[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days

Copper underpins every part of the economy. If you want to destroy the U.S. economy this is how you would do it.

Egyptian Pres. Gamal Abdel Nassers Chilling Decades-Old Prediction About Israel-Palstine Conflict.


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: I saw a plane's tail sticking out of the Pentagon on 911
Source: cnn, fox, msnbc
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 14, 2007
Author: me
Post Date: 2007-02-14 22:30:26 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 897
Comments: 34

After the crash into the Pentagon I saw this scene on TV. It lasted about one to two seconds. I have NEVER seen it again.

This was shown as the nation was "terrorized" by the planes that crashed into the Twin Towers and was apparently used to implant an image into the mind of the public.

Has anyone seen this? It is my first hand account. I don't remember what channel it was on.


Poster Comment:

Above

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#7. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

I didn't see that, but here's one thing I do remember - there was a gas station in the vicinity that had a security camera pointed in the direction of the pentagon. I heard that feds confiscated the tape within an hour of the incident and it was never seen again. the owner of the station was wishing he had watched or copied it, but didn't get a chance. as I recall, he was shocked that they showed up so quickly. I'd forgotten about that.

kiki  posted on  2007-02-14   23:05:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: kiki (#7)

I heard that feds confiscated the tape within an hour of the incident and it was never seen again.

911 Stranger Than Fiction Part I (September 11 Israel Mossad)

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2007-02-14   23:10:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#8)

this is what I was remembering:

http://911review.org /Wiki/PentagonAttackVideos.shtml

Besides the infamous Pentagon Attack Cctv Video that the Pentagon at first denied it had, then gave a few frames to the McMedia, which were subsequently shown to have been tampered with, there are at least 3 other videos of what really hit the Pentagon on 9/11. The FBI are known to have seized at least 2 of them, and they have never been released to the public.

The FBI seized the video from a gas station within minutes of the attack.

(December 11, 2001) Velasquez [NEXCOM Citgo station supervisor] says the gas station's security cameras are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact. "I've never seen what the pictures looked like," he said. "The FBI was here within minutes and took the film." Richmond Times- Dispatch

But Velasquez slammed down the receiver and raced outside when he felt the gas station he supervises suddenly begin to tremble from a too-close airplane. "It was like an earthquake," the Costa Rican native said last week. What Velasquez felt above him almost within touching distance was American Airlines Flight 77 just seconds before impact. ...Velasquez says the gas station's security cameras are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact. "I've never seen what the pictures looked like," he said. "The FBI was here within minutes and took the film." http://ac cessatlanta.com/ajc/terrorism/nation/0914pentagon.html

If the Pentagon Attack was unexpected, that would be amazing police work. Bill Gertz reports:

(September 21, 2001) A security camera atop a hotel close to the Pentagon may have captured dramatic footage of the hijacked Boeing 757 airliner as it slammed into the western wall of the Pentagon. Hotel employees sat watching the film in shock and horror several times before the FBI confiscated the video as part of its investigation. It may be the only available video of the attack. The Pentagon has told broadcast news reporters that its security cameras did not capture the crash. The attack occurred close to the Pentagon's heliport, an area that normally would be under 24-hour security surveillance, including video monitoring.

There may be yet another video of the aircraft that hit the Pentagon. The trajectory of the aircraft flew in low across a cloverleaf that is under constant monitoring of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). The view from their camera would clearly show the trajectory of any sized aircraft.

The manufacturers of the CCTV system used by VDOT boast on their web site:

The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) CCTV system used to manage the Northern Virginia freeway network had cameras in place that observed the September 11 crash site at the Pentagon. This CCTV system and the VDOT Smart Traffic Center were used as a command center for emergency responders and cleanup and recovery crews following the incident.

To date, these videos has never been seen by the public, and there is no logical reason for the authorities to withold it (unless of course they are trying to cover up the fact that it was an Inside Job). Public interest groups such as Citizens Watch should file a FOIA request for this material, and demand an explanation from the Kean Commission as to why they have not already been released.

kiki  posted on  2007-02-14   23:21:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: kiki (#9)

Government Conspiracy (no jet hits the pentagon) Music video

Cnn newsman Jamie Mcintyre states no evidence of plane hitting the pentagon,no large tail sections or wing sections.pieces you can pick ... all » up with your hands.Experimental Electronic Beats to Diego Harmon (Diego Music Creations) native instruments synths.The music in this video can be downloaded at the indicated URL.

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2007-02-14   23:25:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, kiki, ALL (#11)

Cnn newsman Jamie Mcintyre states no evidence of plane hitting the pentagon,no large tail sections or wing sections.pieces you can pick ... all » up with your hands.

*****************

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/06/even-more-quote-mining.html

"I have discussed previously the topic of quote mining, which is where the filmmakers take a quote from a source out of context, to make it appear that they support their conspiracy theory, ignoring the rest of what they said that would completely contradict their theories. There are some previous examples of this here, here, here, (yawn) and here.

Here is yet another example, regarding the supposed lack of a plane crash at the Pentagon, at the 16:23 mark:

----------

Dylan: "Fourth. Why is there absolutely no trace of Flight 77?"

Unidentified speaker: "From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site, is the actual side of the building that's crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon... "

------------

The movie doesn't tell you, but the speaker is CNN's Pentagon correspondent Jamie McIntyre. From this quote we are obviously meant to presume that Mr. McIntyre believes there is no evidence at the Pentagon to indicate that a plane crash there. Is this true? Well let's look at what he says only a minute before this quote (emphasis mine):

----------

And I took a look at the huge gaping hole that's in the side of the Pentagon in an area of the Pentagon that has been recently renovated, part of a multibillion dollar renovation program here at the Pentagon. I could see parts of the airplane that crashed into the building, very small pieces of the plane on the heliport outside the building. The biggest piece I saw was about three feet long, it was silver and had been painted green and red, but I could not see any identifying markings on the plane. I also saw a large piece of shattered glass. It appeared to be a cockpit windshield or other window from the plane.

----------

Gee, why is this not in the movie? It is from the same CNN piece that Dylan and company got their previous quote from! Why was this left out?

Even Jamie McIntyre is angry that people are manipulating his words. From a report regarding last month's release of the video at the Pentagon.

------------

MCINTYRE: The Web sites often take statements out of context, such as this exchange from CNN in which I -- myself -- appear to be questioning whether a plane really hit the building: From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. In fact, I was answering a question based on a eyewitness account who thought the American Airlines plane landed short of the Pentagon. I was indicated there was no crash site near the Pentagon only at the Pentagon

MCINTYRE AUDIO: The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in, quote 'the actual site of the building that's crashed in.'

MCINTYRE: In fact there were thousands of tiny pieces of the plane, and I personally photographed a piece of the fuselage and what appeared to be part of the cockpit.

---------------

If the evidence that the government is behind this is so convincing, why do they keep on having to lie to make their point? Pat and I have made over 200 posts on here debunking Loose Change, and you cannot point out a single case of us being dishonest like this, yet I can point out a half dozen examples in Loose Change, without have to think about it.

*****************

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-15   11:55:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 22.

        There are no replies to Comment # 22.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]