Title: 9/11 Truth: FEMA & NIST's "Pancake Theory" is a Lie Source:
http://www.youtube.com URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pn4ltRSTF8 Published:Oct 11, 2006 Author:DVD at improbablecollapse.com Post Date:2007-02-18 13:47:51 by robin Ping List:*9-11*Subscribe to *9-11* Keywords:None Views:596 Comments:3
The liars at FEMA and NIST (which are agencies of the U.S. federal government, and therefore are both on the Bush Administration's payroll) were given the task of explaining to the world how two 110-floor office buildings could shred themselves to dust in 10 seconds. The best they could do was the unscientific, idiotic garbage known as the "pancake theory", which is completely insufficient to explain what happened to those buildings.
The Column Failure Theory, by NIST is held up as the definitive explanation and has now REPLACED FEMA's Pancake theory. Both are variants on the Progressive Collapse theory.
9/11: Does this look like "structural failure" to you?
9/11 Truth: Fires Could Not Have Shredded the WTC to Dust
BYU physics professor Dr. Steven Jones, as well as Kevin Ryan of Underwriters Laboratories (the company that certified the steel used to construct the WTC), along with Aaron Swirsky, who was one of the 14 WTC Architects, Jim Hoffman of wtc7.net, and Dr. David Ray Griffin, explain why "fire melted the steel" is completely insufficient to explain the complete destruction of the World Trade Center towers. This is a clip from "Improbable Collapse". Get the DVD at improbablecollapse.com
9/11 Truth: Firefighters Describe the Controlled Demolitions
David Ray Griffin reads dozens of oral histories where firefighters describe the controlled demolitions of the WTC towers. These histories were recorded immediately after 9/11, but the government would not release them until a Judicial Watch court case forced them too. Also: Steven Jones on WTC7. This is a clip from "Improbable Collapse". Get the DVD at improbablecollapse.com
9/11 Truth: Structural Failures vs. Controlled Demolitions
Clip from 9/11 Mysteries: Compare and contrast what buildings look like when they collapse because a few joints weaken and break (which is the U.S. government's explanation for the WTC collapse) vs. what buildings look like when they are taken down with explosives in controlled demolitions.