I was anticipating Steve Spak showing a video to support the claim of significant structural damage to the southside of WTC. He talks about it,but I don't see it.
Spak emphasizes the claim the fire was allowed to burn because there was no water pressure, and then shows a fireman spraying down a fire.
Clearly, Spak feels strongly about his opinion and is not interested in letting the facts concerning past skyscrapper fires interfere with his conclusion concerning WTC 7.