I was anticipating Steve Spak showing a video to support the claim of significant structural damage to the southside of WTC. He talks about it,but I don't see it.
Spak emphasizes the claim the fire was allowed to burn because there was no water pressure, and then shows a fireman spraying down a fire.
Clearly, Spak feels strongly about his opinion and is not interested in letting the facts concerning past skyscrapper fires interfere with his conclusion concerning WTC 7.
The highrise in Madrid burned for two days and remained standing.
The highrise in Madrid remained standing only because the portions that survived WERE REINFORCED CONCRETE and therefore essentially impervious to fire. All the portions of the tower that relied solely on steel frames did in fact collapse ... and fairly early on during the fire. Why do you find it necessary to hide these fact from the folks here at FD4UM?
Because it is very unique video. I do recommend turning off the sound. The narrator has a story to tell and he is not going to permit the facts to stand in the way.
For example, no fire, however severe, has ever caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise building.That is the fundamental fact the narrator,like a few others, cannot come to grips with. Fires do not cause the total collapse of steel-framed high-rise buildings.
#6. To: beachooser, Critter, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#4)
BAC -
Just shut up, you Mossadite piece of shit! A simple stopwatch says that the WTC collapses (3) were controlled demolition. Your attempts to phase-shift details don't alter that. Not one bit.
About the upcoming Iran debacle ..... the Bush Cabal is obviously prancing another Tel Aviv jig.
For example, no fire, however severe, has ever caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise building.
No steel-framed high-rise has ever been subjected to the sort of environments these ones saw.
Fires do not cause the total collapse of steel-framed high-rise buildings.
All portions of the Windsor Tower in Madrid that relied solely on a steel frame for support collapsed. If that tower hadn't been made primarily of reinforced concrete, it surely would have collapsed in its entirety as everything above the 5th floor was completely gutted by the fires.
A very specific and measurable program to manipulate public opinion began within minutes of the September 11 attacks.
Many "myths" ... all » about what happened on 9/11 were presented as facts by the US mass media long before anyone could have possibly had the information or done the research to verify them.
This indicates that in addition to arranging for air defense to fail on 9/11, the conspirators also took care to prepare cover stories well in advance of the attacks and had the means to have these cover stories aired on the major networks while perceptions of the situation were still fluid.
This video is based on news footage that appeared within just a few hours (and sometimes just a few minutes) of the initial attacks. Most of these clips were aired once never to be seen again.
They offer support to the hypothesis that the 9/11 attacks were very specifically anticipated by elements within US intelligence and the military.
"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
Got a propane torch? If so, light it up and, if you have a basement, put the flame to a wall and see what happens. You might want to wear eye protection.