases practically to be a Jew. This, however, is true only in, the sense that the children, of the Jewish radical, lose themselves more easily in the surrounding population, and that as a result the Jewish revolutionist is more easily assimilated. But as a general thing, the Jew, even the extreme Jewish radical, can not help retaining his Jewish characteristics, and though he may have abandoned all religion and all faith, he has none the less received the impress of the national genius acting through hereditary and early training. This is especially true of those Jews who lived during the earlier half of the nineteenth century, and on whom Heinrich Heine and Karl Marx may serve as fitting examples." Heine, who in France was regarded as a German and was reproached in Germany with being French, was before all things a Jew . . . The only philosophy that ever really attracted him was pantheism, a doctrine which seemed to come naturally to the Jewish philosopher who in speculating upon the unity of God by, instinct transforms it into a unity of substance. His sensuosness, that sad and voluptuous sensuosness of the Intermezzo, is purely oriental, and has its source, in the Song of Songs. The same is true of Marx. The descendant of a long line of rabbis and teachers he inherited the splendid powers of his ancestors. He had that clear Talmudic mind which does not falter at petty difficulties of fact. He was a Talmudist devoted to sociology and applying his native power of exegesis to the criticism of economic theory. . . . Marx was not merely a logician, he was, also a rebel, an agitator, an acrid controversalist, and he derived his gift for sarcasm and invective, as Heine did, from his Jewish ancestry." As Lazate indicates. Jews are Orientals. Writing in 'Programme for The Third World War' (1943) Douglas commented: "Such ideas as 'fairness', 'decency' and what we call the realistic Christian virtues, convey nothing to the Oriental as such. Perhaps I might with advantage observe ... that many Orientals compare very favourably with many Europeans on every ground. That does not invalidate the main contention, which is that the Oriental has virtues of his own, but they are not in the main the same virtues of those of the European." In a further clarification of this question Douglas observed that the day-to-day behaviour and family life of many Jews compared more than favourably with that of non-Jews. But Douglas came back to the fundamental philosophic and religious cleavage between Christianity and Judaism. Once this is grasped, no one should be surprised to note **** the attraction of collectivism and power movements for the great majority of Jews. All policies are rootcd in philosophies. It is impossible to get Christian figs from Judaic thistles. Commenting on the Jewish Question and "religious freedom," Douglas said in a letter (July 27, 1939) to Mr. Ralph Duclos, prominent Canadian Social Crediter, that "certain philosophies may constitute a social danger. I consider . . . that **** the 'chosen race' philosophy of the Jews with the idea that the whole world is destined to be ruled by a Jewish Junta, and the idea that there is one morality as between Jews and no limitations of morality in the dealing of a Jew with a non-Jew, comes under the category of ***** anti-social and seditious propaganda." In his great classic, **** 'The Iron Curtain Over America', the American historian and former intelligence expert, Dr. John Beaty, documents how ************ the dominating influence in American collectivist movements has been Jewish, with a big percentage of those engaged it treacherous and revolutionary activities also being Jews. Nathaniel Weyl. himself a former Communist and a Jew, demonstrates in his book 'The Jew In American Politics,' (Arlington House. U.S.A., 1968) that the Jewish voting pattern in the U.S.A. from 1932 onwards had demonstrated overwhelming Jewish support for politicians espousing collectivist causes. Even Barry Goldwater, who is proud of ' his Jewish ancestry, was strongly rejected by Jewish voters in the 1964 American Presidential Elections. He was considered too ..right-wing." Christianity stresses the value of each separate individual, and the importance of personal responsibility for one's behaviour. Malcolm Muttgeridge, wrote in 'Chronicles of Wasted Time' (1972), "Was it not two bourgeois Jews ... Freud and Marx who undermined the whole basis of Western European civilisation as no avowedly insurrectionary movement ever has or could, by promoting the notion of determinism, in the one case in morals, in the other in history, thereby relieving individual men and women of all responsibility for their personal and collective behaviour?" "By their fruits ye shall know them," said the Founder of Christianity. The only realistic approach to the basic teachings of Christ is to assess their impact on history when applied. Douglas said "that which works best is moral." It partakes of Truth. The lessons of history show conclusively that Christianity does work successfully when the Truths of Christianity are applied. Traditional Christian philosophy has always insisted that God reveals Himself through history; through the continuous application of policies - economic, financial, political and social - rooted in philosophies. The very chaos of today's world is a demonstration of God's power; that ****** God does not permit a violation of His truths to take place without a price being paid. The disintegration of Civilisation is not sin in itself; it is the wages of sin.............." Social Credit" Versus "Finance Capitalism"'s Monopoly of Money, Land, & Tools; & the Jewish Question http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=45598 I AM the Way, the Truth, and the Life......Ye shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall set you free......something to think about.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
|